do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-312/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 July 2013 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2000/78/EC — Article 5 — Establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation — Persons with disabilities — Insufficient implementing measures)
Date: 2013-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU employment policy, disabled person, discrimination based on disability, equal treatment, job access, national implementing measure, right to work








C_2013245EN.01000202.xml










24.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/2





Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 July 2013 — European Commission v Italian Republic
(Case C-312/11) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2000/78/EC - Article 5 - Establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation - Persons with disabilities - Insufficient implementing measures)
2013/C 245/03
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Enegren and C. Cattabriga, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, assisted by C. Gerardis, avvocato dello Stato)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to take, within the prescribed period, all the provisions necessary to comply with Article 5 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16) — National legislation providing for the application of that article through various measures, the application of which is itself dependent on the currently purely theoretical adoption of further measures — Insufficient guarantees and adjustments

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by not introducing a requirement for all employers to make reasonable adjustments, where needed in a particular case, for all persons with disabilities, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligation to ensure the correct and full implementation of Article 5 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation;










2.


Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 226, 30.7.2011.
No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement
Date: 2013-07-04
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Norway, State aid, control of State aid








C_2013193EN.01001101.xml










4.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 193/11





State aid — Decision to raise no objections
2013/C 193/07
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:







Date of adoption of the decision


:


19 December 2012




Case number


:


72770




Decision number


:


518/12/COL




EFTA State


:


Norway




Name of the beneficiary


:


Eidsiva Bioenergi AS




Type of measure


:


Individual aid under the Energy Fund Scheme, subject to a detailed assessment under Article 61(3)(c) of the EEA agreement




Scheme


:


The Energy Fund Scheme approved by the EFTA Surveillance Authority by Decision No 248/11/COL




Objective


:


Environmental protection




Form of aid


:


Grant




Aid amount


:


NOK 120,5 million




Economic sectors


:


District heating




Name and address of the granting authority


:







Enova SF




Professor Brochs gate 2




7030 Trondheim




NORWAY








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:
http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/
State aid — Decision to raise no objections
Date: 2013-07-04
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Norway, State aid, control of State aid, venture capital








C_2013193EN.01001001.xml










4.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 193/10





No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement
2013/C 193/06
The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:







Date of adoption of the decision


:


21 November 2012




Case number


:


68640




Decision number


:


410/12/COL




EFTA State


:


Iceland




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


:


Alleged State aid through subsidised lease of optical fibres previously operated on behalf of NATO




Legal basis


:


Article 61(1) EEA




Type of measure


:


No aid




Economic sectors


:


Telecommunication




The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:
http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 646/2013 of 4 July 2013 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism
Date: 2013-07-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Latvia, disclosure of information, terrorism








L_2013187EN.01000401.xml










6.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 187/4








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 646/2013
of 4 July 2013
         
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with a view to combating terrorism (1), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 lists the competent authorities to whom information and requests concerning the measures imposed by that Regulation should be sent.












(2)


Latvia requested that the address details concerning its competent authorities should be amended.












(3)


Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 should therefore be updated accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 4 July 2013.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments






(1)  
            OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p. 70.




ANNEX
Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 is amended as follows:
The address details under the heading ‘Latvia’ shall be replaced with:







               ‘Latvijas Republikas Ārlietu Ministrija




K.Valdemāra iela 3




Rīga LV-1395, Latvija




Tel: (+371) 67 016 201




Fax: (+371) 67 828 121




mfa.cha@mfa.gov.lv









Noziedzīgi iegūtu līdzekļu legalizācijas novēršanas dienests




Raiņa bulvāris 15




Rīga LV-1050, Latvija




Tel: (+371) 67 044 430




Fax: (+371) 67 324 497




kd@kd.gov.lv’
Case T-589/10: Order of the General Court of 4 July 2013 — Just Music Fernsehbetriebs GmbH v OHIM — France Télécom (Jukebox) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Revocation of the earlier Community mark — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2013-07-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, music, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013260EN.01004101.xml










7.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 260/41





Order of the General Court of 4 July 2013 — Just Music Fernsehbetriebs GmbH v OHIM — France Télécom (Jukebox)
(Case T-589/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of the earlier Community mark - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 260/72
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Just Music Fernsehbetriebs GmbH (Landshut, Germany) (represented by: T. Kaus, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: France Télécom (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Bertheux Scotte, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 October 2010 (Case R 1408/2009-1), concerning opposition proceedings between France Télécom and Just Music Fernsehbetriebs GmbH.

