do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-102/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 May 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure — Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings — Handwritten signature on the fax different from that on the original application received by post — Action lodged out of time — Manifestly inadmissible)
Date: 2013-05-30
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, payment, provision of documents








C_2013252EN.01004901.xml










31.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/49





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 May 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-102/11) (1)

(Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings - Handwritten signature on the fax different from that on the original application received by post - Action lodged out of time - Manifestly inadmissible)
2013/C 252/87
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser, J. Banquero Cruz, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision refusing to pay to the applicant annual travelling expenses from the place of his employment to his place of origin for the period 2005 to 2010.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 126, 28.4.2012, p. 27.
Case C-357/12 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 May 2013 — Harald Wohlfahrt v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Ferrero SpA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Articles 8(1)(b) and 43(2) — Word sign ‘Kindertraum’ — Opposition of the proprietor of the earlier national word mark Kinder)
Date: 2013-05-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, food industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013225EN.01004801.xml










3.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/48





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 May 2013 — Harald Wohlfahrt v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Ferrero SpA
(Case C-357/12 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Articles 8(1)(b) and 43(2) - Word sign ‘Kindertraum’ - Opposition of the proprietor of the earlier national word mark Kinder)
2013/C 225/83
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Harald Wohlfahrt (represented by: M. Loschelder and V. Schoene, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent), Ferrero SpA (represented by: F. Jacobacci and L. Ghedina, avvocati)

Re:

Appeal lodged against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 May 2012 in Case T-580/10 Wohlfahrt v OHIM — Ferrero (Kindertraum) by which that court dismissed the action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 October 2010 (Case R 815/2009-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Ferrero SpA and Mr Harald Wohlfahrt — Registration of the word sign ‘Kindertraum’ for goods in Classes 16 and 28 — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier word mark ‘Kinder’ — Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 42(2), and 75, first sentence, of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Mr Harald Wohlfahrt shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 287, 22.9.2012