do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-77/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 5 March 2014 — DC v Europol (Civil service — Europol staff — Invalidity — Invalidity allowance — Calculation of interest — Application for damages — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2014-03-05
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, Europol, disability insurance, indemnification, occupational accident








C_2014129EN.01003602.xml










28.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 129/36






Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 5 March 2014 — DC v Europol
(Case F-77/13) (1)

((Civil service - Europol staff - Invalidity - Invalidity allowance - Calculation of interest - Application for damages - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2014/C 129/44)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: DC (represented by: W. Brouwer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: D.C. Neumann and J. Arnould, Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision fixing the interest payable on the sum paid in respect of total incapacity for work following two accidents which occurred during two work-related journeys.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


DC is to bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the European Police Office.






(1)  
            OJ C 352, 30.11.2013, p. 27.
Case T-435/13: Order of the General Court of 5 March 2014  — Triarii v Commission
Date: 2014-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, damages, invitation to tender, jurisdiction








C_2014142EN.01005501.xml










12.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 142/55





Order of the General Court of 5 March 2014 — Triarii v Commission
(Case T-435/13) (1)

2014/C 142/71
Language of the case: English
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.
Case T-46/12: Order of the General Court of 5 March 2013  — Chrysamed Vertrieb v OHIM — Chrysal International (Chrysamed) (Community trade mark  — Opposition proceedings  — Withdrawal of the application for registration  — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2014-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, floriculture, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014142EN.01003402.xml










12.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 142/34





Order of the General Court of 5 March 2013 — Chrysamed Vertrieb v OHIM — Chrysal International (Chrysamed)
(Case T-46/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 142/44
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Chrysamed Vertrieb GmbH (Salzburg, Austria) (represented by: initially T. Schneider, subsequently M. Koch and finally I. Rungg, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Chrysal International BV (Naarden, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Killan, M. Marell and M. Senftleben, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 November 2011 (Case R 64/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Chrysal International BV and Chrysamed Vertrieb GmbH

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Chrysamed Vertrieb GmbH shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-03-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014065EN.01000201.xml










5.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 65/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

4 March 2014
2014/C 65/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3768




JPY


Japanese yen


140,20




DKK


Danish krone


7,4627




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82460




SEK


Swedish krona


8,8603




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2172




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,2485




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,369




HUF


Hungarian forint


311,15




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1865




RON


Romanian leu


4,5183




TRY


Turkish lira


3,0520




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5392




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5244




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,6847




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6411




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7469




KRW


South Korean won


1 474,47




ZAR


South African rand


14,9180




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,4564




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6525




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 957,11




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5049




PHP


Philippine peso


61,639




RUB


Russian rouble


49,7510




THB


Thai baht


44,629




BRL


Brazilian real


3,2100




MXN


Mexican peso


18,2977




INR


Indian rupee


85,1757






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-150/14: Action brought on 5 March 2014 — Pavlides v Commission and ECB
Date: 2014-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Cyprus, bank, bank deposit, equal treatment, financial aid, free movement of capital, human rights, principle of legal certainty, restriction of liberty








C_2014159EN.01003102.xml










26.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/31





Action brought on 5 March 2014 — Pavlides v Commission and ECB
(Case T-150/14)
2014/C 159/42
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Constantinos Pavlides (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: C. Paschalides, Solicitor, and A. Paschalides, lawyer)

Defendants: European Central Bank and European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Order the defendants to compensate the applicant under Article 268 of the TFEU.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant contends that the defendants caused him to be deprived of the money in his account because they induced the premature imposition of a bail-in tool on his deposit with his bank as part of the conditionality attached to financial assistance provided to Cyprus on 26 April 2013 pursuant to Article 13 of the European Stability Mechanism Treaty of 2012 as follows: a) the defendants ‘manifestly and gravely disregarded the limits’ on their power as EU institutions under Article 136(3) of the TFEU; b) unlawfully surrendered effective control of their functions as EU institutions; c) induced the premature passing of a bail-in tool on deposits with Bank of Cyprus and Cyprus Popular Bank which had not been passed into the EU law; d) induced restrictions on the movement of money preventing deposit holders from withdrawing and/or transferring their funds to safer institutions; and e) did so in breach of the principles of legal certainty, equality and human rights.
Case T-152/14: Action brought on 5 March 2014 — Medilab v Commission and ECB
Date: 2014-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Cyprus, bank, bank deposit, equal treatment, financial aid, free movement of capital, human rights, principle of legal certainty, restriction of liberty








C_2014159EN.01003202.xml










26.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/32





Action brought on 5 March 2014 — Medilab v Commission and ECB
(Case T-152/14)
2014/C 159/44
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Medilab Ltd (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: C. Paschalides, Solicitor, and A. Paschalides, lawyer)

