do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-460/12: Order of the President of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of 7 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove — Slovakia) — SKP k.s. v Ján Bríla
Date: 2014-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer information, interpretation of the law, unfair terms of contract








C_2014175EN.01003302.xml










10.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 175/33





Order of the President of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of 7 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove — Slovakia) — SKP k.s. v Ján Bríla
(Case C-460/12) (1)

2014/C 175/42
Language of the case: Slovak
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 46, 16. 2. 2013.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2014-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2014036EN.01000201.xml










7.2.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 36/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

6 February 2014
2014/C 36/03

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3495




JPY


Japanese yen


136,93




DKK


Danish krone


7,4620




GBP


Pound sterling


0,82875




SEK


Swedish krona


8,7883




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2224




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,4000




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,525




HUF


Hungarian forint


307,48




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1880




RON


Romanian leu


4,4705




TRY


Turkish lira


3,0043




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5051




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4925




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,4704




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6392




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7115




KRW


South Korean won


1 454,72




ZAR


South African rand


15,0390




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1770




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6505




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 453,65




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,4883




PHP


Philippine peso


60,959




RUB


Russian rouble


46,9900




THB


Thai baht


44,277




BRL


Brazilian real


3,2431




MXN


Mexican peso


17,8802




INR


Indian rupee


84,2358






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-85/14: Action brought on 7 February 2014 — Infocit v OHIM — DIN (DINKOOL)
Date: 2014-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, service industry, trade-mark law








C_2014135EN.01004802.xml










5.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 135/48






Action brought on 7 February 2014 — Infocit v OHIM — DIN (DINKOOL)
(Case T-85/14)
(2014/C 135/62)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Infocit — Prestação de Serviços, Comércio e Indústria, Lda (Luanda, Angola) (represented by: A. Oliveira, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DIN — Deutsches Institut für Normung eV (Berlin, Germany)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 November 2013 given in Case R 1106/2012-2.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘DINKOOL’ for goods in Classes 7, 9 and 11 — Community trade mark application No 9 768 061
         

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark or sign cited in opposition: International trade mark registration No 229 048 of the figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘DIN’ for goods in Classes 1 to 34 and an earlier non-registered word mark ‘DIN’ in Germany

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Granted the appeal, annulled the contested decision and rejected the contested Community trade mark application in its entirety

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 8(4) and 8(5) CTMR.
Case C-59/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 February 2014  — Firma Ernst Kollmer Fleischimport und -export v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas
Date: 2014-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: export refund, guarantee, infringement of EU law








C_2014142EN.01001302.xml










12.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 142/13





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 7 February 2014 — Firma Ernst Kollmer Fleischimport und -export v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas
(Case C-59/14)
2014/C 142/17
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Firma Ernst Kollmer Fleischimport und -export

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Questions referred







1.


In a case where the infringement of a provision of Community law was discovered only after the occurrence of prejudice, does the irregularity which is necessary for the commencement of the limitation period under the first subparagraph of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 (1) and which is defined in Article 1(2) of that regulation presuppose, in addition to an act or omission by the economic operator, that the general budget of the European Union or budgets managed by the European Union were prejudiced, so that the limitation period begins to run only after the occurrence of the prejudice, or does the limitation period begin, irrespective of when the prejudice occurs, with the act or omission of the economic operator which constitutes an infringement of a provision of Community law?










2.


If the reply to the first question is that the limitation period does not begin until the occurrence of the prejudice:
In connection with a demand for repayment of an export refund which has been definitively granted, is there already prejudice within the meaning of Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 when an amount equal to the export refund within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 565/80 has been paid to the exporter, without the security under Article 6 of that regulation having already been released, or is there no prejudice until the release of the security or the definitive grant of the export refund?






