do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013294EN.01000201.xml










10.10.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

9 October 2013
2013/C 294/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3515




JPY


Japanese yen


131,55




DKK


Danish krone


7,4595




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84640




SEK


Swedish krona


8,7445




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2313




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,1100




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,598




HUF


Hungarian forint


296,20




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7027




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1995




RON


Romanian leu


4,4658




TRY


Turkish lira


2,6857




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4299




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4029




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,4801




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6269




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6918




KRW


South Korean won


1 453,88




ZAR


South African rand


13,5072




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2709




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6125




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 068,43




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3222




PHP


Philippine peso


58,346




RUB


Russian rouble


43,7300




THB


Thai baht


42,488




BRL


Brazilian real


2,9800




MXN


Mexican peso


17,8128




INR


Indian rupee


83,5980






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-622/11: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Pactor Vastgoed BV (Sixth VAT Directive — Articles 13C and 20 — Supply of immovable property — Right to opt for taxation — Right to deduction — Adjustment of deductions — Recovery of sums due following adjustment of a VAT deduction — Taxable person liable for payment — Taxable person other than the person who initially applied the deduction and who is extraneous to the taxed transaction which gave rise to the deduction)
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, basis of tax assessment, delivery, real property, tax relief








C_2013344EN.01001601.xml










23.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 344/16





Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Pactor Vastgoed BV
(Case C-622/11) (1)

(Sixth VAT Directive - Articles 13C and 20 - Supply of immovable property - Right to opt for taxation - Right to deduction - Adjustment of deductions - Recovery of sums due following adjustment of a VAT deduction - Taxable person liable for payment - Taxable person other than the person who initially applied the deduction and who is extraneous to the taxed transaction which gave rise to the deduction)
2013/C 344/25
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant: Pactor Vastgoed BV

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Article 20 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Deduction of input tax — Adjustment of deductions previously made — Supply of a property by a supplier to a real estate company — Supply dealt with by the parties, although not by the applicable legislation, as a taxable transaction

Operative part of the judgment

Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995, must be interpreted as precluding the recovery of amounts due following the adjustment of a value added tax deduction from a taxable person other than the person who applied that deduction.


(1)  OJ C 73, 10.3.2012.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Irish Sea, Netherlands, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, ship's flag








C_2013294EN.01000301.xml










10.10.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/3





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
2013/C 294/03
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


12.8.2013




Duration


12.8.2013-31.12.2013




Member State


The Netherlands




Stock or group of stocks


HER/6AS7BC




Species


Herring (Clupea harengus)




Zone


VIaS, VIIb, VIIc




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


35/TQ39






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Case C-534/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 10 October 2013 — Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare and Others v Fipa Group and Others
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, cost of pollution, environmental liability, environmental monitoring, general legal principle, polluter pays principle, prevention of pollution








C_2013359EN.01000601.xml










7.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 359/6





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 10 October 2013 — Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare and Others v Fipa Group and Others
(Case C-534/13)
2013/C 359/08
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Ministero della Salute, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA)

Respondents: Fipa Group srl, Ivan srl, TWS Automation srl

Question referred

Do the European Union principles relating to the environment, laid down in Article 191(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in Directive 2004/35/EC (1) of 21 April 2004 (Articles 1 and 8(3) and recitals 13 and 24 in the preamble) — specifically, the ‘polluter pays’principle, the precautionary principle and the principles that preventive action should be taken and that environmental damage should be rectified at source as a matter of priority — preclude national legislation, such as the rules set out in Articles 244, 245 and 253 of Legislative Decree No 152 of 3 April 2006, which, in circumstances in which it is established that a site is contaminated and in which it is impossible to identify the polluter or to have that person adopt the restoration measures, do not permit the administrative authority to require the owner (who is not responsible for the pollution) to implement the emergency safety and decontamination measures, merely attributing to that person financial liability limited to the value of the site once the decontamination measures have been carried out?


(1)  Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage (OJ 2004 L 143, p. 56).
Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Union of fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India: modification of the corporate name of a company subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: India, anti-dumping measure, chemical alcohol, import (EU), originating product, registration of a company








C_2013294EN.01001101.xml










10.10.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/11





Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Union of fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India: modification of the corporate name of a company subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate
2013/C 294/11
Imports of fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India are subject to definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 (1).
VVF Limited, a company located in the Republic of India, whose exports to the Union of fatty alcohols and their blends are subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate of EUR 46,98 per tonne net, pursuant to Article 1(2) of the aforementioned Regulation, has informed the European Commission that on 1 June 2012, the operations pertinent to the production and exports of fatty alcohols and their blends have been moved to another legal entity within the existing group with the name VVF (India) Limited.
The Commission has examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011. Therefore, the reference in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 to ‘VVF Ltd’ should be read as ‘VVF (India) Ltd’, with the corporate address unchanged.
The TARIC additional code B110 previously attributed to VVF Ltd shall apply to VVF (India) Ltd.


