do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-180/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — Stoilov i Ko EOOD v Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Stolichna (Request for a preliminary ruling — Legal basis of the decision at issue in the main proceedings no longer present — Lack of relevance of the questions asked — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2013-10-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU statistics, VAT, customs duties, legal basis, tariff nomenclature, textile product








C_2013367EN.01001101.xml










14.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 367/11





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — Stoilov i Ko EOOD v Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Stolichna
(Case C-180/12) (1)

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Legal basis of the decision at issue in the main proceedings no longer present - Lack of relevance of the questions asked - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 367/17
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad Sofia-grad

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Stoilov i Ko EOOD

Defendant: Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Stolichna

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Interpretation of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1031/2008 of 19 September 2008, amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2008 L 291, p. 1) and Council Regulation No (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992, establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) as well as Articles 41(2)(a) and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Tariff classification of goods — Classification of goods (materials for the manufacture of awnings) under heading 5407 61 30 on account of its characteristics as ‘woven fabric’ or under heading 6303 92 10 on account of their sole intended purpose as ‘interior blinds’ — Enforcement order of a Member State requiring payment of a customs duty supplement and VAT after the findings in an expert's report of the customs laboratory — Protection of legitimate expectation in light of the circumstances of the filing of the customs declaration

Operative part of the judgment

There is no need to answer the questions raised by the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria).


(1)  OJ C 194, 30.6.2012.