COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS A Clean Air Programme for Europe
Date: 2013-12-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU programme, air quality, atmosphere, health costs, industrial pollution, job creation, motor vehicle pollution, pollution from agricultural sources, reduction of gas emissions, research and development













EUR-Lex - 52013DC0918 - EN











|



52013DC0918

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS A Clean Air Programme for Europe /* COM/2013/0918 final */









COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL
COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
A Clean Air Programme for Europe
(Text with EEA relevance)
1.           Introduction
Europe's air quality has improved markedly
in recent decades but air pollution remains the principal
environmental factor linked to preventable illness and premature mortality in
the EU and still has significant negative effects on much of Europe's natural environment.
According to the OECD, "Urban air pollution is
set to become the top environmental cause of mortality worldwide by 2050, ahead
of dirty water and lack of sanitation".[1]
Whilst the EU's air quality standards still
lag behind those of other developed nations, compliance with some of these has
been challenging for a variety of reasons. This new
Strategy tackles the reasons for the widespread non-compliance. It also
proposes legislation to reduce harmful emissions in the longer term which
contribute to poor air quality and damage the natural environment. In addition,
it will promote measures which also mitigate atmospheric warming and climate
change. The timelines for the emission reductions are fully consistent with the
new 2030 framework for climate and energy policy which will allow investors to
maximise the synergies of their investments. 
Better air also offers economic opportunities
including for the EU's clean technology sectors.  Major engineering firms in
the EU already earn up to 40% of revenues from their environment portfolios,
and this is set to increase.  There are clear signals that emerging economies
are focusing seriously on air pollution and a smart European policy will
continue to give our industry a head start in these major developing markets.
The measures in this new strategy build on
those presented in the 2005 Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution[2] and will deliver
further progress towards long term objectives of the 6th and 7th
Environmental Action Programmes[3].
The Strategy is accompanied by a legislative proposal
for a revised National Emission Ceilings Directive[4], and a proposal for a
Directive which will for the first time control emissions from Medium sized Combustion
Plants and contribute significantly to the achievement of the necessary
emissions reductions. The strategy also contains non-regulatory support measures
to enhance capacity and co-operation at all political levels, with priority
areas including urban air pollution, research and innovation, and the
international dimension of air policy.
2.           Tackling
poor ambient air quality in the short term
2.1.        Current air quality
At the moment over a third of EU's Air
Quality Management Zones exceed the limit values for particulate matter (PM10)
and a quarter for nitrogen dioxide (NO2). 17 Member States are currently
subject to infringement proceedings for PM10 non-compliance. 
2.2.        Measures to deliver air
quality compliance
The ongoing substantial breaches of air
quality standards can be resolved in the short to medium term by effective
implementation of existing EU legislation, notably on emissions from light-duty
diesels,[5] and complementary measures at national level. Transposing the
amended Gothenburg Protocol agreed in 2012 would also be needed to align the EU
regulatory framework to the EU's international commitments. The aim of these
measures is to achieve full compliance with existing air quality standards by
2020 at the latest.
2.2.1.     Completing unfinished
business: fixing the light-duty diesel emissions problem
Successive generations of Euro standards
and fuel quality standards have been agreed so as to control vehicle emissions
in the EU. The required reductions have been delivered, with one exception: NOx
emissions from light-duty diesel engines. Real-world NOx emissions from Euro 5
cars type-approved since 2009 now exceed those of Euro 1 cars type-approved in
1992, and are in the region of five times the limit value. This has a major
impact on concentrations of NO2, ozone and secondary particles across Europe, generating negative publicity and reputational damage for vehicle manufacturers.
