do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 46/2014 of 20 January 2014 implementing Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus
Date: 2014-01-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Belarus, economic sanctions, international sanctions








L_2014016EN.01000301.xml










21.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 16/3








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 46/2014
of 20 January 2014
         
implementing Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 (1), and in particular Article 8a(1) and 8a(3) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


On 18 May 2006, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 765/2006.












(2)


The Council considers that the reasons for the listing of one person as set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 should be amended.












(3)


Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.





Done at Brussels, 20 January 2014.


For the Council


The President

C. ASHTON
            





(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ L 134, 20.05.2006, p. 1).




ANNEX
In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, entry No. 210 shall be replaced by the following:











 


‘Names Transcription of Belarusian spelling Transcription of Russian spelling


Names (Belarusian spelling)


Names (Russian spelling)


Identifying information


Reasons for listing




210.


Ternavsky, Anatoly Andreevich
(Ternavski, Anatoli Andrievich
Ternavskiy,
Anatoly
Andreyevich)


ТЕРНАВСКИЙ, Анатолий Андрэевiч


ТЕРНАВСКИЙ, Анатолий, Андреевич


DOB: 1950
POB: Donetsk, Ukraine


Person close to family members of President Lukashenka. His company Univest-M is a partner of the Presidents Sports Club, and until May 2011 employed the President's daughter-in-law.
He provides support to the regime, in particular financially, through payments by Univest-M to the Belarusian Ministry of Internal Affairs, Belarusian (State) TV and Radio Company, and the trade union of the chamber of representatives of the National Assembly.
He benefits from the regime through large scale business activities in Belarus. Univest-M owns a subsidiary, FLCC, which is a leading operator in the oil and hydrocarbon sectors. Univest-M is also one of the largest development/real estate companies in Belarus. Business activities on this scale would not be possible in Belarus without the approval of the Lukashenka regime.
He sponsors several sports clubs, through Univest-M, thereby contributing to good relations with President Lukashenka.’
Case T-614/13 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 20 January 2014 — Romonta v Commission (Interim measures — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — System of exchange of greenhouse gas emission allowances — Free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances from 2013 — Application for recognition of hardship — Lack of urgency)
Date: 2014-01-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU Emissions Trading Scheme, greenhouse gas, reduction of gas emissions








C_2014093EN.01002302.xml










29.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/23





Order of the President of the General Court of 20 January 2014 — Romonta v Commission
(Case T-614/13 R)
(Interim measures - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - System of exchange of greenhouse gas emission allowances - Free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances from 2013 - Application for recognition of hardship - Lack of urgency)
2014/C 93/40
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Romonta GmbH (Amsdorf, Seebebiet Mansfelder Land, Germany) (represented by: I. Zenke, M. Vollmer, C. Telschow and A. Schultze, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. White, C. Hermes and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2013/448/EU of 5 September 2013 concerning national implementation measures for the transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances in accordance with Article 11(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2013 L 240, p. 27), in so far as the allocation of emission allowances to the applicant for hardship is refused.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is rejected.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Case C-26/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 20 January 2014 — Beaudout Père et Fils SARL v Ministre du travail, de l’emploi, de la formation professionnelle et du dialogue social, Confédération nationale de la boulangerie et boulangerie-pâtisserie française, Fédération Générale Agroalimentaire — CFDT and Others
Date: 2014-01-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative transparency, collective agreement, social security








C_2014085EN.01001702.xml










22.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 85/17





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 20 January 2014 — Beaudout Père et Fils SARL v Ministre du travail, de l’emploi, de la formation professionnelle et du dialogue social, Confédération nationale de la boulangerie et boulangerie-pâtisserie française, Fédération Générale Agroalimentaire — CFDT and Others
(Case C-26/14)
2014/C 85/31
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Beaudout Père et Fils SARL

Defendants: Ministre du travail, de l’emploi, de la formation professionnelle et du dialogue social, Confédération nationale de la boulangerie et boulangerie-pâtisserie française, Fédération Générale Agroalimentaire — CFDT and Others

Question referred

Is compliance with the obligation of transparency flowing from Article 56 TFEU a mandatory prior condition for the extension, by a Member State, to all undertakings within a sector, of a collective agreement under which a single operator, chosen by the social partners, is entrusted with the management of a compulsory supplementary social security scheme for employees?
Case T-46/14: Action brought on 20 January 2014 — Sales & Solutions v OHIM — Wattline (WATTLINE)
Date: 2014-01-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, energy industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014078EN.01001402.xml










15.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 78/14





Action brought on 20 January 2014 — Sales & Solutions v OHIM — Wattline (WATTLINE)
(Case T-46/14)
2014/C 78/29
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Sales & Solutions GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: K. Gründig-Schnelle, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wattline GmbH (Ruderting, Germany)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Alter the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 November 2013 in Case R 1668/2012-4 to the effect that the opposition is upheld in its entirety and the application for the Community trade mark is rejected;










