do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notifications under Article 37 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) — The possibility for a Member State to provide by law for an obligation to hold or carry papers and documents pursuant to Article 21(c)
Date: 2013-09-20
Institutions: Croatia
Subjects: Croatia, Schengen Agreement, border control, identity document, residence permit








C_2013272EN.01001001.xml










20.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 272/10





Notifications under Article 37 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)
The possibility for a Member State to provide by law for an obligation to hold or carry papers and documents pursuant to Article 21(c)
2013/C 272/09
CROATIA
The obligation to carry ID documents and other documents for State border crossing for third-country nationals is laid down in Article 139(2) and (3) of the Aliens Act (Official Journal 130/2011, 74/2013). It is applied to all foreigners present on Croatian territory.
Case T-506/13: Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB)
Date: 2013-09-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vehicle parts








C_2013352EN.01001701.xml










30.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 352/17





Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB)
(Case T-506/13)
2013/C 352/32
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA (Suceava, Romania) (represented by: I. Burdusel, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Harun Adiguzel (Diosd, Hungary)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 July 2013 given in Case R 1309/2012-4;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of present proceedings; and










—


Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs incurred during the proceedings before the OHIM.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘URB’ for goods in Classes 6 and 7 — Community trade mark registration No 7 380 009

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Absolute grounds for invalidity under Article 52(1)(b) CTMR and relative grounds for invalidity under Article 8(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 53(1)(a) CTMR

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the request for a declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 52(1)(b), 53(1)(a) and 72 CTMR.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6950 — UPC/GPT/JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-09-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Russia, economic concentration, gas, merger control, petrochemicals, plastics








C_2013272EN.01000402.xml










20.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 272/4





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6950 — UPC/GPT/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 272/03
On 16 September 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6950. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.
Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 October 2013 (Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 ( OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1 ))
Date: 2013-09-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, State aid, interest, reimbursement of aid








C_2013272EN.01000801.xml










20.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 272/8





Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 October 2013
(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))
2013/C 272/07
Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this Communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basis points has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending the Implementing Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate.
Modified rates are indicated in bold.
Previous table published in OJ C 210, 24.7.2013, p. 6.


































From


To


AT


BE


BG


CY


CZ


DE


DK


EE


EL


ES


FI


FR


HR


HU


IE


IT


LT


LU


LV


MT


NL


PL


PT


RO


SE


SI


SK


UK




1.10.2013


…


0,56


0,56


1,30


0,56



0,75



0,56


0,85


0,56


0,56


0,56


0,56


0,56


2,49


4,62


0,56


0,56



0,99



0,56


0,91


0,56


0,56


3,18


0,56


5,20


1,60


0,56


0,56


0,99




1.8.2013


30.9.2013


0,56


0,56


1,30


0,56


0,88


0,56


0,85


0,56


0,56


0,56


0,56


0,56


2,49


4,62


0,56


0,56



1,25



0,56



0,91



0,56


0,56


3,18


0,56


5,20


1,60


0,56


0,56


0,99




1.7.2013


31.7.2013


0,56


0,56


1,30


0,56


0,88


0,56


0,85


0,56


0,56


0,56


0,56


0,56



2,49




4,62



0,56


0,56



1,08



0,56


1,10


0,56


0,56



3,18



0,56



5,20



1,60


0,56


0,56


0,99
New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
Date: 2013-09-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Greece, commemoration, euro, issuing of currency








C_2013272EN.01000701.xml










20.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 272/7





New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
2013/C 272/06




National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Hellenic Republic

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.
Issuing country: The Hellenic Republic
Subject of commemoration: 100th anniversary of the union of Crete with Greece
Description of the design: The inner part of the coin depicts Cretan rebels raising the Greek flag, a symbolic representation of Crete’s struggle for Union with Greece. On the upper side, in circular sense and with capital letters the name of the issuing country ‘Hellenic Republic’ in Greek. Underneath the words: ‘100 years of the union of Crete with Greece’ in Greek. On the right: ‘1913-2013’ and the monogram of the Greek Mint. In exergue, ‘ΣΤΑΜ’ (monogram of the author G. Stamatopoulos).
The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.
Number of coins to be issued: up to 750 000
Date of issue: Autumn 2013


(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1, for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).
Case T-508/13: Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Government of Malaysia v OHIM — Vergamini (HALAL MALAYSIA)
Date: 2013-09-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Islam, United Kingdom, meat product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013352EN.01001702.xml