In its CARS 2020 Communication, the
Commission noted the shortcoming of the current procedures and committed to a
new test procedure in the type-approval framework to assess NOx emissions of
light-duty vehicles under real-world driving conditions.[6]
Real driving emissions (RDE) of NOx will be recorded and communicated as from
the mandatory Euro 6 dates (in 2014) and, no more than three years later the
RDE procedure will be applied for type approval, together with robust
not-to-exceed (NTE) emission limits. This will ensure the substantial reduction
of real-world NOx emissions required to achieve Euro 6 NOx emission limits
under normal driving conditions.[7]
Further tightening of EU vehicle emissions
standards beyond Euro 6 is not currently necessary to achieve new air policy
targets for 2025 and 2030. Rather, measures supporting sustainable urban
mobility will help target localised transport problems (see section 2.2.3).
2.2.2.     Fostering enhanced
technical and management capabilities 
To support Member States' competentent authorities with reinforcing
the development and implementation of air pollution control programmes and the
measures contained therein, they will be able to draw on finance under the
2014-2020 European Structural and Investments Funds1 (ESIF) and the new LIFE
instrument for 2014-2020. The Commission proposal for the ESIF includes an air
quality component, in particular for urban areas. Member States, regions and
cities with notable air quality problems are encouraged to consider the use of
these funds, where relevant, to implement actions to reduce air pollutions, not
least through the promotion of innovative technologies. LIFE will support the
temporary additional efforts that may be needed to improve overall air quality
goverance and help leverage more substantial additional finance from other
funding sources. The LIFE projects will be structured building on the recent
positive experience with the joint Commission and EEA air implementation pilot project
(section 3.2.6).
2.2.3.     Broadening
the local and regional air quality management toolbox 
The main responsibility for resolving
localised compliance problems lies with Member States, where there is
substantial scope for enhanced national and local action. The current
assessment and management options available will be supplemented by the
measures on sustainable mobility in the Communication 'Together towards
competitive and resource-efficient urban mobility', in particular those on
Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans and on Urban Vehicle Access Regulations. Guidelines
for retrofit programmes and for promoting the uptake of advanced technology
options will be developed, building on the "Super Ultra Low Emission
Vehicle " concept developed in the U.S.A. The latter concept will also be
expanded to other sectors to support Member States with compliance problems. To
improve public information on the performance of products and the success of
national and local air quality action, new public-oriented indicators will be
developed to track progress in mitigating air pollution nationally and locally.
To facilitate consumer choice, citizens will also be informed of the real-world
vehicle emissions measured according to the new test cycle (from the Euro 6
deadlines onwards). 
2.2.4.     The Ambient Air Quality
Directive
The air policy review indicated that it is
not appropriate to revise the Ambient Air Quality Directive now. Policy should
focus rather on achieving compliance with existing air quality standards by
2020 at the latest, and on using a revised NEC Directive to bring down
pollution emissions in the period to 2030. Such emission reductions will in
turn drive down background concentrations across Europe, bringing major benefits
for public health and ecosystems.
The Ambient Air Quality Directive remains a
key policy if we are to ensure future concentrations below the WHO guideline
values everywhere. It will be kept under review, with a view to revision once
the NECD has set background concentrations on the right downwards track.
3.           Reducing the impacts of
air pollution in the longer term
A thorough review of EU air policy to date has
shown that the combination of targets and legislation has delivered real
benefits for human health and the environment. The health impacts from
particulate matter – the main cause of death from air pollution – fell by
around 20% between 2000 and 2010. The acid rain ("acidification")
problem has been broadly solved in the EU, thanks to a substantial reduction in
emissions of the main pollutants involved.[8]
EU air policy has stimulated innovation in pollution abatement and radically
improved the environmental performance of key economic sectors. This has safeguarded
growth and jobs and opened up green technology opportunities in the EU and
beyond.
Despite these successes, substantial
impacts remain (Table 1), and they are a continuing source of significant
concern to a large proportion of EU citizens.[9]
Air pollution is the number one environmental cause of premature death in the
EU, responsible for ten times the toll of road traffic accidents. In 2010 it
caused over 400 000 premature deaths as well as substantial avoidable sickness
and suffering including respiratory conditions (such as asthma) and exacerbated
cardiovascular problems. The overall external costs of these impacts ranged
between €330-940 billion, including labour productivity losses and other direct
economic damages valued at €23bn per year in 2010. Ecosystems are also
suffering, with algal blooms, fish die-off and other ecosystem disruption
driven by nutrient nitrogen pollution ('eutrophication'). This problem is
particularly acute in Europe's richest and most diverse natural areas,[10] more than three-quarters
of which are under threat.
