do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-317/10 P: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — L v Parliament (Appeals — Staff cases — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Decision to dismiss — Obligation to state reasons — Loss of trust)
Date: 2013-09-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: application of EU law, dismissal, servant (EU)








C_2013304EN.01000902.xml










19.10.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 304/9





Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — L v Parliament
(Case T-317/10 P) (1)

(Appeals - Staff cases - Members of the temporary staff - Contract for an indefinite period - Decision to dismiss - Obligation to state reasons - Loss of trust)
2013/C 304/18
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties


Appellant: L (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented: initially by A. Sèbe and V. Sviderskis and subsequently by A. Sèbe, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented: initially by S. Seyr, K. Zejdová and L. Mašalaitė-Chouteau, subsequently by S. Seyr, K. Zejdová and S. Milius, and finally by S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union [confidential], (2) seeking to have that judgment set aside

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union [confidential] in so far as it did not rule on the plea alleging infringement of the principle of impartiality, rejected the plea alleging factual inaccuracy and a manifest error of assessment and held that the appellant had not claimed that the Parliament should be ordered to pay the costs;










2.


Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;










3.


Dismisses the action brought by Mr L before the Civil Service Tribunal in Case [confidential] as to the remainder;










4.


Orders each party to bear its own costs relating both to the first instance proceedings and the appeal proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.

(2)  Confidential data omitted.
Case F-126/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2013 — de Brito Sequeira Carvalho v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Disciplinary measures — Disciplinary procedure — Disciplinary sanction — Reprimand — Article 25 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Article 22a of the Staff Regulations)
Date: 2013-09-11
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, disciplinary proceedings, psychological harassment








C_2013352EN.01002302.xml










30.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 352/23





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2013 — de Brito Sequeira Carvalho v Commission
(Case F-126/11) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Disciplinary measures - Disciplinary procedure - Disciplinary sanction - Reprimand - Article 25 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Article 22a of the Staff Regulations)
2013/C 352/43
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: José Antonio de Brito Sequeira Carvalho (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Boury, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision of the Appointing Authority in so far as it issues a disciplinary sanction in the form of a written reprimand to the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr de Brito Sequeira Carvalho to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 174, 16.6.12, p. 31.
Case T-540/11: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Melkveebedrijf Overenk and Others v Commission (Action for damages — Levy in the milk and milk products sector — Regulation (EC) No 1468/2006 — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2013-09-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: dairy industry, indemnification, milk, regulation of agricultural production








C_2013336EN.01002301.xml










16.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 336/23





Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Melkveebedrijf Overenk and Others v Commission
(Case T-540/11) (1)

(Action for damages - Levy in the milk and milk products sector - Regulation (EC) No 1468/2006 - Manifest inadmissibility)
2013/C 336/47
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicants: Melkveebedrijf Overenk BV (Sint Anthonis, Netherlands); Maatschap Veehouderij Kwakernaak (Oosterwolde, Netherlands); Mulders Agro vof (Heerle, Netherlands); Melkveebedrijf Engelen vof (Grashoek, Netherlands); Melkveebedrijf De Peel BV (Heusden, Netherlands); and Mathijs Moonen (Nederweert, Netherlands) (represented by P. Mazel and A. van Beelen, lawyers)

Defendants: European Commission (represented by Z. Malůšková and B. Burggraaf, acting as Agents)

Re:

Claim for damages for the loss allegedly caused to the applicants by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1468/2006 of 4 October 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector (JO 2006 L 274, p. 6).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Melkveebedrijf Overenk BV, Maatschap Veehouderij Kwakernaak, Mulders Agro vof, Melkveebedrijf Engelen vof, Melkveebedrijf De Peel BV and Mr Mathijs Moonen are ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.
Case T-243/10: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Rungis express AG v OHIM — Žito (MARESTO) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2013-09-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013336EN.01002102.xml










16.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 336/21





Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Rungis express AG v OHIM — Žito (MARESTO)
(Case T-243/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 336/42
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Rungis express AG (Meckenheim, Germany) (represented: initially by U. Feldmann and subsequently by O. Dimopoulou, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt, R. Pethke and D. Botis, agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Žito prehrambena industrija d.d. (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: M. Praviček, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 March 2010 (Case R 691/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Žito prehrambena industrija d.d. and Rungis express AG.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The applicant and the intervener are ordered to bear their own costs and, each of them, to bear half of the defendant’s costs.






(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.
Judgment of the Court of 11 September 2013 in Case E-6/12 — EFTA Surveillance Authority v Kingdom of Norway (Failure by an EEA/EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 — Social security for migrant workers)
Date: 2013-09-11
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: Norway, children's rights, family benefit, infringement of EU law








C_2013372EN.01001701.xml










19.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 372/17





JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 11 September 2013
in Case E-6/12
EFTA Surveillance Authority v Kingdom of Norway
(Failure by an EEA/EFTA State to fulfil its obligations — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 — Social security for migrant workers)
(2013/C 372/06)
In Case E-6/12, EFTA Surveillance Authority v Kingdom of Norway — APPLICATION for a declaration that, by maintaining in force the administrative practice of not assessing whether a child, living together with another parent outside Norway, is mainly dependent on the parent who is living in Norway and separated from the other parent, the Kingdom of Norway is in breach of Article 1(f)(i), second sentence, in conjunction with Article 76 of the Act referred to at point 1 of Annex VI to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 11 September 2013, the operative part of which is as follows:
The Court hereby:






1.


Declares that, by maintaining in force the administrative practice under the Child Benefits Act of not assessing whether a child, living together with another parent outside Norway, is mainly dependent on the parent who is living in Norway and separated from the other parent, the Kingdom of Norway is in breach of Article 1(f)(i), second sentence, of the Act referred to at point 1 of Annex VI to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto;










2.


