COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT PART II Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION 30TH ANNUAL REPORT ON MONITORING THE APPLICATION OF EU LAW (2012)
Date: 2013-10-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU control, EU statistics, complaint to the Commission, infringement procedure (EU), national implementing measure, sanction (EU)













EUR-Lex - 52013SC0433 - EN











|



52013SC0433

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT PART II Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION 30TH ANNUAL REPORT ON MONITORING THE APPLICATION OF EU LAW (2012) /* SWD/2013/0433 final */









AGRICULTURE & RURAL
DEVELOPMENT
GENERAL STATISTICS

There were 26 open infringement
cases in the area of agriculture & rural development at the end of 2012.
This was the 11th highest number of cases in the Commission’s 21
reporting policy areas. They can be broken down as follows: 
The Commission launched one infringement procedure
in the area of agriculture in 2012 by sending a letter of formal notice. The
case was against France for imposing a tax on milk producers who exceeded their
individual milk quotas, although the national quota had not been exceeded. The
French tax significantly interferes with the functioning of the system of milk
quotas and surplus levies, as established by the Single CMO.[1] 
TRANSPOSITION OF DIRECTIVES
The Commission did not open any late transposition
infringement cases in the area of agriculture in 2012.
COMPLAINTS
The Commission received 59 complaints in the
agricultural area in 2012, substantially fewer than in 2011 (86). It fully
closed 45 of these and transferred 11 to EU Pilot for pre-infringement
discussions with Member States.
Complaints mainly concerned: wine and spirits (use
of protected designations, membership in a producers’ group, respecting the
Single CMO rules and principles); quality schemes; and organic farming. The
Commission received many complaints about a new piece of Polish legislation on
state-owned agricultural estate management, which limited the size of
agricultural land leased to farmers and obliged leaseholders to purchase farms
within a certain timeframe. As in previous years, many complaints concerned the
granting of direct payments and national authorities’ selection of rural
development support beneficiaries.
Petitions received from the European Parliament
resulted in EU-Pilot files being sent to: Ireland (for using the ‘‘Farmed in
the Republic of Ireland’’ logo on milk and cream products); and Greece (on
single payment deductions made by the Agricultural Bank of Greece).
OWN-INITIATIVE CASES
The Commission launched cases in the wine sector
and on the compulsory use of language in labelling. It opened many
own-initiative EU Pilot files on organic farming. The press had revealed
serious cases of fraud in labelling non-biological products as organic ones in
two Member States. Information collected showed significant deficiencies in the
monitoring of organic production in these Member States. The Commission had to
ensure that national authorities adopted or were about to adopt measures to
improve and strengthen their monitoring systems and to take measures in
relation to the fraudulently-labelled products still in circulation. One of
these cases is still pending, as the replies to certain questions were not
satisfactory.
EARLY RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission opened and processed 22 new EU
Pilot files on agricultural issues in 2012. In 21 cases, it accepted the Member
State’s explanation or commitments (95 %
acceptance rate). At the end of 2012, 17 files were still open.
The Commission closed the Italian case on
fraudulently-labelled organic products because the Italian national authorities
provided accurate and detailed information, seriously addressed the problem and
took appropriate remedial measures (legislative or other).
IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS
In 2012, the Court delivered one judgment under
Article 258 TFEU in the area of EU agricultural law. It confirmed[2]
that the Czech Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under the Single
CMO Regulation[3]
by allowing a milk product that cannot be classified as ‘‘butter’’ to be
marketed under the ‘pomazánkové máslo’ (butter spread) sales
designation.
In a preliminary ruling on the nature of sanctions
in the CAP area, the Court confirmed the view of the Commission[4] and judged
that sanctions on direct payments were of an administrative nature. Therefore,
a sanction imposed by a national paying agency due to over-declaration of areas
does not prevent the farmer’s prosecution under national criminal law.
 Outlook Important implementation work in 2013 includes: §         Cases in which Member States do not apply common rules and therefore jeopardise the common agricultural policy’s effectiveness §         Pursuing infringement cases under the reformed CMO rules in the wine sector and those affecting the direct payment regime §         Use of the clearance of accounts procedure to ensure that Member States maintain proper management and control systems 
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/agriculture/index_en.htm
FINANCIAL PROGRAMING AND BUDGET
In 2012, the
Commission detected only 138 anomalies in the area of traditional own resources
(there were 309 in 2011) and set 56 value added tax (VAT) and 255 gross
national income (GNI) reservations.[5]
Correspondingly, 680 accounting actions for traditional own resources (844 in
2011) and 465 for VAT/GNI (185 in 2011) were chosen for potential corrective
payments, which would have included principal amounts and belated interest to
be paid by Member States. Most of the newly detected anomalies were solved at
an early stage in bilateral discussions with Member States, including
senior-level management meetings, or in the Advisory Committee on Own
Resources.[6]
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/index_en.htm

CLIMATE ACTION
GENERAL
STATISTICS
There were 35 open infringement cases in the
climate action area at the end of 2012, the tenth highest caseload in the
Commission’s 21 reporting policy areas. The cases can be broken down as
follows:

The Commission opened 19
infringement cases in the climate action area in 2012, mostly due to late
transposition. These included in particular cases against Greece and Poland for
failure to notify the Commission about putting in place certification and
training systems for companies and personnel working with fluorinated gases, as
required by the Regulation on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases.[7]

None of the climate action cases were referred to
the Court in 2012. There were also no Court judgments under Article 258 TFEU in
the field of climate action.
TRANSPOSITION
OF DIRECTIVES
The Commission launched 11 infringement cases in
2012 because of missing or partial national implementing rules. It launched six
late transposition cases due to delays in communicating national implementing
measures for the directive on fuel quality.[8] Several Member States notified
the Commission of their implementing rules, so some of these cases were closed
by the end of 2012. Still, there remained 31 open late transposition cases in
the area of climate action by the end of 2012. 
COMPLAINTS
The Commission received six complaints on climate
issues in 2012 (there were 6 cases in 2011, too). It handled eight and
transferred three to EU Pilot for discussion with Member States.
OWN-INITIATIVE
CASES
In addition to launching the infringement cases
against Greece and Poland (mentioned above), the Commission also sent reasoned
opinions to Malta and Italy for incorrectly applying the regulation on
fluorinated greenhouse gases.[9]
EARLY
RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission opened 17 files on climate action
in EU Pilot in 2012. It assessed 30 files in 2012 and accepted 16 Member State
replies (53 % success rate). There remained 5 open
EU Pilot files in this area by the end of 2012. 
IMPORTANT
JUDGMENTS
The Court did not deliver any judgments or
preliminary rulings in the area of climate action in 2012.
 Outlook Important implementation work in 2013 includes: §         Verifying that national transposition measures comply with the four flagship directives (aviation in emissions trading,[10] extension of the emissions trading system,[11] fuel quality rules[12] and geological storage of CO2[13]) §         Continuing to monitor the correct application of the regulations on fluorinated greenhouse gases and ozone depleting substances[14]   
Further information is available at:
http://ec.europa.eu/clima/news/index_en.htm
COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, CONTENT
& TECHNOLOGY
GENERAL
STATISTICS
There were 24
open infringement cases in the area of communications networks, content &
technology at the end of 2012. This was the 12th highest number of
cases in the Commission’s 21 reporting policy areas. The cases can be broken
down as follows: 

The Commission launched four new
infringement cases in this area in 2012 by sending letters of formal notice. In
addition, it sent reasoned opinions to the Netherlands and Italy for
non-compliance with the requirements of the Framework Directive[15] and the
Access Directive[16]
(Dutch legislation interferes with the National Regulatory Authority’s
independence, tasks and responsibilities, while Italian legislation pre-empts
the National Regulatory Authority’s margin of discretion in using its
regulatory powers to ensure that the measure adopted is appropriate to tackle
the competitive problems reported in the market analysis).
The Commission
referred 13 cases to the Court in 2012 in relation to telecommunication issues.
It contested Hungary's special tax on telecom operators.[17] There were
two referrals under Article 260(2) TFEU (see next paragraph) and ten under
Article 260(3) TFEU (see next section). 
At the end of
2012, five cases that were launched due to non-compliance with a Court judgment
under Article 258 TFEU were still open. For two of them, a letter of formal
notice was sent to Belgium and Portugal under Article 260(2) TFEU and then the
cases were referred to the Court. The Commission asked the Court to fine
Portugal for not respecting a 2010 Court judgment[18] requiring
compliance with EU telecoms rules when deciding who should provide universal
service in Portugal.[19]