Table 1: Principal health and ecosystem impacts of air pollution in 2010 
 Impacts || Health impacts[11] (premature mortality due to particulate matter and ozone ) || Ecosystem area exceeding eutrophication limits[12] 
 2010 || 406,000 || 62% 
Even if existing legislation is implemented
in full, the EU will suffer very significant negative impacts on public health
and the environment (Table 2). Human health impacts (in terms of
pollution-related premature mortality) will only reduce by slightly more than one-third
by 2025, with most of the reduction happening before 2020. Only minor
improvements are expected for eutrophication, with more than half of the EU
ecosystem area expected still to exceed the threshold for ecosystem damage. External
health and environment costs[13]
associated with air pollution would remain substantial, reducing by around 30% in
2025, and 35% in 2030 to an estimated range of €212-740bn.
Table 2: Expected evolution of the principal air pollution impacts up
to 2030 assuming full implementation of current legislation (reduction in
impacts relative to 2005) 
 Impacts || Health impacts (premature mortality due to particulate matter and ozone ) || Ecosystem area exceeding eutrophication limits 
 2025 || -37% || -21% 
 2030 || -40% || -22% 
3.1.        New strategic air policy objectives for the period up to
2030
The long-term EU objective for air
pollution implies no exceedence of the World Health Organisation guideline
levels for human health[14]
(which may also develop over time) and no exceedence of the critical loads and
levels which mark the limits of ecosystem tolerance.[15] The new strategy
pursues two priorities in parallel: to achieve full compliance with existing
legislation by 2020 at the latest, and to set a pathway for the EU to meet the
long-term objective.
The new air policy objectives for 2030 are
set out in Table 3 below in line with those aims. They will deliver an
additional third of the health improvements and an additional half of the
eutrophication reduction compared with existing legislation. 
Table 3: New air policy objectives for 2030 relative to 2005 
 Impacts || Health impacts (premature mortality due to particulate matter and ozone ) || Ecosystem area exceeding eutrophication limits 
   ||   ||   
 2030 || -52% || 35% 
The benefits associated with the 2030 reductions
greatly outweigh the compliance costs. First, the proposed measures will
translate into people in the EU living longer and healthier lives as a result
of reducing deaths from diaseses caused by air pollution.[16] Second, when the reduced
impacts of ill-health are reflected, the net benefits of the policy are around
€40 billion per year, according to the most conservative estimate. This is
without taking into account the very substantial environmental benefits of reduced
ecosystem damage, which are difficult to monetise. Once productivity gains from
implementation are taken into account,[17]
the net GDP impact of the policy is fully offset, and further direct benefits accrue
from reduced health care costs linked to the reduction in pollution-related
illness,[18]
and from reduced crop losses and infrastructure damage. The Impact Assessment
considered differential impacts across Member States, and concluded that these
are proportionate in the proposed policy.
 
3.2.        Delivering the targets
Delivering the above targets will require a
combination of regulatory and non-regulatory measures. The EU and Member States must work together, and Member States must work with their regions and
cities. Full compliance with existing legislation is possible by 2020 through a
combination of national and EU efforts, with the latter focused on full
delivery of existing source controls. The targets for 2030 will require additional
EU action to reduce emissions at source. The resulting reductions in background
concentrations will in due course enable us to revise ambient concentration
standards towards the WHO guidelines.[19]
The measures outlined below will also focus on delivering benefits for climate
change mitigation by targeting those pollutants that contribute significantly
to climate impacts as well as air pollution (such as the "black carbon"
component of particulate matter) or promoting measures that tackle air
pollutants and climate gases simultaneously (such as ammonia and nitrous
oxide).
