do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1168/2013 of 7 November 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Sal de Tavira/Flor de Sal de Tavira (PDO)]
Date: 2013-11-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Portugal, designation of origin, product designation, salt








L_2013310EN.01000101.xml










20.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 310/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1168/2013
of 7 November 2013
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Sal de Tavira/Flor de Sal de Tavira (PDO)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Portugal's application to register the name ‘Sal de Tavira’/‘Flor de Sal de Tavira’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 7 November 2013.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Dacian CIOLOȘ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 132, 9.5.2013, p. 22.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.8.   Other products listed in Annex I to the Treaty (spices, etc.)

PORTUGAL
Sal de Tavira/Flor de Sal de Tavira (PDO)
Case C-615/12 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — Arbos, Gesellschaft für Musik und Theater v European Commission (Appeal — Action for damages — Grants made for projects financed by the ‘Culture 2000’ programme — Claims for payment of various sums — Content of the application — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2013-11-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU financing, EU programme, culture, income in addition to normal pay, indemnification, infringement of EU law, lawyer








C_2013377EN.01000302.xml










21.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 377/3





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — Arbos, Gesellschaft für Musik und Theater v European Commission
(Case C-615/12 P) (1)

(Appeal - Action for damages - Grants made for projects financed by the ‘Culture 2000’ programme - Claims for payment of various sums - Content of the application - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
2013/C 377/05
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Arbos, Gesellschaft für Musik und Theater (represented by: H. Karl, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls and D. Roussanov, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 25 October 2012 in Case T-161/06 Arbos v Commission by which the General Court dismissed the action against the Commission, seeking payment of, first, the sum of EUR 38 585,42 together with interest at the rate of 12 % from 1 January 2001 and the sum of EUR 27 618,91 together with interest at the rate of 12 % from 1 March 2003 and, second, of the sum of EUR 26 459,38 excluding VAT in respect of the fees of lawyers instructed during the pre-litigation procedure — Infringement of Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Arbos, Gesellschaft für Musik und Theater, is to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7038 — Nippon Express/Panasonic Corporation/Panasonic Logistics) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-11-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronics industry, merger control, transport company, work of art








C_2013321EN.01000801.xml










7.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 321/8





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.7038 — Nippon Express/Panasonic Corporation/Panasonic Logistics)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 321/08






1.


On 30 October 2013, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the Japanese undertakings Nippon Express Co., Ltd. (‘Nippon Express’) and Panasonic Corporation (‘Panasonic’) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Panasonic Logistics Co., Ltd. (‘Panasonic Logistics’, Japan) by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


Nippon Express is a global logistics supplier, including domestic and international relocation and transportation of specialised goods and fine art by rail, sea and air,










—


Panasonic is primarily active worldwide in the development, manufacture and sale of a wide range of audio-visual and communication products, home appliances, electronic components, industrial and other products,










—


Panasonic Logistics (to be renamed ‘Nittsu Panasonic Logistics’) provides air and sea freight forwarding, land freight transport, warehousing and storage services.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.7038 — Nippon Express/Panasonic Corporation/Panasonic Logistics, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).
Case C-90/12: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Air transport — Agreements relating to air services between Member States and third countries — Obligation on Member States to distribute traffic rights among eligible Community air carriers on the basis of a non-discriminatory and transparent procedure and to inform the Commission of that procedure without delay)
Date: 2013-11-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Poland, air transport, equal treatment, infringement of EU law, market access








C_2014009EN.01000701.xml










11.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 9/7





Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
(Case C-90/12) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Air transport - Agreements relating to air services between Member States and third countries - Obligation on Member States to distribute traffic rights among eligible Community air carriers on the basis of a non-discriminatory and transparent procedure and to inform the Commission of that procedure without delay)
2014/C 9/09
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: K. Simonsson and M. Owsiany-Hornung, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna and M. Szpunar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 5 and 6 of Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries (OJ 2004 L 157, p. 7) — Obligation on the Member States to distribute traffic rights among eligible Community air carriers on the basis of a non-discriminatory and transparent procedure and to inform the Commission of that procedure without delay

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by not taking the necessary measures to comply with Articles 5 and 6 of Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions;










2.


Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 126, 28.4.2012.
Case C-313/12: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei conti, sezione giurisdizionale per la Regione Siciliana — Italy) — Giuseppa Romeo v Regione Siciliana (National administrative procedure — Purely internal situation — Administrative acts — Obligation to state reasons — Whether it is possible for failure to state reasons to be remedied during legal proceedings against an administrative act — Interpretation of the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU and Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
Date: 2013-11-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, administrative procedure, interpretation of the law, judicial proceedings, jurisdiction








C_2014009EN.01001101.xml










11.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 9/11





Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei conti, sezione giurisdizionale per la Regione Siciliana — Italy) — Giuseppa Romeo v Regione Siciliana
(Case C-313/12) (1)

(National administrative procedure - Purely internal situation - Administrative acts - Obligation to state reasons - Whether it is possible for failure to state reasons to be remedied during legal proceedings against an administrative act - Interpretation of the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU and Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
2014/C 9/15
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte dei conti, sezione giurisdizionale per la Regione Siciliana

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Giuseppa Romeo

Defendant: Regione Siciliana

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Corte dei conti, sezione giurisdizionale per la Regione Siciliana — Interpretation of Article 296 TFEU and Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — National legislation allowing public authorities not to state the reasons for their acts in certain circumstances or to remedy the failure to state reasons for an administrative act during judicial proceedings brought against that act — National law which makes a renvoi to European Union law in order to regulate purely internal situations — Whether it is possible for the national courts to interpret and apply the provisions and principles of national law in a manner which is at variance with the interpretation provided by the Court of Justice

Operative part of the judgment







1.


The first question referred by the Corte dei conti, sezione giurisdizionale per la Regione Siciliana (Italy), by decision of 19 June 2012 is inadmissible.










2.


The Court of Justice of the European Union has no jurisdiction to answer the second and third questions referred by the Corte dei conti, sezione giurisdizionale per la Regione Siciliana by decision of 19 June 2012.






(1)  OJ C 295, 29.9.2012
Case T-588/13: Action brought on 7 November 2013 — Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll v OHIM — A. Weber (JETROC)
Date: 2013-11-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building materials, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2014024EN.01002802.xml










25.1.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/28





Action brought on 7 November 2013 — Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll v OHIM — A. Weber (JETROC)
(Case T-588/13)
2014/C 24/51
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Deutsche Rockwool Mineralwoll GmbH & Co. OHG (Gladbeck, Germany) (represented by: J. Krenzel, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: A. Weber SA (Rouhling, France)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 June28 August 2013 given in Case R 257/2013-2










—


Order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘JETROC’ for goods in Classes 1, 17 and 19 — International Registration No 940 180 designating the European Union

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Likelihood of confusion pursuant to Article 53(1)(a) in conjunction with 8(1)(b) CTMR

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.
Case T-63/13: Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2013 — Three-N-Products v OHIM — Munindra (AYUR) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark AYUR — Earlier Benelux word marks AYUS — Likelihood of confusion — Articles 8(1)(b) and 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2013-11-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medical plant, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013377EN.01001503.xml










21.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 377/15





Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2013 — Three-N-Products v OHIM — Munindra (AYUR)
(Case T-63/13) (1)

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark AYUR - Earlier Benelux word marks AYUS - Likelihood of confusion - Articles 8(1)(b) and 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2013/C 377/36
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Three-N-Products Private Ltd (New Delhi, India) (represented by: M. Thewes and T. Chevrier, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Munindra Holding BV (Lelystad, Netherlands)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 November 2012 (Case R 2296/2011-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Munindra Holding BV and Three-N-Products Private Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Three-N-Products Private Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1169/2013 of 7 November 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela (PDO)]
Date: 2013-11-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Portugal, designation of origin, pip fruit, product designation








L_2013310EN.01000301.xml










20.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 310/3








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1169/2013
of 7 November 2013
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela (PDO)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1151/2012, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EC) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 7 November 2013.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Dacian CIOLOȘ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 85, 23.3.2013, p. 16.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

PORTUGAL
Maçã Riscadinha de Palmela (PDO)
Case F-19/12: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure — Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings — Lawyer’s hand-written signature different from that on the original application received by post — Action lodged out of time — Manifest inadmissibility — None)
Date: 2013-11-07
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: facsimile, indemnification, lawyer, paid leave








C_2013377EN.01002301.xml










21.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 377/23





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-19/12) (1)

(Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings - Lawyer’s hand-written signature different from that on the original application received by post - Action lodged out of time - Manifest inadmissibility - None)
2013/C 377/52
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and J. Banquero Cruz, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s note containing one or more decisions concerning the applicant’s administrative status and a claim for damages.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Mr Marcuccio will bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 34.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1163/2013 of 7 November 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Mohant (PDO)]
Date: 2013-11-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Slovenia, cows’ milk cheese, designation of origin, product designation, soft cheese








L_2013309EN.01001301.xml










19.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 309/13








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1163/2013
of 7 November 2013
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Mohant (PDO)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovenia’s application to register the name ‘Mohant’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 7 November 2013.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Dacian CIOLOȘ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 160, 6.6.2013, p. 7.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

SLOVENIA
Mohant (PDO)