COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Analysis by the Commission services of the budgetary situation in Croatia
Date: 2013-12-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Croatia, budget deficit, budgetary equilibrium, gross domestic product, public debt, tax reform













EUR-Lex - 52013SC0523 - EN











|



52013SC0523

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Analysis by the Commission services of the budgetary situation in Croatia /* SWD/2013/0523 final */









1.           Introduction

Croatia
joined the European Union on 1 July 2013, following the completion of the
ratification process of the Accession Treaty and is a subject to the procedures
of the surveillance of the excessive deficits as laid down in Article
126 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). 
According to the 2013 budget revision and the draft 2014 budget[1] adopted by the government and sent to Parliament on 14 November
2013,
the Croatian authorities plan a general government deficit of 5.5% of GDP for
2013, after 5% in 2012, and expect the ratio to remain unchanged in 2014 and to
decrease only gradually in 2015 and 2016. The
Commission 2013 Autumn forecast, released on 5 November, projects the general
government deficit significantly above the 3% of GDP reference value in the
Treaty already in 2013, rising above 6% of GDP in the period 2014-2015 in the
absence of countervailing measures.
The
report prepared by the European Commission under Article 126(3) of the Treaty
on the Functioning of the European Union ('the Treaty'), which represents the
first step in the Excessive Deficit Procedure (EDP), analysed the reasons for
the breach of the deficit and debt criteria of the Treaty, with due regard to
the economic background and all other relevant factors. According to the
report, both the deficit and debt criteria of the Treaty are not fulfilled. 
2.           Recent
macro-economic developments 
Croatia is
experiencing a protracted economic downturn in the aftermath of the global
financial crisis. The pre-crisis boom fuelled by a high inflow of foreign
investment was followed by a prolonged recessionary period, amplified by
structural impediments to growth such as insufficient capital flows in the
tradable sector in the pre-crisis years, gradually eroding price and cost
competitiveness, an unfavourable business environment, a relatively rigid
labour market. The post-crisis weakness in some of the country's main trading
partners (particularly Italy and Slovenia) accentuated the slump in economic
activity. 
Although not yet
a Member State of the EU at the time, Croatia participated in the 2013 European
Semester on an informal basis. As such, Croatia submitted an "Economic
Programme" in April 2013. The document was assessed by Commission services
but the Council did not adopt country specific recommendations. However, the
Commission Staff Working Document identified certain areas in which Croatia
would benefit from reforms notably as regards labour market rigidities, the
business environment and the quality of public administration in order to
ensure an outcome most conducive to economic prosperity in the medium to long
run.
In
2013, Croatia continued to struggle with negative economic developments. In the
first half of 2013, real GDP fell by 1.1%, echoing developments of both foreign
and domestic demand. While domestic demand was under pressure from high
unemployment and on-going private sector deleveraging, external trade was
negatively affected by the short-term impact of changes in the trade regime associated
with EU accession and the termination of CEFTA membership. Going forward, some
monthly indicators, notably on industrial production and construction, suggest
that economic activity will remain subdued towards the end of the year.
Overall, the economy is expected to stagnate in the second half of 2013.
Weak
economic activity continues to negatively impact the labour market. The
survey-based unemployment rate is projected to increase to 16.9% in 2013 from
15.9% in 2012. Before the country entered into recession in 2009, this rate had
been slightly above 8%. Depressed domestic demand dampens the inflationary
impact stemming from tax hikes and increases in administrative prices. On the
whole, the average CPI inflation is projected to moderate to 2.6% in 2013 from
3.4% in 2012, and to slow down further in 2014.
Table 1:
Comparison of macroeconomic developments and forecasts
The
recession has also contributed to a significant adjustment of the country’s
current account position, which swung into a slight surplus in 2012 following