3.2.1.     Revising the National
Emission Ceilings Directive
To achieve the new air policy targets for
2030, pollution emissions from each Member State need to be substantially
reduced. The principal instrument for delivering cost-effective reductions is
the National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directive. 
The accompanying proposal for a revised NEC
Directive extends the policy horizon to 2030, with two important interim
milestones: for 2020, transposition of the EU's new international obligations
agreed under the amended Gothenburg Protocol; and for 2025, intermediate reduction
obligations to maintain the trajectory towards 2030. The proposal also
strengthens coherence with the assessment and management of air quality
standards contained in the Ambient Air Quality Directive and with climate
change mitigation, and will contribute to limiting climate change.[20] It also features
enhanced provisions on inventories, projections, and ecosystem monitoring, to
measure implementation more effectively. The reporting timetable has been
aligned with that for greenhouse gases. Further opportunities for synergies
across dataflows will be examined in the forthcoming evaluation of the European
Pollutant Release and Transfer Register.
For 2030 the proposal includes[21] cost-effective
national emission reduction obligations for the four original air pollutants
(SO2, NOx, non-methane VOCs, and NH3), and for two new
ones: primary PM2.5 (fine particulate matter, which has major health impacts)
and CH4 (methane, a key short-lived climate pollutant). In
implementing the PM2.5 reductions, particular emphasis will be placed on
reduction of black carbon (BC), the other major short-lived climate pollutant.
The CH4 and BC measures will provide direct climate co-benefits
whilst also preparing the ground for international action. Flexibility
arrangements are proposed, to allow for uncertainties regarding emission
inventory methods and the future energy mix without undermining the integrity
of the instrument.  
3.2.2.     Tapping the full potential
of existing source controls: Industrial Emissions, Ecodesign, and Non-Road Mobile Machinery 
While the NEC Directive gives Member States
maximum flexibility to identify appropriate measures, many stakeholders
requested support through targeted EU source controls. The possible sectorial contributions
are detailed in the Impact Assessment accompanying this Communication. Existing
and planned EU source measures will continue to make a substantial contribution
to achieving the required reductions, ranging from 57% of the required
reduction for VOCs to 72% for NOx. The main instruments involved are:
·                        
The Ecodesign Directive, tackling emissions from
domestic combustion sources; 
·                        
The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) and its
ongoing programme for developing BAT conclusions, which covers the main
industrial sources, including in particular combustion plants over 50 MW;[22] 
·                        
Revision of the Non-Road Mobile Machinery Directive,
which will generate substantial benefits by extending the capacity range and
machinery types covered, and by aligning controls with the Euro VI heavy-duty
limits.
For ammonia, by contrast, EU source legislation
will deliver only around 25% of the required reduction. Thus the case for
source measures for agriculture is pressing, and the issue is taken up in
section 3.2.4 below.
3.2.3.     Proposal
for a Directive on Medium Combustion Plants[23]
The main gap in EU source legislation (other
than agriculture) concerns emissions from combustion installations of a thermal
capacity between 1 and 50 MW, which are important also to avoid tradeoffs
between air quality and renewables policy (notably related to increased biomass
use). The proposed Directive on the limitation of emissions of certain
pollutants into air from medium combustion plants (MCP) will provide an effective
instrument to further reduce pollution of NOx, SO2 and PM through appropriate
limit values for new and existing installations, coupled with a simple
registration scheme. This delivers the highest benefit-to-cost ratio with low
administrative costs. The Directive will help deliver a significant part of
member States' emission reduction obligations.
