do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-04-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013100EN.01000601.xml










6.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 100/6





Euro exchange rates (1)

5 April 2013
2013/C 100/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2944




JPY


Japanese yen


124,49




DKK


Danish krone


7,4547




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84910




SEK


Swedish krona


8,3984




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2158




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,4475




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,763




HUF


Hungarian forint


301,13




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7012




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1738




RON


Romanian leu


4,4215




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3294




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2425




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3134




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,0517




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5408




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6045




KRW


South Korean won


1 466,25




ZAR


South African rand


11,8430




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0272




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6100




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 615,11




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9616




PHP


Philippine peso


53,319




RUB


Russian rouble


40,8580




THB


Thai baht


37,939




BRL


Brazilian real


2,6060




MXN


Mexican peso


15,9620




INR


Indian rupee


70,9780






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Action brought on 6 April 2013 by DB Schenker against the EFTA Surveillance Authority (Case E-4/13)
Date: 2013-04-06
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: Norway, access to EU information, infringement of EU law, provision of documents








C_2013174EN.01001101.xml










20.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 174/11





Action brought on 6 April 2013 by DB Schenker against the EFTA Surveillance Authority
(Case E-4/13)
2013/C 174/07
An action against the EFTA Surveillance Authority was brought before the EFTA Court on 6 April 2013 by Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS (collectively DB Schenker), represented by Jon Midthjell, advokat, Advokatfirmaet Midthjell AS, Grev Wedels plass 5, 0151 Oslo, Norway.
The applicants request the EFTA Court to:






1.


Annul ESA’s decision of 7 February 2013 in Case No 73038 (DB Schenker — access to documents) in so far as it denies access to the inspection documents in Case No 34250 (Norway Post/Privpak);










2.


Order ESA (and any intervener) to bear the costs.





Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:







—


The applicants, Schenker North AB, Schenker Privpak AB and Schenker Privpak AS are part of the DB Schenker group, an international freight forwarding and logistic group. Schenker North AB runs the group’s business operations in Norway, Sweden and Denmark, including the subsidiaries Schenker Privpak AS and Schenker Privpak AB.










—


The applicants submitted a request for access to the documents in Case No 34250 on 3 August 2010 under the rules on public access to documents established by ESA Decision No 407/08/COL on 27 June 2008 (RAD). In a decision dated 16 August 2011, ESA refused access to certain documents in the file (‘inspection documents’). The decision was annulled by a judgment of the EFTA Court in Case E-14/11, 21 December 2012, insofar as it denied full or partial access to inspection documents in Case No 34250 Norway Post/Privpak.










—


New rules on public access to documents were enacted by way of ESA Decision No 300/12/COL on 5 September 2012. On 7 February 2013 ESA adopted a decision denying access to a number of the inspection documents under the new rules on public access to documents. The applicants seek to annul that decision under Article 36 SCA.




The applicants claim that the EFTA Surveillance Authority has inter alia:






—


taken an unlawful starting point by considering that RAD 2012 is not part of EEA law and not subject to the principle of homogenous interpretation, and given the new rules unlawful retroactive effect;










—


infringed Article 4(4) RAD 2012 and the duty to state reasons, cf. Article 16 SCA; and










—


infringed the right to partial access in Article 4(9) RAD 2012 and the duty to state reasons, cf. Article 16 SCA.
Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union OJ C 86, 23.3.2013
Date: 2013-04-06
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union








C_2013101EN.01000101.xml










6.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 101/1





2013/C 101/01
Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union



OJ C 86, 23.3.2013



Past publications


OJ C 79, 16.3.2013


OJ C 71, 9.3.2013


OJ C 63, 2.3.2013


OJ C 55, 23.2.2013


OJ C 46, 16.2.2013


OJ C 38, 9.2.2013

These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu