do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-78/14: Action brought on 4 February 2014  — Benediktinerabtei St. Bonifaz v OHIM — Andechser Molkerei Scheitz (Genuß für Leib & Seele KLOSTER Andechs SEIT 1455)
Date: 2014-02-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dairy industry, organic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014135EN.01004602.xml










5.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 135/46






Action brought on 4 February 2014 — Benediktinerabtei St. Bonifaz v OHIM — Andechser Molkerei Scheitz (Genuß für Leib & Seele KLOSTER Andechs SEIT 1455)
(Case T-78/14)
(2014/C 135/59)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Benediktinerabtei St. Bonifaz Köperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts (Munich, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Andechser Molkerei Scheitz GmbH (Andechs, Germany)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 November 2013 in Case R 1272/2012-1 concerning the opposition proceedings No B 1 754 228 (Community trade mark application No 9 255 811);










—


order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Applicant

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Genuß für Leib & Seele KLOSTER Andechs SEIT 1455’ for goods in Class 29 (Community trade mark application No 9 255 811)

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Andechser Molkerei Scheitz GmbH

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National and Community figurative marks containing the word elements ‘ANDECHSER NATUR’ and ‘ANDECHSER NATUR SEIT 1908’ for goods and services in Classes 29 and 35

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law:







—


Infringement of the first sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of the second sentence of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009










—


Infringement of the second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009