Defendants: European Central Bank and European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Order the defendants to compensate the applicant under Article 268 of the TFEU.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant contends that the defendants caused him to be deprived of the money in his account because they induced the premature imposition of a bail-in tool on his deposit with his bank as part of the conditionality attached to financial assistance provided to Cyprus on 26 April 2013 pursuant to Article 13 of the European Stability Mechanism Treaty of 2012 as follows: a) the defendants ‘manifestly and gravely disregarded the limits’ on their power as EU institutions under Article 136(3) of the TFEU; b) unlawfully surrendered effective control of their functions as EU institutions; c) induced the premature passing of a bail-in tool on deposits with Bank of Cyprus and Cyprus Popular Bank which had not been passed into the EU law; d) induced restrictions on the movement of money preventing deposit holders from withdrawing and/or transferring their funds to safer institutions; and e) did so in breach of the principles of legal certainty, equality and human rights.
Case T-151/14: Action brought on 5 March 2014 — Vassiliou v Commission and ECB
Date: 2014-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Cyprus, bank, bank deposit, equal treatment, financial aid, free movement of capital, human rights, principle of legal certainty, restriction of liberty








C_2014159EN.01003201.xml










26.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/32





Action brought on 5 March 2014 — Vassiliou v Commission and ECB
(Case T-151/14)
2014/C 159/43
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Costas Vassiliou (Kinshasa, Congo) (represented by: C. Paschalides, Solicitor, and A. Paschalides, lawyer)

Defendants: European Central Bank and European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Order the defendants to compensate the applicant under Article 268 of the TFEU.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant contends that the defendants caused him to be deprived of the money in his account because they induced the premature imposition of a bail-in tool on his deposit with his bank as part of the conditionality attached to financial assistance provided to Cyprus on 26 April 2013 pursuant to Article 13 of the European Stability Mechanism Treaty of 2012 as follows: a) the defendants ‘manifestly and gravely disregarded the limits’ on their power as EU institutions under Article 136(3) of the TFEU; b) unlawfully surrendered effective control of their functions as EU institutions; c) induced the premature passing of a bail-in tool on deposits with Bank of Cyprus and Cyprus Popular Bank which had not been passed into the EU law; d) induced restrictions on the movement of money preventing deposit holders from withdrawing and/or transferring their funds to safer institutions; and e) did so in breach of the principles of legal certainty, equality and human rights.
Case C-105/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Cuneo (Italy) lodged on 5 March 2014  — Criminal proceedings against Ivo Taricco and Others
Date: 2014-03-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, State aid, limitation of legal proceedings, restriction on competition








C_2014194EN.01001002.xml










24.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/10





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Cuneo (Italy) lodged on 5 March 2014 — Criminal proceedings against Ivo Taricco and Others
(Case C-105/14)
2014/C 194/12
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Cuneo

Criminal proceedings against

Ivo Taricco,
Ezio Filippi,
Isabella Leonetti,
Nicola Spagnolo,
Davide Salvoni,
Flavio Spaccavento,
Goranco Anakiev

Questions referred







(a)


In so far as it provides for the limitation period to be extended by only a quarter following interruption and, therefore, allows crimes to become time barred, resulting in impunity, even though criminal proceedings were brought in good time, has the amendment to the last subparagraph of Article 160 of the Italian Criminal Code made by Law No 251 of 2005 led to infringement of the provision protecting competition in Article 101 TFEU?










(b)


Has the Italian State, in amending by Law No 251 of 2005 the last subparagraph of Article 160 of the Italian Criminal Code, in so far as this provides for the limitation period to be extended by only a quarter following interruption, which means therefore that there are no penal consequences for crimes committed by unscrupulous economic operators, unlawfully introduced a form of aid prohibited by Article 107 TFEU?










(c)


Has the Italian State, in amending by Law No 251 of 2005 the last subparagraph of Article 160 of the Italian Criminal Code, in so far as this provides for the limitation period to be extended by only a quarter following interruption, thus conferring impunity on those who exploit the Community directive, unlawfully added a further exemption to those exhaustively listed by Article 158 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006? (1)











(d)


In so far as it provides for the limitation period to be extended by only a quarter following interruption and, therefore, fails to penalise conduct that deprives the State of the resources necessary in order to meet its obligations to the European Union also, has the amendment to the last subparagraph of Article 160 of the Italian Criminal Code made by Law No 251 of 2005 led to breach of the principle of sound public finances laid down by Article 119 TFEU?






(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).
Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)
Date: 2014-03-05
Institutions: European Medicines Agency
Subjects: European Medicines Agency, information analysis, information technology profession, job vacancy








CA2014065EN.01000101.xml










5.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 65/1






RECRUITMENT FOR THE EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY (LONDON)

(2014/C 65 A/01)

The Agency is responsible for coordinating the evaluation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use in the European Union (see Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1)). The Agency was established in January 1995. It has many close contacts with the European Commission, the 28 EU Member States, the EEA-EFTA countries and many other groups in government and the private sector.