TRANSPOSITION
OF DIRECTIVES
No
infringement cases caused by late transposition in the area of communications
networks, content and technology were launched in 2012 (39 in 2011). Seven
on-going late transposition infringement cases were still open at the end of
2012. 
The Commission
referred ten cases to the Court under Article 260(3) TFEU, proposing financial
sanctions because of late transposition of: the Citizens’ Rights Directive[20]
(Belgium, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal and Slovenia); the Better
Regulation Directive[21]
(Belgium, the Netherlands, Poland and Slovenia); and the Directive amending the
Audiovisual Media Services Directive[22]
(Poland).
COMPLAINTS
The Commission
received 28 complaints relating to communication networks in 2012 (32 in 2011).
Of the 34 complaints the Commission processed in 2012, it fully closed 13 and
transferred 17 to EU Pilot for discussion with Member States. As in previous
years, most complaints received in 2012 concerned national telecommunications
rules.
OWN-INITIATIVE
CASES
The Commission
assessed Member States’ compliance with the Audiovisual Media Services
Directive and identified issues with implementing EU laws on electronic
communications (e.g. independence of the national regulators). It sent Estonia
a reasoned opinion and urged it to ensure the national regulator’s
independence, as required by the Framework Directive.[23]
EARLY
RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission
opened 34 new EU Pilot files on electronic communications issues and processed
49 in 2012. In 29 cases, it accepted the Member State’s explanations or actions
(59 % success rate). At the end of 2012, 54
files were still open.
Several cases
of non-conformity with EU electronic communications rules were closed in 2012
before the Court issued a judgment because Member States complied with EU law.
They included cases against Greece, Hungary, the United Kingdom and Denmark. A
case against Hungary on the incorrect transposition of the directive on
re-using public sector information[24]
was also closed because Hungary complied with EU rules.
IMPORTANT
JUDGMENTS
There were no
particularly important judgments in the area of communications networks,
content and technology in 2012.
 Outlook Important implementation work in 2013 includes: §         Monitoring correct transposition of the ‘revised framework for electronic communications’ (Citizens’ Rights and Better Regulation Directives); priorities include: independence of national regulators, respect for consultation procedures and consumer protection. §         Monitoring the correct implementation of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive 
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htm
COMPETITION
PRIORITY
AREAS
In 2012, the
Commission focused on monitoring the non-discriminatory assignment of
broadcasting spectrum freed by the introduction of digital terrestrial
television broadcasting (the so called ‘digital dividend’). It investigated
several Member States to establish whether they have assigned parts or all of
the ‘digital dividend’ by using open and transparent procedures, which are
based on proportionate, objective and non-discriminatory criteria. 
In particular,
the Commission sent a reasoned opinion to Bulgaria because of the limitations
and prohibitions laid down in its legislation on tenders for assigning the
digital terrestrial broadcasting spectrum appeared to be in breach of the
competition directive,[25]
the framework directive[26]
and the directive on authorising electronic communications networks[27].[28]
The Commission
also handled a number of complaints concerning the postal sector, as 2012 was
the last year before the Postal Directives’[29] full liberalisation
obligation entered into force. For example, the Commission's action resolved a
situation where a Member State attempted to protect the incumbent by imposing
excessive registration requirements for alternative postal operators. 
FOLLOW-UP
OF STATE AID DECISIONS
The Commission
launched two infringement proceedings against Italy for failure to implement
two Court judgments, which ordered the recovery of incompatible state aid
provided to enterprises that invested in the communities hit by the 2002
natural disasters and to those located in the Venice and Chioggia areas. 
Proceedings
under Article 260 TFEU, which obliges a Member State to recover incompatible
state aid following a Commission Decision, remain an important part of the
Commission’s infringement work in this area. In 2013, the Commission will
continue to refer long standing non-recovery cases to the Court to ensure
effective recovery.
IMPORTANT
JUDGMENTS
The Court
annulled the 2008 Commission Decision that found Greece to be infringing
Articles 106 and 102 TFEU by giving the Public Power Corporation (PPC)
privileged access to lignite,[30]
which created unequal opportunities in electricity production and enabled PPC
to maintain or reinforce its dominant position on the Greek wholesale market.
In a parallel dispute between the same parties, the Court has also annulled the
2009 Commission Decision that imposed specific remedies proposed by Greece to
resolve this competition problem. The Commission has appealed both judgments.[31]
The Court
condemned Spain under Article 260(2) TFEU for failing to recover aid granted to
Magefesa and imposed a lump sum and daily penalty payments.[32]
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/competition/index_en.htm 
EDUCATION AND
CULTURE
There were
eight open infringement cases on education and culture issues at the end of
2012.
The Commission
launched three new infringement cases in this area in 2012 by sending letters
of formal notice. One was against the Netherlands for discriminating against
students from other Member States in matters of access to higher education. The
second was also against the Netherlands, for applying residence requirements to
eligibility for lower statutory tuition fees at Dutch universities. The third
was against Slovakia for indirectly discriminating against nationals of other
Member States by making the examination requirements for the traditional
academic title most easily met by Slovak nationals.
The Commission
received 34 complaints relating to education and culture in 2012. Out of the
five complaints it assessed, three were closed and two were transferred to
Member States for discussion within the framework of EU Pilot. 
The Court
issued one judgment in 2012, against Austria.[33] It found that Austria was in
breach of its obligations under the Treaty (Articles 18, 20 and 21 TFEU) and
the Free Movement and Residence Directive[34], because it granted reduced
public transport fares only to students whose parents received Austrian family
allowances.
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/index_en.htm
ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS
In January 2012, the Commission opened an
infringement procedure against
Hungary for an alleged breach of the Central Bank’s independence under Article
130 TFEU. It voiced concerns about national legislation amendments that
provided for various possibilities to influence the Hungarian Central Bank. The
Commission closed this infringement procedure when the Hungarian Central Bank
statute and transitional provisions of the Fundamental Law were put in line
with Article 130 TFEU. Moreover, the Ministry of Finance stopped issuing press
releases that aimed to influence the Hungarian Central Bank’s monetary policy.
However, shortly afterwards, Hungary adopted the
Law on the Financial Transaction Duty, which affected the independence of the
Hungarian Central Bank. It was to come into force on 1 January 2013 and would
have restricted the Bank’s ability to freely select the monetary policy
instruments needed to reach its primary objective of price stability, thereby
hampering its independence. In addition, the financial transaction duty to be
paid by the Bank would have been equivalent to 0.4 % of Hungary’s Gross Domestic Product, 10 times
higher than the bank’s annual operational budget. This kind of credit to the
public sector would have been a breach of the prohibition of monetary financing
under Article 123 TFEU. Therefore, another infringement case on the Bank’s
independence was planned for 2012, but Hungary amended the law after
discussions with the Commission.
Further information is available at:
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htm
ENLARGEMENT
An earlier
judgment of the Court in this area condemned the Netherlands for charging
disproportionately high fees when issuing residence permits to Turkish
nationals who acquired the right of residence.[35]  The Dutch authorities
aligned the fees with those charged for similar documents issued to EU
citizens, but the question of possible reimbursement of Turkish citizens who
had paid disproportionately high fees in the past remains. The Commission is in
contact with the Dutch government on this issue.
The Court
issued a number of judgments in 2012 on interpretation of the EU-Turkey
association law referred by national jurisdictions for preliminary ruling. The
Commission continues to receive complaints on the application and
interpretation of certain provisions of the EU-Turkey association law, in
particular on the alleged violation by a number of Member States of the
standstill clauses set out in the instruments governing the relations between
Turkey and the EU.[36]

Further information is available at:
http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/index_en.htm 
EMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL AFFAIRS &
INCLUSION
GENERAL STATISTICS

There were 62 open infringement
cases in the area of employment in 2012. This was the seventh highest number of
cases in the Commission’s 21 reporting policy areas. The areas can be broken
down as follows:
The Commission launched 41 infringement cases in
the employment area in 2012. For example: Slovakia refused to pay certain
disability allowances to eligible people residing in another Member State[37];
Luxembourg limited to 12 years the duration of foreign professional experience
that could be taken into account in determining public sector employees’
working conditions; in France, doctors’ working time in public hospitals did
not respect the minimum rest periods under the Working Time Directive[38]
and the conditions for using the ‘opt-out’ clause.
The Commission referred Italy to the Court in 2012
because its legislation and practice excluded managers from procedural
guarantees (information and consultation of workers’ representatives) in case
of collective layoffs.[39]

By the end of 2012, Germany and the Netherlands
had not complied with Court judgments made under Article 258 TFEU, which
condemned the residence conditions when granting benefits for the blind, deaf
and disabled[40]
and for migrant workers and dependent family members to pursue higher education
abroad, respectively.[41]
TRANSPOSITION OF DIRECTIVES
The Commission launched 25 infringement cases in
2012 because of failure to transpose of the Temporary Agency Work Directive[42]
(15 cases) and the directive on occupational limit values for chemical agents.[43]
(10 cases) Only six late transposition cases were still open at the end of
2012.
COMPLAINTS
The Commission received 309 complaints on
employment issues in 2012, more than in 2011 (269).
In the area of the free movement of workers, most
complaints concerned: access to and working conditions in the public sector
(especially recognition of professional experience and qualifications acquired
in other Member States); access to study grants (restrictive criteria for
providing study grants, employment obligation for graduates); and obstacles to
the free movement of professional sports players. There were several complaints
on social security coordination rules, including on determining the applicable
legislation, levying social security contributions, refusal to issue or accept
the European Health Insurance Cards, granting healthcare to pensioners,
non-export of long-term care benefits, access to special non-contributory
benefits, entitlement to and calculation of pensions. Health and safety
complaints mainly concerned the incorrect or bad application of the Framework
Directive,[44]
the Construction Sites Directive[45]
and the Asbestos Directive.[46]
There were 33 labour law complaints on breaches of the Working Time Directive,
including on paid annual leave for police forces in the Basque Region. Numerous
complaints concerned fixed-term
employment in the education sector, especially in schools.
The Commission handled 298 complaints in 2012. It
closed 193 and transferred 44 to EU Pilot for discussion with Member States. 
EARLY RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission opened 61 files in EU Pilot and
processed 50 in 2012. In 32 cases, it accepted the Member State’s explanations
or commitments (64 % success rate). At the end of 2012, 42
files were still open.
Potential cases were resolved early in several
areas, including: the free movement of workers (Greece started to recognise
post-graduate diplomas acquired abroad when deciding on workers' salaries and
promotions) health and safety (the UK complied with the Asbestos Directive);
and labour law (Belgium removed rules under which certain workers were obliged
to postpone their right to annual leave for up to 12 months, which goes against
the Working Time Directive).
IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS
The Court ruled that: a Member State can grant family benefits to posted
or seasonal workers who are resident in another Member State. If they do this,
they cannot exclude workers entitled to comparable benefits in another Member
State;[47]
study grants for children of migrant workers could not be dependent on the
country of residence;[48]
frontier workers’ working conditions could not be less favourable than those of
national workers and accordingly, the salary top-up paid to frontier workers
who work part time before retiring cannot be calculated in a way that penalises
them in comparison with national workers;[49] and according to the Working
Time Directive, Member States cannot make paid annual leave conditional on a
minimum period of 10 days’ work or one month’s actual work during the reference
period and the paid annual leave cannot be affected by an employee’s sick
leave.[50]

