Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Directives 2006/112/EC and 2008/118/EC as regards the French outermost regions and Mayotte in particular
Date: 2013-08-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Mayotte, VAT, application of EU law, excise duty, peripheral region













EUR-Lex - 52013PC0577 - EN











|



52013PC0577

Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE amending Directives 2006/112/EC and 2008/118/EC as regards the French outermost regions and Mayotte in particular /* COM/2013/0577 final - 2013/0280 (CNS) */









EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
With Decision 2012/419/EU amending the
status of Mayotte with regard to the European Union, the European Council has
decided that, from 1 January 2014, the status of Mayotte will be that
of outermost region within the meaning of Article 349 of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) instead of that of an overseas country
or territory (OCT) within the meaning of Article 355(2) of the TFEU. To
this end, in the above-mentioned European Council Decision, Mayotte has been added to the list of outermost regions in Articles 349 and 355(1) of
the TFEU. Union legislation on VAT (Directive 2006/112/EC[1]) and excise duties (Directive 2008/118/EC[2]) will therefore apply in Mayotte after the change of status. In substance, the objective of this proposal is to
bring Mayotte's situation into line with that of other French outermost
regions by excluding it from the scope of Directives 2006/112/EC and
2008/118/EC. Furthermore, by referring to Articles 349 and 355(1) of the
TFEU, the intention is to make it clearer that all these regions, including Mayotte, are excluded from the scope of these Directives.
2.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS
WITH THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
 305 || In substance the only change made by this proposal concerns the region of Mayotte. Given its similar situation to that of other French outermost regions, the objective of the proposal is to ensure that it is subject to the same treatment under the two above‑mentioned directives when it becomes an outermost region on 1 January 2014. The proposal will not have any impact on the situation of the other French outermost regions. In order to make it clear that any change in the status of all these regions - including Mayotte - under national law does not have any bearing on their situation under the above-mentioned directives, it is proposed that their designation should be changed and reference made to Articles 349 and 355(1) of the TFEU from now on. Thus, there are no grounds for an impact assessment and the Commission has therefore not carried one out. 
3.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE
PROPOSAL
 Summary of the proposed measures The proposal states that Directives 2006/112/EC and 2008/118/EC do not apply to the French outermost regions listed in Articles 349 and 355(1) of the TFEU. 
 Legal basis Article 113 of the TFEU. 
 Principle of subsidiarity Article 113 of the TFEU asks the Council to adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes and excise duties. Only the European Union is competent to define the territory to which harmonised legislation applies. The proposal therefore complies with the principle of subsidiarity. 
 Principle of proportionality The proposal complies with the principle of proportionality for the following reasons. The objective of the proposal is to give Mayotte the same status as that which has long applied in Guadeloupe, French Guyana, Martinique and Réunion. It clarifies the status of the French part of Saint Martin without modifying it. 
 Choice of instruments 
 Proposed instrument: Council Directive on the basis of Article 113 of the Treaty. 
 Other instruments would not have been appropriate for the following reasons. As the purpose is to amend two Directives, the same legal form must be used. 
4.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS
The proposal has no impact on the budget of the
European Union.
5.           OPTIONAL ELEMENTS 
Articles 1 and 2 make the same amendment
to two articles of Directives 2006/112/EC and 2008/118/EC, which relate to
the territorial scope of these two Directives, replacing 'French overseas
departments' by 'the French outermost regions listed in Articles 349
and 355(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union'.
This new wording makes it clear that any change
in the national law of these territories will not have any bearing on their
situation with respect to the two Directives. 
The situation of Saint-Barthélemy does not need
to be examined as this territory ceased to be an outermost region on
1 January 2012 pursuant to European Council Decision 2010/718/EU
of 29 October 2010.
Given the simplicity of the transposition
measures to be implemented, the Commission does not require explanatory
documents to carry out its task of overseeing the transposition of the
Directives. The individual transposition measures to be notified should be
sufficiently self-explanatory.
2013/0280 (CNS)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE
amending Directives 2006/112/EC and
2008/118/EC as regards the French outermost regions and Mayotte in particular
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 113 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative
act to the national Parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the
European Parliament[3],
Having regard to the opinion of the
European Economic and Social Committee[4],
Acting in accordance with a special
legislative procedure,
Whereas: 
(1)       With
Decision 2012/419/EU amending the status of Mayotte with regard to the
European Union[5],
the European Council has decided that, from 1 January 2014, the
status of Mayotte will be that of outermost region within the meaning of
Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU)
instead of that of an overseas country or territory (OCT) within the meaning of
Article 355(2) of the TFEU. To this end, under the above-mentioned
European Council Decision, Mayotte has been added to the list of outermost
regions in Articles 349 and 355(1) of the TFEU. Community tax law shall
therefore apply in Mayotte after this change of status.
(2)       As regards added value tax
(VAT) and excise duties, Mayotte is in a situation similar to that of the
existing French outermost regions (Guadeloupe, French Guyana, Martinique,
Réunion and Saint-Martin), which fall outside the territorial scope of Council
Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system
of value added tax[6],
and Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning
the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC[7]. Although the existing
provisions of these two Directives exclude the 'French overseas
departments' from their territorial scope and Mayotte enjoys that status under
French law, it is necessary to adapt the two Directives as Mayotte was not
part of the Union territory when these Directives were adopted. Article 6
of Directive 2006/112/EC and Article 5 of Directive 2008/118/EC must
therefore be amended in order to include Mayotte in these provisions.
(3)       In order to make it clear
that Mayotte and the other French outermost regions are excluded from the scope
of Directives 2006/112/EC and 2008/118/EC regardless of any change in
their status under French law, reference should be made to Articles 349
and 355(1) of the TFEU for all these regions.
(4)       Directives 2006/112/EC
and 2008/118/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Article 1
Article 6(1)(c) of
Directive 2006/112/EC shall be replaced by the following:
'c) the French outermost regions listed in
Articles 349 and 355(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
Union;'.
Article 2
Article 5 of
Directive 2008/118/EC is amended as follows:
a)           Paragraph (2)(b) is
replaced by the following:
'b) the French outermost regions listed in
Articles 349 and 355(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the
European Union;'.
b)           Paragraph (5) is replaced
by the following:
'France may give notice, by means of a
declaration, that this Directive and the Directives referred to in
Article 1 apply to the territories referred to in paragraph (2)(b) —
subject to measures to adapt to their extreme remoteness — in respect of all or
some of the excise goods referred to in Article 1, as from the first day
of the second month following deposit of such declaration.'
Article 3
1.           Member States shall adopt
and publish, no later than 31 December 2013, the laws, regulations
and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They
shall immediately communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.
They shall apply those provisions from
1 January 2014.
When Member States adopt those provisions, they
shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a
reference on the occasion of their official publication. Member States shall
determine how such reference is to be made.
2.           Member States shall
communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law
which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Article 4
This Directive shall enter into force on
the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of
the European Union.
Article 5
This
Directive is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
[1]               Council Directive 2006/112/EC of
28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax,
OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1.
[2]               Council Directive 2008/118/EC of
16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty
and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC, OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 12.
[3]               OJ C , , p. .
[4]               OJ C , , p. .
[5]               OJ L 204, 31.7.2012, p. 131.
[6]               OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1.
[7]               OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 12.