do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-12-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Germany, State aid, aid for restructuring, aid to undertakings, company in difficulties, control of State aid








C_2013357EN.01000201.xml










6.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 357/2





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 357/02







Date of adoption of the decision


22.10.2013




Reference number of State Aid


SA.37371 (13/N)




Member State


Germany




Region


—


Mixed




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Aid for external consultants for SMEs in difficulties (Beratungsleistungen zur Herstellung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit von KMU)




Legal basis


Richtlinie Turn Around Beratung




Type of measure


Scheme


—




Objective


Restructuring firms in difficulty




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget








 


Overall budget: EUR 37 000 000










 


Annual budget: EUR 7 000 000








Intensity


75 %




Duration (period)


1.1.2014-31.12.2014




Economic sectors


All economic sectors eligible to receive aid




Name and address of the granting authority







KfW Bankengruppe




Charlottenstraße 33-33a




10117 Berlin




DEUTSCHLAND








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm
Case C-649/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Versailles (France) lodged on 6 December 2013 — Works Council of Nortel Networks SA and Others v Me Rogeau, Liquidator of Nortel Networks SA, Alan Robert Bloom and Others
Date: 2013-12-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: financial solvency, jurisdiction, seizure of goods








C_2014039EN.01001402.xml










8.2.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/14





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce de Versailles (France) lodged on 6 December 2013 — Works Council of Nortel Networks SA and Others v Me Rogeau, Liquidator of Nortel Networks SA, Alan Robert Bloom and Others
(Case C-649/13)
2014/C 39/23
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de commerce de Versailles

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Works Council of Nortel Networks SA and Others

Defendants: Me Rogeau, Liquidator of Nortel Networks SA, Alan Robert Bloom and Others

Question referred

Do the courts of the State in which secondary proceedings have been opened have exclusive jurisdiction over or concurrent jurisdiction with the courts of the State in which the main proceedings have been opened, to rule on the determination of the debtor’s assets falling with the scope of the effects of the secondary proceedings in accordance with Articles 2(g), 3(2) and 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings (1) and, in the event that there is exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction, is the applicable law that of the main proceedings or of the secondary proceedings?


(1)  OJ 2000 L 160, p. 1.
Communication from the Commission concerning the prolongation of the application of the Framework on State aid to shipbuilding
Date: 2013-12-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, export aid, innovation, shipbuilding








C_2013357EN.01000101.xml










6.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 357/1





Communication from the Commission concerning the prolongation of the application of the Framework on State aid to shipbuilding
2013/C 357/01
The Framework on State aid to shipbuilding (1) (‘the Framework’) applies until 31 December 2013.
According to paragraph 10 of the Framework, after that date the Commission envisages including the provisions on innovation aid in the Community framework for State aid for research and development and innovation and integrating regional aid for shipbuilding into the Guidelines on regional aid.
On 19 June 2013, the Commission adopted new Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 (2). These Guidelines will cover regional aid to shipbuilding following the expiry of the Framework (3). However, these Guidelines will only become applicable as from 1 July 2014 (4).
The Commission is also currently reviewing the Framework for State aid for research and development and innovation. The date of adoption of the new Framework for State aid for research and development and innovation is not yet known although it is the intention of the Commission to complete that process by 30 June 2014.
The Commission has therefore decided to continue to apply the current Framework until 30 June 2014.


(1)  OJ C 364, 14.12.2011, p. 9.

(2)  OJ C 209, 23.7.2013, p. 1.

(3)  See footnote 9 of the Guidelines.

(4)  See points 186-191 of the Guidelines.
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 6 December 2013 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39685(2) Fentanyl — Rapporteur: Latvia/UK
Date: 2013-12-06
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Subjects: Latvia, United Kingdom, dominant position, fine, infringement of EU law, intra-EU trade, pharmaceutical industry, trade agreement








C_2015142EN.01001901.xml










29.4.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 142/19





Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 6 December 2013 regarding a draft decision relating to Case AT.39685(2) Fentanyl
Rapporteur: Latvia/UK
(2015/C 142/08)






1.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that fines should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.










2.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fine for Johnson & Johnson/Janssen-Cilag B.V.










3.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the increase for Johnson & Johnson/Janssen-Cilag B.V. to ensure a sufficient deterrent effect.










4.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine for Johnson & Johnson/Janssen-Cilag B.V.










5.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s approach to base the calculation of fine for Novartis AG/Sandoz B.V. on the value transferred.










6.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the increase for Novartis AG/Sandoz B.V. to ensure a sufficient deterrent effect.










7.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine for Novartis AG/Sandoz B.V.










8.


The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.