3.2.4.     Measures
to abate ammonia emissions from agriculture
To achieve the new air policy targets for
2030, the proposed NEC Directive requires ammonia reductions of 27%. The
Directive provides a set of source measures to be taken into account by Member
States when developing national programmes. Many of these are cost-effective
even on rather small farms. Member States may also provide support by earmarking
appropriate resources under the Rural Development Funds. Options for further
source controls at EU level will be examined, including a general requirement
for a nutrient balance in the application of fertiliser, specific controls on
manure management, and labelling and other provisions for inorganic fertilisers
(in the context of the ongoing review of the Fertilisers Regulation). Many of these measures will also help reduce emissions
of nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas regulated under the Kyoto Protocol.[24]
3.2.5.     Controlling emissions from
shipping
The 2012 revision of the Directive on the
Sulphur Content of Liquid Fuels[25]
ensures that the most cost-effective measures to reduce sulphur emissions from
shipping in the EU are already on the way, with the SECA standard of 0.1%
sulphur content in the Baltic and North Sea from 2015, and the global standard
of maximum 0.5% sulphur in all EU waters from 2020.
However, previous analysis shows that
emissions from shipping will continue to impact air quality on land,[26] and that reductions
from the sector could be cost-effective. Considering the international
character of shipping and Europe's dependence on it, preference must always be
given to policy development at the international level (IMO), such as
designation of NOx Emission Control Areas and enforcement of NOx emission
standards already agreed by the IMO. The proposal for a revised NEC Directive
aims to incentivise reductions from shipping, by allowing them to be offset
against the reduction obligations for land-based sources for 2025 and 2030.[27]
3.2.6.     Non-regulatory measures
As part of the review, the Commission and
the European Environment Agency jointly conducted an air implementation pilot
project[28]
to assess the practical experience of twelve European cities with the current
policy framework. The policy's overall adequacy was confirmed, but a number of
areas for improvement were identified, including the need for better
co-ordination and capacity-building on assessment and management. A range of
non-regulatory measures are presented to support policy implementation, targeting
in particular the urban, agriculture and international dimensions while
promoting closer links between policy-makers and the research and innovation community.
The urban dimension was considered in section 2.2.3 above; the others are taken
up below.
3.2.6.1.  Active
engagement with the farming sector
The contribution that agriculture can make
to improved air quality is clear, and a number of work strands are coming
together: the revised ammonia ceilings under the NECD, the UNECE Ammonia Guidance Document,[29] the increasing focus in the Common Agricultural Policy on
environmental protection, and the co-benefits of air pollution control for climate,
water and soil. To fuse these strands into a critical mass and promote active
engagement with the farming community, the Commission's agriculture and environment
services will jointly establish an agriculture platform as part of the European
Clean Air Forum (see section 5.1 below).
3.2.6.2.  Mobilising
international action
EU ratification of the 2012 amendment to
the Gothenburg Protocol is important to stimulate wider ratification by non-EU
parties, to promote the green economy in third countries and ultimately to reduce
their impact on EU air quality. A proposal for ratification therefore
accompanies this Strategy. The Commission will also continue to engage with Eastern
Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (EECCA) states to implement the Gothenburg
Protocol, inter alia by providing financial assistance where appropriate
through EU development co-operation assistance. The new targets for 2030 will
also set the agenda for a future revision of the Gothenburg Protocol, which
should aim at coherent policy approaches to further reduce air pollution within
the UNECE region, but also engagement with large emitters outside, particularly
in Asia.
3.2.6.3.  Promoting
research and innovation
The review also delivered a clear agenda
for national and EU research in support of better air quality management in the
EU. The EU's research and innovation programme for 2014 to 2020, Horizon 2020, aims
at facilitating the societal transformation to a green economy, so reducing the
negative effects on health and the environment due to air pollution in Europe. It will foster integrated approaches to tackle both air pollution and climate
change so as to find long-term, sustainable solutions in the EU. Advanced and
innovative tools and strategies to improve air quality will be developed,
taking account of specific local circumstances. Technological developments in
the area of transport will include new engines with low real-driving emissions,
and reduction of non-exhaust emissions. In addition there is a continued need
to improve the integration of knowledge for policy application at various
policy levels. FP7 research currently supports the implementation of EU air
policy in areas such as integrated assessment tools, short lived climate
forces, socio-economic aspects and effects on ecosystems. In addition to
pursuing these measures, the Commission will publish and regularly update the
R&I priorities for improving air quality.
