do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Joined Cases C-523/11 and C-585/11: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2013 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover, Verwaltungsgericht Karlsruhe — Germany) — Laurence Prinz v Region Hannover (C-523/11), and Philipp Seeberger v Studentenwerk Heidelberg (C-585/11) (Citizenship of the Union — Articles 20 TFEU and 21 TFEU — Right of freedom of movement and residence — Education or training grant awarded to nationals of a Member State in order to pursue their studies in another Member State — Requirement of residence in the home Member State for at least three years prior to the commencement of studies)
Date: 2013-07-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU national, State aid, education grant, free movement of persons, residence permit








C_2013260EN.01000901.xml










7.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 260/9





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2013 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover, Verwaltungsgericht Karlsruhe — Germany) — Laurence Prinz v Region Hannover (C-523/11), and Philipp Seeberger v Studentenwerk Heidelberg (C-585/11)
(Joined Cases C-523/11 and C-585/11) (1)

(Citizenship of the Union - Articles 20 TFEU and 21 TFEU - Right of freedom of movement and residence - Education or training grant awarded to nationals of a Member State in order to pursue their studies in another Member State - Requirement of residence in the home Member State for at least three years prior to the commencement of studies)
2013/C 260/15
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Hannover, Verwaltungsgericht Karlsruhe

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Laurence Prinz (C-523/11), Philipp Seeberger (C-585/11)

Defendants: Region Hannover (C-523/11), and Studentenwerk Heidelberg (C-585/11)

Re:

Requests for a preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgericht Hannover — Interpretation of Articles 20 TFEU and 21 TFEU — Receipt of an education or training grant (‘Ausbildungsförderung’) — National rules limiting receipt of that grant to one year for citizens who pursue their studies abroad and reside for less than three years prior to the commencement of their studies in a national territory

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 20 TFEU and 21 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that they preclude legislation of a Member State which makes the award of an education grant for studies in another Member State for a period of more than one year subject to a sole condition, such as that laid down in Paragraph 16(3) of the Federal Law on assistance for education and training [Bundesgesetz über individuelle Förderung der Ausbildung (Bundesausbildungsförderungsgesetz)], as amended on 1 January 2008, by the twenty-second law amending the Federal Law on assistance for education and training, requiring the applicant to have had a permanent residence, within the meaning of that law, in national territory for at least three years before commencing those studies.


(1)  OJ C 13, 14.1.2012.

OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections  Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty
Date: 2013-07-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, Estonia, State aid, aid to agriculture, control of State aid, farming sector, fishing industry, silviculture








C_2013204EN.01000701.xml










18.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 204/7





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty)
2013/C 204/03







Date of adoption of the decision


3.4.2013




Reference number of State Aid


SA.35809 (13/N)




Member State


Denmark




Region


—


—




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Guarantee scheme




Legal basis


Lov nr. 571 af 1. juli 2002 om Vækstfonden, med senere ændringer. Bekendtgørelse nr. 1013 af 17. august 2007 om Vækstfondens virke. Aktstykke nr. 1 vedtaget af Finansudvalget den 30. oktober 2009.




Type of measure


Scheme


—




Objective


—




Form of aid


Guarantee




Budget


—




Intensity


Measure does not constitute aid




Duration (period)


Until 31.12.2015




Economic sectors


Agriculture, forestry and fishing




Name and address of the granting authority







Vækstfonden




Strandvejen 104 A




2900 Hellerup




DANMARK








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm







Date of adoption of the decision


14.6.2013




Reference number of State Aid


SA.36513 (13/N)




Member State


Estonia




Region


—


—




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Eesti maaelu arengukava 2007–2013 meede 2.7 „Natura 2000 toetus erametsamaale”




Legal basis








1)


„Eesti maaelu arengukava 2007–2013”, peatükk 5.3.2.2;










2)


Põllumajandusministri 11. märtsi 2010. aasta määrus nr 26 „Natura 2000 alal asuva erametsamaa kohta antava toetuse saamise nõuded, toetuse taotlemise ja taotluse menetlemise täpsem kord”;










3)


Euroopa Liidu ühise põllumajanduspoliitika rakendamise seadus.








Type of measure


Scheme


—




Objective


Forestry




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget








 


Overall budget: EUR 25,44 million










 


Annual budget: EUR 5,24 million








Intensity


100 %




Duration (period)


Until 31.12.2014




Economic sectors


Agriculture, forestry and fishing




Name and address of the granting authority







Põllumajanduse Registrite ja Informatsiooni Amet




Narva mnt. 3




51009 Tartu




EESTI/ESTONIA








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 688/2013 of 18 July 2013 on the allocation of import rights for applications lodged for the period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 for frozen meat of bovine animals
Date: 2013-07-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: beef, common organisation of markets, frozen product, import (EU), import licence, tariff quota








L_2013196EN.01001201.xml










19.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 196/12








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 688/2013
of 18 July 2013
         
on the allocation of import rights for applications lodged for the period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 for frozen meat of bovine animals


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 of 19 May 2008 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota for frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN code 0202  and products covered by CN code 0206 29 91  (3) opens an import tariff quota for beef and veal products.












