do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 1/2014 of 14 February 2014 amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement
Date: 2014-02-14
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: European Economic Area, Ukraine, rabies, research body, revision of an agreement, vaccine, veterinary inspection




L_2014211EN.01000101.xml










17.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 211/1








            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE
         
No 1/2014
of 14 February 2014
         
amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement


THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Implementing Decision 2013/261/EU of 3 June 2013 authorising a laboratory in Ukraine to carry out serological tests to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccines (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.












(2)


This Decision concerns legislation regarding live animals other than fish and aquaculture animals. Legislation concerning these matters shall not apply to Iceland, as specified in paragraph 2 of the Introductory Part of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement. This Decision is therefore not to apply to Iceland.












(3)


This Decision concerns legislation regarding veterinary matters. Legislation regarding veterinary matters shall not apply to Liechtenstein as long as the application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products is extended to Liechtenstein, as specified in the sectoral adaptations to Annex I to the EEA Agreement. This Decision is therefore not to apply to Liechtenstein.












(4)


Annex I to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following point is inserted after point 97 (Commission Implementing Decision 2011/396/EU) in Part 4.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement:






‘98.



32013 D 0261: Commission Implementing Decision 2013/261/EU of 3 June 2013 authorising a laboratory in Ukraine to carry out serological tests to monitor the effectiveness of rabies vaccines (OJ L 152, 5.6.2013, p. 50).
This act shall not apply to Iceland.’
                  






Article 2
The text of Implementing Decision 2013/261/EU in the Norwegian language, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on 15 February 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).


Article 4
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 14 February 2014.


For the EEA Joint Committee


The President

Gianluca GRIPPA
            





(1)  
            OJ L 152, 5.6.2013, p. 50.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.
Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 16/2014 of 14 February 2014 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement
Date: 2014-02-14
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: European Economic Area, computer terminal, harmonisation of standards, public service, revision of an agreement, safety device, satellite communications, telecommunications equipment, transmission network, waveband




L_2014211EN.01002401.xml










17.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 211/24








            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE
         
No 16/2014
of 14 February 2014
         
amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement


THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Directive 86/529/EEC (1), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement, expired on 31 December 1991 and consequently the reference thereto should be deleted from the EEA Agreement.












(2)


Commission Decisions 96/630/EC (2) and 97/526/EC (3) were repealed by Decision 98/574/EC (4), which are all incorporated into the EEA Agreement, and consequently the references to Decisions 96/630/EC and 97/526/EC should be deleted from the EEA Agreement.












(3)


Commission Decision 97/528/EC (5) was repealed by Decision 98/575/EC (6), which are both incorporated into the EEA Agreement, and consequently the reference to Decision 97/528/EC should be deleted from the EEA Agreement.












(4)


Commission Decision 2000/638/EC (7) was repealed by Decision 2004/71/EC (8), which are both incorporated into the EEA Agreement, and consequently the reference to Decision 2000/638/EC should be deleted from the EEA Agreement.












(5)


Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The texts of points 1 (Council Directive 86/529/EEC), 4o (Commission Decision 96/630/EC), 4u (Commission Decision 97/526/EC), 4w (Commission Decision 97/528/EC) and of the second indent in point 4zg (Commission Decision 2000/638/EC) of Chapter XVIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement are deleted.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on 15 February 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).


Article 3
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 14 February 2014.


For the EEA Joint Committee


The President

Gianluca GRIPPA
            





(1)  
            OJ L 311, 6.11.1986, p. 28.

(2)  
            OJ L 282, 1.11.1996, p. 79.

(3)  
            OJ L 215, 7.8.1997, p. 54.

(4)  
            OJ L 278, 15.10.1998, p. 30.

(5)  
            OJ L 215, 7.8.1997, p. 60.

(6)  
            OJ L 278, 15.10.1998, p. 35.

(7)  
            OJ L 269, 21.10.2000, p. 52.

(8)  
            OJ L 16, 23.1.2004, p. 54.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.
Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 21/2014 of 14 February 2014 amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement
Date: 2014-02-14
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: European Economic Area, carriage of goods, common transport policy, rail network, revision of an agreement, transport infrastructure, transport market




L_2014211EN.01003101.xml










17.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 211/31








            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE
         
No 21/2014
of 14 February 2014
         
amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement


THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 concerning a European rail network for competitive freight (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.












(2)


Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following point is inserted after point 41b (Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:






‘41c.



32010 R 0913: Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 concerning a European rail network for competitive freight (OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 22).’






Article 2
The text of Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on 15 February 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).


Article 4
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 14 February 2014.


For the EEA Joint Committee


The President

Gianluca GRIPPA
            





(1)  
            OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 22.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.
Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 28/2014 of 14 February 2014 amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement
Date: 2014-02-14
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: European Economic Area, air space, air traffic, air traffic control, project of common interest, revision of an agreement




L_2014211EN.01003801.xml










17.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 211/38








            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE
         
No 28/2014
of 14 February 2014
         
amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement


THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 409/2013 of 3 May 2013 on the definition of common projects, the establishment of governance and the identification of incentives supporting the implementation of the European Air Traffic Management Master Plan (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.












(2)


Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following point is inserted after point 66ua (Commission Regulation (EU) No 176/2011) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:






‘66ub.



