Case C-409/11: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 July 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság — Hungary) — Gábor Csonka, Tibor Isztli, Dávid Juhász, János Kiss, Csaba Szontágh v Magyar Állam (Use of motor vehicles — Insurance against civil liability — Directive 72/166/EEC — Article 3(1) — Directive 84/5/EEC — Article 1(4), first subparagraph — Insolvency of the insurer — No payment of compensation by the body providing compensation)
Date: 2013-07-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Hungary, financial solvency, indemnification, insurance company, interpretation of the law, motor vehicle, motor vehicle insurance, third-party insurance








C_2013252EN.01000701.xml










31.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/7





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 July 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság — Hungary) — Gábor Csonka, Tibor Isztli, Dávid Juhász, János Kiss, Csaba Szontágh v Magyar Állam
(Case C-409/11) (1)

(Use of motor vehicles - Insurance against civil liability - Directive 72/166/EEC - Article 3(1) - Directive 84/5/EEC - Article 1(4), first subparagraph - Insolvency of the insurer - No payment of compensation by the body providing compensation)
2013/C 252/09
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Gábor Csonka, Tibor Isztli, Dávid Juhász, János Kiss, Csaba Szontágh

Defendant: Magyar Állam

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Fővárosi Bíróság — Interpretation of Council Directive 72/166/EEC of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability (OJ, English Special Edition 1972 (II), p. 360) — Obligation for the Member States to take the measures necessary to ensure that all compulsory insurance policies against civil liability cover the whole of the territory of the Community — Withdrawal of a motor vehicle insurance company’s operating licence, giving rise to an obligation on the part of individuals who had concluded contracts with that insurance company to answer personally, using their own assets, for the damage they caused to others — State liability in cases of incorrect transposition of a directive

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Council Directive 72/166/EEC of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability, as amended by Directive 2005/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005, read in the light of Article 1(4) of Second Council Directive 84/5/EEC of 30 December 1983 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, as amended by Directive 2005/14, must be interpreted as not including, among the obligations which that provision imposes on Member States, that of establishing a body to ensure that compensation is provided to victims of road accidents in situations where, although the persons responsible for the damage had taken out insurance covering their civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, the insurer has become insolvent.


(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.