do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-545/12: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2013 — Mory and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Traditional and express couriers — Decision not to extend the obligation of repayment to the potential purchasers of the beneficiary in composition with creditors — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2013-11-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, State aid, control of State aid, reimbursement of aid








C_2014015EN.01001602.xml










18.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 15/16





Order of the General Court of 11 November 2013 — Mory and Others v Commission
(Case T-545/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Traditional and express couriers - Decision not to extend the obligation of repayment to the potential purchasers of the beneficiary in composition with creditors - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)
2014/C 15/23
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Mory SA (Pantin, France); Mory Team (Pantin); Superga Invest, formerly Compagnie française superga d’investissement dans le service (CFSIS) (Miraumont, France) (represented by: B. Vatiert and F. Loubières, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 2401 final of 4 April 2012, concerning the takeover of assets of the Sernam group as part of its composition with creditors.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


There is no need to adjudicate on the applications of the French Republic and Calberson to intervene.










3.


Mory SA, Mory Team and Superga Invest shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.










4.


The French Republic and Calberson, applicants for leave to intervene, shall bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.
Case T-485/09: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2013 — France v Commission
Date: 2013-11-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, animal disease, food safety, import (EU), import restriction, marketing restriction, milk product








C_2014015EN.01002002.xml










18.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 15/20





Order of the General Court of 11 November 2013 — France v Commission
(Case T-485/09) (1)

2014/C 15/31
Language of the case: French
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 37, 13.2.2010.
Case T-599/13: Action brought on 11 November 2013 — Cosmowell v OHIM — Haw Par (GELENKGOLD)
Date: 2013-11-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014039EN.01002201.xml










8.2.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/22





Action brought on 11 November 2013 — Cosmowell v OHIM — Haw Par (GELENKGOLD)
(Case T-599/13)
2014/C 39/38
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Cosmowell GmbH (Sankt Johann in Tirol) (represented by: J. Sachs, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Haw Par Corp. Ltd (Singapore, Singapore)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 September 2013 in Case R 2013/2012-4;










—


order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred in the appeal procedure.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Community trade mark concerned: figurative mark which includes the picture of a tiger and the word element ‘GELENKGOLD’, for goods in Classes 5, 29 and 30 — Community trade mark application No 9957978

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Haw Par Corp. Ltd

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community figurative marks which include the picture of a tiger, for goods in Class 5

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T-337/13 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 11 November 2013 — CSF v Commission (Interim measures — Public health, safety, consumers and workers protection in order to address the risks resulting from the use of machinery — Measure taken by the Danish authorities prohibiting a type of multi-purpose earthmoving machinery without an appropriate protective structure — Commission decision declaring the measure to be justified — Application for stay of execution — Lack of urgency)
Date: 2013-11-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Denmark, agricultural machinery, consumer protection, protective equipment








C_2014015EN.01001901.xml










18.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 15/19





Order of the President of the General Court of 11 November 2013 — CSF v Commission
(Case T-337/13 R)
(Interim measures - Public health, safety, consumers and workers protection in order to address the risks resulting from the use of machinery - Measure taken by the Danish authorities prohibiting a type of multi-purpose earthmoving machinery without an appropriate protective structure - Commission decision declaring the measure to be justified - Application for stay of execution - Lack of urgency)
2014/C 15/28
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: CSF Srl (Grumolo delle Abbadesse, Italy) (represented by: R. Santoro, S. Armellini and R. Bugaro, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Zavvos, acting as Agent, and by M. Pappalardo, lawyer)

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Commission Decision 2013/173/EU of 8 April 2013 on a measure taken by Denmark under Article 11 of Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council prohibiting a type of multi-purpose earthmoving machinery (OJ 2013 L 101, p. 29).

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Case T-234/08: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2013 — EuroChem MCC v Council
Date: 2013-11-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Russia, anti-dumping duty, chemical fertiliser, import (EU), originating product








C_2014015EN.01002001.xml










18.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 15/20





Order of the General Court of 11 November 2013 — EuroChem MCC v Council
(Case T-234/08) (1)

2014/C 15/30
Language of the case: English
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 209, 15.8.2008.
Case T-592/13: Action brought on 11 November 2013 — Ratioparts-Ersatzteile v OHIM — Norwood Industries (NORTHWOOD professional forest equipment)
Date: 2013-11-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, electronic commerce, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014024EN.01002901.xml










25.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/29





Action brought on 11 November 2013 — Ratioparts-Ersatzteile v OHIM — Norwood Industries (NORTHWOOD professional forest equipment)
(Case T-592/13)
2014/C 24/52
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Ratioparts-Ersatzteile-Vertriebs GmbH (Euskirchen, Germany) (represented by: M. Koch, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Norwood Industries (Kilworthy, Canada)

Form of order sought







—


Amend the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 28 August 2013 (case R 356/2013-2) so as to dismiss in its entirety Opposition B1771461; and










—


Order the opponent to pay the costs of the opposition proceedings and the respondent in the appeal to pay the costs of the appeal.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Ratioparts-Ersatzteile-Vertriebs GmbH

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘NORTHWOOD professional forest equipment’ for goods and services in Classes 8, 9, 20, 25 and 35 — Community trade mark No 9 412 776

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Norwood Industries

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark ‘NORWOOD’ for goods in Class 7

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009
Case F-110/13: Action brought on 11 November 2013 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2013-11-11
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: damages, indemnification, teaching curriculum








C_2014024EN.01004103.xml










25.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/41





Action brought on 11 November 2013 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-110/13)
2014/C 24/78
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Tymen and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission decision excluding the applicant from the list of candidates authorised to attend the ‘certification’ training programme in 2013.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the European Commission of 19 April 2013 excluding the applicant from the list of candidates authorised to attend the ‘certification’ training programme in 2013 (Administrative Notice No 13-2013);










—


in so far as necessary, annul the Commission decision of 30 July 2013, dismissing the applicant’s complaint;










—


award the applicant damages in the amount of EUR 10 000;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1139/2013 of 11 November 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for saithe in Norwegian waters south of 62° N by vessels flying the flag of Sweden
Date: 2013-11-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU waters, Norwegian Sea, Sweden, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








L_2013303EN.01000201.xml










14.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 303/2








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1139/2013
of 11 November 2013
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for saithe in Norwegian waters south of 62° N by vessels flying the flag of Sweden


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and, to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international negotiations or agreements (2), lays down quotas for 2013.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2013.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 11 November 2013.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.




ANNEX






No


64/TQ40




Member State


Sweden




Stock


POK/04-N.




Species


Saithe (Pollachius virens)




Zone


Norwegian waters south of 62° N




Date


28.10.2013