—


Order the intervener to pay the costs including those incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Wattline GmbH

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘WATTLINE’ for services in Classes 35, 36 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 8 908 345

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the German word and figurative mark and the Community word and figurative mark ‘Watt’ for services in Classes 35, 39 and 42

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the contested decision was annulled and the opposition was rejected

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and infringement of Rule 20(7)(c) and Rule 50 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95
Case T-50/14: Action brought on 20 January 2014 — Demp v OHIM (TURBO DRILL)
Date: 2014-01-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building materials, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014078EN.01001502.xml










15.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 78/15





Action brought on 20 January 2014 — Demp v OHIM (TURBO DRILL)
(Case T-50/14)
2014/C 78/31
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Demp BV (Vianen, Netherlands) (represented by C. Gehweiler, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 22 November 2013 in Case R 1254/2013-4 in respect of the goods in Class 6 (building material made of metal, ironmongery, small items of metal hardware, fastening material, assembly material, screws, parts and accessories for all of the abovementioned goods, all of the abovementioned goods made of metal); the goods in Class 19 (building material, fastening material, assembly material, screws, parts and accessories for all of the abovementioned goods, all of the abovementioned goods not made of metal) and the goods in Class 20 (fastening material, assembly material, screws);










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘TURBO DRILL’ for goods in Classes 6, 7, 8, 19 and 20 — Community trade mark application No 11 695 145

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009
Council Implementing Decision 2014/24/CFSP of 20 January 2014 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus
Date: 2014-01-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Belarus, economic sanctions, international sanctions, removal








L_2014016EN.01003201.xml










21.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 16/32








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION 2014/24/CFSP
of 20 January 2014
         
implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP (1), and in particular Article 6(1) and 6(3) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


On 15 October 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus.












(2)


The Council considers that the reasons for the listing of one person as set out in the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP should be amended.












(3)


The Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP should be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.





Done at Brussels, 20 January 2014.


For the Council


The President

C. ASHTON
            





(1)  Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ L 285, 17.10.2012, p. 1).




ANNEX
In the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP, entry No. 210 shall be replaced by the following:










 


Names Transcription of Belarusian spelling Transcription of Russian spelling


Names (Belarusian spelling)


Names (Russian spelling)


Identifying information


Reasons for listing




210


Ternavsky, Anatoly Andreevich
(Ternavski, Anatoli Andrievich
Ternavskiy,
Anatoly
Andreyevich)


ТЕРНАВСКИЙ, Анатолий Андрэевiч


ТЕРНАВСКИЙ, Анатолий, Андреевич


DOB: 1950
POB: Donetsk, Ukraine.


Person close to family members of President Lukashenka. His company Univest-M is a partner of the President's Sports Club, and until May 2011 employed the President's daughter-in-law.
He provides support to the regime, in particular financially, through payments by Univest-M to the Belarusian Ministry of Internal Affairs, Belarusian (State) TV and Radio Company, and the trade union of the chamber of representatives of the National Assembly.
He benefits from the regime through large scale business activities in Belarus. Univest-M owns a subsidiary, FLCC, which is a leading operator in the oil and hydrocarbon sectors.
Univest-M is also one of the largest development/real estate companies in Belarus. Business activities on this scale would not be possible in Belarus without the approval of the Lukashenka regime.
He sponsors several sports clubs, through Univest-M, thereby contributing to good relations with President Lukashenka.
Action brought on 20 January 2014 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against Iceland (Case E-8/14)
Date: 2014-01-20
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: European Works Council, Iceland, national implementing measure, worker consultation, worker information








C_2014163EN.01001301.xml










28.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 163/13





Action brought on 20 January 2014 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against Iceland
(Case E-8/14)
(2014/C 163/12)
An action against Iceland was brought before the EFTA Court on 20 January 2014 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, represented by Xavier Lewisand Maria Moustakali, acting as Agents of the EFTA Surveillance Authority, Rue Belliard 35, 1040 Brussels, Belgium.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority requests the EFTA Court to:






1.


Declare that by failing to adopt, and/or to notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority forthwith of, all the measures necessary to implement the Act referred to at point 27 of Annex XVIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees (Recast)), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by way of Protocol 1 and by Joint Committee Decision No 54/2010 thereto, within the time prescribed, Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under the Act and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement.










2.


Order Iceland to bear the costs of these proceedings.





Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:







—


The application addresses Iceland’s failure to comply, no later than on 26 August 2013, with a reasoned opinion delivered by the EFTA Surveillance Authority on 26 June 2013 regarding that State’s failure to implement into its national legal order Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees (Recast) (‘the Act’), as referred to at point 27 of Annex XVIII to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as adapted to the EEA Agreement by way of Protocol 1 thereto.










