do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-08-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013239EN.01000101.xml










20.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 239/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

19 August 2013
2013/C 239/01

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3344




JPY


Japanese yen


130,72




DKK


Danish krone


7,4571




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85290




SEK


Swedish krona


8,7120




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2352




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,9040




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,855




HUF


Hungarian forint


300,71




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7028




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2503




RON


Romanian leu


4,4610




TRY


Turkish lira


2,6055




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4592




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3786




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,3490




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6453




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7026




KRW


South Korean won


1 492,06




ZAR


South African rand


13,5749




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1704




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5430




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


14 090,74




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3863




PHP


Philippine peso


58,457




RUB


Russian rouble


43,9800




THB


Thai baht


41,873




BRL


Brazilian real


3,2158




MXN


Mexican peso


17,3238




INR


Indian rupee


84,5580






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-251/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Östersunds tingsrätt (Sweden) lodged on 6 May 2013 — E.ON Vattenkraft Sverige Aktiebolag v Kammarkollegiet and Others
Date: 2013-08-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: degradation of the environment, ecosystem, prevention of pollution, surface water, water pollution, water protection








C_2013377EN.01000503.xml










21.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 377/5





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Östersunds tingsrätt (Sweden) lodged on 6 May 2013 — E.ON Vattenkraft Sverige Aktiebolag v Kammarkollegiet and Others
(Case C-251/13)
2013/C 377/10
Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Östersunds tingsrätt

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: E.ON Vattenkraft Sverige Aktiebolag

Defendants: Kammarkollegiet, Ljustorp socken ekonomisk förening, Länsstyrelsen i Västernorrlands län, Murberget Länsmuseet Västernorrland, Naturskyddsföreningen Timrå, Naturvårdsverket, Sveriges Sportfiske- och Fiskevårdsförbund, Timrå kommun, Miljö- och byggnadsnämnden, Älvräddarnas samorganisation
On 20 August 2013, the President of Court ordered the discontinuance of the case.
Case T-442/13: Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Makhlouf v Council
Date: 2013-08-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, common foreign and security policy, international sanctions








C_2013325EN.01003902.xml










9.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 325/39





Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Makhlouf v Council
(Case T-442/13)
2013/C 325/65
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Hafez Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: C. Rygaert and G. Karouni, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs pursuant to Articles 87 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-359/11 Makhlouf v Council. (1)



(1)  OJ 2011 C 282, p.25.
Case T-435/13: Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Triarii v Commission
Date: 2013-08-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, damages, invitation to tender, jurisdiction








C_2013304EN.01002102.xml










19.10.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 304/21





Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Triarii v Commission
(Case T-435/13)
2013/C 304/37
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Triarii BV (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Verhellen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the European Commission (Re.: ENER B 1/IMMR(2013) ENER.B.1.2638778) dated 20 June 2013 in order to include the offer of the applicant in the tender;










—


In case the Court’s decision, as sought, is taken after the tender is awarded to a bidder:






—


Annul the current tender No ENER/B1/2013-371 in order to give the applicant a chance to bid again;










—


Annul the decision to be taken by the European Commission granting tender No ENER/B1/2013-371 to a bidder; and/or










—


Grant damages in compensation of a missed opportunity, due to the exclusion of the applicant from the tender No ENER/B1/2013-371.









Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the General Court is competent to try the present case, in conformity with Article 263 TFEU.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that, through its conduct, the Commission created legitimate expectation that the bid was served in due time on it.
Case C-310/12: Order of the President of the Court of 20 August 2013 — European Commission v Hungary
Date: 2013-08-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: fine, national implementing measure, waste recycling








C_2013344EN.01005302.xml










23.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 344/53





Order of the President of the Court of 20 August 2013 — European Commission v Hungary
(Case C-310/12) (1)

2013/C 344/92
Language of the case: Hungarian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 366, 24.11.2012.
Case T-443/13: Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Makhlouf v Council
Date: 2013-08-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, common foreign and security policy, international sanctions








C_2013325EN.01003903.xml










9.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 325/39





Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Makhlouf v Council
(Case T-443/13)
2013/C 325/66
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Mohammad Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: C. Rygaert and G. Karouni, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs pursuant to Articles 87 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-383/11 Makhlouf v Council. (1)



(1)  OJ 2011 C 282, p.30.
Case T-439/13: Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Fard and Sarkandi v Council
Date: 2013-08-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Iran, international sanctions, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2013367EN.01003101.xml










14.12.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 367/31





Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Fard and Sarkandi v Council
(Case T-439/13)
2013/C 367/54
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Mohammad Moghaddami Fard (Tehran, Iran); and Ahmad Sarkandi (United Arab Emirates) (represented by: M. Taher, Solicitor, M. Lester, Barrister, and S. Kentridge, QC)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


Annul Council Decision 2013/270/CFSP of 6 June 2013 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ L 156, p.10) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 522/2013 of 6 June 2013 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ L 156, p.3);










—


Order that the Council pays the applicants’ costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the Council erred manifestly in its assessment that any of the listing criteria has been fulfilled as regards either of the applicants, and that there is no valid legal basis for the applicants’ designation.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the Council has purported to impose a travel ban on the applicants without a proper legal basis.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the Council has failed to give adequate or sufficient reasons for including the applicants in the contested measures.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Council has failed to safeguard the applicants’ rights of defence and to effective judicial review,










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging that the Council’s decision to designate the applicants has infringed, without justification or proportion, the applicants’ fundamental rights, including their right to protection of their property, family life, business, and reputation.
Case T-441/13: Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Makhlouf v Council
Date: 2013-08-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions








C_2013325EN.01003901.xml










9.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 325/39





Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Makhlouf v Council
(Case T-441/13)
2013/C 325/64
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Eyad Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: C. Rygaert and G. Karouni, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs pursuant to Articles 87 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-383/11 Makhlouf v Council. (1)



(1)  OJ 2011 C 282, p.30.