P7_TA(2013)0416 European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR) ***I European Parliament legislative resolution of 10 October 2013 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing the European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR) (COM(2011)0873 — C7-0506/2011 — 2011/0427(COD)) P7_TC1-COD(2011)0427 Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 10 October 2013 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) No …/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Border Surveillance System (Eurosur)
Date: 2013-10-10
Institutions: Committee on Budgets, Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Development, Committee on Foreign Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: EU migration policy, Frontex, Schengen Agreement, border control, cross-border cooperation, exchange of information, external border of the EU, fight against crime, illegal migration, personal data








C_2016181EN.01021301.xml










19.5.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 181/213





P7_TA(2013)0416
European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR) ***I
European Parliament legislative resolution of 10 October 2013 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing the European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR) (COM(2011)0873 — C7-0506/2011 — 2011/0427(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
(2016/C 181/32)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2011)0873),










—


having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 77(2)(d) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C7-0506/2011),










—


having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to the reasoned opinion submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Swedish Parliament, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity,










—


having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 14 June 2013 to approve Parliament’s position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (A7-0232/2013),












1.


Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;












2.


Approves its statement annexed to this resolution;












3.


Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend its proposal substantially or replace it with another text;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.






P7_TC1-COD(2011)0427
Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 10 October 2013 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) No …/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Border Surveillance System (Eurosur)

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EU) No 1052/2013.)




ANNEX TO THE LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

Statement by the European Parliament

The European Parliament stresses that the EU institutions should endeavour to use appropriate and neutral terminology in legislative texts when addressing the issue of third-country nationals whose presence on the territory of the Member States has not been authorised by the Member States' authorities or is no longer authorised. In such cases, EU institutions should avoid using the word ‘illegal’ when it is possible to find alternative wording, and in all cases, when referring to persons, ‘irregular migrants’ should be used.