do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-07-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013211EN.01000201.xml










25.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

24 July 2013
2013/C 211/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3246




JPY


Japanese yen


132,60




DKK


Danish krone


7,4583




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86260




SEK


Swedish krona


8,5521




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2388




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,7845




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,930




HUF


Hungarian forint


295,59




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7025




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2075




RON


Romanian leu


4,3903




TRY


Turkish lira


2,5278




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4361




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3604




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,2753




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6606




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6764




KRW


South Korean won


1 474,50




ZAR


South African rand


12,7500




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1264




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4953




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


13 617,35




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,2222




PHP


Philippine peso


57,262




RUB


Russian rouble


42,8003




THB


Thai baht


40,983




BRL


Brazilian real


2,9396




MXN


Mexican peso


16,5509




INR


Indian rupee


78,2570






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6866 — Time Warner/CME)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-07-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Hungary, Moldova, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, economic concentration, means of communication, merger control, serial publication








C_2013211EN.01000101.xml










25.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6866 — Time Warner/CME)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 211/01
On 14 June 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6866. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case C-422/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig-Holsteinisches Oberverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 25 July 2013 — Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein v Uta Wree
Date: 2013-07-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, area of holding, interpretation of the law, waste disposal








C_2013304EN.01000501.xml










19.10.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 304/5





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig-Holsteinisches Oberverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 25 July 2013 — Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein v Uta Wree
(Case C-422/13)
2013/C 304/08
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Schleswig-Holsteinisches Oberverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein

Defendant: Uta Wree

Question referred

Is there also an agricultural area within the meaning of Article 34(2)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (1) of 19 January 2009 if that area, although also used for agricultural purposes (grazing for sheep farming purposes), forms the cover layer of a landfill site in after-care?


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ 2009 L 30, p. 16).
Case C-427/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Autorità per la Vigilanza sui Contratti pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture (Italy) lodged on 25 July 2013 — Emmeci v Cotral
Date: 2013-07-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, Italy, administrative transparency, equal treatment, interpretation of the law, invitation to tender, public institution








C_2013325EN.01001201.xml










9.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 325/12





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Autorità per la Vigilanza sui Contratti pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture (Italy) lodged on 25 July 2013 — Emmeci v Cotral
(Case C-427/13)
2013/C 325/19
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Autorità per la Vigilanza sui Contratti pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Emmeci Srl

Defendant: Cotral SpA

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 56 of Directive 2004/17/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that it is not permissible for the national legislature to allow contracting authorities to prevent competitors, during the final bid phase, from viewing their rankings or the bids made by other economic operators, and to postpone disclosure of that information until the end of the auction?










2.


Do Article 56 of Directive 2004/17/EC and the principles of transparency and equal treatment preclude national legislation or administrative practices, such as those described in these proceedings, which provide for a five-minute ‘black-out’ in the final phase of the electronic auction, during which competitors are unable to ascertain their respective rankings?






(1)  Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 1).
Case F-74/13: Action brought on 25 July 2013 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2013-07-25
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: transfer of pension rights








C_2013274EN.01003302.xml










21.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 274/33





Action brought on 25 July 2013 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-74/13)
2013/C 274/56
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis, D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision on the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights into the European Union pension scheme applying the new general implementing provisions (‘GIP’) relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.

Form of order sought







—


annul the decision to transfer the applicant’s pension rights acquired before his entry into service into the pension scheme applicable to staff of the European institutions in accordance with the calculations for the transfer drawn up pursuant to the GIP of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.
Case T-385/13 P: Appeal brought on 25 July 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 14 May 2013 in Case F-4/12, Marcuccio v Commission
Date: 2013-07-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: deduction at source, disability insurance, redemption








C_2013284EN.01000401.xml










28.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/4





Appeal brought on 25 July 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 14 May 2013 in Case F-4/12, Marcuccio v Commission
(Case T-385/13 P)
2013/C 284/04
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought by the appellant







—


Annul the order under appeal in its entirety and without exception;










—


Refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-203/13 P Marcuccio v Commission.
Case C-423/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 25 July 2013 — UAB ‘Vilniaus energija’ v Lietuvos metrologijos inspekcijos Vilniaus apskrities skyrius
Date: 2013-07-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, Lithuania, data transmission, interpretation of the law, measuring equipment








C_2013304EN.01000502.xml










19.10.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 304/5





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 25 July 2013 — UAB ‘Vilniaus energija’ v Lietuvos metrologijos inspekcijos Vilniaus apskrities skyrius
(Case C-423/13)
2013/C 304/09
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania)

Parties to the main proceedings


Claimant: UAB ‘Vilniaus energija’

Defendant: Lietuvos metrologijos inspekcijos Vilniaus apskrities skyrius

Question referred

Must Article 34 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and/or Directive 2004/22/EC (1) be interpreted as prohibiting a national regulation and practice under which a hot-water meter which satisfies all of the requirements of Directive 2004/22/EC and is connected to a remote (telemetric) data-transmission device is regarded as being a measuring system and by reason of that fact that hot-water meter cannot be used as intended until a metrological verification has been carried out on that meter and that remote (telemetric) data-transmission device as together constituting a measuring system?


(1)  Directive 2004/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on measuring instruments (OJ L 135, p. 1).
Case C-424/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 25 July 2013 — Zuchtvieh-Export GmbH v Stadt Kempten
Date: 2013-07-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, domestic animal, length of journey, livestock, supervisory body, third country, transport of animals, vehicle documents








C_2013336EN.01000601.xml










16.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 336/6





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 25 July 2013 — Zuchtvieh-Export GmbH v Stadt Kempten
(Case C-424/13)
2013/C 336/14
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Zuchtvieh-Export GmbH

Respondent: Stadt Kempten

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that in the case of long journeys for domestic Equidae and domestic animals of bovine, ovine, caprine and porcine species, where the place of departure is in a Member State of the European Union but the place of destination is in a third country, the competent authority of the place of departure may stamp the journey log submitted by the organiser in accordance with Article 14(1)(c) only if the journey log meets the requirements set out in Article 14(1)(a)(ii) for the entire journey from the place of departure to the place of destination, and thus also for sections of the journey which lie entirely outside the territory of the European Union?










2.


Is Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 to be interpreted as meaning that the competent authority at the place of departure pursuant to that provision may, in accordance with Article 14(1)(b) of that regulation, require the organiser of the transport to change the arrangements for the intended long journey in such a way that it will comply with the provisions of that regulation for the entire journey from the place of departure to the place of destination, even if some sections of that journey lie entirely within third countries?






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97 (OJ 2005 L 3, p. 1).