do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Commission notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 ( OJ C 366, 14.12.2013 )
Date: 2014-01-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: administrative formalities, merger, merger control, simplification of formalities








C_2014011EN.01000601.xml










15.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 11/6





Corrigendum to Commission notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 366 of 14 December 2013
)
2014/C 11/05
On page 6, paragraph 7:
for:

‘For the purpose of the application of points 5(b), 5(c) and 6 in the case of an acquisition of joint control outside the field of activity of the joint venture, relationships that exist only between the undertakings acquiring joint control are not considered horizontal or vertical relationships for the purpose of this Notice. Those relationships may however give rise to coordination as referred to in Article 2(4) of the Merger Regulation; such situations are dealt with in point 15 of this Notice.’

read:

‘For the purpose of the application of points 5(b), 5(c) and 6 in the case of an acquisition of joint control, relationships that exist only between the undertakings acquiring joint control outside the field of activity of the joint venture are not considered horizontal or vertical relationships for the purpose of this Notice. Those relationships may however give rise to coordination as referred to in Article 2(4) of the Merger Regulation; such situations are dealt with in point 15 of this Notice.’
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7143 — Mitsubishi Corporation/Mitsubishi Electric Corporation/Mitsubishi Elevator Thailand) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2014-01-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: distribution business, economic concentration, electrical industry, electronics industry, lift, maintenance, merger control








C_2014011EN.01000501.xml










15.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 11/5





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.7143 — Mitsubishi Corporation/Mitsubishi Electric Corporation/Mitsubishi Elevator Thailand)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2014/C 11/04






1.


On 8 January 2014, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Mitsubishi Corporation (‘MC’, Japan) and Mitsubishi Electric Corporation (‘MELCO’, Japan) acquire within the meaning of the article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Mitsubishi Elevator (Thailand) Co., Ltd (‘MET’, Thailand) by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for MC: general trading company active in various industries including energy, metals, machinery, chemicals, food and general merchandise,










—


for MELCO: manufacture and sale of electric and electronic equipment used in energy and electric systems, industrial automation, information and communication systems, electronic devices, and home appliances,










—


for MET: active in the supply, installation, maintenance and repair of elevators, escalators and moving walkways as well as the supply of relevant components, product parts, elevator and escalator monitoring and safety related products in Thailand.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.7143 — Mitsubishi Corporation/Mitsubishi Electric Corporation/Mitsubishi Elevator Thailand, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).
Case T-279/12: Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2014 — SICOM v Commission (Arbitration clause — Food aid — Supply of colza oil to Guinea — Non-performance of the contract — Limitation period)
Date: 2014-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Guinea, arbitration clause, food aid, indemnification, vegetable oil








C_2014052EN.01003403.xml










22.2.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 52/34





Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2014 — SICOM v Commission
(Case T-279/12) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Food aid - Supply of colza oil to Guinea - Non-performance of the contract - Limitation period)
2014/C 52/63
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: SICOM Srl — Società industriale per il confezionamento degli olii meridionale (Cercola, Italy) (represented by: R. Manzi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Bartelt and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under an arbitration clause seeking an order that the Commission pay the applicant a sum corresponding to penalties imposed in relation to quantities not delivered and delays in supply, deducted by the Commission from the final amount paid to the applicant for the delivery of refined colza oil for the benefit of the Republic of Guinea, in the context of a food aid operation carried out pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 664/2001 of 2 April 2001 on the supply of vegetable oil as food aid (OJ 2001 L 93, p. 3).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action as inadmissible;










2.


Orders SICOM Srl — Società industriale per il confezionamento degli olii meridionale to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.