do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-568/12 P: Appeal brought on 29 November 2012 by Doru Cristian Ioanovici against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 25 September 2012 in Case T-313/12: Ioanovici v Commission
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Romania, crime against humanity, indemnification, infringement of EU law, ownership, public authorities








C_2013225EN.01005303.xml










3.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/53





Appeal brought on 29 November 2012 by Doru Cristian Ioanovici against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 25 September 2012 in Case T-313/12: Ioanovici v Commission
(Case C-568/12 P)
2013/C 225/96
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Doru Cristian Ioanovici (represented by: R. Neagu, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 27 June 2013 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.
Case C-353/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim (Germany) lodged on 27 June 2013 — Jürgen Hein, Hjördis Hein v Condor Flugdienst GmbH
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, air transport, delegation of power, interpretation of the law








C_2013274EN.01000402.xml










21.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 274/4





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim (Germany) lodged on 27 June 2013 — Jürgen Hein, Hjördis Hein v Condor Flugdienst GmbH
(Case C-353/13)
2013/C 274/08
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Rüsselsheim

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Jürgen Hein, Hjördis Hein

Defendant: Condor Flugdienst GmbH

Questions referred







1.


Are adverse actions by third parties acting on their own responsibility and to whom certain tasks that constitute part of the operation of an air carrier have been entrusted to be deemed to be extraordinary circumstances within the meaning of Article 5(3) of Regulation No 261/2004? (1)











2.


If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative, does the assessment of the situation depend on who (airline, airport operator etc.) entrusted the tasks to the third party?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.
Notification of the Austrian Government pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ( ‘Electricity Directive’ ) concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity regarding the designation of the Austrian Power Grid Aktiengesellschaft and the Vorarlberger Übertragungsnetz GmbH as transmission system operators in Austria
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: Austria
Subjects: electricity supply, private sector, public contract








C_2013182EN.01000501.xml










27.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/5





Notification of the Austrian Government pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Electricity Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity regarding the designation of the Austrian Power Grid Aktiengesellschaft and the Vorarlberger Übertragungsnetz GmbH as transmission system operators in Austria
2013/C 182/06
Following the Austrian regulatory authority's final decision of 12 March 2012 regarding the certification of the Austrian Power Grid Aktiengesellschaft and of 1 June 2012 regarding the certification of the Vorarlberger Übertragungsnetz GmbH as independent transmission operators (Chapter V of the Electricity Directive), Austria has notified to the Commission the official approval and designation of these companies as transmission system operators operating in Austria in accordance with Article 10 of the Electricity Directive.
Any additional information can be obtained from:
Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth — Department Renewable Energies, Electricity and District Heat including Cogeneration, Mr Michael Sebanz (Michael.Sebanz@bmwfj.gv.at) — http://www.bmwfj.gv.at
Case F-63/13: Action brought on 27 June 2013 — ZZ v ENISA
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, accountant, indemnification








C_2013336EN.01003102.xml










16.11.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 336/31





Action brought on 27 June 2013 — ZZ v ENISA
(Case F-63/13)
2013/C 336/69
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment, firstly, of the decision to dismiss the applicant and, secondly, of the decision, adopted after the judgment of the CST in Case F-118/10, to appoint another agent to the post of accountant. Finally, compensation for the non-pecuniary harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of ENISA rejecting the applicant’s claim, and the other contested decisions, namely the decision of ENISA of 4 September 2012 dismissing the applicant and the decision of ENISA of 9 October 2012 appointing Mr X. to the post of accountant in the applicant’s place;










—


Order ENISA to pay the applicant, in respect of all the abovementioned unlawful acts, the sum of EUR 100 000 as compensation for the non-pecuniary harm;










—


Order ENISA to pay the costs.
Notification of the Hungarian Government pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ( ‘Electricity Directive’ ) concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity regarding the designation of MAVIR Hungarian Independent Transmission Operator Company Ltd, MAVIR Zrt. as a transmission system operator in Hungary — Electricity TSO
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: Hungary
Subjects: electricity supply, private sector, public contract








