do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Decision of 3 February 2014 designating the sites awarded the European Heritage Label in 2013
Date: 2014-02-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Austria, Estonia, European symbol, Netherlands, cultural heritage, heritage protection








C_2014033EN.01000401.xml










5.2.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 33/4






COMMISSION DECISION

of 3 February 2014
designating the sites awarded the European Heritage Label in 2013
2014/C 33/04
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Decision No 1194/2011/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 establishing a European Union action for the European Heritage Label (1), and in particular Article 14(1) thereof,
Whereas:






(1)


The European panel transmitted on 28 November 2013 its report regarding the selection process of sites for the attribution of the European Heritage Label in 2013 and, taking into account its recommendations, the Commission should designate the sites to be awarded the label.










(2)


In accordance with Article 15 of Decision No 1194/2011/EU, each site awarded the label should be monitored on a regular basis in order to ensure that it continues to meet the criteria and that it respects the project and work plan submitted in its application for the selection,




HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Sole Article
The European Heritage Label is awarded to the archaeological site of Carnuntum (Austria), the Great Guild Hall-Estonian History Museum (Estonia), Camp Westerbork (the Netherlands) and the Peace Palace (the Netherlands).

Done at Brussels, 3 February 2014.


For the Commission

Androulla VASSILIOU


Member of the Commission





(1)  OJ L 303, 22.11.2011, p. 1.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 106/2014 of 3 February 2014 establishing a prohibition of fishing for skates and rays in EU waters of VIId by vessels flying the flag of The Netherlands
Date: 2014-02-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU waters, English Channel, Netherlands, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2014036EN.01000501.xml










6.2.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 36/5








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 106/2014
of 3 February 2014
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for skates and rays in EU waters of VIId by vessels flying the flag of The Netherlands


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 39/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available to EU vessels for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are not subject to international negotiations or agreements (2), lays down quotas for 2013.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2013.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 February 2014.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 1.




ANNEX






No


85/TQ39




Member State


The Netherlands




Stock


SRX/07D.




Species


Skates and rays (Rajiformes)




Zone


EU waters of VIId




Date


10.12.2013
Case T-198/13: Order of the General Court of 3 February 2014  — Imax v OHIM — Himax Technologies (IMAX) (Community trade mark  — Opposition  — Withdrawal of the opposition  — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2014-02-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electronics industry, registered trade mark, technology, trade-mark law








C_2014142EN.01003501.xml










12.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 142/35





Order of the General Court of 3 February 2014 — Imax v OHIM — Himax Technologies (IMAX)
(Case T-198/13) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 142/45
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Imax Corporation (Mississauga, Canada) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, lawyer, and K. Hughes, solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Himax Technologies, Inc. (Hsinhua, Taiwan)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 January 2013 (Case R 740/2012-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Himax Technologies, Inc. and Imax Corporation.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The parties shall bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.13.
Case C-49/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Cartagena (Spain) lodged on 3 February 2014  — Finanmadrid E.F.C, S.A. v VA (*) and Others
Date: 2014-02-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, Spain, judicial review, special procedure, unfair terms of contract




C_2014135EN.01002001.xml










5.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 135/20






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Cartagena (Spain) lodged on 3 February 2014 — Finanmadrid E.F.C, S.A. v VA (*1) and Others
(Case C-49/14)
(2014/C 135/22)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Cartagena

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Finanmadrid E.F.C, S.A.

Defendants: VA (*1), QE (*1), DG (*1), NZ (*1)


Questions referred







(1)


Must Directive [93/13] (1) be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as that currently governing the Spanish order for payment procedure (Articles 815 and 816 [of the] LEC), which does not mandatorily provide either for the examination of unfair terms or the intervention of the court, except when the Secretario Judicial considers it expedient or the debtors lodge an objection, because that legislation hinders or prevents examination of their own motion by the courts of contracts which may contain unfair terms?










(2)


Must Directive 93/13/EEC be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as the Spanish law that does not permit a court to consider, of its own motion and [in] limine litis, during subsequent enforcement proceedings [relating to] an enforceable instrument (a reasoned decision issued by the Secretario Judicial bringing the order for payment procedure to a close), whether the contract giving rise to the reasoned decision whose enforcement is sought contained unfair terms, because under national law the matter is res judicata (Articles 551 and 552 in conjunction with Article 816(2) of the LEC)?










(3)


Must the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2) be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as that relating to the order for payment procedure and the procedure for the enforcement of judicial instruments, that does not provide for review by the court in every case during the declaratory stages of proceedings and does not permit the court at the enforcement stage to reconsider the reasoned decisions previously taken by the Secretario Judicial?










(4)


Must the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as precluding national legislation that prohibits a court from considering, of its own motion, whether the right to be heard has been observed, because the matter is res judicata?






(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).

(2)  
            OJ 2000 C 364, p. 1.
Case C-50/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte (Italy) lodged on 3 February 2014 — CASTA and Others v A.S.L. di Ciriè, Chivasso e Ivrea (ASL TO4) and Regione Piemonte
Date: 2014-02-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, invitation to tender, services contract, transport of patients








C_2014093EN.01002002.xml










29.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/20





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte (Italy) lodged on 3 February 2014 — CASTA and Others v A.S.L. di Ciriè, Chivasso e Ivrea (ASL TO4) and Regione Piemonte
(Case C-50/14)
2014/C 93/33
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Consorzio Artigiano Servizio Taxi e Autonoleggio (CASTA), Galati Lucimorto Roberto — Autonoleggio Galati, Seren Bernardone Guido — Autonoleggio Seren Guido

Defendants: Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Ciriè, Chivasso e Ivrea (ASL TO4), Regione Piemonte

Questions referred







1.


Does European Union public procurement law — in the case under examination, concerning excluded contracts and the general principles of free competition, equal treatment, transparency and proportionality — preclude national legislation under which contracts for the provision of ambulance and health-related transport services may be awarded directly to voluntary organisations organised predominantly on the basis of unpaid work and in return for genuine reimbursement of costs?










2.


If such an award is regarded as compatible with Community law, must there be a prior comparison of tenders from several homogeneous (and possibly also Community) operators and recipients of a direct award in order to limit the risk of exposure to inefficient and unreasonable costs, and must the national law under which direct awards are permitted accordingly be construed to that effect?










3.


If such an award is regarded as compatible with Community law, must voluntary organisations which receive direct awards be subject to precise percentage limits on parallel access to the market, and must the provision of national law under which the commercial activity of those organisations has to be marginal accordingly be construed to that effect?