(1)  OJ L 293, 11.11.2011, p. 1.
Case C-321/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — F. van der Helder, D. Farrington v College voor zorgverzekeringen (Social security — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 28(2)(b) — Sickness insurance benefits — Entitlement to an old-age pension in several Member States — Residence in another Member State — Provision of benefits in kind in the State of residence — Burden of the cost of benefits — Member State ‘legislation’ to which the pensioner has been subject for the longest period of time — Concept)
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: health insurance, pension scheme, residence








C_2013344EN.01003302.xml










23.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 344/33





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — F. van der Helder, D. Farrington v College voor zorgverzekeringen
(Case C-321/12) (1)

(Social security - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 28(2)(b) - Sickness insurance benefits - Entitlement to an old-age pension in several Member States - Residence in another Member State - Provision of benefits in kind in the State of residence - Burden of the cost of benefits - Member State ‘legislation’ to which the pensioner has been subject for the longest period of time - Concept)
2013/C 344/57
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Centrale Raad van Beroep

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: F. van der Helder, D. Farrington

Defendant: College voor zorgverzekeringen

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Centrale Raad van Beroep — Interpretation of Articles 4 and 28(2)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1971 (II), p. 416) — Sickness insurance — Benefits for pensioners resident in a Member State other than that of the competent institution — Benefits to be paid by the institution of the Member State in which the person concerned has been covered for the longest period — Concept of ‘legislation [to which] the pensioner has been subject for the longest period of time’

Operative part of the judgment

Article 28(2)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, in the version amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1992/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006, must be interpreted as meaning that ‘legislation’ to which the pensioner has been subject for the longest period of time, for the purpose of that provision, refers to legislation concerning pensions.


(1)  OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.
Decisions in the context of the monitoring of the implementation of decisions regarding restructuring and liquidation aid for financial institutions  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Ireland, State aid, aid for restructuring, financial institution, liquidation








C_2013294EN.01000101.xml










10.10.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 294/1





Decisions in the context of the monitoring of the implementation of decisions regarding restructuring and liquidation aid for financial institutions
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 294/01






Date of adoption of the decision


9.7.2013




Reference number of the aid


SA.36784 (13/MC)




Member State


Ireland




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Bank of Ireland: Amendment of commitments




Type of decision


Decisions in the context of the monitoring of the implementation of decisions regarding restructuring and liquidation aid for financial institutions




Content


Adaptation of structural requirements: swap of a business to be divested, Adaptation of behavioural measures or similar requirements, Other adaptation




Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 768/2013 of 8 August 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 917/2004 on detailed rules to implement Council Regulation (EC) No 797/2004 on measures improving general conditions for the production and marketing of apiculture products ( OJ L 214, 9.8.2013 )
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU financing, aid to agriculture, apiculture, payment








L_2013268EN.01001701.xml










10.10.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 268/17







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 768/2013 of 8 August 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 917/2004 on detailed rules to implement Council Regulation (EC) No 797/2004 on measures improving general conditions for the production and marketing of apiculture products
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 214 of 9 August 2013
)

On page 8, in the Annex table, row HR:
for:







‘HR


491 481 ’,





read:







‘HR


491 981 ’.
Case T-399/13: Order of the General Court of 10 October 2013 — KO-Invest v OHIM — Kraft Foods Schweiz (Milkoshake For Active People)
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, foodstuff, miscellaneous industries, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013359EN.01002002.xml










7.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 359/20





Order of the General Court of 10 October 2013 — KO-Invest v OHIM — Kraft Foods Schweiz (Milkoshake For Active People)
(Case T-399/13) (1)

2013/C 359/38
Language of the case: Polish
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 284, 28.9.2013.
Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2012 of 21 December 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran ( OJ L 356, 22.12.2012 )
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions








L_2013268EN.01001801.xml










10.10.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 268/18







Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2012 of 21 December 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 356 of 22 December 2012
)

On page 58, Annex, Part I, ‘Entities’, entry 13:
for:










‘13.


Hong Kong Intertrade Company Ltd


Hong Kong Intertrade Company, Hong Kong


Hong Kong Intertrade Company Ltd (HKICO) is assisting designated entities to violate the provisions of the EU regulation on Iran and is providing financial support to the government of Iran. HKICO is a front company controlled by EU-designated National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC). In mid-2012 HKICO was scheduled to receive millions of dollars from NIOC oil sales.


22.12.2012’





read:










‘13.


HK Intertrade Company Ltd


HK Intertrade Company, 21st Floor, Tai Yau Building, 181 Johnston Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong


HK Intertrade Company Ltd (HKICO) is assisting designated entities to violate the provisions of the EU regulation on Iran and is providing financial support to the government of Iran. HKICO is a front company controlled by EU-designated National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC). In mid-2012 HKICO was scheduled to receive millions of dollars from NIOC oil sales.