C_2013182EN.01000401.xml










27.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/4





Notification of the Hungarian Government pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Electricity Directive’) concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity regarding the designation of MAVIR Hungarian Independent Transmission Operator Company Ltd, MAVIR Zrt. as a transmission system operator in Hungary — Electricity TSO
2013/C 182/04
Following the Hungarian regulatory authority's final decision of 13 March 2012 regarding the certification of MAVIR Hungarian Independent Transmission Operator Company Ltd, MAVIR Zrt. as independent transmission operator (Chapter V of the Electricity Directive), Hungary has notified to the Commission the official approval and designation of this company as a transmission system operator operating in Hungary in accordance with Article 10 of the Electricity Directive.
Any additional information can be obtained from the website of the Hungarian Energy Office as follows:






—


decision of the Hungarian regulatory authority on the certification of MAVIR Zrt.:
http://192.168.54.12/gcpdocs/70/200-2012_MAVIR_A%20MAVIR_Zrt_tanusitasa.pdf










—


decision of the Hungarian regulatory authority on the licensing for operation of MAVIR Zrt.:
http://www.eh.gov.hu/gcpdocs/70/715_2012_MAVIR_atviteli_rendszeriranyitasra_vonatkozo_mukodesi_engedely.pdf
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, public service, transport regulations








C_2013182EN.01000701.xml










27.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/7





Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 182/09






Member State


Italy




Route concerned


Olbia–Rome Fiumicino and vice versa




Period of validity of the contract


Four years starting on 27 October 2013




Deadline for submission of tenders


Two months after the date of publication of this notice




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained







Regione Autonoma della Sardegna




Assessorato dei trasporti




Via XXIX Novembre 41




09123 Cagliari CA




ITALIA




Tel. +39 0706067308




Fax +39 0706067338




E-mail: trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it




Internet: http://www.regione.sardegna.it




http://www.mit.gov.it
Reserve list — Open competition — EPSO/AD/235/12 — Croatian-language (HR) Lawyer-linguists (AD 7)
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: Croatia, EPSO, competition (EU), lawyer








CA2013182EN.01000101.xml










27.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 182/1





RESERVE LIST (1)

OPEN COMPETITION
EPSO/AD/235/12
CROATIAN-LANGUAGE (HR) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)
(2013/C 182 A/01)
‘Court of Justice’ channel






BIŽAJIĆ


Robert




BOŽAC


Ivana




IVANČEVIĆ


Ivana




KUKEC


Lana




ROMIĆ


Mirna




STANKOVIĆ


Danijel




ZELJKO


Maja




The reserve list will be valid until 23 April 2016.


(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.
Case C-155/12: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 June 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Minister Finansów v RR Donnelley Global Turnkey Solutions Poland sp. z o.o. (VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 44 and 47 — Place where taxable transactions are deemed to be carried out — Place of supply for tax purposes — Concept of ‘supply of services connected with immovable property’ — Complex cross-border service relating to the storage of goods)
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Poland, VAT, interpretation of the law, provision of services, real property, storage








C_2013225EN.01003002.xml










3.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/30





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 June 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Minister Finansów v RR Donnelley Global Turnkey Solutions Poland sp. z o.o.
(Case C-155/12) (1)

(VAT - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 44 and 47 - Place where taxable transactions are deemed to be carried out - Place of supply for tax purposes - Concept of ‘supply of services connected with immovable property’ - Complex cross-border service relating to the storage of goods)
2013/C 225/50
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Minister Finansów

Defendant: RR Donnelley Global Turnkey Solutions Poland sp. z o.o.

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) — Interpretation of Articles 44 and 47 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1), as amended — Determination of the relevant place for tax purposes — Concept of the supply of services connected with immovable property — Complex cross-border service involving the storage of goods provided to contractual customers established in other Member States or in non-member countries and comprising the admission of goods to warehouses situated in Poland, their shelving, storage, loading and unloading, repackaging and return to the customer

Operative part of the judgment

Article 47 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2008/8/EC of 12 February 2008, must be interpreted as meaning that the supply of a complex storage service, comprising admission of goods to a warehouse, placing them on the appropriate storage shelves, storing them, packaging them, issuing them, unloading and loading them, comes within the scope of that article only if the storage constitutes the principal service of a single transaction and only if the recipients of that service are given a right to use all or part of expressly specific immovable property.