 Outlook Important implementation work in 2013 includes: §         Access to benefits based on residence, public sector posts and study grants for workers and their families §         Issuance and acceptance of the European Health Insurance Card §         Occupational health and safety: implementation of the directive on sharp injuries[51] §         Correct transposition of the Temporary Agency Work Directive[52] 
Further information is available at:
http://ec.europa.eu/social/home.jsp
ENERGY
GENERAL
STATISTICS
There were 93 open infringement cases in the area
of energy at the end of 2012 (as compared to 149 in 2011). This was the sixth
highest number of cases in the Commission’s 21 reporting policy areas. The
Commission’s total caseload was broken down as follows:
In 2012, the Commission launched 27 new energy
infringement procedures by sending letters of formal notice. Most of these
cases were launched because of the Member States not or only partially
transposing directives by the transposition deadlines (see below). Romania and
the Czech Republic received a letter of formal notice due to insufficient
reporting under the Gas Supply Regulation[53] and the Renewable Energy Directive,[54] respectively.
The Commission referred nine energy infringement
cases to the Court in 2012. Italy was referred because it did not correctly
implement the former Directive on buildings’ energy performance[55] as regards
energy performance certificates and inspections of air-conditioning systems.[56] The UK and Ireland failed to make the
necessary arrangements to ensure the maximum interconnection capacity between
their gas transmission systems, as the pipeline connecting Northern Ireland and
Ireland was not open to the market.[57]
The other six referrals were because of incomplete transposition of two energy
directives (see below).
TRANSPOSITION
OF DIRECTIVES
The Commission launched 24 new late transposition
infringements in the area of energy in 2012 (121 in 2011). By the end of 2012,
there were 75 open late transposition infringement procedures in this area.
All 24 new late transposition infringement cases
were due to Member States failing to transpose, entirely or partly, the new
Directive on buildings’ energy performance.[58]
As a number of Member States notified the
Commission of measures fully transposing the two directives in the Third Energy
Package[59],
many of the corresponding infringements could be closed. The Commission
however, had to refer Finland, Poland and Slovenia to the Court with a proposal
for penalties under Article 260(3) TFEU since these countries only partially
transposed the directives.[60]
COMPLAINTS
The Commission received 71 complaints on energy
matters in 2012, a slight increase compared to 2011 (57 incoming complaints).
Two-thirds of these complaints concerned renewable energy and the internal
market in electricity and gas. The other complaints were about energy
efficiency, licences for prospection and expropriation of hydrocarbons, and
nuclear energy. The Commission processed 47 energy complaints. Most
complainants (28) received a full response, but 17 files had to be transferred
to EU Pilot for further discussion with the Member States.
OWN-INITIATIVE
CASES
The Commission launched all the new energy
infringement cases in 2012 and referred others to the Court (see the ‘General
statistics’ section above) on its own initiative. In addition to the progress
made in these cases, the Commission also sent an additional reasoned opinion
concerning another own-initiative case claiming that the system of regulated
gas prices in France did not comply with the Gas Directive.[61]
EARLY
RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission opened 50 new EU Pilot files on
energy issues and processed 39 files during 2012. In 32 cases, the Commission
accepted the Member State’s explanation and/or commitments made (82 % success rate). By the end of 2012, 29 energy
files were still open in EU Pilot.
The Commission closed a number of cases in 2012
due to several Member States bringing their price regulation systems in
compliance with EU law (adoption of legislation phasing out regulated
electricity prices in France[62] and Greece;[63] adoption of legislation phasing out
regulated electricity and gas prices in Portugal[64] and Romania[65]).
IMPORTANT
JUDGMENTS
The Court annulled the Council Regulation on the
notification of investment projects in energy infrastructure[66] because its
legal basis had not been selected correctly. The Court took the view that this
Regulation should have been adopted under the new legal basis for energy
legislation in the Treaty (Article 194(2) TFEU), which requires an ordinary
legislative procedure, and not under Article 337 TFEU, which requires the
Council’s simple majority. The effects of the annulled Regulation are
maintained until a new regulation is adopted on the correct legal basis enters
into force.[67]
 Outlook Important implementation work in 2013 includes: §         Timely transposition of the Directive on spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste[68] §         Conformity checks under the Third Energy Package and the Nuclear Safety Directive §         Conformity checks under the Directive on buildings’ energy performance 
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy/index_en.htm
ENTERPRISE & INDUSTRY
GENERAL
STATISTICS

