do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
2013/338/EU: Decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 26 June 2013 appointing Judges to the Court of Justice
Date: 2013-06-26
Institutions: Representatives of the Governments of the Member States
Subjects: Court of Justice (EU), appointment of members, judge








L_2013179EN.01009401.xml










29.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 179/94








            DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES
         
of 26 June 2013
         
appointing Judges to the Court of Justice
(2013/338/EU)


THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 19 thereof,


Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 253 and 255 thereof,


Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Under Articles 5 and 7 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and following the resignations of Mr Uno LÕHMUS and Mr Jean-Jacques KASEL as of 6 October 2013, two judges should be appointed to the Court of Justice for the remainder of the terms of office of Mr LÕHMUS and Mr KASEL, which run until 6 October 2015.












(2)


Ms Küllike JÜRIMÄE and Mr François BILTGEN have been proposed as candidates for the vacant posts.












(3)


The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on the suitability of Ms Küllike JÜRIMÄE and Mr François BILTGEN to perform the duties of Judges of the Court of Justice,





HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following are hereby appointed Judges to the Court of Justice for the period from 6 October 2013 to 6 October 2015:






—


Ms Küllike JÜRIMÄE










—


Mr François BILTGEN.






Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.





Done at Brussels, 26 June 2013.


The President

R. MONTGOMERY
Case F-106/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — BM v ECB (Civil Service — ECB Staff — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary penalty — Written reprimand)
Date: 2013-06-26
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: administrative sanction, disciplinary proceedings, member of the European Central Bank








C_2013252EN.01004401.xml










31.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/44





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — BM v ECB
(Case F-106/11) (1)

(Civil Service - ECB Staff - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary penalty - Written reprimand)
2013/C 252/74
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: BM (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented initially by P. Embley, M. López Torres and E. Carlini, Agents, then by M. López Torres and E. Carlini, Agents and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application to annul the decision of the Deputy Director General of the ECB’s Human Resources, Budget and Organisation Directorate General to impose a reprimand on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Declares that BM is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European Central Bank.






(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 68.
Case F-12/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — Di Prospero v Commission (Civil Service — Appointment — Success in a competition following a request to the applicant to sit the competition with a view to complying with a judgment — Appointment in the grade with retroactive effect)
Date: 2013-06-26
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: appointment of staff, competition (EU), enforcement of ruling, staff assessment








C_2013252EN.01004503.xml










31.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/45





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — Di Prospero v Commission
(Case F-12/12) (1)

(Civil Service - Appointment - Success in a competition following a request to the applicant to sit the competition with a view to complying with a judgment - Appointment in the grade with retroactive effect)
2013/C 252/78
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Rita Di Prospero (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)

Re:

Civil Service — Action for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision rejecting the applicant’s request for classification at grade AD 11 with retroactive effect as at 1 January 2010 and for compensation for damage allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


The decision of the European Commission of 18 October 2011 refusing to grade Ms Di Prospero in grade AD 11 with retroactive effect from 1 January 2010 is annulled;










2.


The remainder of the action is dismissed;










3.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by Ms Di Prospero.






(1)  OJ C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 32.
Communication in accordance with Article 12(5)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 on the information provided by the customs authorities of the Member States concerning the classification of goods in the customs nomenclature
Date: 2013-06-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, customs regulations, exchange of information, tariff nomenclature








C_2013180EN.01000901.xml










26.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 180/9





Communication in accordance with Article 12(5)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 on the information provided by the customs authorities of the Member States concerning the classification of goods in the customs nomenclature
2013/C 180/03
Binding Tariff Information ceases to be valid from this day if it becomes incompatible with the interpretation of the customs nomenclature as a result of the following international tariff measures:
Amendments to the Harmonised System Explanatory Notes and the Compendium of Classification Opinions, approved by the Customs Cooperation Council (CCC doc. NC1819 — report of the 50th Session of the HS Committee):

AMENDMENTS TO THE EXPLANATORY NOTES TO BE DONE UNDER ARTICLE 8 PROCEDURE OF THE HS CONVENTION AND CLASSIFICATION OPINIONS EDITED BY THE HS COMMITTEE OF THE WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANISATION

(50th SESSION OF THE HSC IN SEPTEMBER 2012)
DOC. NC1819

Amendments of the Explanatory Notes of the Nomenclature annexed to the HS Convention







