do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 587/2013 of 20 June 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Fraises de Nîmes (PGI)]
Date: 2013-06-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, designation of origin, product designation, soft fruit








L_2013169EN.01006201.xml










21.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 169/62








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 587/2013
of 20 June 2013
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Fraises de Nîmes (PGI)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).












(2)


Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Fraises de Nîmes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).












(3)


As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Fraises de Nîmes’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 20 June 2013.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Dacian CIOLOȘ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(3)  
            OJ C 296, 2.10.2012, p. 9.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

FRANCE
Fraises de Nîmes (PGI)
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-06-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013174EN.01000501.xml










20.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 174/5





Euro exchange rates (1)

19 June 2013
2013/C 174/03

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3406




JPY


Japanese yen


127,44




DKK


Danish krone


7,4596




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85580




SEK


Swedish krona


8,5750




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2326




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,6765




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,686




HUF


Hungarian forint


293,99




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7016




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2598




RON


Romanian leu


4,4978




TRY


Turkish lira


2,5238




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4105




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3673




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,3981




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6749




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6841




KRW


South Korean won


1 515,21




ZAR


South African rand


13,3336




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2139




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4805




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


13 282,17




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,2250




PHP


Philippine peso


57,804




RUB


Russian rouble


43,1798




THB


Thai baht


41,197




BRL


Brazilian real


2,9208




MXN


Mexican peso


17,2401




INR


Indian rupee


78,8210






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-337/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 20 June 2013 — Almos Agrárkülkereskedelmi Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Észak-alföldi Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága
Date: 2013-06-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Hungary, VAT, basis of tax assessment, infringement of EU law, interpretation of the law, tax harmonisation, tax relief








C_2013304EN.01000401.xml










19.10.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 304/4





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 20 June 2013 — Almos Agrárkülkereskedelmi Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Észak-alföldi Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága
(Case C-337/13)
2013/C 304/06
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Kúria

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Almos Agrárkülkereskedelmi Kft.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Észak-alföldi Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága

Questions referred







1.


Is Paragraph 77(1) and (2) of the általános forgalmi adóról szóló 2007. évi CXXVII. törvény (Law CXXVII of 2007 on value added tax), in force until 31 December 2010 consistent with the provisions of Article 90(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (‘VAT Directive’); does the national VAT law cover all the cases of possible reduction of the taxable amount provided for in the VAT Directive?










2.


If the answer to the first question is no, is the taxable person entitled, in the absence of national legislation, to reduce the taxable amount, on the basis of the principles of tax neutrality and proportionality, and in the light of Article 90(1) of the VAT Directive, where it receives no consideration on completion of a transaction?










3.


If Article 90(1) has direct effect, under what circumstances can [the taxable person] reduce the taxable amount? Is it sufficient to issue an amending invoice and send it to the purchaser or is it necessary, in addition, to demonstrate that, in fact, property in or possession of the goods has been recovered?










4.


If the answer to the third question is no, is it obligatory under Community law to compensate the taxable person for the damage arising from the fact that the Member State did not fulfil its obligations as to harmonisation and, as a result, it was not possible for the taxable person to reduce its taxable amount.










5.


May Article 90(2) be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of total or partial non-payment, the Member States have the possibility of not applying a reduction in the taxable amount. If so, is an express prohibition in the Member State’s legislation necessary or does the absence of any rule have the same legal effect.






(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.