4.           Growth
and Competitiveness
The new air policy will provide a stimulus
to the economy through enhanced labour productivity and markets for
environmental techology and services which is of the order of the pollution
control costs.  Both small and large engineering companies that thrive in the
clean technology sector are some of Europe's most advanced and innovative firms. 
The additional stimulus plus the enhanced focus of Horizon 2020 will ensure
that the drive towards innovation continues.  The policy will increase productivity
in the region of 100 000 full time equivalents, of which around 40 000 will be
new jobs created.
The market for this technology is
increasingly international.  Our main trading partners in the world's advanced
economies already have more stringent standards than the EU.  To sell into
those markets we need domestic technology drivers.  The OECD's Environment
Outlook 2050 report also shows an increasing focus on air pollution in emerging
economies. This will generate a further demand for clean air solutions globally
with increased market opportunities for European firms. China has recently
announced investment of 0,4% of GDP per year over the next five years on air
pollution control in Beijing alone[30] – an order of magnitude larger than the implementation costs of
this package for the entire EU. European business will be well-placed to
benefit from this investment.
5.           Monitoring, Evaluation,
and review 
5.1.        The
European Clean Air Forum
The Commission will set up a Clean Air
Forum to facilitate the coordinated implementation of this Strategy and bring
together all relevant stakeholders every two years. The Regulatory Committee on
air quality and its associated expert groups will continue to be used for
technical improvements to the Directives, and to bring the air quality and
emissions communities closer together.
5.2.        Timing and process
Progress on achievement of the objectives
and implementation of the instruments will be reviewed on a five-yearly basis,
with the first review by 2020. Progress towards the new air policy targets for
2030 will be assessed using the indicators in which they are expressed. Reductions
in real-world emissions from light-duty diesels and progress in compliance with
the Ambient Air Quality Standards will be tracked closely through the existing
reporting mechanisms. The analysis that underpins the impact assessment will be
updated every two years, and progress reviews will be presented to the Clean
Air Forum.
The first review will assess the scope for
further action on ambient air quality standards, considering also the appropriate
balance between air quality limit values that apply everywhere, and alternative
concepts that focus on areas with particularly high population exposure.
6.           Conclusion 
Europe's ambitious long-term
goal on air quality can only be achieved in steps. The reductions of the previous
(2005) Strategy will be broadly delivered by 2020, through a combination of Member State and EU action. This will deliver a major reduction in the negative impacts of
pollution on people's health and on the environment, but substantial problems
will remain. The new Strategy shows that further steps towards the EU's long-term
objective are possible, delivering health benefits of €45 billion and large
environmental benefits. This will pave the way for EU ambient air quality
standards to progress towards the WHO guideline concentrations.
A strong air policy will answer citizens'
aspirations for their health and wellbeing, but also has direct economic
benefits. Improvements in productivity and reduced health-care costs fully
compensate the compliance costs, and the policy is expected to deliver a net
increase in employment. Opportunities will be opened up in the rapidly
expanding global markets for abatement technology and services. The EU can gain
a competitive advantage and exploit opportunities by focusing research and
development on resource-efficient and less polluting technologies that other
countries will eventually need to adopt.
[1]               The OECD Environment Outlook
2050 available at
http://www.oecd.org/document/11/0,3746,en_2649_37465_49036555_1_1_1_37465,00.html. It estimates that number of premature deaths from exposure to
particulate air pollutants leading to respiratory failure could double from
current levels to 3.6 million every year globally, with most occurring in China and India. Because of their ageing and urbanised populations, OECD countries are likely to
have one of the highest rate of premature death from ground-level ozone in
2050, second only to India.
[2]               COM(2005)446 final.
[3]               Decision 1600/2002/EC, ' achieving levels of air
quality that do not give rise to significant negative impacts on and risks to
human health and the environment'.
[4]               Directive 2001/81/EC
[5]               I.e. implementation of the
Euro 6 vehicle controls under Regulation (EC) 715/2007 so as to ensure that
real world emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from light-duty diesel vehicles
are close to the limit values in the legislation.