32013 R 0409: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 409/2013 of 3 May 2013 on the definition of common projects, the establishment of governance and the identification of incentives supporting the implementation of the European Air Traffic Management Master Plan (OJ L 123, 4.5.2013, p. 1).’






Article 2
The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 409/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on 15 February 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 228/2013 of 13 December 2013 (2), whichever is the later.


Article 4
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 14 February 2014.


For the EEA Joint Committee


The President

Gianluca GRIPPA
            





(1)  
            OJ L 123, 4.5.2013, p. 1.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

(2)  
            OJ L 154, 22.5.2014, p. 25.
Case C-79/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 14 February 2014  — TUIfly GmbH v Harald Walter
Date: 2014-02-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, consumer protection, holiday, transport regulations








C_2014142EN.01001701.xml










12.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 142/17





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 14 February 2014 — TUIfly GmbH v Harald Walter
(Case C-79/14)
2014/C 142/23
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: TUIfly GmbH

Defendant: Harald Walter

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 7 of Regulation EC No 261/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council to be interpreted as meaning that a non-notified ‘early’ flight, with the result that the passengers cannot take the flight, is also covered by the regulation?










2.


Is the regulation to be interpreted as meaning that, with the exception of Article 5, the cause of the delay is not decisive?










3.


Is the aim of the regulation, namely to compensate for the damage arising from a loss of time, also affected if the passenger would arrive earlier and therefore time arrangements before the flight are concerned?










4.


Does the lack of notification of the bringing forward of the flight, the consequence of which was that the holiday resort was reached later than planned, result in the regulation being applied?










5.


Is the aim of the regulation to provide a high level of protection, with the result that the restriction of the passenger’s time arrangements is protected? Also in respect of an early arrival?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).
Case T-98/14: Action brought on 14 February 2014  — Société Générale v Commission
Date: 2014-02-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: bank, equal treatment, fine, sale








C_2014142EN.01003601.xml










12.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 142/36





Action brought on 14 February 2014 — Société Générale v Commission
(Case T-98/14)
2014/C 142/47
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Société Générale SA (Paris, France) (represented by: P. Zelenko, J. Marthan and D. Kupka, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Article 2(c) of the European Commission decision No C(2013) 8512 final of 4 December 2013 in the EIRD case in so far as it imposes a fine on Société Générale;










—


reduce the amount of the fine imposed by that decision on Société Générale to an appropriate amount;










—


order, in any event, the European Commission to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment committed by the Commission in the determination of the method of calculating the values of sales, in so far as the values adopted in the contested decision on the basis of that method do not reflect the respective positions of the banks against which the action has been brought on the relevant market during the infringement period (first part). The applicant submits that the Commission has thereby infringed its duty of diligence (second part) and has infringed the principles of equal treatment (third part) and of the protection of legitimate expectations (fourth part).










2.


Second plea in law, alleging a failure to state reasons as regards the choice of the method applied by the Commission in order to calculate the value of the sales by the banks against which the action has been brought.










3.


Third plea in law, claiming that the General Court should exercise its unlimited jurisdiction in order to reduce the applicant’s fine to an appropriate amount reflecting the respective positions of the banks against which the action has been brought on the relevant market.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.7108 — Axpo Group/EDP Group/JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-02-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, economic concentration, energy industry, merger control, wind energy








C_2014043EN.01000401.xml










14.2.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 43/4





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.7108 — Axpo Group/EDP Group/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 43/07
On 4 February 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7108. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.
Case T-106/14: Action brought on 14 February 2014 — Universal Utility International v OHIM (Greenworld)
Date: 2014-02-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, renewable energy, trade-mark law, water management








C_2014142EN.01003701.xml










12.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 142/37





Action brought on 14 February 2014 — Universal Utility International v OHIM (Greenworld)
(Case T-106/14)
2014/C 142/48
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Universal Utility International GmbH & Co. KG (Kaarst, Germany) (represented by J. Mietzel, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought







—


annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 December 2013 in Case R 1658/2013-4;










—


in the alternative, annul the contested decision in so far as it upheld the refusal of the application for the services in classes 35 and 39;










—


in the further alternative, annul the contested decision in so far as it upheld the refusal of the application for the services in class 35;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: Word mark Greenworld for goods and services in Classes 4, 35 and 39 — Community trade mark application No 11 616 588

Decision of the Examiner: Application refused

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law:







—


Breach of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94










—


Breach of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94
Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 14/2014 of 14 February 2014 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement
Date: 2014-02-14
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: European Economic Area, drugs classification, equidae, revision of an agreement, veterinary drug, veterinary inspection, veterinary medicine




L_2014211EN.01002101.xml










17.7.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 211/21








            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE
         
No 14/2014
of 14 February 2014
         
amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement


THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Regulation (EU) No 122/2013 of 12 February 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1950/2006 establishing, in accordance with Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products, a list of substances essential for the treatment of equidae (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.












(2)


Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following is added in point 15za (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1950/2006) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

                  ‘, as amended by:






—



32013 R 0122: Commission Regulation (EU) No 122/2013 of 12 February 2013 (OJ L 42, 13.2.2013, p. 1).’
                     






Article 2
The text of Regulation (EU) No 122/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on 15 February 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).


Article 4
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 14 February 2014.


For the EEA Joint Committee


The President

Gianluca GRIPPA
            





(1)  
            OJ L 42, 13.2.2013, p. 1.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.