There were 52 open infringement
cases in the area of enterprise & industry at the end of 2012. This is the
ninth highest number of cases in the Commission’s 21 reporting policy areas.
The caseload was broken down as follows:
The 29 new
enterprise infringement cases related mostly to provisions ensuring the free
movement of goods. Letters of formal notice were sent to, among others: Poland
(concerning import rules on the fast-growing food supplement market); Romania
(due to its gas export ban); and Germany (because it set conditions for
marketing chemical substances beyond those of the REACH Regulation[69]).
The Commission
brought three enterprise cases before the Court. Two of them contested the
additional German requirements on construction products already bearing the
CE-mark;[70]
the judgment could impact the so-called Bauregellisten.[71][72]
Spain was referred to the Court because of Spain’s import barriers on
heavy-goods vehicles.[73]
At the end of
2012, only two Court judgments made under Article 258 TFEU in this area still
had to be implemented by the Member States. In one of these cases, the
Commission opened the procedure under Article 260(2) TFEU as the Member State
did not make sufficient progress in complying with the judgment.
TRANSPOSITION
OF DIRECTIVES
The Commission
launched 19 new enterprise infringement procedures in 2012 because of Member
States’ missing or partial national transposition measures for various
directives. In all, 24 late transposition cases were still open at the end of
2012.
Eight
infringement procedures had to be launched because of missing or partial
updates to the defence-related products list.[74] Further eight procedures were
also launched under the Directive on the identification and traceability of
civil explosives.[75]
COMPLAINTS
The Commission
received 152 new complaints concerning enterprise in 2012, a moderate increase
over 2011 (124 incoming complaints). Most complaints received concerned
national laws on motor vehicles (registration rules) going against the Treaty’s
free movement of goods provisions.[76]
Other complaints related to pharmaceutical products, foodstuffs and food
supplements, and construction products.
From the 133
processed enterprise complaints in 2012, the Commission closed most of them
(63) by sending a full response to the complainant and transferred 54 to EU
Pilot to be discussed with the Member States.
EARLY
RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission
opened 62 new EU Pilot enterprise files in 2012 and processed 37 files. 17
assessments were positive, i.e. the Commission accepted the Member State’s
explanation or actions (46 % success rate). In all, 60 files were
still open in EU Pilot at the end of 2012.
Member States
settled many major enterprise infringement cases with the Commission without
litigation or before a Court judgment was delivered. For example: Spain
modified its rules on the prior notification of medicines for export; the new
French rules on the safety requirements for fire fighters’ hoods now respect EU
standards;[77]
Italy repealed the law that restricted the import of bottled drinking water;[78]
and Greece annulled surface area requirements for preparing ‘bake-off’
products.[79]
IMPORTANT
JUDGMENTS
The Court
passed one judgment under Article 258 TFEU in the field of enterprise in 2012:
The Belgian car registration laws were condemned as they were not in line with
the Treaty’s rules on the free movement of goods (such as the systematic
requirement of the vehicle’s certificate of conformity and the rejection of
roadworthiness tests carried out in other Member States).
The Court’s
preliminary rulings confirmed that private law bodies must respect the
principle of the free movement of goods, if the products these bodies certify
are legally considered compliant with national law.[80] It also
found that parts of the Polish gambling law could constitute ‘technical
regulations’[81]
in so far as it established that the provisions in question constituted
conditions which can significantly influence the nature or the marketing of the
product concerned, which is a matter for the referring court to determine. In
such a case their drafts should be cleared with the Commission before being
adopted.[82]
Finally, the Court upheld retailers’ right to import tobacco from other Member
States, which could impact state monopolies.[83] 
 Outlook Important implementation work in 2013 includes: §         Ensuring timely and correct transposition of the Late Payment Directive[84] §         Following up the correct application of the Construction Products Regulation[85] §         Subject to Court judgments,[86] verification of registration rules for right-hand drive vehicles. 
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/index_en.htm
ENVIRONMENT
GENERAL
STATISTICS
Most of the on-going infringement cases at the end
of 2012 (272) concerned the environment, as in previous years. They can be
broken down as follows:
The Commission launched 138 environmental
infringement cases in 2012. Several concerned the incorrect transposition of
the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive[87] (the screening procedure,
interpretation of ‘development consent’), failure to ensure adequate protection
of species[88],
and Natura 2000 sites.[89]
The Commission referred 16 environmental cases to
the Court, including four for late transposition of the Waste Framework Directive,[90]
three for operating landfills below EU standards[91], and three
on water, for narrow interpretation of ‘water services’ in the Water Framework
Directive,[92]
inadequate treatment of urban wastewater[93], insufficient designation of
zones vulnerable to nitrates and inadequate protection of water from nitrate
pollution[94].
At the end of 2012, Member States had still not
fully implemented 35 Court judgments. Correct implementation of EU waste law
remains a main challenge. The Commission launched a second referral against
Italy in 2012 due to landfill operation.[95] It referred Ireland to the
Court for failing to assess all the matters required by the Directive on
environmental impact assessment, not ensuring coordination of the authorities
during the assessment, and excluding demolition works from the scope of
transposing legislation.[96]
TRANSPOSITION
OF DIRECTIVES
The Commission launched 63 cases in 2012 due to
late transposition of environmental directives.
These included cases against 11 Member States for
failing to transpose the Directive on petrol vapour recovery during vehicle
refuelling.[97]
There remained 13 open late transposition cases in the area of environment by
the end of 2012. 
The Commission referred Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland
and Slovakia to the Court proposing financial sanctions under Article 260(3)
TFEU for late transposition of the Waste Framework Directive.[98] It also
referred Poland for partial transposition of the Directive on marine strategy.[99]
COMPLAINTS
The Commission received 588 environment complaints
in 2012, slightly fewer than in 2011 (604).
Most concerned: nature protection (200);
environmental impact assessment (80); waste (70); and water (60). The
Commission processed 512 environmental complaints in 2012. It fully closed over
half of them (293) and transferred 131 to EU Pilot for discussion with Member
States.
The Commission launched two infringement cases
(against the United Kingdom and Greece) and 22 EU Pilot discussions with Member
States following petitions and questions from the European Parliament. Most of
them concerned nature protection, environmental impact assessment and waste
management.
OWN-INITIATIVE
CASES
The Commission addressed incorrect transposition
of key environmental directives, especially in the nature, impact assessment, waste
and water sectors. It focused on the fulfilment of strategic obligations under
the environmental acquis (e.g. waste collection, recovery and recycling
targets) and focused on breaches of protection requirements and quality
standards (e.g. misapplied hunting derogations, non-compliant landfills and
inadequate wastewater treatment).
EARLY
RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission opened 386 environment files in EU
Pilot and processed 354 in 2012. In 265 cases, it accepted the Member State’s
response (75 % success rate). At the end of 2012,
400 files were still open.
Several important environmental cases were closed
in 2012 because of Member States' compliance with EU law. These included cases
against 12 Member States for late transposition of the Waste Framework
Directive. The Czech Republic, Romania and Denmark respected the Directive on
electrical and electronic waste[100].
Hungary complied with the Directives on mining waste[101] and floods.[102]
Lithuania and France implemented the Packaging Waste Directive[103] and Slovakia
the End-of-life Vehicles Directive.[104]
France complied with the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive[105]
and Italy with the Directive on strategic environmental assessment.[106]
The Markinch combustion plant in the UK is in line with the Large Combustion
Plant Directive as its net rated thermal input has been decreased.[107]
IMPORTANT
JUDGMENTS
The Court delivered two judgments against Ireland
and imposed financial penalties because of its failure to respect earlier
judgments on impact assessment of certain agricultural projects and on setting
up an inspection system for septic tanks.[108] It established that Belgium,
Greece, Portugal and Spain did not adopt the River Basin Management Plans
required by the Water Framework Directive.[109]
The Court also delivered a number of important
preliminary rulings in 2012.[110]
 Outlook Important implementation work in 2013 includes: §         Monitoring the adequacy of urban waste water treatment rules and adoption of the River Basin Management Plans §         Verifying the timely transposition of the new Industrial Emissions Directive[111] §         Monitoring the transposition of the Air Quality Directive[112] §         Follow-up on Member States’ obligation to designate Special Areas of Conservation under the Habitats Directive §         Court judgments interpreting the Water Framework Directive, the Directive on public participation in strategic environmental assessment and the Aarhus Convention[113] 
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/index_en.htm
STATISTICS ON EUROPE
The
infringement procedure on Greece’s violation of statistical principles is
on-going. The Commission is analysing the current situation and progress made
in Greece with a view to determining the actions to take.
The Commission
launched two EU Pilot investigations on statistical issues in 2012. One of them
concerned national accounts; the other dealt with a farm structure survey. The
Commission made progress on investigations launched in the following
statistical fields: tourism, carriage of goods by road, science and technology,
and structure and activity of foreign affiliates.
Further information is available at: 
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home
HOME AFFAIRS
GENERAL STATISTICS
There were 22
open infringement cases in the area of home affairs at the end of 2012 (60 in
2011). This is the 13th highest number of cases in the Commission’s
21 reporting policy areas. They can be broken down as follows:
The Commission
launched 4 home affairs infringement cases in 2012 against: Belgium for not
informing it of transposition measures for the Data Retention Directive[114]; Italy for incorrectly applying the
‘Dublin II Regulation’,[115] the Reception Conditions Directive,[116] the Asylum Procedures Directive,[117] the Qualification Directive[118], and the Charter of Fundamental
Rights; and Austria and Slovakia for obstacles to fluid traffic flow at their
common border.
The Commission
referred Belgium to the Court for not complying with EU law on security
standards and biometrics in passports (Belgium is the last Member State to not
issue biometric passports).[119]
At the end of
2012, two cases on non-compliance with a Court judgment made under Article 258
TFEU were still open. The Commission requested only lump sum penalty against
Sweden because the transposing measures for the Data Retention Directive[120] were notified during the Court
procedure.
TRANSPOSITION OF DIRECTIVES
The Commission
launched one late transposition infringement case on home affairs (76 in 2011).
At the end of 2012, there were 13 open cases on late transposition of
directives. 
Germany was
referred to the Court with a proposal for financial sanctions under Article
260(3) TFEU due to its incomplete transposition of the Data Retention
Directive.[121]
COMPLAINTS
132 home
affairs complaints were received in 2012, more than in 2011 (123). Most
concerned visas, immigration, asylum, border management, and return policy. 
From the 104 home
affairs complaints that the Commission processed in 2012, 65 were closed with
full response and 9 were sent to EU Pilot for further discussion with Member
States. 
OWN-INITIATIVE CASES
In 2012, the
Commission used EU Pilot to address several Member States because: their
bilateral local border traffic agreements with third countries did not comply
with the Local Border Traffic Regulation;[122] or they seem to have implemented the
Visa Code[123],
the Family Reunification Directive[124]
or the Long-Term Residents Directive[125] incorrectly; or they created
obstacles to fluid traffic flow at internal borders (e.g., speed limits not
based only on road-safety considerations). 
EARLY RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission
opened 45 home affairs files in EU Pilot and processed 23 in 2012. In 11 cases,
it accepted the Member State’s explanations or actions (48 % success
rate). At the end of 2012, 40 files were still open.
IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS
The Court
ruled against the Netherlands for imposing excessive and disproportionate charges
when granting residence permits to third-country nationals seeking long-term
resident status.[126] 
In preliminary
rulings, the Court held that: a Member State should allocate housing benefits
also to long-term resident third-country nationals, if they are available to EU
citizens;[127] the concept of persecution for
religious reasons covers only acts which violate severely basic human rights,
whether they interfere with a person’s freedom to practice his faith in private
or to live that faith publicly;[128] a Member State must grant the minimum
conditions for receiving asylum seekers until the applicant’s transfer, even if
it considers that another Member State is responsible for examining the
application;[129] a Member State must recognise a person
as refugee, if the protection she previously received from United Nations
bodies ceased due to reasons beyond her control or independently from her will;[130]
and the Schengen Borders Code allows checks at the internal border on foreign
nationals to combat illegal stay, under certain guarantees.[131] 
 Outlook Important implementation work in 2013 includes: §         Monitoring the transposition of the Directives on the Blue Card, employer sanctions, return, critical infrastructures, long term residents and family reunification[132] §         Court judgments on the Data Retention Directive[133] §         Transposition of the Directives on extending the long-term residents Directive to beneficiaries of international protection,[134] preventing trafficking in human beings[135] and the Qualification Directive[136] §         National provisions on the right to appeal against visa refusals[137] 
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/index_en.htm
JUSTICE, FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &
CITIZENSHIP
GENERAL STATISTICS

