do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-482/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción n °2 de Marchena (Spain) lodged on 10 September 2013 — Unicaja Banco SA v José Hidalgo Rueda and Others
Date: 2013-09-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, real estate credit, unfair terms of contract








C_2013352EN.01000402.xml










30.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 352/4





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción no 2 de Marchena (Spain) lodged on 10 September 2013 — Unicaja Banco SA v José Hidalgo Rueda and Others
(Case C-482/13)
2013/C 352/06
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción no 2 de Marchena

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Unicaja Banco SA

Defendants: José Hidalgo Rueda, María del Carmen Vega Martín, Gestión Patrimonial Hive, S.L., Francisco Antonio López Reina, Rosa María Hidalgo Vega

Questions referred







1.


Under Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, and in particular Article 6(1) thereof, and in order to ensure the protection of consumers and users in accordance with the principles of equivalence and effectiveness, must a national court, when it finds there to be an unfair default-interest clause in mortgage loans, declare the clause void and not binding or, on the contrary, must it moderate the interest clause, referring the matter back to the party seeking enforcement or lender for recalculation of the interest?










2.


Is the Second Transitional Provision of Law 1/2013 of 14 May 2013 nothing more than a clear limitation on the protection of consumer interests, by implicitly imposing upon the court the obligation to moderate a default-interest clause which is tainted by unfairness, recalculating the stipulated interest and maintaining in force a stipulation which was unfair, instead of declaring the clause to be void and not binding upon the consumer?










3.


Does the Second Transitional Provision of Law 1/2013 of 14 May 2013 contravene Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, and in particular Article 6(1) thereof, by preventing application of the principles of equivalence and effectiveness in relation to consumer protection and avoiding application of the penalty of nullity and lack of binding force in respect of default-interest clauses tainted by unfairness and stipulated in mortgage loans entered into prior to the entry into force of Law 1/2013 of 14 May 2013?






(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.
European Parliament decision of 10 September 2013 proposing the appointment of Luigi Berlinguer to the panel set up under Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2013/2161(INS))
Date: 2013-09-10
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union, appointment of members








C_2016093EN.01036401.xml










9.3.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/364





P7_TA(2013)0349
Appointment of Luigi Berlinguer to the panel set up under Article 255 of the TFEU
European Parliament decision of 10 September 2013 proposing the appointment of Luigi Berlinguer to the panel set up under Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2013/2161(INS))
(2016/C 093/38)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the second paragraph of Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),










—


having regard to Rule 107a of its Rules of Procedure,










A.


whereas Luigi Berlinguer meets the conditions laid down in the second paragraph of Article 255 TFEU;












1.


Proposes that Luigi Berlinguer be appointed to the panel;












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the President of the Court of Justice.
Case T-562/11: Order of the General Court of 10 September 2013 — Symbio Gruppe v OHIM — Ada Cosmetic (SYMBIOTIC CARE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Cancellation of international registration — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2013-09-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013336EN.01002302.xml










16.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 336/23





Order of the General Court of 10 September 2013 — Symbio Gruppe v OHIM — Ada Cosmetic (SYMBIOTIC CARE)
(Case T-562/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Cancellation of international registration - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 336/48
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Symbio Gruppe GmbH & Co. KG (Herborn, Germany) (represented by: A. Schulz and C. Onken, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke and D. Botis, agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Ada Cosmetic GmbH (Kehl, Germany) (represented: initially by H. Börjes-Pestalozza, then by R. Douglas Morton and E. Kessler, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 August 2011 (Case R 2121/2010-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Symbio Gruppe GmbH & Co. KG and Ada Cosmetic GmbH.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 13, 14.1.2012