Operative part







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Just Music Fernsehbetriebs GmbH and France Télécom shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).






(1)  OJ C 72, 5.3.2011.
Case C-350/11: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 July 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Argenta Spaarbank NV v Belgische Staat (Tax legislation — Corporation tax — Deduction for risk capital — Notional interest — Reduction of the amount deductible by companies with establishments abroad the income from which is exempt under double taxation conventions)
Date: 2013-07-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Netherlands, corporation tax, double taxation, tax relief, venture capital








C_2013245EN.01000301.xml










24.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/3





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 July 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Argenta Spaarbank NV v Belgische Staat
(Case C-350/11) (1)

(Tax legislation - Corporation tax - Deduction for risk capital - Notional interest - Reduction of the amount deductible by companies with establishments abroad the income from which is exempt under double taxation conventions)
2013/C 245/04
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Argenta Spaarbank NV

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Interpretation of Article 49 TFEU — Tax legislation — Corporation tax — Deduction for risk capital (‘notional interest’) — Reduction of the amount deductible, for companies with establishments abroad the income from which is exempt under agreements to prevent double taxation conventions

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which, for calculation of a deduction granted to a company subject to full tax liability in a Member State, the net value of the assets of a permanent establishment situated in another Member State is not taken into account when the profits of that permanent establishment are not taxable in the first Member State by virtue of a double taxation convention, whereas the assets attributed to a permanent establishment situated in the territory of the first Member State are taken into account for that purpose.


(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-07-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013193EN.01000201.xml










4.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 193/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

3 July 2013
2013/C 193/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2959




JPY


Japanese yen


128,85




DKK


Danish krone


7,4605




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84920




SEK


Swedish krona


8,7083




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2285




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,9355




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


26,020




HUF


Hungarian forint


294,88




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7020




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3365




RON


Romanian leu


4,4480




TRY


Turkish lira


2,5264




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4278




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3664




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,0485




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6743




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6510




KRW


South Korean won


1 482,67




ZAR


South African rand


13,0640




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9449




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4705




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 881,45




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1295




PHP


Philippine peso


56,338




RUB


Russian rouble


43,1000




THB


Thai baht


40,290




BRL


Brazilian real


2,9376




MXN


Mexican peso


17,0048




INR


Indian rupee


78,0970






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement
Date: 2013-07-04
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Iceland, State aid, control of State aid, telecommunications equipment, telecommunications industry








C_2013193EN.01000901.xml










4.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 193/9





No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement
2013/C 193/05
The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:







Date of adoption of the decision


:


5 December 2012




Case number


:


72447




Decision number


:


459/12/COL




EFTA State


:


Norway




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


:


Bømlabadet Bygg AS




Type of measure


:


Direct grant




Name and address of the granting authority


:







The Municipality of Bømlo




Rådhuset




5430 Bremnes




NORWAY








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:
http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/
European Parliament resolution of 4 July 2013 on the crisis in Egypt (2013/2697(RSP))
Date: 2013-07-04
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: Egypt, constitution, constitutional court, democracy, democratisation, early election, military intervention, parliamentary election, political situation, presidential election








C_2016075EN.01015901.xml










26.2.2016   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 75/159





P7_TA(2013)0333
Situation in Egypt
European Parliament resolution of 4 July 2013 on the crisis in Egypt (2013/2697(RSP))
(2016/C 075/24)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the statements of General Abdul Fatah Khalil Al-Sisi, Chairman of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces of Egypt, of 4 July 2013,










—


having regard to Rule 110(2) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure,










A.


whereas, in its statement of 4 July 2013, the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces announced the suspension of the constitution, the transfer of power to the head of the High Constitutional Court until early presidential elections are held, to be followed by parliamentary elections, and the forming of a national coalition government and a committee to look into amendments to the constitution; whereas Mr Adly Mansour has been sworn in as interim President;










1.