high deficits (in the order of 7% to 9% of GDP) during the pre-crisis years.
The current account adjustment mainly came from the import side, reflecting
depressed household and investment demand. At the same time, exports remained constrained
by the unfavourable external environment, compounded by the generally low
competitiveness of domestic products as well as a crisis induced readjustment
of some key export sectors (in particular the shipyard industry). Foreign
direct investment (FDI) declined sharply in recent years, averaging 2.5% of GDP
in 2011-2012, down from some 8% of GDP in the pre-crisis period. Despite bank
and corporate deleveraging in the last two years, the country’s gross external
debt ratio remains elevated at above 100% of GDP reflecting weak economic
activity and significant borrowing by the state.
According to the
Commission 2013 Autumn forecast, economic growth in Croatia will continue to be
weak in 2014 and 2015, with domestic demand still exerting a drag on growth and
net exports no longer expected to exert a significant counterbalance. The
labour market situation is expected to continue to deteriorate in 2014 and this
in turn would hold back private consumption. However, investment growth is
projected to resume under the combined effect of the impulse of the expected
improvement in the international environment, the perspectives opened by EU
accession and access to EU cohesion and structural funds, and new legislation
adopted to improve the investment climate. As a result, real GDP growth is
projected to reach 0.5% in 2014 and to pick up to 1.2% in 2015, supported by a
gradual recovery in domestic demand. However, the labour market situation is
forecast to improve only marginally, hindered by existing structural weaknesses.
Chiefly reflecting weak domestic demand, inflation is forecast to moderate,
after having spiked in 2012 largely due to aligning of the tax system with the
acquis communautaire. The subdued near-term growth outlook
will weigh
on public finances, as regards constraining fiscal revenue and putting
pressure on expenditures.
3.           Budgetary
outlook
Croatia’s
budgetary situation deteriorated rapidly in the course of 2013, reflecting a
worse outturn relative to the initial budgetary plan and unexpected revenue
shortfalls. The general government deficit on a cash basis reached 4.2% of GDP
in the first nine months of the year. With EU accession, tax revenues were
adversely affected by the change in the system of VAT collection, resulting in
a one-off delay in payments. The shortfall in corporate income tax receipts
following the introduction of a tax break on reinvested profits was
significantly larger than originally estimated by the authorities. Total
expenditures increased by 4.1% year-on-year chiefly due to higher payments for
social benefits (including a 1%-of-GDP clearance of arrears of the state health
insurance fund) and rapidly growing interest expenditures. These were partly
offset by a 3% cut in the public sector wage bill. 
In view of the
abovementioned negative trends in revenues and higher-than-planned
expenditures, on 14 November 2013 the government revised the general government
deficit projection for 2013 to 5.5% of GDP. This is a marked increase compared
to the September EDP notification[2], but
only marginally above the Commission 2013 Autumn forecast of 5.4% of GDP
published on 5 November. According to the draft 2014 budget, the planned
general government deficit for 2014 is expected to remain unchanged in 2014, at
5.5% of GDP. The draft 2014 budget foresees a reduction in the headline general
government deficit in 2015 and 2016 to 4.6% and 3.5% of GDP, respectively, but
without providing substantive details about the measures underpinning this
projected decrease. 
It is difficult
to assess planned deficit trends for 2014-2016 since the government projections
are not harmonised in terms of coverage nor in terms of the methodology applied
– in particular with respect to conformity to ESA 95. As regards the draft 2014
budgetary
projections only those for the central government can be compared to previous
ones: for 2014 the amended budget expects the growth of expenditures of the
central government to be around 1.1% of GDP higher compared to 2013 budget,
mostly due to higher interest expenditures and contributions to the EU budget.
According to the government projections, revenues are also estimated to be
higher, by around 0.8% of GDP, mostly due to higher growth in grants and social
contributions. 
According to the
Commission 2013 Autumn forecast, the general government deficit is projected to