22.12.2012’
Case C-353/12: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2013 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Aid for Ixfin SpA — Aid which is illegal and incompatible with the internal market — Recovery — Non-performance)
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, State aid, aid to undertakings, financial solvency, infringement of EU law, reimbursement of aid, single market








C_2013344EN.01003501.xml










23.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 344/35





Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2013 — European Commission v Italian Republic
(Case C-353/12) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - State aid - Aid for Ixfin SpA - Aid which is illegal and incompatible with the internal market - Recovery - Non-performance)
2013/C 344/60
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Grespan, B. Stromsky and S. Thomas, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and E. De Giovanni, avvocato dello Stato)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt the measures necessary to comply with Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Commission Decision C(2009) 8123 of 28 October 2009 on State aid C 59/07 implemented by Italy for Ixfin SpA (OJ 2010 L 167, p. 39) — Obligation to recover immediately aid declared unlawful and incompatible with the common market and to inform the Commission thereof — Insolvent undertaking — Implementation not absolutely impossible

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to adopt within the prescribed period all measures necessary to recover from Ixfin SpA the State aid declared unlawful and incompatible with the internal market in Article 1 of Commission Decision 2010/359/EC of 28 October 2009 on State aid C 59/07 (ex N 127/06 and NN 13/06) implemented by Italy for Ixfin SpA, and by not having submitted to the European Commission, within the period prescribed, the information listed in Article 4 of that decision, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the fourth paragraph of Article 288 TFEU and under Articles 2 to 4 of that decision;










2.


Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.
Joined Cases C-488/12 to C-491/12 and C-526/12: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Nagy Sándor (C-488/12) v Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal, Lajos Tiborné Böszörményi (C-489/12), Róbert Gálóczhi-Tömösváry (C-490/12), Magdolna Margit Szabadosné Bay (C-491/12) v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal and Józsefné Ványai (C-526/12) v Nagyrábé Község Polgármesteri Hivatal (Request for a preliminary ruling  — Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union  — Implementation of Union law  — Failure to implement Union law  — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: application of EU law, civil servant, jurisdiction, unfair dismissal








C_2014102EN.01000301.xml










7.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 102/3





Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Nagy Sándor (C-488/12) v Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal, Lajos Tiborné Böszörményi (C-489/12), Róbert Gálóczhi-Tömösváry (C-490/12), Magdolna Margit Szabadosné Bay (C-491/12) v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal and Józsefné Ványai (C-526/12) v Nagyrábé Község Polgármesteri Hivatal
(Joined Cases C-488/12 to C-491/12 and C-526/12) (1)

((Request for a preliminary ruling  - Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union  - Implementation of Union law  - Failure to implement Union law  - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court))
2014/C 102/03
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Nagy Sándor(C-488/12), Lajos Tiborné Böszörményi (C-489/12), Róbert Gálóczhi-Tömösváry (C-490/12), Magdolna Margit Szabadosné Bay (C-491/12) Józsefné Ványai (C-526/12)

Defendants: Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal (C-488/12), Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal (C-489/12, C-490/12, C-491/12), Nagyrábé Község Polgármesteri Hivatal (C-526/12)

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság — Interpretation of Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Unjustified dismissal — Dismissal without reasons being given — Official of a public administrative body dismissed on the basis of a provision of national legislation on the status of officials.

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary).


(1)  OJ C 79, 16.3.2013
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP of 21 December 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran ( OJ L 356, 22.12.2012 )
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Iran, economic sanctions, financial transaction, international sanctions, nuclear non-proliferation, terrorism








L_2013268EN.01001901.xml










10.10.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 268/19







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP of 21 December 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 356 of 22 December 2012
)

On page 75, Annex, Part I, Entities, entry 13:
for:










‘13.


Hong Kong Intertrade Company Ltd


Hong Kong Intertrade Company, Hong Kong


Hong Kong Intertrade Company Ltd (HKICO) is assisting designated entities to violate the provisions of the EU regulation on Iran and is providing financial support to the government of Iran. HKICO is a front company controlled by EU-designated National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC). In mid-2012 HKICO was scheduled to receive millions of dollars from NIOC oil sales.


22.12.2012’





read:










‘13.


HK Intertrade Company Ltd


HK Intertrade Company, 21st Floor, Tai Yau Building, 181 Johnston Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong


HK Intertrade Company Ltd (HKICO) is assisting designated entities to violate the provisions of the EU regulation on Iran and is providing financial support to the government of Iran. HKICO is a front company controlled by EU-designated National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC). In mid-2012 HKICO was scheduled to receive millions of dollars from NIOC oil sales.


22.12.2012’