(1)  Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ 1995 L 312, p. 1).
Corrigendum to Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council meeting on 9 and 10 December 2013 ( OJ C 376, 21.12.2013 )
Date: 2014-02-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: European cooperative, coordination of financing, economic growth, health care, health care profession, health expenditure, health service, job creation, public investment, structural expenditure








C_2014036EN.01000601.xml










7.2.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 36/6





Corrigendum to Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council meeting on 9 and 10 December 2013
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 376 of 21 December 2013
)
(2014/C 36/06)
On page 3 and on the cover page, the title should read as follows:
for:

'Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council meeting on 9 and 10 December 2013',

read:

'Council conclusions on the "Reflection process on modern, responsive and sustainable health systems" '.
Case C-482/12: Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 7 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov — Slovakia) — Peter Macinský, Eva Macinská v Getfin s.r.o., Financreal s.r.o.
Date: 2014-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, real property, unfair terms of contract








C_2014184EN.01002201.xml










16.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 184/22





Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 7 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Prešov — Slovakia) — Peter Macinský, Eva Macinská v Getfin s.r.o., Financreal s.r.o.
(Case C-482/12) (1)

2014/C 184/29
Language of the case: Slovak
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 9, 12.1.2013.
Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons
Date: 2014-02-07
Institutions: Netherlands
Subjects: Netherlands, extraction of oil, hydrocarbon, petroleum exploration, public contract








C_2014036EN.01000501.xml










7.2.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 36/5





Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons
2014/C 36/05
The Minister for Economic Affairs hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block N4 as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2002, No 245).
With reference to the Directive mentioned in the introduction and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block N4 of the Dutch continental shelf.
The Minister for Economic Affairs is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the abovementioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).
Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:





The Minister for Economic Affairs




attn: Mr P. Jongerius, Energy Market Directorate




Bezuidenhoutseweg 73




Postbus 20401




2500 EK Den Haag




NEDERLAND




Applications received after the expiry of this period will not be considered.
A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after this period has expired.
Further information can be obtained by calling Mr E. J. Hoppel on the following telephone number: +31 703797762.
Case C-61/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Regionale di Giustizia Amministrativa di Trento (Italy) lodged on 7 February 2014  — Orizzonte Salute — Studio Infermieristico Associato v Azienda Pubblica di Servizi alla persona ‘San Valentino’ and Others
Date: 2014-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to the courts, administrative court, award of contract, tax








C_2014135EN.01002102.xml










5.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 135/21






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Regionale di Giustizia Amministrativa di Trento (Italy) lodged on 7 February 2014 — Orizzonte Salute — Studio Infermieristico Associato v Azienda Pubblica di Servizi alla persona ‘San Valentino’ and Others
(Case C-61/14)
(2014/C 135/25)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Regionale di Giustizia Amministrativa di Trento

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Orizzonte Salute — Studio Infermieristico Associato

Defendants: Azienda Pubblica di Servizi alla persona ‘San Valentino’ — Città di Levico Terme, Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri and Segretario Generale del Tribunale Regionale di Giustizia Amministrativa di Trento

Other party to the proceedings: Associazione Infermieristica D & F. Care

Question referred

Do the principles laid down in Council Directive 89/665/EEC (1) of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts, as amended by Council Directive 92/50/EEC (2) of 18 June 1992, as subsequently amended and added to, preclude a provision of national law, such as that set out in Article 13(1a), (1c) and (6a) and in Article 14(3b) of Decree of the President of the Republic No 115 of 30 May 2002 (as progressively amended by subsequent legislative interventions) which laid down high amounts of the standard fee for access to administrative proceedings relating to public contracts?


(1)  Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts (OJ 1989 L 395, p. 33).

(2)  Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts (OJ 1992 L 209, p. 1).
Case F-12/14: Action brought on 7 February 2014 — ZZ v CdT
Date: 2014-02-07
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, damages, indemnification








C_2014184EN.01004001.xml










16.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 184/40





Action brought on 7 February 2014 — ZZ v CdT
(Case F-12/14)
2014/C 184/65
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: N. Cambonie, D. Ciolino and E. Macchi, lawyers)

Defendant: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union rejecting the request made by the applicant on the basis of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations to adopt a decision apologising to him and granting him compensation for the damage suffered.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:






—


annul the CdT’s implied rejection, or otherwise annul the rejection in the letter produced by the lawyer representing the CdT containing the decision of 10 April 2013 and, so far as necessary, the confirmatory decision of the CdT of 8 November 2013 rejecting the applicant’s request for it to take a decision;