remain above the 3% of GDP reference value in the period 2013-2015, and the
structural balance is projected to continue deteriorating throughout the
forecast period, from 4.1% of GDP in 2013 to 5.9% of GDP in 2015. These
developments result mainly from increases on the expenditure side such as
interest outlays combined with revenue shortfalls. The Commission
2013 Autumn forecast did not include the fiscal consolidation programme
announced in September 2013 together with the Economic and Fiscal Policy
Guidelines, as the information on measures underpinning this announced
consolidation package was very limited. 
Measures
presented in the second 2013 budget revision and draft 2014 budget adopted by
the government on 14 November 2013 and sent to the Parliament do not seem to
have a substantial impact in 2014. For 2015 and 2016 the authorities plan some
consolidation on the expenditure side on the back of announced reforms which,
however, at this stage remain insufficiently quantified in terms of actual
fiscal impact. 
As regards
general government debt, the persistently high budget deficits, coupled with
weak economic activity, resulted in its rapid expansion. According to the
notified fiscal data, from 2009 to 2012 the general government gross debt ratio
in Croatia increased by almost 20 percentage points – from 36.6% in 2009 to
55.5% in 2012. Moreover, the general government debt ratio reached 59.5% at the
end of the second quarter of 2013. In the projections of the draft 2014 budget,
the planned general government debt ratio at the end of 2014 would reach 62%
and increase further in 2015 and 2016 to 64.1% and 64.7%. In the Commission
2013 Autumn forecast the general government debt ratio is expected to increase
to 59.6% in 2013, and, on unchanged policies, to rise above the 60% reference
value in 2014 and continuing to increase further. 
Table 2:
Forecast of key macroeconomic and budgetary variables under the baseline
scenario
The scenario
reported in Table 2 has been built on the Commission 2013 Autumn forecast,
updated to encompass new information that became available after its
publication. In particular, the new baseline reflects the
effect of those measures in the 2013 budget revision and the draft 2014 budget that
could be credibly estimated. Overall, the changes compared to the projections
in the Autumn 2013 forecast are marginal for the headline deficit, while the
general government debt ratio rises above the 60% threshold already in 2013
because of a new USD-denominated bond issuance in November 2013. In many Member
States undergoing a deep recession estimates of the structural balance are
surrounded by substantial uncertainty; however the update of the Commission
2013 Autumn forecast only implied a marginal adjustment to the estimated
structural balance. In order to assess compliance with the debt
reduction benchmark as a necessary condition for abrogation, the baseline
scenario has been extended to 2018 relying on standard assumptions about the
closure of the output gap and the sensitivity of the budget to the cycle, in
line with the commonly agreed methodology.[3] The
relatively muted expected rebound in the economic activity in the outer years
of the projection stems from the constraints of structural impediments and the
deleveraging dynamics that hold back a faster recovery.
4.           Proposed
adjustment path
According
to Regulation 1467/97, the correction of the excessive deficit should be
completed in the year following its identification, unless there are special
circumstances. Longer deadlines could be set, in particular in the case of
excessive deficit procedures based on the debt criterion, when the government
deficit requested to comply with the debt criterion is significantly lower than
3% of GDP. In order to correct the excessive deficit by the 2015 deadline
consistent with this approach and ensure the joint compliance with the debt
reduction benchmark, the required structural effort would amount to at least
1.3% of GDP both in 2014 and 2015. This would result in a significant output
loss and aggravate an already protracted and deep recession. A longer
adjustment path would enable Croatia to pursue the structural reforms in
parallel with fiscal consolidation, addressing weak growth fundamentals. 
The
scenario on which the proposed adjustment path that should lead to a correction
of the excessive deficit by 2016 (the EDP scenario) is based on the revised
Commission 2013 Autumn forecast (the baseline scenario in Table 2).[4] The
EDP scenario proposed implies the correction of the excessive deficit with
respect to both the deficit and debt criteria by 2016. Specifically, with
