do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-324/13 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 January 2014 — Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Ld a v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Word mark PATRICIA ROCHA — Opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark ROCHAS — Refusal to register by the Opposition Division of OHIM — Inadmissibility of the action brought before the Board of Appeal of OHIM)
Date: 2014-01-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014184EN.01000702.xml










16.6.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 184/7





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 January 2014 — Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(Case C-324/13 P) (1)

((Appeal - Community trade mark - Word mark PATRICIA ROCHA - Opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark ROCHAS - Refusal to register by the Opposition Division of OHIM - Inadmissibility of the action brought before the Board of Appeal of OHIM))
2014/C 184/10
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Appellant: Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda (represented by: A. J. Rodrigues, advogado)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 April 2013 in Case T-360/11 Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços v OHIM — Parfums Rochas (PATRIZIA ROCHA) by which the General Court dismissed an action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 April 2011 (Case R 2355/2010-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Parfums Rochas SAS and Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda


Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Fercal — Consultadoria e Serviços, Lda. is ordered to pay the costs






(1)  OJ C 260, 07.09.2013.
Public holidays in 2014: EEA/EFTA States and EEA institutions
Date: 2014-01-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EEA joint institution, EFTA countries, public holiday








C_2014027EN.01000401.xml










30.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 27/4





Public holidays in 2014: EEA/EFTA States and EEA institutions
(2014/C 27/05)










 


Iceland


Liechtenstein


Norway


EFTA Surveillance Authority


EFTA Court




1 January


X


X


X


X


X




2 January


 


X


 


X


 




3 January


 


 


 


X


 




6 January


 


X


 


 


 




2 February


 


X


 


 


 




4 March


 


X


 


 


 




19 March


 


X


 


 


 




17 April


X


 


X


 


 




18 April


X


X


X


X


 




21 April


X


X


X


X


X




24 April


X


 


 


 


 




1 May


X


X


X


X


X




17 May


 


 


X


 


 




29 May


X


X


X


X


X




30 May


 


 


 


X


 




9 June


X


X


X


X


X




17 June


X


 


 


 


 




19 June


 


X


 


 


 




23 June


 


 


 


 


X




4 August


X


 


 


 


 




15 August


 


X


 


 


X




8 September


 


X


 


 


 




1 November


 


X


 


 


X




8 December


 


X


 


 


 




22 December


 


 


 


X


 




23 December


 


 


 


X


 




24 December


 


 


 


X


 




25 December


X


X


X


X


X




26 December


X


X


X


X


X




29 December


 


 


 


X


 




30 December


 


 


 


X


 




31 December


 


X


 


X
Case T-495/11: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2014 — Streng v OHIM — Gismondi (PARAMETRICA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PARAMETRICA — Earlier national word mark parameta — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to produce evidence in the language of the opposition proceedings — Rule 19(2) and (3) and Rule 98(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
Date: 2014-01-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, translation








C_2014071EN.01001701.xml










8.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/17






Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2014 — Streng v OHIM — Gismondi (PARAMETRICA)
(Case T-495/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PARAMETRICA - Earlier national word mark parameta - Relative ground for refusal - Failure to produce evidence in the language of the opposition proceedings - Rule 19(2) and (3) and Rule 98(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
(2014/C 71/28)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Michael Streng (Erding, Germany) (represented by: A. Pappert, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Fulvio Gismondi (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Masetti Zannini de Concina, G. Petrocchi, M. Bucarelli and F. Bellan, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2011 (Case R 1348/2010-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Michael Streng and Mr Fulvio Gismondi.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Michael Streng to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6962 — Renova Industries/Schmolz & Bickenbach)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-01-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Europe, Russia, South Africa, United States, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, metallurgical industry








C_2014027EN.01000101.xml










30.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 27/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6962 — Renova Industries/Schmolz & Bickenbach)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2014/C 27/01)
On 19 December 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6962. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.