(1)  OJ C 184, 23.6.2012.
Case C-542/11: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 June 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Codirex Expeditie BV (Community Customs Code — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Goods in temporary storage — Non-Community goods — External Community transit procedure — Point at which a customs-approved treatment or use is assigned — Acceptance of the customs declaration — Release of the goods — Customs debt)
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Union transit, customs debt, customs warehouse, interpretation of the law








C_2013225EN.01001401.xml










3.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/14





Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 June 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Codirex Expeditie BV
(Case C-542/11) (1)

(Community Customs Code - Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Goods in temporary storage - Non-Community goods - External Community transit procedure - Point at which a customs-approved treatment or use is assigned - Acceptance of the customs declaration - Release of the goods - Customs debt)
2013/C 225/22
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Respondent: Codirex Expeditie BV

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Article 50 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) — Goods in temporary storage having been declared for placing under the external Community transit procedure — Point at which a customs-approved treatment or use is assigned

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 50, 67 and 73 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 648/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2005, must be interpreted as meaning that the point at which non-Community goods, covered by a customs declaration accepted by the customs authorities for placing under the external Community transit procedure and having the status of goods in temporary storage, are placed under that customs procedure and thereby assigned a customs-approved treatment or use is the moment at which they are released.


(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.
Case C-567/12 P: Appeal brought on 29 November 2012 by Adrian Barliba against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 25 September 2012 in Case T-312/12: Barliba v Commission
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Romania, crime against humanity, indemnification, infringement of EU law, ownership, public authorities








C_2013225EN.01005302.xml










3.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/53





Appeal brought on 29 November 2012 by Adrian Barliba against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 25 September 2012 in Case T-312/12: Barliba v Commission
(Case C-567/12 P)
2013/C 225/95
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Adrian Barliba (represented by: R. Neagu, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 27 June 2013 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.
No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Liechtenstein, State aid, control of State aid, scientific research, software, tax relief








C_2013182EN.01001001.xml










27.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/10





No State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement
2013/C 182/12
The EFTA Surveillance Authority considers that the following measure does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement:







Date of adoption of the decision


:


12 December 2012




Case number


:


71725




Decision number


:


480/12/COL




EFTA State


:


Liechtenstein




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


:


Liechtenstein — Preferential tax treatment for revenues from software and scientific and technical databases




Legal basis


:


Article 61(1) of the EEA




Type of measure


:


No aid




Economic sectors


:


All sectors




The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website:
http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6938 — Mahle/Behr) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry, vehicle parts








C_2013182EN.01001401.xml










27.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/14





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6938 — Mahle/Behr)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 182/16






1.


On 19 June 2013, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Mahle GmbH (Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control over Behr GmbH & Co. KG (Germany) by way of a purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for Mahle: the automotive supply industry, in particular the development and the production of high-quality components and systems for the international motor vehicle and engine industry,










—


for Behr: the development and the production of components, modules and comprehensive systems for engine cooling and the air-conditioning of motor vehicles, heat transfer products and thermostatic control devices for coolant circuits.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6938 — Mahle/Behr, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6895 — 3G Special Situations Fund III/Berkshire Hathaway/H J Heinz Company)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: distribution business, economic concentration, food processing, investment company, merger control








C_2013182EN.01000101.xml










27.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6895 — 3G Special Situations Fund III/Berkshire Hathaway/H J Heinz Company)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 182/01
On 31 May 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6895. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case T-248/11: Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2013 — International Engine Intellectual Property Company v OHIM (PURE POWER) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark PURE POWER — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2013-06-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, machine-tool industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013225EN.01007001.xml










3.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/70





Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2013 — International Engine Intellectual Property Company v OHIM (PURE POWER)
(Case T-248/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark PURE POWER - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2013/C 225/154
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: International Engine Intellectual Property Company, LLC (Warrenville, Illinois, United States) (represented by: C. Thomas and B. Reiter, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 February 2011 (Case R 2310/2010-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign PURE POWER as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 211, 16.7.2011.