(2)


The applications for import rights lodged for the period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 relate to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import rights may be allocated should therefore be determined and an allocation coefficient laid down to be applied to the quantities applied for,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The quantities for which import right applications covered by the quota with the serial number 09.4003 have been lodged for the period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 under Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 29,736422 %.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 July 2013.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 18 July 2013.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

(3)  
            OJ L 130, 20.5.2008, p. 3.
Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-07-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Poland, State aid, Sweden, aid to undertakings, company in difficulties, control of State aid, employment aid, motor vehicle industry, vehicle parts








C_2013204EN.01000901.xml










18.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 204/9





Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU
Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 204/04







Date of adoption of the decision


17.6.2010




Reference number of State Aid


SA.30604 (N 103/10)




Member State


Poland




Region


Rzeszowsko-tarnobrzeski


Article 107(3)(a)




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Pomoc na ratowanie dla Wytwórni Filtrów „PZL-Sędziszów” SA




Legal basis








1)


Ustawa z dnia 30 sierpnia 1996 r. o komercjalizacji i prywatyzacji – art. 56










2)


Uchwała Zarządu ARP SA z dnia 21 stycznia 2010 r. nr 86/X/2010








Type of measure


Ad hoc aid


—




Objective


Rescuing firms in difficulty




Form of aid


Soft loan




Budget


Overall budget: PLN 4 million




Intensity


—




Duration (period)


17.6.2010-17.1.2011




Economic sectors


Manufacture of other parts and accessories for motor vehicles




Name and address of the granting authority







Agencja Rozwoju Przemysłu SA




ul. Wołoska 7




02-675 Warszawa




POLSKA/POLAND








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm







Date of adoption of the decision


2.7.2013




Reference number of State Aid


SA.36671 (13/N)




Member State


Sweden




Region


—


—




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Stöd för yrkesintroduktionsanställningar




Legal basis


Förslag till lag om ändring i lagen (1999:591) om kreditering på skattekonto av vissa stöd beslutade av arbetsmarknadsmyndighet och Rederinämnden




Type of measure


Scheme


—




Objective


Employment




Form of aid


Direct grant, Reduction of social security contributions




Budget








 


Overall budget: SEK 1 152 million










 


Annual budget: SEK 390 million








Intensity


50 %




Duration (period)


15.1.2014-31.12.2016




Economic sectors


All economic sectors eligible to receive aid




Name and address of the granting authority







Skatteverket




171 96 Solna




Arbetsförmedlingen




SE-113 99 Stockholm




SVERIGE








Other information


—




The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:
http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-07-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013204EN.01001501.xml










18.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 204/15





Euro exchange rates (1)

17 July 2013
2013/C 204/09

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3136




JPY


Japanese yen


131,15




DKK


Danish krone


7,4573




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86315




SEK


Swedish krona


8,6295




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2340




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,8775




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,968




HUF


Hungarian forint


293,85




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7025




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2610




RON


Romanian leu


4,4457




TRY


Turkish lira


2,5299




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4273




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3656




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,1903




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6725




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6599




KRW


South Korean won


1 469,11




ZAR


South African rand


13,0168




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0595




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5160




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


13 192,75




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1924




PHP


Philippine peso


56,954




RUB


Russian rouble


42,6280




THB


Thai baht


40,840




BRL


Brazilian real


2,9669




MXN


Mexican peso


16,6105




INR


Indian rupee


78,1130






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-201/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2013 — Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) v European Commission, Kingdom of Belgium, and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Appeals — Television broadcasting — Directive 89/552/EEC — Article 3a — Measures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance for the society of that Member State — European Football Championship — Decision declaring the measures compatible with European Union law — Statement of reasons — Articles 49 EC and 86 EC — Right to property)
Date: 2013-07-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: copyright, pay television, professional sport, sports body








C_2013260EN.01000301.xml










7.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 260/3





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2013 — Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) v European Commission, Kingdom of Belgium, and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
(Case C-201/11 P) (1)

(Appeals - Television broadcasting - Directive 89/552/EEC - Article 3a - Measures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance for the society of that Member State - European Football Championship - Decision declaring the measures compatible with European Union law - Statement of reasons - Articles 49 EC and 86 EC - Right to property)
2013/C 260/03
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) (represented by: D. Anderson QC, and D. Piccinin, Barrister, instructed by B. Keane and T. McQuail, Solicitors)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Montaguti, N. Yerrell and A. Dawes, acting as Agents, and M. Gray, Barrister), Kingdom of Belgium, and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, (represented by: L. Seeboruth and J. Beeko, acting as Agents, and T. de la Mare, Barrister)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 February 2011 in Case T-55/08 UEFA v Commission dismissing an action for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/730/EC of 16 October 2007 declaring compatible with Community law measures taken by the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ 2007 L 295, p. 12)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.
Case C-408/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Karlsruhe (Germany) lodged on 18 July 2013 — Barbara Huber v Manfred Huber
Date: 2013-07-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: enforcement of ruling, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, maintenance obligation