Further information on the Agency and its activities is readily accessible through the Internet; our web address is http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is organising a selection procedure with a view to drawing up a reserve list for:






 



EMA/CA/L/042: Data Analyst, Data Collection and Management, Business Data and Support Department, Procedure Management and Business Support Division (Contract Staff, long-term, FG IV)





Selected candidates will be included on a reserve list and, depending on the budgetary situation, may be offered a 5-year renewable contract in accordance with the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union (OJ L 56, 4.3.1968).
The place of employment shall be London.
Candidates must be nationals of a Member State of the European Union, or of Iceland, Liechtenstein or Norway, on condition that they have full rights as a citizen.

The complete conditions and job description should be downloaded from the Agency website:


http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema under ‘Careers at the Agency’.


Applications have to be submitted electronically using the form available on the Agency website. Deadline for submission of application forms is 5 April 2014 at midnight.


Please note that due to the large number of applications the Agency may receive, when reaching the deadline for submission of applications, the system may have problems to process the large amounts of data. Applicants are therefore advised to send in their application well ahead of the deadline.

If you wish to receive notification of vacancy publications electronically please register online for an RSS feed at http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema under ‘RSS news feeds’.
Case T-149/14: Action brought on 5 March 2014 — Anastasiou v Commission and ECB
Date: 2014-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Cyprus, bank, bank deposit, equal treatment, financial aid, free movement of capital, human rights, principle of legal certainty, restriction of liberty








C_2014159EN.01003101.xml










26.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 159/31





Action brought on 5 March 2014 — Anastasiou v Commission and ECB
(Case T-149/14)
2014/C 159/41
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Harry Anastasiou (Larnaca, Cyprus) (represented by: C. Paschalides, Solicitor, and A. Paschalides, lawyer)

Defendants: European Central Bank and European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Order the defendants to compensate the applicant under Article 268 of the TFEU.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant contends that the defendants caused him to be deprived of the money in his account because they induced the premature imposition of a bail-in tool on his deposit with his bank as part of the conditionality attached to financial assistance provided to Cyprus on 26 April 2013 pursuant to Article 13 of the European Stability Mechanism Treaty of 2012 as follows: a) the defendants ‘manifestly and gravely disregarded the limits’ on their power as EU institutions under Article 136(3) of the TFEU; b) unlawfully surrendered effective control of their functions as EU institutions; c) induced the premature passing of a bail-in tool on deposits with Bank of Cyprus and Cyprus Popular Bank which had not been passed into the EU law; d) induced restrictions on the movement of money preventing deposit holders from withdrawing and/or transferring their funds to safer institutions; and e) did so in breach of the principles of legal certainty, equality and human rights.
Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Amendment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
Date: 2014-03-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Spain, air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, public service, transport regulations








C_2014065EN.01000901.xml










5.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 65/9





Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Amendment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
2014/C 65/06






Member State


Spain




Route concerned


Menorca–Madrid




Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


4 July 2012




Date of entry into force of the changes


30 March 2014




Address where the text and any other information or documentation related to the public service obligations can be obtained







Ministerio de Fomento




Dirección General de Aviación Civil




Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo




Paseo de la Castellana, 67




28071 Madrid




ESPAÑA




Tel. +34 915978454




Fax +34 915978643




E-mail: osp.dgac@fomento.es








The route subject to public service obligations may be operated on the basis of free competition access under the new conditions as from 30 March 2014. If within a period of 15 calendar days following the date of publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union no air carrier submits a programme of services compliant with the public service obligations imposed, access will be restricted to a single air carrier through the corresponding public tender procedure, in accordance with Article 16(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.7154 — World Fuel Services Corporation/Watson Petroleum Limited)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-03-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: distributive trades, economic concentration, fuel, merger control, petroleum product








C_2014065EN.01000101.xml










5.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 65/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.7154 — World Fuel Services Corporation/Watson Petroleum Limited)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 65/01
On 28 February 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7154. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-416/12: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2014 — HP Health Clubs Iberia v OHIM — Shiseido (ZENSATIONS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark ZENSATIONS — Earlier Community word mark ZEN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Admissibility of the applicant’s form of order — Article 46 of the Rules of Procedure — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Examination of the facts by the Office of its own motion — Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2014-03-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, health care, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014112EN.01002902.xml










14.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/29





Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2014 — HP Health Clubs Iberia v OHIM — Shiseido (ZENSATIONS)
(Case T-416/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark ZENSATIONS - Earlier Community word mark ZEN - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Admissibility of the applicant’s form of order - Article 46 of the Rules of Procedure - Obligation to state reasons - First sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 - Examination of the facts by the Office of its own motion - Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))
2014/C 112/38
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: HP Health Clubs Iberia (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Serrat Viñas, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, Agent)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Shiseido Company Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: B. Moreau-Margotin, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 June 2012 (Case R 2212/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Shiseido Company Ltd and HP Health Clubs Iberia S.A.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action.










2.


Dismisses the heads of claims of Shiseido Company Ltd other than that essentially seeking the dismissal of the action as manifestly inadmissible.










3.


Orders HP Health Clubs Iberia S.A. to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM.)










4.


Orders Shiseido Company Ltd to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.