Expresses its deep concern at the situation in Egypt following the military intervention; underlines that power should be transferred to democratically-elected civilian authorities as soon as possible; expresses its fundamental solidarity with all those Egyptians who cherish democratic aspirations for their country and calls for a rapid return to the democratic process, including the holding of free and fair presidential and parliamentary elections in a fully inclusive process with the participation of all democratic actors;










2.


Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the parliaments and governments of the Member States, and the Parliament and Government of Egypt.
State aid — Decision to raise no objections
Date: 2013-07-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: ceramics, economic concentration, investment company, merger control








C_2013193EN.01001201.xml










4.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 193/12





State aid — Decision to raise no objections
2013/C 193/08
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following State aid measure:







Date of adoption of the decision


:


13 March 2013




Case number


:


73095




Decision number


:


104/13/COL




EFTA State


:


Norway




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


:


National Seed Capital Scheme




Legal basis


:


Prop. 111 S (2011-2012) Tilleggsbevilgninger og omprioriteringer i statsbudsjettet 2012 – Meld. St. (2011-2012) Verktøy for vekst – Om Innovasjon Norge og SIVA SF




Type of measure


:


Aid scheme




Objective


:


Risk capital




Form of aid


:


Provision of risk capital, grant to investors




Budget


:


Overall budget: NOK 1,5 billion




Duration


:


Funds to be set up by 2017, investment phase of five years




Economic sectors


:


All sectors




Name and address of the granting authority


:







Innovation Norway




PO Box 448, Sentrum




0104 Oslo




NORWAY








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:
http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6904 — Yamaha/KYB/KYB Motorcycle Suspension JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-07-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, vehicle








C_2013193EN.01000101.xml










4.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 193/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6904 — Yamaha/KYB/KYB Motorcycle Suspension JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 193/01
On 25 June 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6904. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
State aid — Decision to raise no objections
Date: 2013-07-04
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Norway, State aid, control of State aid, environmental protection, heating








C_2013193EN.01001301.xml










4.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 193/13





NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS
2013/C 193/09
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions for:
CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS







English language (EN)


:


EPSO/AD/256/13 (AD 5)




French language (FR)


:


EPSO/AD/257/13 (AD 5 and AD 7)




Romanian language (RO)


:


EPSO/AD/258/13 (AD 7)




Slovenian language (SL)


:


EPSO/AD/259/13 (AD 5 and AD 7)




The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal C 193 A of 4 July 2013.
Further information can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/
Case T-355/13: Action brought on 4 July 2013 — easyJet Airline v Commission
Date: 2013-07-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Netherlands, competition law, interpretation of the law, low cost airline, rights of the defence








C_2013260EN.01004401.xml










7.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 260/44





Action brought on 4 July 2013 — easyJet Airline v Commission
(Case T-355/13)
2013/C 260/79
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: easyJet Airline Co. Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. J. Werner and R. Marian, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Declare void the Commission’s decision C(2013) 2727 final of 3 May 2013 in Case COMP/39.869 — easyJet/Schiphol; and










—


Order the defendant to bear the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is vitiated by an error of law (misinterpretation of the provisions of Article 13 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1)) combined with manifest error of assessment (erroneous conclusion that the national proceedings in the Netherlands equated to a national competition authority having dealt with the case).










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision infringes an essential procedural requirement, namely the failure to give adequate statements for the reasons for its rejection. In addition, the Commission has not considered all the matters of fact and of law which the applicant brought to its attention.






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1)