C_2013274EN.01001501.xml










21.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 274/15





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Karlsruhe (Germany) lodged on 18 July 2013 — Barbara Huber v Manfred Huber
(Case C-408/13)
2013/C 274/26
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Karlsruhe

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Barbara Huber

Defendant: Manfred Huber

Question referred

Whether it is compatible with Article 3(a) and (b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations, (1)

if it is provided in the first sentence of Paragraph 28(1) of the Gesetzes zur Geltendmachung von Unterhaltsansprüchen im Verkehr mit ausländischen Staaten (Auslandsunterhaltsgesetz — AUG),
that, if a party concerned does not have his or her habitual residence in Germany, the court which is to rule exclusively on applications in maintenance cases falling under Article 3(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 is the Local Court which has jurisdiction for the seat of the Higher Regional Court in whose area of jurisdiction the defendant or creditor has his or her habitual residence?


(1)  OJ 2009 L 7, p. 1.
Case C-205/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2013 — Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) v European Commission, Kingdom of Belgium, and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Appeals — Television broadcasting — Directive 89/552/EEC — Article 3a — Measures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance for the society of that Member State — Football World Cup — Decision declaring the measures compatible with European Union law — Statement of reasons — Articles 43 EC, 49 EC and 86 EC — Right to property)
Date: 2013-07-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: copyright, pay television, professional sport, sports body








C_2013260EN.01000401.xml










7.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 260/4





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2013 — Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) v European Commission, Kingdom of Belgium, and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
(Case C-205/11 P) (1)

(Appeals - Television broadcasting - Directive 89/552/EEC - Article 3a - Measures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance for the society of that Member State - Football World Cup - Decision declaring the measures compatible with European Union law - Statement of reasons - Articles 43 EC, 49 EC and 86 EC - Right to property)
2013/C 260/05
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) (represented by: A. Barav and D. Reymond, avocats)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Montaguti and N. Yerrell, acting as Agents, and M. Gray, Barrister), Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: C. Pochet, J.-C. Halleux, acting as Agents, and A. Joachimowicz and J. Stuyck, advocaten), and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: S. Ossowski and J. Beeko, acting as Agents, and T. de la Mare QC)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 February 2011 in Case T-68/08 Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v Commission dismissing an action for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/730/EC of 16 October 2007 declaring compatible with Community law measures taken by the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ 2007 L 295, p. 12)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 232, 6.8.2011.
Case C-621/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 July 2013 — New Yorker SHK Jeans GmbH & Co. KG, formerly New Yorker SHK Jeans GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Vallis K.-Vallis A. & Co. OE (Appeal — Application for registration of the Community word mark FISHBONE — Opposition proceedings — Earlier national figurative mark FISHBONE BEACHWEAR — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Taking into account additional evidence not submitted within the time-limit set — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Articles 42(2) and (3) and Article 76(2) — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 22(2))
Date: 2013-07-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, graphic illustration, leather industry, registered trade mark, textile industry, trade-mark law








C_2013260EN.01000902.xml










7.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 260/9





Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 July 2013 — New Yorker SHK Jeans GmbH & Co. KG, formerly New Yorker SHK Jeans GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Vallis K.-Vallis A. & Co. OE
(Case C-621/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Application for registration of the Community word mark FISHBONE - Opposition proceedings - Earlier national figurative mark FISHBONE BEACHWEAR - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Taking into account additional evidence not submitted within the time-limit set - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Articles 42(2) and (3) and Article 76(2) - Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Rule 22(2))
2013/C 260/16
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: New Yorker SHK Jeans GmbH & Co. KG, formerly New Yorker SHK Jeans GmbH (represented by: V. Spitz, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent), Vallis K. — Vallis A. & Co. O.E

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 September 2011 in Case T-415/09 New Yorker SHK Jeans v OHIM by which that court dismissed an action for annulment brought by the applicant for the word mark ‘FISHBONE’, for goods in Classes 18 and 25, against decision R 1051/2008-1 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 30 July 2009, rejecting in part the appeal brought against the decision of the Opposition Division refusing in part registration of that mark in the context of the opposition formed by the proprietor of the national mark ‘FISHBONE BEACHWEAR’ for the goods in Class 25, and the national sign ‘Fishbone’ used in business — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Taking into account additional evidence

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders New Yorker SHK Jeans GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.