COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL Commission Declaration Accompanying Commission proposal for a Council Regulation fixing the production levies in the sugar sector for the marketing years 2001/2002, 2002/2003, 2003/2004, 2004/2005, 2005/2006, the coefficient required for calculating the additional levy for the marketing years 2001/2002 and 2004/2005 and the amounts to be paid by sugar manufacturers to beet sellers in respect of the difference between the maximum amount of the levies and the amount of these levies to be charged for the marketing years 2002/2003, 2003/2004 and 2005/2006.
Date: 2013-07-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: market stabilisation, marketing, producer price, production aid, redemption, sugar beet, sugar levy













EUR-Lex - 52013DC0526 - EN











|



52013DC0526

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL Commission Declaration Accompanying Commission proposal for a Council Regulation fixing the production levies in the sugar sector for the marketing years 2001/2002, 2002/2003, 2003/2004, 2004/2005, 2005/2006, the coefficient required for calculating the additional levy for the marketing years 2001/2002 and 2004/2005 and the amounts to be paid by sugar manufacturers to beet sellers in respect of the difference between the maximum amount of the levies and the amount of these levies to be charged for the marketing years 2002/2003, 2003/2004 and 2005/2006. /* COM/2013/0526 final */









COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO
THE COUNCIL
Commission Declaration 
Accompanying Commission proposal for a Council Regulation fixing the production
levies in the sugar sector for the marketing years 2001/2002, 2002/2003,
2003/2004, 2004/2005, 2005/2006, the coefficient required for calculating the
additional levy for the marketing years 2001/2002 and 2004/2005 and the amounts
to be paid by sugar manufacturers to beet sellers in respect of the difference
between the maximum amount of the levies and the amount of these levies to be
charged for the marketing years 2002/2003, 2003/2004 and 2005/2006.
1.           Reimbursement of the
principal and interest 
In its judgement of 27 September 2012[1], the Court of Justice of the
European Union has held that, as a result of the invalidity of Commission Regulation
(EC) No 1193/2009[2],
producers are entitled to reimbursement of the excess sums unduly paid in
respect of the invalid production levies paid in the relevant marketing years. Such
excess levies have accrued to the Union budget net of 25% of the collection
fees which have accrued to the national budgets pursuant to Article 2(3) of
Council Decision 2000/597/(EC, Euratom) on the system of the European
Communities' own resources[3].

The proposed Council Regulation fixes sugar
production levies for the marketing years 2001/2002, 2002/2003, 2003/2004,
2004/2005 and 2005/2006, which will allow Member States to determine the
amounts to be reimbursed to sugar producers. Only the difference between the
old and the new levies, and not the entire amounts collected over the period
concerned, is to be reimbursed to sugar producers. 
It follows from the general principle of
unjust enrichment that Member States should be able to recover the amounts
actually reimbursed, net of 25% retained by them by way of collection costs,
from the EU budget.
The Court clarified that individuals
entitled to reimbursement of sums paid unduly in respect of production levies
in the sugar sector determined on the basis of an invalid regulation are also entitled
to payment of the interest on such sums. It follows that reimbursements by
Member States to economic operators of sums unduly paid under the EU law shall
therefore include the payment of interest, to the extent provided for by
national law in similar situations. 
Member States shall apply their national
law for calculating the amount of interest. 
2.           Reimbursement of beet
sellers 
The proposed Council Regulation lays down in
its Article 1(3) the revised complement prices on the basis of which sugar producers
have to make a repayment to beet sellers. It has to be underlined that only the
difference between the old and the new complement prices should be used for the
calculation of the reimbursement to beet sellers, including interest payable
under the same conditions referred to in Section 1. 
Before reimbursing sugar producers the
excess levies paid over the period in question, Member States should put in
place administrative procedures ensuring that the concerned producers repay, where
relevant, the amounts due to the beet sellers. In the absence of such
repayment, the reimbursement to sugar producers should be reduced
proportionally.
3.           Accounting procedure
The own resources regulatory framework does
not include any provision that would allow for the payment of interest from the
EU to the Member States. Therefore, when claiming back to the Commission
expenditure incurred, Member States must inform the Commission about the
amounts effectively paid as restitution to the concerned economic operators, distinguishing
the principal from the interest components. 
3.1.        Principal amounts
The reimbursement of the sugar levies
constitutes a correction in the EU own resources. This implies that Member
States can deduct 75% of the excess amount effectively paid, by way of charging
the own resources of the EU. 
Based on Article 2(2) of Council Regulation
(EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 of 22 May 2000 implementing Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom
on the system of the Communities' own resources[4],
Member States have to establish the corrected sugar levies applicable in the
relevant years by the date laid down in Article 2 of the proposed Council
Regulation fixing the sugar levies.
As the proposed Council Regulation refers
to a correction of the sugar levies originally paid, Member States have all the
elements in their possession to establish the correct amounts to be reimbursed.

Member States can recover, via a negative
correction in the so-called A-statement, the amounts effectively paid as
reimbursement of the excess levies unduly collected. It should be stressed that
in the A-statement, Member States will have first to include the full amount
(100%) reimbursed as correction. Subsequently, the amount net of the sums
retained by them as collection costs (75%) shall be posted in the last column
of the statement. This is the normal procedure to take into account the
collection costs.
According to Article 2 of the proposed Council
Regulation, the establishment by the Member States for the own resources has to
be done the last day of the fourth month following the day of entry into force
of that Regulation, at the latest. Member States have to introduce the result
of the establishment in the A-statements that they have to transmit to the
Commission on the first working day after the 19th day of the second month
following the month during which the entitlement was established, at the
latest. 
Therefore, in practical terms, Member
States have to establish the correction of the own resources on the last day of
[….], at the latest. They have to introduce the entitlement in the A-statements
to be transmitted to the Commission on [….], at the latest.
Depending on the adoption date of the
Council Regulation, the financial impact on the revenue part of the EU budget
could either be in 2013, in 2014 or in both financial years.
3.2.        Interest
As indicated above, it follows from the
general principle of unjust enrichment that individuals entitled to
reimbursement of sums paid unduly as a result of the production levies in the
sugar sector determined on the basis of an invalid regulation are also entitled
to payment of the interest on such sums to the extent provided for by national
law in similar situations.
Interest effectively paid shall be
declared, using the procedure for making monthly payments referred to in
Article 15 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of common
agricultural policy, under budget line 05 07 02 dedicated to the 'settlement of
disputes'. In particular, this budget line 'is intended to accommodate, if
necessary, appropriations to cover expenditure (positive or negative) for which
the Commission may be made responsible by a decision of a Court of Justice,
including the cost of settling claims for damages and interest'. 
4.           Monitoring of
reimbursement process
For monitoring purposes, Member States
should notify the Commission an overview of the amounts that are to be reimbursed
to sugar manufacturers, distinguishing the principal and the interest amounts,
before starting the reimbursement process, and in any case by the second month
following the entry into force of the Regulation at the latest. This
notification should include a detailed explanation of the legal basis in the
national law used to determine the interest payable and the rate applied, and
the period considered for the calculation of the interest amount. In accordance
with the principle of equivalence, the Commission wishes to emphasise that the
interest rate used shall correspond to the one normally used for similar
national reimbursements.
The Commission reserves the right to ask
for additional justifications of the amounts declared as paid and to take any
appropriate measure to protect the Union's financial interests. 
[1]               Joined cases C-113/10,
C-147/10 and C-234/10, not yet published.
[2]               OJ L 321, 8.12.2009, p. 1.
[3]               OJ L 253, 7.10.2000, p. 42.
[4]               OJ L 130, 31.5.2000, p. 1.