—


declare the CdT liable for the damage suffered by the applicant, and consequently grant the applicant damages amounting to EUR 306 733,60 in respect of material loss and EUR 130 000 in respect of non-material loss, or any other, possibly greater, sum to be determined by the Tribunal, or else by expert evidence;










—


order the CdT to pay the costs.
Case F-11/14: Action brought on 7 February 2014 — ZZ v EEAS
Date: 2014-02-07
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: administrator, damages, indemnification, staff assessment, work contract








C_2014102EN.01004502.xml










7.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 102/45





Action brought on 7 February 2014 — ZZ v EEAS
(Case F-11/14)
2014/C 102/67
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant’s contract in so far as he is placed in grade AD5 and for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of 1 April 2013 in so far as it places the applicant in grade AD5;










—


If necessary, annul the decision of 28 October 2013 rejecting the applicant’s claim;










—


Order the regrading of the applicant’s post to a grade corresponding to the level of his responsibilities;










—


Order the defendant to bear all the consequences, in particular financial, of that regrading, retroactively since his entry into the service;










—


Compensate the applicant for the non-pecuniary damage suffered, assessed ex aequo et bono at EUR 5 000;










—


Order the EEAS to pay all the costs.
Case T-180/13: Order of the General Court of 7 February 2014 — Pesquerias Riveirenses and Others v Council (Action for annulment — Fisheries policy — Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 — Amalgamation of the northern and southern components of the stock of blue whiting in the north-east Atlantic in order to establish the TAC — Lack of direct concern — Manifestly inadmissible)
Date: 2014-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, authorised catch, fishing agreement, fishing area, international waters, sea fish








C_2014112EN.01003401.xml










14.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/34





Order of the General Court of 7 February 2014 — Pesquerias Riveirenses and Others v Council
(Case T-180/13) (1)

((Action for annulment - Fisheries policy - Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 - Amalgamation of the northern and southern components of the stock of blue whiting in the north-east Atlantic in order to establish the TAC - Lack of direct concern - Manifestly inadmissible))
2014/C 112/45
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: Pesquerias Riveirenses, SL (Ribeira, Spain); Pesquerias Campo de Marte, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Anpajo, SL (Ribeira); Arrastreros del Barbanza, SA (Ribeira); Martínez Pardavila e Hijos, SL (Ribeira); Lijo Pesca, SL (Ribeira); Frigoríficos Hermanos Vidal, SA (Ribeira); Pesquera Boteira, SL (Ribeira); Francisco Mariño Mos y Otros, CB (Ribeira); Pérez Vidal Juan Antonio y Hno, CB (Ribeira); Marina Nalda, SL (Ribeira); Portillo y Otros, SL (Ribeira); Vidiña Pesca, SL (Ribeira); Pesca Hermo, SL (Ribeira); Pescados Oubiña Pérez, SL (Ribeira); Manuel Pena Graña (Ribeira); Campo Eder, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Laga, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Jalisco, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Jopitos, SL (Ribeira); y Pesca-Julimar, SL (Ribeira) (represented by: J. Tojeiro Sierto, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Westerhof Löfflerová and A. de Gregorio Merino, acting as Agents)

Re:

ACTION for annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and, to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international negotiations or agreements (OJ 2013 L 23, p. 54), as amended, in so far as it amalgamates the northern and southern components of the stock of blue whiting in the north-east Atlantic in order to establish the TAC (total allowable catch) for blue whiting set out in Annexes IA and IB of that regulation.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


The applicants, Pesquerias Riveirenses, SL, and others, are ordered to bear their own costs as well as those incurred by the Council of the European Union.






(1)  OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.7063 — Vestas Wind Systems/Mitsubishi Heavy Industries/JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy industry, merger control, turbine, wind energy








C_2014036EN.01000102.xml










7.2.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 36/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.7063 — Vestas Wind Systems/Mitsubishi Heavy Industries/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 36/02
On 30 January 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7063. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.7098 — Sales & Solutions/Verbund/JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Austria, Germany, economic concentration, energy industry, merger control








C_2014036EN.01000101.xml










7.2.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 36/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.7098 — Sales & Solutions/Verbund/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 36/01
On 28 January 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7098. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.