Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the existence of an excessive deficit in Croatia
Date: 2013-12-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Croatia, budget deficit, budgetary equilibrium, gross domestic product, public debt













EUR-Lex - 52013PC0903 - EN











|



52013PC0903

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the existence of an excessive deficit in Croatia /* COM/2013/0903 final - 2013/0437 (NLE) */









2013/0437 (NLE)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL DECISION
on the existence of an excessive deficit
in Croatia
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article
126(6) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal
from the Commission,
Having regard to the
observations made by Croatia,
Whereas:
(1)       According to Article 126
of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) Member States
shall avoid excessive government deficits.
(2)       The Stability and Growth
Pact (SGP) is based on the objective of sound government finances as a means of
strengthening the conditions for price stability and for strong sustainable growth
conducive to employment creation.
(3)       The excessive deficit
procedure (EDP) under Article 126 TFEU, as clarified by Council Regulation (EC)
No 1467/97 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive
deficit procedure[1]
(which is part of the SGP), provides for a decision on the existence of an
excessive deficit. The Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to
the Treaty sets out further provisions relating to the implementation of the
EDP. Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2009[2]
lays down detailed rules and definitions for the application of the provision
of the said Protocol.
(4)       According to Article
126(5) TFEU, if the Commission considers that an excessive deficit in a Member
State exists or may occur, it shall address an opinion to the Member State
concerned and the Council accordingly. Having taken into account its report in
accordance with Article 126(3) TFEU and having regard to the opinion of the
Economic and Financial Committee in accordance with Article 126(4) TFEU, the
Commission concluded that an excessive deficit exists in Croatia. The Commission
therefore addressed such an opinion to Croatia and informed the Council on 10
December 2013[3].
(5)       Article 126(6) TFEU states
that the Council should consider any observations which the Member State
concerned may wish to make before deciding, after an overall assessment,
whether an excessive deficit exists. In the case of Croatia, this overall assessment
leads to the following conclusions.
(6)       According to the revision of the 2013 budget and the draft 2014
budget[4]
adopted by the government and sent to Parliament on 14 November 2013, the Croatian
authorities plan a general government deficit of 5.5% of GDP for 2013, after 5%
of GDP in 2012, and expect the ratio to remain unchanged in 2014 and to
decrease only gradually in 2015 and 2016. The Commission 2013 Autumn forecast,
released on 5 November, projects the general government deficit significantly
above the 3% of GDP reference value in the Treaty already in 2013, rising to
above 6% of GDP in the period 2013-2015 in the absence of countervailing measures.
As indicated in the Commission report under Article 126(3) TFEU, the planned
and forecast deficits are above and not close to the Treaty reference value.
The excess over the reference value can be considered as exceptional within the
meaning of the SGP. In particular, it results in part from a severe economic
downturn in the sense of the SGP. Economic activity is estimated to have
contracted by almost 12% since the peak in 2008. Real GDP is projected to
contract further in 2013, with a slight recovery expected only in 2014. Potential
output growth, as estimated by the Commission services according to the
commonly agreed method stagnated in 2009, turned negative in 2010, and has been
negative since then. The calculated output gap, which has been negative since
2009, is expected to narrow gradually over the forecast period yet remain
negative through 2015, confirming the depth and the extension of the recession.
However, the planned excess over the reference value cannot be considered
temporary in the sense of the SGP. According to the projections of the
authorities and the Commission 2013 Autumn forecast the general governement deficit
will remain significantly above the reference value also in 2014 and 2015. The requirement
concerning the deficit criterion of the Treaty is therefore not fulfilled.
(7)       In the draft 2014 budget,
the government foresees an increase in the debt-to-GDP ratio from 58.1% in 2013
to 62% in 2014 and further to 64.1% in 2015 and 64.7% in 2016. These figures
are slightly higher than those in the September 2013 Economic and Fiscal Policy
Guidelines, where the government forecast the debt ratio to reach 56.6% in
2013, and 60.6%. 63.4% and 65.3% in 2014, 2015 and 2016 respectively. In the
Commission Autumn 2013 forecast, the projection for the general government debt
ratio is 59.7% for 2013. On unchanged policies, the debt ratio is expected to
rise above 60% in 2014, thus exceeding the 60% of GDP Treaty reference value. According
to currently available information a USD-denominated bond issuance in November
2013 would bring the general government debt ratio above the 60% threshold
already by the end in 2013. Article 2(1a) of Regulation 1467/97 stipulates that
the requirement under the debt criterion shall also be considered to be fulfilled
if the budgetary forecasts of the Commission indicate that the required
reduction in the differential with respect to the reference value will occur
over the three-year period encompassing the two years following the final year
for which the data is available. The forecasts of the authorities and of the Commission
show that the debt ratio is on an upward trend on account of continuing high
deficits and weak economic activity and it is expected to remain so over the
forecast horizon. Hence the debt benchmark and thus the Treaty requirement
concerning the debt criterion are not fulfilled.
(8)       In line with the
provisions in the Treaty, the Commission also analysed “relevant factors” in
its report according to Article 126(3) TFEU. As specified in Article 2.4 of
Regulation (EC) No 1467/97, for countries with a debt ratio above the reference
value, these factors can only be taken into account in the steps leading to the
decision on the compliance with the deficit criterion if the general government
deficit remains close to the reference value and if its excess over the
reference value is temporary, which is not the case for Croatia. The relevant
factors, in particular the deep and protracted recession, against the backdrop
of unsupportive external conditions, have been taken into account in the
assessment of compliance with the debt criterion. They do not modify the
conclusion that the debt criterion in the Treaty is not fulfilled,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
From an overall
assessment it follows that an excessive deficit exists in Croatia.
Article 2
This Decision is
addressed to the Republic of Croatia.
Done at Brussels,
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
[1]               OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 6.
[2]               OJ L 145, 10.6.2009, p. 1-9.
[3]               All EDP-related documents for
Croatia can be found at the following website:     
http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/sgp/deficit/countries/croatia_en.htm.
[4]               The draft budget is not prepared according to the ESA 95 methodology. Deficit estimates for
2009-2012 based on ESA95 are between 1.5 and 3.3 percentage points higher than
those reported according to the national methodology. Differences stem mainly
from the fact that deficit figures according to ESA95 include certain
guarantees payments, debt assumptions and the repayment of the debt to
pensioners.