[6]               COM(2012) 636 final, Brussels, 8.11.2012
[7]               Investigation and repression
of some of the possible causes of these deviations (poor maintenance, cycle
beating at certification, aftermarket defeat devices that eliminate or bypass
pollution reduction equipment) should also be enforced, as this would allow to
reduce emissions from high emitters without waiting for a new generation of
vehicles to enter into service.
[8]               The emission reductions are due to EU legislation on
sulphur emissions from large combustion plants (LCPs), and to the low sulphur
road transport fuel requirements that also enabled the use of enhanced
after-treatment devices from Euro 4 onwards.
[9]               See Eurobarometer report 'Attitudes of Europeans to
air Quality', http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_360_en.pdf,
based on interviews with over 25 000 EU citizens.
[10]             Notably in the " Natura 2000" network of
protected sites.
[11]             See report TSAP Baseline: Health and Environmental
Impacts http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/tsap_impacts.pdf
for calculation methodology.
[12]             Percentage of EU ecosystem area exceeding critical
loads for eutrophication.
[13]             This is an estimate of all costs due to air pollution,
i.e. not only the direct costs to the economy (of lost productivity, health
care, lower crop yields etc,) but also the monetized valuation of ill health on
the individual. The estimate is mainly health-based because there are
methodological shortcomings with valuing ecosystem impacts in monetary terms.
[14]             Strictly speaking, there is no known safe level of
exposure for some pollutants such as particulate matter, but WHO guidelines are
set at low risk levels and regularly revised.
[15]             Critical loads and levels, i.e. the maximum levels the
ecosystem can tolerate without degrading.
[16]             The proposed measures are estimated to lead to an
additional 500,000 life years gained each year.
[17]             An additional increase of 15 million working days per
year though reductions in ill health due to air pollution.
[18]             The proposed measures are estimated to lead to lead to EUR 650m in reduced health care costs per year.
[19]             The Ambient Air Quality Directives were the legislative
focus for the 2005 TSAP, but the priority for those now is to achieve full
compliance as soon as possible.
[20]             The proposal maintains the requirement for national
pollution control programmes but adapted so as to maximise synergies with the
ambient air quality directives and climate policies. 
[21]             Action on Short Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCPs) was
specifically examined. While a separate ceiling for black carbon (BC) is not
currently appropriate, the EU and Member States are to prioritise measures with
an impact on BC in meeting their PM2.5 reduction obligations. The new methane
ceiling will exploit the substantial potential for low- or zero-cost reduction,
thus complementing the VOC and NOx reductions required to reduce the
concentrations of ozone both in the EU and internationally. These actions are
aimed also at promoting international action on SLCF to reduce hemispheric air
pollution.
[22]             There is a timetable in place to adopt all BAT
conclusions by 2020, but Member States will play a key role in determining the
level of BAT, and thus the reduction delivered by the IED.
[23]             The air quality benefits of the Renewables Directive
and the Energy Efficiency Directive are integrated into the baseline. 
[24]             UNEP has estimated that, globally, N2O emissions
equivalent to 0.8 gigatonnes of CO2 could be avoided every year by 2020,
amounting to 8% of the ‘emissions
gap’ between reduction pledges made by countries and the action needed to
keep global temperature rise below 2°C.
[25]             Directive 2012/33/EU.
[26]             In the EU, in 2005 NOx and
SO2 emissions from international shipping were equivalent to about
25% and 21% of the land-based emissions. While NOx emissions from
land sources are expected by 2030 to be 65% lower, on business as usual
shipping emissions would reduce only 2%.
[27]             This Communication and the accompanying Impact
Assessment fulfil in substance the request of Article 7(2) of Directive
1999/32/EC.
[28]             http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-implementation-pilot-2013
[29]             Decision 2012/11, ECE/EB/AIR/113/Add. 1, adopted by the
Parties to the LRTAP Convention at the 31st session of the Executive
Body of the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (11-13
December 2012).
[30]             http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-09/24/c_132746706.htm.