There were 61 open infringement
cases in the area of justice at the end of 2012 (72 at the end of 2011). This
was the eighth highest number of cases in the Commission’s 21 reporting policy
areas. The caseload was broken down as follows:
In 2012, the
Commission launched 26 new justice cases by sending letters of formal notice.
These included: a case against Malta on discriminating non-Maltese EU citizens
in their eligibility for reduced water and electricity tariffs; eight
procedures caused by delayed ratification of two international agreements[138];
and cases against Czech Republic and Bulgaria to defend citizens’ political
rights (membership in political parties and non-discriminatory participation in
local and European Parliament elections).
The Commission
referred 7 justice cases to the Court. In particular, it contested Hungary’s
new laws on judges’ retirement age as age-based discrimination[139] and argued
that Hungary violated the independence of its Data Protection Supervisory
Authority.[140]
Three referrals were due to late transposition (see below). 
By the end of
2012, Member States had not yet complied with 3 justice judgments under Article
258 TFEU. A letter of formal notice was sent to one of them under Article
260(2) TFEU. Member States were still working on the implementation of the two
other judgments, which had been passed in late 2012 (see section on important
judgments).
TRANSPOSITION OF DIRECTIVES
10
infringement cases were launched in 2012 because of missing or only partially
notified national transposition rules for the Directives on parental leave[141]
and gender equality in self-employment.[142] 11 late transposition cases
were still pending at the end of 2012.
3 late
transposition cases were referred to the Court with a request for financial sanctions
under Article 260(3) TFEU because Cyprus and the Netherlands had only partially
transposed the Mediation Directive[143]
and Cyprus did the same for the Environmental Crime Directive.[144]
COMPLAINTS
There were 491
complaints concerning justice in 2012 (433 in 2011). Most concerned the free
movement of people, citizenship rights, various forms of discrimination,
fundamental rights,[145]
civil justice and consumer law.
The Commission
fully closed 312 out of the 358 justice complaints it handled in 2012 by
sending a full response. It transferred 27 complaints to EU Pilot to be
discussed with the Member States.
A question
from the European Parliament led to an EU Pilot enquiry that in the end
confirmed that Austria correctly implemented a preliminary ruling.[146]
OWN-INITIATIVE CASES
The
Commission’s next step[147]
was to send reasoned opinions to six Member States because of their incomplete
implementation of the Free Movement Directive.[148]
EARLY RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission
opened most of the 103 justice files new in EU Pilot in 2012 on its own
initiative, to verify the correct transposition of various directives. From the
57 processed EU Pilot files, the Commission accepted 28 Member State responses
(49 % success rate). 125 justice files were
still open in EU Pilot at the end of 2012.
Important
cases closed in 2012 include: acceptance of the registration of double surnames
for Swedish children who also have another EU nationality and whose double
surname was already registered by another Member State[149], and alignment
of the Equality Act with the Directive on equal treatment in employment in the
UK.[150]
IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS
The Court
ruled that: the Hungarian laws on the compulsory retirement of judges,
prosecutors and notaries when they reach the age of 62 constituted age-based
discrimination[151]
and the Austrian Data Protection Supervisory Authority lacked the independence
required by the Data Protection Directive.[152]
A preliminary
ruling of the Court also clarified how Member States should treat EU nationals’
applications for non-EU family members to enter and stay in a Member State.[153]
 Outlook Important implementation work in 2013 includes: §         Full implementation of the Free Movement Directive[154] based on impact studies §         Enforcing citizens’ political rights stemming from the Treaty and secondary law §         Verifying the correct implementation of the Gender Equality Directives[155] 
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/justice/index_en.htm
MARITIME AFFAIRS AND FISHERIES
GENERAL
DEVELOPMENTS
EU maritime
laws ensure, inter alia, the direct electronic exchange of fisheries-related
data and the monitoring of fishing vessels’ engine power in order to allow the
Commission to verify Member States’ compliance. In this framework, the
Commission addressed irregularities in the fisheries control systems of Italy
and Spain, by launching an inquiry and an action plan, respectively, and
monitored the implementation of the action plan adopted with Malta in 2011.
COMPLAINTS
The Commission
received four new complaints on fisheries matters during 2012 and treated 12,
out of which 3 were transferred to EU Pilot to obtain clarifications from the
Member State concerned.
OWN-INITIATIVE
CASE
The Commission
learnt that Italy gained access to certain Mediterranean third countries'
waters via bilateral agreements, which violates the EU’s exclusive external
competence under the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). It sent Italy a letter of
formal notice under Article 258 TFEU. By the end of 2012, the Italian
authorities had responded constructively and committed to withdrawing the
non-compliant provisions of the agreements. The next step will depend on Italy
providing evidence of this remedial action. 
EARLY RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
In 2012, the
Commission opened 42 new EU Pilot files on matters related to the CFP, bringing
the number of EU Pilot cases in the maritime field to 55. Of the 46 files
treated during 2012, the Commission assessed 32 positively (70 % success
rate).
FOLLOW-UP TO COURT JUDGMENTS
The Court
ruled against Italy in 2009 for failure to prohibit the use of illegal
driftnets, as is required by EU rules.[156] Italy’s remedial action was
not satisfactory, so the Commission sent a letter of formal notice under
Article 260(2) TFEU. In response, the Italian authorities referred to a series
of adopted or planned measures that would remedy the situation. The Commission
monitored the Italy's progress in 2012 also via local inspections. Due to the
inconclusive results, the decision on whether to refer the case to the Court
for a second time (with a proposal for financial sanctions) is still pending.
The Court
ruled against Spain in 2008 for insufficient monitoring of landings and
marketing of undersized fish and inadequate action against breaches of the
corresponding EU rules.[157]
The Spanish authorities notified the Commission of a number of measures they
had taken in order to implement the judgment. The Commission carried out
several inspections in late 2011 and in 2012 to verify whether these measures
were sufficient. It found Spain’s progress satisfactory and closed the case.
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/index_en.htm

INTERNAL MARKET AND SERVICES
GENERAL STATISTICS
At the end of
2012, 167 internal market cases remained open, the 4th highest
number in the Commission’s 21 reporting policy areas. The Commission’s total
caseload was broken down as follows:

The Commission's letters of
formal notice launched 72 internal market infringement cases in 2012 against,
for example: Italy (failure to publish tenders for public health services);
Slovakia (exemption of health insurance companies from the Non-Life Insurance
Directives[158]);
and Bulgaria (charging privatised assets with state mortgages).
Amongst
others, the Commission referred Greece to the Court because it had disregarded
EU public procurement rules when purchasing an IT system for the Social
Security Foundation (IKA)[159].
At the end of
2012, 17 internal market judgments made by the Court under Article 258 TFEU had
not yet been implemented by Member States. In 7 cases, the Commission started
infringement procedures under Article 260(2) TFEU because Member States did not
sufficiently progress in complying with the judgment. The Commission had
already referred two cases to the Court requesting financial sanctions.
TRANSPOSITION OF DIRECTIVES
53
infringement cases were launched in 2012 due to missing or only partially notified
national transposition measures for internal market directives. In all, 77 such
cases remained open at the end of 2012. 
In particular,
18 late transposition cases were started under the Prospectus Directive.[160]
The
Netherlands, Luxembourg, Poland and Slovenia were referred to the Court with a
proposal for financial sanctions under Article 260(3) TFEU due to the late
transposition of the Directive on defence procurement[161] and so was
Belgium for the incomplete transposition of the eMoney Directive[162].
COMPLAINTS
In 2012, 462
internal market complaints were received (530 in 2011), mostly on public
procurement, services and regulated professions.
The Commission
closed 303 of the 469 internal market complaints it handled in 2012 by sending
a full response. It transferred 130 to EU Pilot for discussion with Member
States.
Upon the
European Parliament’s questions, electrical service providers’ authorisation
and the purchase of diesel trains without public tender were investigated. 
OWN-INITIATIVE CASES
Own-initiative
investigations targeted problems mostly in public procurement, services and
regulated professions.
EARLY RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission
opened 196 internal market files in EU Pilot in 2012, and processed 141. In 115
cases, it accepted Member States’ responses (81 % success rate). At the end of 2012, 176 internal
market files remained open in EU Pilot.
Member States’
actions settled many disputes before Court procedure. For example: Romania and
Malta removed their nationality condition for public notaries; Bulgaria
annulled a security services contract for its national electricity company due
to misapplied EU public procurement rules;[163] France modified its
sector-based authorisation procedure for foreign investments;[164] and Cyprus
corrected its rules on buying secondary residences.[165]
IMPORTANT
JUDGMENTS
Among other,
the Court ruled that: the prior authorisation system for investors'
acquisitions in strategic Greek companies goes against the freedom of
establishment;[166]
and Belgium’s Limosa system is incompatible with the free provision of
services.[167]

The Court’s
preliminary rulings clarified: that hosting service providers could not be
obliged to invest in filtering systems that prevent violation of audio-visual
works’ copyright, if these systems extended to all users and content stored,
without time limits;[168]
the circumstances in which a piece of information would be deemed precise
enough to constitute insider information under the Market Abuse Directive;[169]
that when buying dual-use military materials, public tenders may be avoided
under certain conditions;[170]
the extent to which the exception based on horizontal cooperation between
public authorities can be invoked in public procurement;[171] whether the
right of distribution also applies to software downloaded from the internet
once its holder conferred the right of use;[172] and whether trade mark
applicants may seek protection for an entire range of goods or services by
referring to class headings of the Nice Classification.,[173]
 Outlook Important implementation work in 2013 includes:   §         Transposition assistance and conformity checks of key Single Market directives[174] §         Follow-up of the transposition of the Directive on alternative investment fund managers[175] 
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/index_en.htm 
MOBILITY & TRANSPORT
GENERAL
STATISTICS