30.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 352/17





Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Government of Malaysia v OHIM — Vergamini (HALAL MALAYSIA)
(Case T-508/13)
2013/C 352/33
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Government of Malaysia (Putrajaya, Malaysia) (represented by: R. Volterra, Solicitor, R. Miller, Barrister, V. von Bomhard and T. Heitmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Paola Vergamini (Castelnuovo di Garfagnana, Italy)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 June 2013 given in Case R 326/2012-1; and










—


Order that the costs of proceedings be borne by the defendant and by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, if it joins as the intervener.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal elements ‘HALAL MALAYSIA’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 18, 25, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 9 169 343

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The non-registered figurative mark containing the verbal elements ‘HALAL MALAYSIA’, which is well known in all 27 Member States of the European Union within the meaning of Article 8(2)(c) CTMR in conjunction with Article 6bis of the Paris Convention and for the purpose of Article 8(4) CTMR a non-registered figurative mark in the United Kingdom

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(4) CTMR.
Case T-523/13: Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Euromed v OHIM — DC Druck-Chemie (EUROSIL)
Date: 2013-09-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, agricultural product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013352EN.01002101.xml










30.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 352/21





Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Euromed v OHIM — DC Druck-Chemie (EUROSIL)
(Case T-523/13)
2013/C 352/39
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Euromed, SA (Mollet del Vallès, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DC Druck-Chemie GmbH (Ammerbuch-Altingen, Germany)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 June 2013 given in Case R 1854/2012-1; and










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘EUROSIL’ for goods in Class 1 — Community trade mark application No 8 558 751

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘EUROSIL-85’ for goods in Class 5 — Community registration No 6 140 099 and the word mark ‘EUROSIL-85’ for goods in Class 5 — Spanish registration No 2 785 209

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.
Case F-92/13: Action brought on 20 September 2013 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2013-09-20
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, legal basis, transfer of pension rights








C_2013336EN.01003201.xml










16.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 336/32





Action brought on 20 September 2013 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-92/13)
2013/C 336/71
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to calculate the bonus on pension rights acquired before the entry into the service on the basis of the new GIP concerning Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials

Form of order sought







—


Declare Article 9 of the General Implementing Provisions of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations unlawful and, accordingly, inapplicable;










—


Annul the decision of 15 February 2013 to add a bonus to the pension rights acquired by the applicant before her entry into the service, on the transfer thereof to the pension scheme of the European Union institutions (‘EUIPS’), by application of the General Implementing Provisions (‘GIP’) of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011;










—


Order the Commission to pay the costs.
Case T-524/13: Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Euromed v OHIM — DC Druck-Chemie (EUROSIL)
Date: 2013-09-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, agricultural product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013352EN.01002102.xml










30.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 352/21





Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Euromed v OHIM — DC Druck-Chemie (EUROSIL)
(Case T-524/13)
2013/C 352/40
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Euromed, SA (Mollet del Vallès, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DC Druck-Chemie GmbH (Ammerbuch-Altingen, Germany)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 June 2013 given in Case R 1829/2012-1; and










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘EUROSIL’ for certain goods in Class 1 — Community trade mark application No 8 540 049

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘EUROSIL-85’ for goods in Class 5 — Community registration No 6 140 099 and the word mark ‘EUROSIL-85’ for goods in Class 5 — Spanish registration No 2 785 209

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8 (1)(b) CTMR.
Case F-99/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 20 September 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil Service — Remuneration — Payment of arrears of remuneration — Locus standi — Action manifestly inadmissible)
Date: 2013-09-20
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, deadline for payment, remuneration of work








C_2013325EN.01005102.xml










9.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 325/51





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 20 September 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-99/11) (1)

(Civil Service - Remuneration - Payment of arrears of remuneration - Locus standi - Action manifestly inadmissible)
2013/C 325/82
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission rejecting the applicant’s claim for payment of salary arrears for the period from 1 June 2005 to 21 July 2010.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Mr Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 67.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 918/2013 of 20 September 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for haddock in EU and international waters of Vb and VIa by vessels flying the flag of Spain
Date: 2013-09-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU waters, Faroes, Scotland, Spain, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, ship's flag








L_2013253EN.01000401.xml










25.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 253/4








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 918/2013
of 20 September 2013
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for haddock in EU and international waters of Vb and VIa by vessels flying the flag of Spain


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 39/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available to EU vessels for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are not subject to international negotiations or agreements (2), lays down quotas for 2013.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2013.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 20 September 2013.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 1.




ANNEX






No


42/TQ39




Member State


Spain




Stock


HAD/5BC6A.




Species


Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)




Zone


EU and international waters of Vb and VIa




Date


20.8.2013