35.07


L/5




Chapter 40 — General


L/20




56.02


L/20




56.03


L/20




59.03


L/20




59.06


L/20




84.15


L/8




84.35


L/10




84.38


L/10




84.73


L/12




85.09


L/10




Chapter 87 — General


L/14




87.03


L/16, L/21




87.04


L/16




87.11


L/16





Classification Opinions approved by the HS Committee







1704.90/9


L/2




3004.90/2


L/4




6304.91/2


L/6




8415.10/1


L/7




8419.89/3


L/9




8471.30/2-3


L/11




8523.51/4-5


L/13




8704.21/2


L/15




8704.31/4-5


L/15




9018.90/2


L/17




Information regarding the contents of these measures can be obtained from the Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union of the European Commission (rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, 1049 Brussels, Belgium) or can be downloaded from the Internet site of this Directorate-General:
http://ec.europa.eu/comm/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/tariff_aspects/harmonised_system/index_en.htm
Case F-116/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — Vacca v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Competition notice EPSO/AD/207/11 — Non-admission to the assessment tests — Admission tests — Cancellation of questions — Information for candidates)
Date: 2013-06-26
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, admission to examinations, competition (EU)








C_2013225EN.01008501.xml










3.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/85





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — Vacca v Commission
(Case F-116/11) (1)

(Civil service - Open competition - Competition notice EPSO/AD/207/11 - Non-admission to the assessment tests - Admission tests - Cancellation of questions - Information for candidates)
2013/C 225/195
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Annalisa Vacca (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision not to admit the applicant to the assessment tests in the competition EPSO/AD/207/11.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Orders the European Commission to pay the sum of EUR 500 to Ms Vacca;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of the costs incurred by Ms Vacca;










4.


Orders Ms Vacca to bear one third of her own costs.






(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2013, p. 69.
Case F-78/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — BM v ECB (Civil service — ECB Staff — Retroactive extension of the probationary period — Decision to end the contract during the probationary period — Disciplinary proceedings)
Date: 2013-06-26
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: contract, disciplinary proceedings, indemnification, member of the European Central Bank








C_2013252EN.01004301.xml










31.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/43





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — BM v ECB
(Case F-78/11) (1)

(Civil service - ECB Staff - Retroactive extension of the probationary period - Decision to end the contract during the probationary period - Disciplinary proceedings)
2013/C 252/71
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: BM (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented: initially by P. Embley, M. López Torres and E. Carlini, acting as Agents, and subsequently by M. López Torres and E. Carlini, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application to annul the ECB’s decision to terminate the applicant’s contract during the probationary period because of a disciplinary fault punished by a reprimand.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank of 20 May 2011, which terminates BM’s contract as of 31 October 2011;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Declares that the European Central Bank is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by BM.






(1)  OJ C 319, 29.10.11, p. 30.
2013/337/EU: Decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 26 June 2013 appointing Judges to the General Court
Date: 2013-06-26
Institutions: Representatives of the Governments of the Member States
Subjects: General Court (EU), appointment of members, judge








L_2013179EN.01009301.xml










29.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 179/93








            DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES
         
of 26 June 2013
         
appointing Judges to the General Court
(2013/337/EU)


THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 19 thereof,


Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 254 and 255 thereof,


Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The terms of office of 13 Judges of the General Court are due to expire on 31 August 2013. New appointments should therefore be made for the period from 1 September 2013 to 31 August 2019.












(2)


It has been proposed that the terms of office of Mr Guido BERARDIS, Mr Eugène BUTTIGIEG and Mr Carl WETTER as Judges of the General Court should be renewed.












(3)


Mr Anthony COLLINS, Mr Stéphane GERVASONI and Mr Ignacio ULLOA RUBIO have been proposed as candidates for the vacant posts of Judges of the General Court.












(4)


The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on the suitability of Mr Guido BERARDIS, Mr Eugène BUTTIGIEG, Mr Anthony COLLINS, Mr Stéphane GERVASONI, Mr Ignacio ULLOA RUBIO and Mr Carl WETTER to perform the duties of Judge of the General Court,





HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following are hereby appointed Judges to the General Court for the period from 1 September 2013 to 31 August 2019:






—


Mr Guido BERARDIS










—


Mr Eugène BUTTIGIEG










—


Mr Anthony COLLINS










—


Mr Stéphane GERVASONI










—


Mr Ignacio ULLOA RUBIO










—


Mr Carl WETTER.






Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.





Done at Brussels, 26 June 2013.


The President

R. MONTGOMERY