There were 205 infringement cases
open in the area of transport at the end of 2012. This is the second-highest
number of cases in the Commission’s 21 reporting policy areas. The cases can be
broken down as follows:
148 transport
cases were launched in 2012, including letters of formal notice against:
Lithuania, Ireland, Belgium, Slovenia and Germany for failure to separate the
accounts of railway undertakings and railway infrastructure managers;[176]
Spain, Greece, Germany and the United Kingdom due to lack of port security
plans;[177]
Portugal and Spain due to lack of airport slot coordinators' independence;[178]
Belgium and Greece for failing to ratify the Western Balkans Aviation
Agreement; and Spain for increasing airport charges without the consultation
required by the Airport Charges Directive.[179]
The Commission
referred ten transport infringement cases to the Court in 2012, including a
case against Bulgaria due to incorrect implementation of the First Railway
Package as regards railway track access charges.[180] Nine
referrals were due to late transposition of directives (see next section).
By the end of
2012, Member States had not complied with the two Court judgments made in the
transport area under Article 258 TFEU in late 2012 (see last section). 
TRANSPOSITION
OF DIRECTIVES
The Commission
launched 115 late transposition infringement cases in the transport area in
2012 (240 in 2011). At the end of 2012, 99 were still open.
Of the six
transport-related directives with a 2012 transposition deadline, late
transposition infringement cases were launched on two of them: intelligent
transport systems for road transport[181] and ships’ reporting
formalities[182].

The Commission
referred the following Member States to the Court proposing financial sanctions
under Article 260(3) TFEU: Finland (late transposition of the Clean Vehicles
Directive[183]
and the Road Safety Management Directive[184]); Cyprus (Driving Licence
Directive[185]);
and Poland (Maritime Accident Investigation Directive[186] and Airport
Charges Directive[187]). The Commission referred four other late
transposition cases to the Court[188],
against: Finland (in connection with driving licence rules[189] – two cases);
Portugal (driving licence rules[190]); and Poland (a railway
interoperability directive[191]).

COMPLAINTS
The Commission
received 68 complaints on transport issues in 2012, slightly more than in 2011
(65).
Most concerned
violations of air and rail passenger rights. There were also numerous
complaints on the road safety sector (e.g. driving licences). From the 91
transport-related complaints handled in 2012, the Commission closed 64 and
transferred 20 to EU Pilot for discussion with Member States.
Upon a petition
from the European Parliament, the Commission investigated Malta’s bus fare
system and urged Austria to put in place a public service obligation and a
system for differentiating toll rates.
OWN-INITIATIVE
CASES
The
infringement cases discussed in the general statistics section (except for the
Spanish one) were launched on the Commission’s own initiative. The Commission
also continued  to extend the social protection afforded by the Drivers’
Working Time Directive to self-employed drivers.[192]
EARLY
RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission
opened 164 new transport files in EU Pilot and processed 141 in 2012. In 96
cases, it accepted the Member State’s explanations or actions (68 % success rate). 117 transport files remained open
in EU Pilot at the end of 2012. 
Important
infringement cases closed in 2012 include three cases on implementing the First
Railway Package in Ireland, Denmark and Slovakia.[193] In
addition, Italy justified its lower port taxes on intra-EU sea traffic and
Spain introduced a non-discriminatory port charge system following a Court
judgment.[194]
IMPORTANT
JUDGMENTS
The Court
found that Greece failed to adopt the tariff units used for calculating railway
infrastructure costs[195]
and that Portugal kept the state railway company’s capital transactions under
government control and failed to ensure that the infrastructure manager’s
accounts were balanced.[196]
 Outlook Important implementation work in 2013 includes: §         Analysing the impact of four key judgments relating to the First Railway Package[197] §         Application of the internal market principle in the port sector §         Directives on airport charges and ships’ reporting formalities: conformity checks 
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/transport/index_en.htm
REGIONAL POLICY
GENERAL
STATISTICS
The Commission received considerably fewer
complaints in the area of regional policy in 2012 than it did in 2011. The
number of new EU Pilot files on regional policy has therefore been stable. Although
the Commission handled many complaints on regional policy in 2012, it did not
open any new infringement procedures in this area. One case (concerning Puerto
Punta Langosteira in Spain) was closed in September 2012.
COMPLAINTS
The Commission received 33 new complaints on
regional policy in 2012. The number of complaints has decreased by two-thirds
since 2011, when 92 complaints were received.
Most complaints concerned the selection of
projects under funding programmes. As in previous years, the main reasons were:
rejection of financial support, individual projects’ non-compliance with EU law
on environment or public procurement, and problems with specific infrastructure
projects (e.g. wastewater treatment plants).
The Commission processed 106 complaints related to
regional policy in 2012. It fully closed most of them (84). It transferred
three to EU Pilot for discussion with Member States.
The European Parliament sent the Commission seven
petitions on regional policy.
EARLY
RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission opened three new files based on
complaints in EU Pilot and processed 15 in 2012. In 11 cases, it accepted the
Member State’s explanations or commitments (73 % success rate). At the end of 2012, eight files
were still open in EU Pilot.
Since 2012, files that are subject to procedures
set up solely to ensure the legality of payments and/or sound financial
management of resources available from EU funds are not subject to the EU Pilot
procedure. Files subject to procedures that go beyond financial aspects and
concern the correct application of EU law must go through EU Pilot.
IMPORTANT
JUDGMENTS
The Court made fourteen judgments on regional
policy issues in 2012. In most of these cases, the Court rejected Member
States' appeals against Commission decisions making financial corrections due
to irregular public procurement procedures and ineligible expenditure.[198]
Further information is available at:
http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/index_en.cfm
HEALTH & CONSUMERS
GENERAL
STATISTICS

There were 98 open infringement
cases in the health and consumers area at the end of 2012. This is the fifth
highest number of cases in the Commission’s 21 reporting policy areas. The
cases can be broken down as follows:
The Commission launched 132 infringement cases in
the health and consumers area in 2012. These included cases on implementing the
ban on ‘un-enriched cages for laying hens,[199] a case against Latvia for
not protecting sufficiently consumers’ collective interests with injunctions,[200]
and a case against Denmark for allowing the sale of loose snus.[201]
The Commission referred two disputes on issues of
EU health and consumer law to the Court in 2012. One case against Portugal
concerned transposition of the directive on distance marketing of consumer
products; Portuguese law does not allow a consumer withdrawing from a service
contract to automatically cancel all linked contracts. Another was brought
against Poland due to its failure to simplify its mechanism for putting ‘old’
vegetable seeds on the market.
TRANSPOSITION
OF DIRECTIVES
In 2012, the Commission opened 108 infringement
cases due to missing or partial national transposition measures for directives
in the health and consumer area. There remained 57 open late transposition
cases in this area by the end of 2012.
Of the directives with transposition deadlines in
2012, two were most problematic. The Commission launched cases against 19
Member States for failing to notify their transposition measures on
pharmacovigilance[202]
(the Directive amending the Community code relating to medicinal products for
human use[203]).
It launched cases against 17 Member States for late transposition of the
Directive on standards of quality and safety of human organs intended for
transplantation[204].
COMPLAINTS
The Commission received 125 complaints on health
and consumers issues in 2012, which is an increase over 2011 (99 incoming
complaints). 
Most complaints concerned public health, food
safety and animal welfare. Medical devices and medicinal products were two new
areas in which complaints were received in 2012.
The Commission processed 106 health and consumers
complaints in 2012. It fully closed more than half of them (60) and transferred
36 to EU Pilot so that Member States could react to them. 
At the request of the European Parliament, the
Commission investigated four petitions on EU rules on animal by-products,
public health and food safety.
OWN-INITIATIVE
CASES
In 2012, the Commission worked on ensuring that
the directive on protection of pigs[205]
was properly transposed and that compliance was achieved, in particular on the
welfare of sows. In addition, the Commission pursued conformity assessments on
the proper transposition of Human Blood Directives[206].
Furthermore, continued efforts were necessary to ensure proper application of
other provisions on animal welfare and on genetically-modified organisms
(GMOs).
EARLY
RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission opened 72 EU Pilot files on health
and consumers issues and processed 57 in 2012. In 42 cases, it accepted the
Member State’s explanations or commitments (74 % success rate). At the end of 2012, 66 files were
still open in EU Pilot.
The cases against Latvia and Slovakia for
incorrect transposition of the directive on protecting consumers’ interests
with injunctions were closed in 2012 without being referred to the Court. The
cases on protecting laying hens against Belgium, Bulgaria, France, Hungary,
Latvia, the Netherlands, Portugal and Romania were closed as well.
IMPORTANT
JUDGMENTS
The Court ruled that by allowing in certain
circumstances the import of non-authorised medicinal products, Poland has
infringed the medicinal product code.[207] It also clarified the powers
of a Member State validating a marketing authorisation application. It ruled
that France infringed EU legislation on veterinarian medicinal products by
refusing to authorise the marketing of two of them.[208] When France banned the marketing of certain medicinal
veterinary products in a procedure falling also under EU rules[209], the Court specified the role of the "reference Member State" when several Member States
work together to authorise a medicinal product[210].
 Outlook Important implementation work in 2013 includes: §         Follow-up of transposition of Directives on cross-border health care[211] and on falsified medicines[212] §         Pursuing Member States that fail to fully comply with the pig protection directive (to implement group housing of sows) §         Monitoring the correct transposition of the Consumer Credit Directive[213] 
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/index_en.htm
TAXATION & CUSTOMS UNION
GENERAL STATISTICS