regard to general government debt, the proposed adjustment path ensures
compliance with the forward-looking debt benchmark at the end of the EDP period,
i.e. in 2016. 
Table 3:
Forecast of key macroeconomic and budgetary variables under the EDP scenario
The
EDP scenario has been calibrated to ensure that the required fiscal effort in
terms of the improvement in the structural balance is consistent with joint
compliance with the deficit criterion and the debt criterion, by ensuring a
sufficiently diminishing debt-to-GDP ratio. For 2014 and 2015 the scenario
implies headline deficit targets of 4.6% and 3.5% of GDP and for 2016 a target
of 2.7% of GDP in order to ensure the respect of the debt benchmark. The
attainment of these targets is consistent with an improvement in the structural
budget balance of 0.5 pp. of GDP in 2014, 0.9 pp. of GDP in 2015 and 0.7 pp. in
2016. To
reach these structural targets Croatia would need to adopt consolidation
measures of 2.3% of GDP in 2014 and 1.0% of GDP in 2015 and in 2016. The
required amount of consolidation measures in 2014 reflects the deterioration in
the structural balance in the baseline scenario compared to 2013 (1.7 pp of
GDP). These targets for the annual improvement in the structural budget balance
in the EDP scenario take into account the need to compensate for the
negative second-round effects of fiscal consolidation on public finances,
through its impact on economic activity. The debt-to-GDP
ratio in this scenario would peak at close to 67% in 2016 before decreasing to
close to 65% by 2018.
5.           Summary
According to the
Commission 2013 Autumn forecast, the general government deficit is projected to
remain above the 3% of GDP reference value in the period 2013-2015, on
unchanged policies. The November revision of the 2013 budget
led to an increase in the planned general government deficit for 2013 to 5.5%
of GDP, from 3.6% of GDP in the autumn fiscal notification. The draft 2014
budget adopted
by the government on 14 November 2013 and sent to the Parliament defines
deficit targets for 2014, 2015 and 2016 that are above the Treaty reference
value. 
In the
Commission 2013 Autumn forecast, the general government debt ratio is expected
to increase to 59.6% of GDP in 2013, and, on unchanged policies, to rise above
60% in 2014 and continue to increase further. According to the data notified in
autumn 2013, the general government debt ratio in Croatia increased from 36.6%
in 2009 to 55.5% in 2012. In the projections of the draft 2014 budget, the
planned general government debt ratio at the end of 2014 would reach 62% and
increase further in 2015 and 2016 to 64.1% and 64.7%. 
New
figures presented in the budget revision and draft budget do not entail a
substantive modification of the Commission 2013 Autumn forecast. Estimated
effects of these measures have been nevertheless incorporated in the adjusted
Commission forecast; the revised projections constitute the new baseline
scenario.
Additional information on debt developments has also been incorporated,
updating the projections in the Commission 2013 Autumn forecast. A new
USD-denominated bond issue in November will bring the forecast general
government debt ratio above the 60%  threshold already in 2013.
[1]               The draft 2014 budget is not prepared according to the ESA 95 methodology. Deficit estimates for
2009-2012 based on ESA95 are between 1.5 and 3.3 percentage points higher than
those reported according to the national methodology. Differences stem mainly
from the fact that general government deficit figures according to ESA95
include certain guarantees payments, debt assumptions and the repayment of the
debt to pensioners.
[2]               According to Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2009,
Member States have to report to the Commission, twice a year, their planned and
actual government deficit and debt levels. In the notification of autumn 2013,
the government planned a general government deficit of 3.6% of GDP in 2013. The
most recent notification of Croatia can be found at:      
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/government_finance_statistics/excessive_deficit/edp_notification_tables.

[3]               As the impact of the measures is very limited, the real
side of the baseline scenario remains essentially unchanged compared to the
Autumn 2013 forecast. 
[4]               As revisions to the determinants of potential growth
are smoothed over for the full period covered by the series, the rate of
potential growth in the EDP scenario differs somewhat from the baseline even in
some years before 2014.