—


The EFTA Surveillance Authority submits that Iceland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16 of the Act and under Article 7 of the EEA Agreement by failing to adopt, and/or to notify the EFTA Surveillance Authority of, all the measures necessary to implement the Act within the time prescribed.
Case C-25/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 20 January 2014 — Union des syndicats de l'immobilier (UNIS) v Ministre du travail, de l’emploi, de la formation professionnelle et du dialogue social, Syndicat national des résidences de tourisme (SNRT) and Others
Date: 2014-01-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative transparency, collective agreement, social security








C_2014085EN.01001701.xml










22.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 85/17





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 20 January 2014 — Union des syndicats de l'immobilier (UNIS) v Ministre du travail, de l’emploi, de la formation professionnelle et du dialogue social, Syndicat national des résidences de tourisme (SNRT) and Others
(Case C-25/14)
2014/C 85/30
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Union des syndicats de l'immobilier (UNIS)

Defendants: Ministre du travail, de l’emploi, de la formation professionnelle et du dialogue social, Syndicat national des résidences de tourisme (SNRT) and Others

Question referred

Is compliance with the obligation of transparency flowing from Article 56 TFEU a mandatory prior condition for the extension, by a Member State, to all undertakings within a sector, of a collective agreement under which a single operator, chosen by the social partners, is entrusted with the management of a compulsory supplementary social security scheme for employees?
Council Decision 2014/23/CFSP of 20 January 2014 repealing Decision 2013/350/CFSP amending and extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for the Middle East peace process
Date: 2014-01-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Israel, Lebanon, Middle East, Palestine question, Syria, diplomatic representation, establishment of peace








L_2014016EN.01003101.xml










21.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 16/31








            COUNCIL DECISION 2014/23/CFSP
of 20 January 2014
         
repealing Decision 2013/350/CFSP amending and extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for the Middle East peace process


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28, Article 31(2) and Article 33 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 23 January 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/33/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Andreas REINICKE as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the Middle East peace process.












(2)


On 2 July 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/350/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the EUSR until 30 June 2014 and providing a financial reference amount for the period from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2013.












(3)


On 27 November 2013, the Political and Security Committee acknowledged the way forward proposed by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the understanding that the EUSR's tasks will be assumed for the time being by the European External Action Service (EEAS). Furthermore, regular reporting to Member States as well as high-level contacts will be assured.












(4)


Decision 2013/350/CFSP should, therefore, be repealed with effect from 1 January 2014,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1

Repeal

Decision 2013/350/CFSP is repealed.


Article 2

Review

The future representation of the Union in relation to the Middle East peace process shall be reviewed before May 2014.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
It shall apply from1 January 2014.




Done at Brussels, 20 January 2014.


For the Council


The President

C. ASHTON
            





(1)  Council Decision 2012/33/CFSP of 23 January 2012 appointing the European Union Special Representative for the Middle East peace process (OJ L 19, 24.1.2012, p. 17).

(2)  Council Decision 2013/350/CFSP of 2 July 2013 amending and extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for the Middle East peace process (OJ L 185, 4.7.2013, p. 3).
Council Decision 2014/22/CFSP of 20 January 2014 amending Decision 2013/353/CFSP amending and extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for the South Caucasus and the crisis in Georgia
Date: 2014-01-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Caucasus countries, Georgia, diplomatic representation, distribution of EU funding








L_2014016EN.01003001.xml










21.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 16/30








            COUNCIL DECISION 2014/22/CFSP
of 20 January 2014
         
amending Decision 2013/353/CFSP amending and extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for the South Caucasus and the crisis in Georgia


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28, Article 31(2) and Article 33 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 25 August 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/518/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Philippe LEFORT as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the South Caucasus and the crisis in Georgia.












(2)


On 2 July 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/353/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the EUSR until 30 June 2014 and providing a financial reference amount until 31 December 2013.












(3)


A new financial reference amount covering the period from 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2014 should be provided,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Article 5 of Decision 2013/353/CFSP is amended as follows:






(a)


in paragraph 1, the following subparagraph is added:
‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR for the period from 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2014 shall be EUR 1 040 000.’;










(b)


in paragraph 2, the first sentence is replaced by the following:

                        ‘The expenditure financed by the amount set out in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 shall be eligible as from 1 July 2013
                        ’.






Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.
It shall apply as of 1 January 2014.




Done at Brussels, 20 January 2014.


For the Council


The President

C. ASHTON
            





(1)  Council Decision 2011/518/CFSP of 25 August 2011 appointing the European Union Special Representative for the South Caucasus and the crisis in Georgia (OJ L 221, 27.8.2011, p. 5).

(2)  Council Decision 2013/353/CFSP of 2 July 2013 amending and extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for the South Caucasus and the crisis in Georgia (OJ L 185, 4.7.2013, p. 9).