There were 193 open infringement
cases in the taxation area at the end of 2012. This is the third highest number
of cases in the Commission’s 21 reporting policy areas. The cases can be broken
down as follows:
The Commission launched 49 taxation
cases in 2012. It delivered reasoned opinions to: France and Luxembourg on their
reduced VAT rates for electronic books (e-books)[214]; Hungary on
its retail and telecommunication taxes[215]; and Bulgaria on certain
duty and tax relief provisions included in a bilateral agreement on technical
assistance concluded with the United States.[216]
The Commission brought seven taxation
cases before the Court in 2012, including: three against the UK (tax
legislation on cross-border loss relief,[217] taxation system for assets
transferred abroad,[218]
attribution of gains to members of non-resident companies[219]); and one
against Germany for excluding certain non-resident companies from the benefits
of its corporation tax fiscal unity regime.[220] 
At the end of 2012, Member States had
still not complied with 16 Court judgments under Article 258 TFEU. They may
face financial sanctions under Article 260(2) TFEU.
TRANSPOSITION OF DIRECTIVES
The Commission opened 18 infringement
cases due to partial or incomplete communication of national implementing rules
in 2012. However, only four of these were still open at the end of the year,
because Member States acted quickly to ensure compliance with EU law.
Three tax directives had a
transposition deadline in 2012. There were only three infringement cases for
partial or incomplete communication on transposing the Directive on the
taxation system applicable to parent companies and subsidiaries in different
Member States[221].
The other two directives with transposition deadlines in 2012 were: the
Directive on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation[222]
and the Directive on mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to
taxes and duties.[223]
COMPLAINTS
The Commission received 384 complaints
on taxation issues in 2012, slightly fewer than in 2011 (411 complaints).
In the direct taxation area, most
complaints concerned: the discriminatory taxation of cross-border workers;
inheritance and gift taxes; and the discriminatory taxation of companies or
individuals moving abroad (exit tax). In the indirect taxation area, most
complaints concerned VAT and car registration taxes.[224] Most
customs-related complaints concerned customs fees and direct representation. 
The Commission processed 396 tax
complaints in 2012. It fully closed 286 of them and transferred 89 to EU Pilot
for discussion with Member States.
OWN-INITIATIVE CASES
The Commission addressed the lack of
import control systems. It continued to scrutinise tax exemptions and to ensure
strict interpretation of the rules, because of the potential impact of tax
exemptions on the EU’s own resources. It also continued to monitor the correct
application of the Court’s case law on leasing and use of company cars. It
launched several own-initiative cases on discriminatory inheritance and gift
taxes and ‘‘exit taxes’’ (paid when companies or individuals move abroad).
EARLY RESOLUTION OF INFRINGEMENTS
The Commission opened 132
taxation-related files in EU Pilot and processed 130 in 2012. In 74 cases, it
accepted the Member State’s explanations or commitments (57 % success rate). At the end of 2012, 119 were
still open in.
Several important cases were resolved
before the Court made a judgment under Article 258 TFEU because Member States
complied with EU law. They included cases on discriminatory car taxation rules
in Cyprus [225]
and on taxes applied to controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) in the UK.[226]

IMPORTANT JUDGMENTS
The Court of Justice ruled that the
following tax regimes were discriminatory: exclusion of non-resident pensioners
from tax allowances granted under Estonian law because, due to the modest
amount of the pension, it was not taxable in the Member State of residence;[227];in
Finland, taxation of dividends paid to non-resident pension funds by foreign
companies based in Finland for tax purposes;[228] in Spain, restrictive exit
tax on individuals who cease to be tax resident in Spain;[229] the French VAT reduction for opening night receptions in
theatres[230] and for the supply of race horses[231], as well as France's local electricity taxes[232];and
in Portugal, the exemption of farmers from paying VAT.[233]
In a preliminary ruling, the Court
confirmed that France cannot tax nationally-sourced dividends received by UCITS[234]
resident abroad, while exempting such dividends from tax if they are received
by UCITS resident in France.[235]
 Outlook Important implementation work for 2013 includes: §         EU-wide initiative to remove the discriminatory taxation of mobile persons §         Continuing EU-wide initiatives to remove discriminatory taxation of cross-border workers and cross-border inheritances §         Using the Customs Monitoring Programme to detect infringements related to Remission and Recovery, Simplified Procedure and Tariff/Taric 
Further information is available at: 
http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm
[1]               Common
organisation of the markets in agricultural products
[2]               Commission
v the Czech Republic, C-37/11
[3]               Regulation
(EC) No 1234/2007
[4]               Bonda, C-489/10
[5]               Regulation
(EC) No 1553/1989
and Regulation (EC) No 1150/2000.
[6]               The two
above-mentioned Regulations establish a conciliation mechanism, whose function
is similar to that of EU Pilot.
[7]               Regulation
(EC) No 842/2006
[8]               Directive
2011/63/EC
[9]               IP/12/415
[10]             Directive2008/101/EC
[11]             Directive2009/29/EC
[12]             Directives
2011/63/EC
and 2009/30/EC
[13]             Directive 2009/31/EC
[14]             Regulations
(EC) Nos 842/2006
and 1005/2009
[15]             Directive 2002/21/EC
[16]             Directive 2002/19/EC
[17]             IP/12/286
[18]             Commission
v Portugal, C-154/09
[19]             IP/12/287
[20]             Directive 2009/136/EC
[21]             Directive 2009/140/EC
[22]             Directive 2007/65/EC
[23]             IP/12/630
[24]             Directive 2003/98/EC
[25]             Directive 2002/77/EC
[26]             Directive 2002/21/EC
[27]             Directive 2002/20/EC
[28]             IP/12/298
[29]             Directive 97/67/EC
[30]             Dimosia
Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) v Commission, T-169/08
[31]             Commission
v DEI, C-553/12 P and Commission v DEI, C-554/12 P
[32]             Commission
v Spain, C‑610/10
[33]             Commission
v Austria, C-75/11
[34]             Directive 2004/38/EC
[35]             Commission
v the Netherlands, C-92/07
[36]             In
particular, the 1970 Additional
Protocol and Decision No 1/80
of the Association Council. 
[37]             MEMO/12/794
[38]             Directive 2003/88/EC
[39]             IP/12/1145
[40]             Commission
v Germany, C-206/10
[41]             Commission
v the Netherlands, C-542/09
[42]             Directive 2008/104/EC
[43]             Directive 2009/161/EU
[44]             Directive 89/391/EEC
[45]             Directive 92/57/EEC
[46]             Directive 2009/148/EC
[47]             Hudziński
and Wawrzyniak, C-611/10
and C-612/10
[48]             Commission
v Netherlands, C-542/09
[49]             Erny, C-172/11
[50]             Dominguez, C-282/10
[51]             Directive 2010/32/EU
[52]             Directive 2008/104/EC 
[53]              Regulation
(EU) No 994/2010
[54]             Directive 2009/28/EC
[55]             Directive 2002/91/EC
[56]                    IP/12/411
[57]             IP/12/52
[58]             Directive 2010/31/EU
[59]             Directives
2009/72/EC
and 2009/73/EC
[60]             IP/12/1139
and IP/12/1236
[61]             Directive 2009/73/EC
and IP 06/1768
[62]              IP 06/1768 on the earlier reasoned opinion
[63]              IP 09/1035 on the earlier
letter of formal notice and MEMO 09/926
[64]              IP/11/590 on the earlier reasoned
opinion
[65]              IP/11/414 on the earlier
reasoned opinion
[66]             Regulation
(EU, Euratom) No 617/2010
[67]             Parliament
v Council, C-490/10
[68]             Directive 2011/70/Euratom
[69]             Regulation
(EC) No 1907/2006
[70]             The CE
marking
proves that the product had been assessed before it was placed on the market.
[71]             Construction products
list (explanation).
[72]             IP/12/648
[73]             IP/12/649
[74]             Directive 2012/10/EU
[75]             Directive 2012/4/EU
[76]             Articles
34 to 36 TFEU
[77]             IP/11/610 on the earlier
reasoned opinion
[78]             IP/10/1220 on the earlier
reasoned opinion
[79]             IP/11/1415 on the earlier
referral decision
[80]             Fra.bo, C-171/11
[81]             As defined
by Directive 98/34/EC
[82]             Fortuna
and Others, C-213/11
[83]             ANETT, C-456/10
[84]             Directive 2011/7/EU
[85]             Regulation
(EC) No 305/2011
[86]             Commission
v Poland and Commission v Lithuania, cases C-639/11 and C-61/12
[87]             Directive 2011/92/EU
[88]             Directive 2009/147/EC
[89]             Directive 92/43/EEC,

[90]             Directive 2008/98/EC,
IP/12/422
[91]             Directive 1999/31/EC,
IP/12/1140,
IP/12/655
and IP/12/1023
[92]             Directive 2000/60/EC,
IP/12/536
[93]             IP/12/658
[94]             IP/12/170
[95]             IP/12/1140
[96]             Directive 1985/337/EEC,
IP/12/657
[97]             Directive 2009/126/EC
[98]             Directive 2008/98/EC
and IP/12/422
[99]             Directive 2008/56/EC
[100]            Directive 2002/96/EC
[101]            Directive 2006/21/EC
[102]            Directive 2007/60/EC
[103]            Directive 94/62/EC
[104]            Directive 2000/53/EC
[105]            Directive 2011/92/EU
[106]            Directive 2001/42/EC
[107]            Directive 2001/80/EC
[108]            Commission
v Ireland, cases C-279/11
and C-374/11
[109]            Commission
v Belgium, C-366/11;
Commission v Greece, C-297/11;
Commission v Portugal, C-223/11;
and Commission v Spain, C-403/11
and Directive 2000/60/EC
[110]            E.g. cases
Solvay and others, C-182/10;
Flachglas Torgau, C-204/09;
Syllogos Ellinon Poleodomonkaichorotakton, C-177/11;
Nomarchiaki Aftodioikisi Aitoloakarnanias and others, C-43/10;
and Amia, C-97/11.

