do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-226/13 P: Appeal brought on 14 April 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 6 February 2013 in Case F-67/12, Marcuccio v Commission
Date: 2013-04-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: indemnification, lawyer, legality








C_2013171EN.01003602.xml










15.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/36





Appeal brought on 14 April 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 6 February 2013 in Case F-67/12, Marcuccio v Commission
(Case T-226/13 P)
2013/C 171/69
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought by the appellant







—


Grant all the appellant’s claims in the proceedings at first instance;










—


Order the Commission to reimburse the appellant in respect of the costs incurred by him in the proceedings at first instance.





Pleas in law and main arguments

These proceedings are brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 6 February 2013 rejecting as manifestly lacking any foundation in law an action seeking: (i) annulment of the decision by which the European Commission rejected the appellant’s claim for compensation for the damage arising as a result of the fact that a letter concerning the manner in which the judgment of the Tribunal of 4 November 2008 in Case F-41/06 Marcuccio v Commission was to be enforced was sent to the lawyer who represented him in the appeal proceedings against that judgment; and (ii) an order that the Commission pay compensation for the damage purportedly caused as a result of that act.
In support of his appeal, the appellant alleges an absolute failure to state reasons for the rejection of his claim for compensation, by reason, inter alia, of failure to make inquiries, distortion and misrepresentation of the facts, arbitrary reasoning and incorrect and unreasonable interpretation and application of:






 


the rules of law relating to the incurring of Aquilian liability on the part of the institutions of the European Union;










 


the concept of the duty to state reasons incumbent on all European Union institutions and the European Union judicature;










 


the concept of unlawful conduct on the part of a European Union institution.










 


The appellant also contends that the ruling of the court at first instance on costs was unlawful.
Recommendation of the EU-Palestinian Authority Joint Committee of 14 April 2013 on the implementation of the European Union-Palestinian Authority European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plan
Date: 2013-04-14
Institutions: Joint Committee
Subjects: European neighbourhood policy, Palestine, Palestine Liberation Organisation, Union for the Mediterranean, association agreement (EU), interim agreement (EU)








L_2013125EN.01003401.xml










7.5.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 125/34








            RECOMMENDATION OF THE EU-PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY JOINT COMMITTEE
         
of 14 April 2013
         
on the implementation of the European Union-Palestinian Authority European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plan


THE EU-PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part (1), and in particular Article 63(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 70 of euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part (‘the Agreement’), the Parties shall take any general or specific measures required to fulfil their obligations under the Agreement and shall see to it that the objectives set out in the Agreement are attained.












(2)


The Parties to the Agreement have agreed on the text of the European Union – Palestinian Authority European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plan (‘the EU-PA ENP Action Plan’).












(3)


The EU-PA ENP Action Plan should support the implementation of the Agreement through the drawing up and adoption of concrete steps with a view to attaining its objectives.












(4)


The EU-PA ENP Action Plan serves the dual purpose of setting out concrete steps with a view to the respect, by the parties, of the obligations set out in the Agreement and of providing a broader framework for further strengthening EU-PA relations.







HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the Parties implement the EU-PA ENP Action Plan (2) insofar as such implementation is directed towards attainment of the objectives of the euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part,



Done at Brussels, 14 April 2013.


For the EU-Palestinian Authority Joint Committee


The President

C. ASHTON
            





(1)  
            OJ L 187, 16.7.1997, p. 3.

(2)  http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/12/st17/st17814.en12.pdf
Case T-229/13 P: Appeal brought on 14 April 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 February 2013 in Case F-113/11, Marcuccio v Commission
Date: 2013-04-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: deduction at source, disability insurance, redemption








C_2013171EN.01003701.xml










15.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/37





Appeal brought on 14 April 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 February 2013 in Case F-113/11, Marcuccio v Commission
(Case T-229/13 P)
2013/C 171/70
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought by the appellant







—


Annul the order under appeal in its entirety and without exception;










—


Refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those relied on in Case T-203/13 P Marcuccio v Commission.