do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
2014/15/EU: Council Decision of 18 November 2013 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia establishing a framework for the participation of Georgia in European Union crisis management operations
Date: 2013-11-18
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Georgia, agreement (EU), international dispute, settlement of disputes, signature of an agreement








L_2014014EN.01000101.xml










18.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 14/1








            COUNCIL DECISION
         
of 18 November 2013
         
on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia establishing a framework for the participation of Georgia in European Union crisis management operations
(2014/15/EU)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 37 thereof, in conjunction with Article 218(5) and (6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


Conditions regarding the participation of third States in European Union crisis management operations should be laid down in an agreement establishing a framework for such possible future participation, rather than being defined on a case-by-case basis for each operation concerned.












(2)


Following the adoption of a Decision by the Council on 13 November 2012 authorising the opening of negotiations, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy negotiated an agreement between the European Union and Georgia establishing a framework for the participation of Georgia in European Union crisis management operations (‘the Agreement’).












(3)


The Agreement should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The Agreement between the European Union and Georgia establishing a framework for the participation of Georgia in the European Union crisis management operations is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.
The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.


Article 2
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Union.


Article 3
The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 16(1) of the Agreement (1).


Article 4
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 18 November 2013.


For the Council


The President

C. ASHTON
            





(1)  The date of entry into force of the Agreement will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General Secretariat of the Council.
Case C-580/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 18 November 2013 — Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg
Date: 2013-11-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, access to information, banking secrecy, credit institution








C_2014031EN.01000401.xml










1.2.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 31/4





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 18 November 2013 — Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg
(Case C-580/13)
2014/C 31/04
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Coty Germany GmbH

Defendant: Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg

Question referred

Must Article 8(3)(e) of Directive 2004/48/EC (1) be interpreted as precluding a national provision which, in a case such as that in the main proceedings, allows a banking institution to refuse, by invoking banking secrecy, to provide information pursuant to Article 8(1)(c) of that directive concerning the name and address of an account holder?


(1)  Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45).
Case T-597/13: Action brought on 18 November 2013 — Calida v OHIM — Quanzhou Green Garments (dadida)
Date: 2013-11-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014024EN.01003001.xml










25.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/30





Action brought on 18 November 2013 — Calida v OHIM — Quanzhou Green Garments (dadida)
(Case T-597/13)
2014/C 24/54
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Calida Holding AG (Sursee, Switzerland) (represented by: R. Kaase and H. Dirksmeier, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Quanzhou Green Garments Co. Ltd (Quanzhou, China)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 September 2013 given in Case R 1190/2012-4;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: International registration with effect in the European Union No 979 903 for the figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘dadida’ for goods in Class 25

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Relative grounds pursuant to Article 53(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) CTMR

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the request for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.
Case T-162/12: Order of the General Court of 18 November 2013 — Trabelsi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia — Extension of asset-freezing — Annulment of initial asset-freezing measures — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2013-11-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Tunisia, capital movement, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, international sanctions








C_2014015EN.01001601.xml










18.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 15/16





Order of the General Court of 18 November 2013 — Trabelsi v Council
(Case T-162/12) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia - Extension of asset-freezing - Annulment of initial asset-freezing measures - No need to adjudicate)
2014/C 15/22
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Mohamed Trabelsi (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Tekari, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Decision 2012/50/CFSP of 27 January 2012 amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2012 L 27, p. 11), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The Council of the European Union is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.
Council Decision 2014/71/CFSP of 18 November 2013 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Chile establishing a framework for the participation of the Republic of Chile in European Union crisis management operations
Date: 2013-11-18
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Chile, agreement (EU), international dispute, ratification of an agreement, settlement of disputes, signature of an agreement








L_2014040EN.01000101.xml










11.2.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 40/1








            COUNCIL DECISION 2014/71/CFSP
of 18 November 2013
         
on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Chile establishing a framework for the participation of the Republic of Chile in European Union crisis management operations


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 37 thereof, in conjunction with Article 218(5) and (6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


Conditions regarding the participation of third States in European Union crisis management operations should be laid down in an agreement establishing a framework for such possible future participation, rather than being defined on a case-by-case basis for each operation concerned.












(2)


Following the adoption of a Decision by the Council on 26 April 2010 authorising the opening of negotiations, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy negotiated an agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Chile establishing a framework for the participation of the Republic of Chile in European Union crisis management operations (‘the Agreement’).












(3)


The Agreement should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Chile establishing a framework for the participation of the Republic of Chile in the European Union crisis management operations is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.
The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.


Article 2
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Union.


Article 3
The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 16(1) of the Agreement (1).


Article 4
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 18 November 2013.


For the Council


The President

C. ASHTON
            





(1)  The date of entry into force of the Agreement will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General Secretariat of the Council.
Case T-377/10: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2013 — Preparados Alimenticios v OHIM — Rila Feinkost-Importe (Jambo Afrika) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark Jambo Afrika — Earlier Community figurative marks JUMBO, JUMBO CUBE, JUMBO MARINADE, JUMBO NOKKOS, JUMBO ROF, JUMBO CHORBA MOUTON-MUTTON, JUMBO Aroma All purpose seasoning Condiment — Earlier national figurative marks JUMBO — Non-registered earlier word mark JUMBO — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2013-11-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, prepared foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014009EN.01002201.xml










11.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 9/22





Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2013 — Preparados Alimenticios v OHIM — Rila Feinkost-Importe (Jambo Afrika)
(Case T-377/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark Jambo Afrika - Earlier Community figurative marks JUMBO, JUMBO CUBE, JUMBO MARINADE, JUMBO NOKKOS, JUMBO ROF, JUMBO CHORBA MOUTON-MUTTON, JUMBO Aroma All purpose seasoning Condiment - Earlier national figurative marks JUMBO - Non-registered earlier word mark JUMBO - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2014/C 9/34
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Preparados Alimenticios, SA (L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: D. Pellisé Urquiza, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Rila Feinkost-Importe GmbH & Co. KG (Stemwede-Levern, Germany) (represented by: T. Weeg, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 June 2010 (Case No R 1144/2009-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Preparados Alimenticios, SA and Rila Feinkost-Importe GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Preparados Alimenticios, SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.