[111]            Directive 2010/75/EU
[112]            Directive 2008/50/EC
[113]            Directive 2003/35/EC
and Council Decision 2005/370/EC
[114]            Directive 2006/24/EC
[115]            Regulation
(EC) No 343/2003
[116]            Directive 2003/9/EC
[117]            Directive 2005/85/EC
[118]            Directive 2004/83/EC
[119]            IP/12/1247
[120]            Commission
v Sweden, C‑270/11
[121]            IP/12/530
[122]            Regulation
(EC) No 1931/2006
[123]            Regulation
(EC) No 810/2009
[124]            Directive 2003/86/EC
[125]            Directive 2003/109/EC
[126]            Commission
v the Netherlands, C-508/10,
Court press release No 52/12
[127]            Kamberaj,
C-571/10, Court
press release No 48/12
[128]            Y and Z,
joined Cases C-71/11
and C-99/11,
Court press release No 108/12
[129]            Cimade and Groupe
d’information et de soutien des immigrés (GISTI), C-179/11, Court press release No 119/12
[130]            Abed El Karem El Kott
and Others, C-364/11
[131]            Atiqullah Adil v Minister
voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel, C-278/12
[132]            Directives 2009/50/EC, 2009/52/EC, 2008/115/EC, 2008/114/EC, 2003/109/EC and 2003/86/EC
[133]            Commission
v Sweden, C-270/11
and Commission v Germany, C-329/12
[134]            Directive 2011/51/EU
[135]            Directive 2011/36/EU
[136]            Directive 2011/95/EU
[137]            Regulation
(EC) No 810/2009
[138]            The Bunker Convention (Austria, the Czech
Republic, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia and Sweden) and the 2004 Protocol amending the Paris
Convention on third-party liability in the field of nuclear energy (Italy and
Belgium).
[139]            IP/12/395 and Directive 2000/78/EC.
[140]            IP/12/395 and Directive 95/46/EC.
[141]            Directive 2010/18/EU.
[142]            Directive 2010/41/EU
[143]            IP/12/1016 and Directive 2008/52/EC
[144]            IP/12/296 and Directive 2008/99/EC 
[145]            Report on the Application of
the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
[146]            Waltraud
Brachner v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt, C-123/10
[147]            29th
Annual Report on monitoring the
application of EU law, p. 53.
[148]            IP/12/646 (Austria, Germany and
Sweden), IP/12/417 (the United Kingdom), IP/12/75 (the
Czech Republic and Lithuania) and Directive 2004/38/EC
[149]            IP/12/644
[150]            Directive
2000/78/EC
[151]            Commission
v Hungary, C‑286/12 and Directive 2000/78/EC
[152]            Commission v Austria, C-614/10 and Directive 95/46/EC
[153]            Secretary of State for the Home Department v Muhammad
Sazzadur Rahman a.o., C-83/11
[154]            Directive 2004/38/EC
[155]            Directives 2004/113/EC and 2006/54/EC
[156]            Commission
v Italy, C-249/08
[157]            Commission
v Spain, C-189/07
[158]            Directives 73/239/EEC
and 92/49/EEC
[159]            IP/12/1249
[160]            Directive 2010/73/EU
[161]            IP/12/1020 and Directive 2009/81/EC
[162]            IP/12/1248 and Directive 2009/110/EC
[163]            IP/11/715 on the earlier
reasoned opinion
[164]            IP/06/1353 on the earlier
reasoned opinion
[165]            IP/11/416 on the earlier
reasoned opinion
[166]            Commission
v Greece, C-244/11
[167]            Limosa
is a prior declaration scheme for all posted workers. Commission v Belgium, C-577/10
[168]            SABAM, C-360/10
[169]            Directive 2003/6/EC and Geltl, C-19/11
[170]            Insinööritoimisto
InsTiimi, C-615/10
[171]            ASL Leece, C-159/11
[172]            UsedSoft, C-128/11
[173]            The Nice
Classification is a WIPO database. Chartered Institute of
Patent Attorneys, C-307/10
[174]            See the
annex of the Communication on ‘Better Governance for the Single Market’ (COM(2012) 259/2).
[175]            Directive 2011/61/EU
[176]            Directive 91/440/EEC
[177]            Directive 2005/65/EC
[178]            Regulation
(EEC) No 95/93
[179]            Directive 2009/12/EC
[180]            IP/12/53; a detailed
description on the First Railway Package is available here.
[181]            Directive 2010/40/EU
[182]            Directive 2010/65/EU
[183]            IP/12/270 and Directive 2009/33/EC
[184]            IP/12/641 and Directive 2008/96/EC
[185]            IP/12/1237 and Directive 2006/126/EC
[186]            IP/12/643 and Directive 2009/18/CE
[187]            IP/12/1143 and Directive 2009/12/EC
[188]            As the
directives in question were not adopted by legislative procedure, Article
260(3) TFEU does not apply.
[189]            IP/12/56 and Directive 2009/112/EC and Directive2009/113/EC
[190]            IP/12/56 and Directive 2009/113/EC
[191]            IP/12/1136 and Directive 2011/18/EU
[192]            Directive 2002/15/EC
[193]            IP/10/807
[194]            Commission
v Spain, C-18/09
[195]            Commission
v Greece, C-528/10
[196]            Commission
v Portugal, C-557/10
[197]            Commission v Hungary, C-473/10, Commission v Spain, C-483/10, Commission v Austria,
C-555/10 and Commission v
Germany, C-556/10; and Court Press
Release No 20/13
[198]            For
example: Portugal v Commission, T-111/10;
Spain v Commission, joined cases T-178/10,
T-263/10 and T-265/10; Hungary v Commission, cases T-89/10
and T-407/10;
Germany v Commission, cases T-265/08
and T-270/08;
GAMP, C-579/11;
Portugal v Commission, C-246/11;
TME v Commission, T-329/11;
Région Poitou-Charentes v Commission, T-31/12;
and Spain v Commission, T-96/12.
[199]            According
to Directive 1999/74/EC, as
from 1 January 2012 all laying hens must be kept in ‘enriched cages’ with extra
space to nest, scratch and roost, or in alternative systems. Cages can be used
only if they provide each hen with at least 750 cm² of cage area, a nest-box,
litter, perches and claw-shortening devices (IP/12/47).
[200]            Directive 2009/22/EC
[201]            Directive 2001/37/EC prohibits placing
‘tobacco for oral use’ on the market (with an exception for Sweden), MEMO/12/794
[202]            Directive 2010/84/EU
[203]            Directive 2001/83/EC
[204]            Directive 2010/53/EU
[205]            Directive 2008/120/EC
[206]            Directive 2002/98/EC
and Directives 2004/33/EC,
2005/61/EC
and 2005/62/EC
[207]            Commission
v Poland, C-185/10 and Directive 2001/83/EC
[208]            Commission v France, C-145/11 and Directive 2001/82/EC
[209]            Directive 2001/82/EC 
[210]            Commission
v France, C-145/11
[211]            Directive 2011/24/EU
[212]            Directive 2011/62/EU
[213]            Directive 2008/48/CE
[214]            MEMO/12/794
[215]            MEMO/12/876
[216]            IP/12/672
[217]            IP/12/1017
[218]            IP/12/1147
[219]            IP/12/1146
[220]            IP/12/283
[221]            Directive 2011/96/EU
[222]            Directive 2011/16/EU
[223]            Directive 2010/24/EU
[224]            Member
States tend to follow their own policies after the Council refused the
Commission’s proposal for a harmonisation directive in 2005.
[225]            IP/11/1277
[226]            IP/11/606
[227]            Commission v
Estonia, C-39/10
[228]            Commission v
Finland, C-342/10
[229]            Commission v
Spain, C-269/09.
[230]            Commission v
France, C-119/11
[231]            Commission v
France, C-596/10
[232]            Commission v
France, C-164/11
[233]            Commission
v Portugal, C-524/10
[234]            UCITS: undertakings
for collective investments in transferable securities.
[235]            Santander
Asset Management SGIIC, joined cases C-338/11 and C-347/11