Dismisses the application as to the remainder; and,










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6994 — Arrow Electronics/CSS Computer Security Solutions Holding) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-09-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: distributive trades, economic concentration, electronic component, information technology industry, merger control








C_2013262EN.01000301.xml










11.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 262/3





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6994 — Arrow Electronics/CSS Computer Security Solutions Holding)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 262/03






1.


On 3 September 2013, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Arrow Electronics, Inc. (‘Arrow’, USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking CSS Computer Security Solutions Holding GmbH (‘CSS’, Germany) and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including Computerlinks AG (‘Computerlinks’, Germany), by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for Arrow: global wholesale distribution of electronic components (including semiconductors and passive, electromechanical and interconnect products) and enterprise computing solutions (software and hardware, including servers and data storage products) and ancillary support services to industrial and commercial users,










—


for Computerlinks: global value-added wholesale distributor of enterprise computer products, focussing on the distribution of software and network equipment and related services.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6994 — Arrow Electronics/CSS Computer Security Solutions Holding, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6953 — Bain Capital Investors/Golden Gate Capital/BMC Software)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-09-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, information technology, investment company, merger control, software








C_2013262EN.01000101.xml










11.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 262/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6953 — Bain Capital Investors/Golden Gate Capital/BMC Software)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 262/01
On 24 June 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6953. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.
European Parliament resolution of 11 September 2013 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund, in accordance with point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (COM(2013)0259 — C7-0116/2013 — 2013/2085(BUD))
Date: 2013-09-11
Institutions: Committee on Budgets, Committee on Regional Development, European Parliament
Subjects: Austria, Croatia, Slovenia, aid to disaster victims, flood, fund (EU), general budget (EU), payment appropriation








C_2016093EN.01036801.xml










9.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/368





P7_TA(2013)0355
Mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund: flooding in Slovenia, Croatia and Austria in autumn 2012
European Parliament resolution of 11 September 2013 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund, in accordance with point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (COM(2013)0259 — C7-0116/2013 — 2013/2085(BUD))
(2016/C 093/41)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2013)0259 — C7-0116/2013),










—


having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (1), and in particular point 26 thereof,










—


having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund (2),










—


having regard to Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, adopted during the conciliation meeting on 17 July 2008 on the Solidarity Fund,










—


having regard to the letter of the Committee on Regional Development,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets (A7-0283/2013),












1.


Approves the decision annexed to this resolution;












2.


Instructs its President to sign the decision with the President of the Council and arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;












3.


Instructs its President to forward this resolution, including its annex, to the Council and the Commission.






(1)  OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p. 3.



ANNEX


DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL


on mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund, in accordance with point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management


(The text of this annex is not reproduced here since it corresponds to the final act, Decision 2013/714/EU.)
Case C-276/13: Order of the President of the Court of 11 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Pontevedra — Spain) — Pablo Acosta Padín v Hijos de J. Barreras SA
Date: 2013-09-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Spain, income in addition to normal pay, interpretation of the law, legal profession, price list








C_2014102EN.01003003.xml










7.4.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 102/30





Order of the President of the Court of 11 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Pontevedra — Spain) — Pablo Acosta Padín v Hijos de J. Barreras SA
(Case C-276/13) (1)

2014/C 102/47
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 September 2013 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde on facilitating the issue of short-stay visas to citizens of the Republic of Cape Verde and of the European Union (05674/2013 — C7-0110/2013 — 2012/0271(NLE))
Date: 2013-09-11
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Foreign Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: Cabo Verde, EU visa policy, agreement (EU), ratification of an agreement, residence permit








C_2016093EN.01040402.xml










9.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/404





P7_TA(2013)0362
EU-Cape Verde agreement on facilitating the issue of short-stay visas to citizens of the Republic of Cape Verde and of the EU ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 September 2013 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde on facilitating the issue of short-stay visas to citizens of the Republic of Cape Verde and of the European Union (05674/2013 — C7-0110/2013 — 2012/0271(NLE))
(Consent)
(2016/C 093/48)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (05674/2013),










—


having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde on facilitating the issue of short-stay visas to citizens of the Republic of Cape Verde and of the European Union (14203/2012),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 77(2), point (a) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0110/2013),










—


having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0266/2013),












1.


Consents to conclusion of the Agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Cape Verde.
Case T-475/11 P: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Reimbursement of recoverable expenses — Lack of interest in bringing proceedings — Appeal manifestly inadmissible)
Date: 2013-09-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European civil service, interest in bringing an action, legal action








C_2013336EN.01002203.xml










16.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 336/22





Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case T-475/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil Service - Reimbursement of recoverable expenses - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Appeal manifestly inadmissible)
2013/C 336/46
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2011 in Case F-67/10 Marcuccio v Commission ECR-SC I-A-0000 and II-0000, seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 311, 22.10.2011.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-09-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013262EN.01000201.xml










11.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 262/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

10 September 2013
2013/C 262/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3240




JPY


Japanese yen


132,80




DKK


Danish krone


7,4585




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84380




SEK


Swedish krona


8,6887




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2392




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,8610




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,830




HUF


Hungarian forint


299,28




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7025




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2595




RON


Romanian leu


4,4598




TRY


Turkish lira


2,6766




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4255




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3684




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,2671




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6432




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6794




KRW


South Korean won


1 437,47




ZAR


South African rand


13,2383




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1029




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5875




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 974,81




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3380




PHP


Philippine peso


57,924




RUB


Russian rouble


43,7732




THB


Thai baht


42,586




BRL


Brazilian real


3,0007




MXN


Mexican peso


17,2954




INR


Indian rupee


84,5900






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.