do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-721/13: Action brought on 31 December 2013 — The Directv Group v OHIM — Bolloré (DIRECTV)
Date: 2013-12-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, telecommunications industry, trade-mark law








C_2014112EN.01003901.xml










14.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/39





Action brought on 31 December 2013 — The Directv Group v OHIM — Bolloré (DIRECTV)
(Case T-721/13)
2014/C 112/51
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: The Directv Group, Inc. (El Segundo, United States) (represented by: F. Valentin, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bolloré SA (Érgue Gaberic, France)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 October 2013 given in Case R 1961/2012-2.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: The word mark ‘DIRECTV’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 38 and 41 — Community trade mark registration No 243 774

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Partially revoked CTM registration

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and revoked CTM registration in its entirety

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) CTMR.
Corrigendum to Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys ( OJ L 170, 30.6.2009 )
Date: 2013-12-31
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: European standard, product safety, safety standard, technical standard, toy industry








L_2013355EN.01009201.xml










31.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 355/92







Corrigendum to Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 170 of 30 June 2009
)

On page 19:
Article 53(2):
for:

                  ‘…, provided that such toys meet the requirements set out in Part 3 of Annex II to Directive 88/378/EEC and …’,
read:

                  ‘…, provided that such toys meet the requirements set out in Section 3 of Part II of Annex II to Directive 88/378/EEC and …’;
Article 55, first paragraph:
for:

‘Directive 88/378/EEC, except Article 2(1) and Part 3 of Annex II, is repealed with effect from 20 July 2011. Article 2(1) thereof and Part 3 of Annex II thereto are repealed with effect from 20 July 2013.’,

read:

‘Directive 88/378/EEC, except Article 2(1) and Section 3 of Part II of Annex II, is repealed with effect from 20 July 2011. Article 2(1) thereof and Section 3 of Part II of Annex II thereto are repealed with effect from 20 July 2013.’.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-12-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013382EN.01000201.xml










31.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 382/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

30 December 2013
2013/C 382/03

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3783




JPY


Japanese yen


145,02




DKK


Danish krone


7,4603




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83640




SEK


Swedish krona


8,9283




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2259




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,4255




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


27,480




HUF


Hungarian forint


296,80




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7025




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1487




RON


Romanian leu


4,4707




TRY


Turkish lira


2,9348




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5520




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4764




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,6886




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6866




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7481




KRW


South Korean won


1 454,26




ZAR


South African rand


14,4257




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,3555




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6250




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 839,12




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,5408




PHP


Philippine peso


61,211




RUB


Russian rouble


45,1700




THB


Thai baht


45,230




BRL


Brazilian real


3,2208




MXN


Mexican peso


18,0096




INR


Indian rupee


85,3040






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-690/13: Action brought on 31 December 2013 — Invivo v OLAF
Date: 2013-12-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: corruption, financial control, fraud against the EU, legal person








C_2014151EN.01002001.xml










19.5.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 151/20





Action brought on 31 December 2013 — Invivo v OLAF
(Case T-690/13)
2014/C 151/26
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Invivo Ltd (Abinsk, Russia) (represented by: T. Huopalainen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)

Form of order sought

The applicant claim that the Court should:






—


Review the legality of a failure to act on the part of the defendant in case OF/2013/0902 after it has been called upon to act by the applicant;










—


Order the defendant to act.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging failure to act based on Article 265 TFEU, as the financial interests of the EU are involved within the meaning of Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 (1) when the national agency that grants the aid receives most of its funds from the EU and where on the alleged abuser side legal entities from at least two member states are involved.


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) (OJ 1999 L 136, p. 1)
Case T-694/13: Action brought on 31 December 2013 — Ipatau v Council
Date: 2013-12-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belarus, economic sanctions, international sanctions








C_2014093EN.01002502.xml










29.3.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/25





Action brought on 31 December 2013 — Ipatau v Council
(Case T-694/13)
2014/C 93/43
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Vadzim Ipatau (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Michalauskas, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Council Decision 2013/534/CFSP of 29 October 2013 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, in so far as it concerns the applicant;










—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1054/2013 of 29 October 2013 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus, in so far as it concerns the applicant;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those relied on in the context of Case T-693/13 Mikhalchanka v Council.
List of competent authorities referred to in Article 4(1) of Council Directive 2011/16/EU
Date: 2013-12-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, administrative formalities, domestic market, intra-EU trade, tax evasion








C_2013382EN.01000401.xml










31.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 382/4





List of competent authorities referred to in Article 4(1) of Council Directive 2011/16/EU
2013/C 382/05






Member State


Competent authority (in the national language)




Belgium


Président du Comité de direction du SPF Finances/Voorzitter van het Directiecomité van de FOD Financiën/Präsident des Direktionsausschusses des FÖD Finanzen




Bulgaria


Изпълнителния директор на Национална агенция за приходите или негов упълномощен представител




Czech Republic


Ministerstvo financí, Generální finanční ředitelství




Denmark


Skatteministeriet




Germany


Bundesministerium der Finanzen




Estonia


Eesti Maksu- ja Tolliamet




Ireland


The Revenue Commissioners or their authorised representative




Greece


Υπουργείο Οικονομικών, Διεύθυνση Διεθνών Οικονομικών Σχέσεων




Spain


Agencia Estatal de Administración Tributaria




France


Direction générale des finances publiques




Croatia


Ministarstvo financija




Italy


Il Direttore generale delle Finanze




Cyprus


Υπουργείο Οικονομικών




Latvia


Valsts ieņēmumu dienests




Lithuania


Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerija




Luxemburg


Ministère des finances




Hungary


Központi Kapcsolattartó Iroda




Malta


Direttur (Tassazzjoni Internazzjonali), Dipartiment tat-Taxxi Interni, Ministeru tal-Finanzi, l-Ekonomija u Investiment




Netherlands


De minister van financiën of een door deze aangewezen vertegenwoordiger




Austria


Der Bundesminister für Finanzen oder dessen bevollmächtigter Vertreter




Poland


Ministerstwo Finansów




Portugal


Ministro das Finanças




Romania


Serviciul Schimb Internațional de Informații




Slovenia


Ministrstvo za finance




Slovakia


Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky




Finland


Verohallinto/Skatteförvaltningen




Sweden


Skatteverket




United Kingdom


The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs or their authorised representative