do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013094EN.01000301.xml










3.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

2 April 2013
2013/C 94/04

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2840




JPY


Japanese yen


119,79




DKK


Danish krone


7,4548




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84690




SEK


Swedish krona


8,3110




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2159




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,4670




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,881




HUF


Hungarian forint


301,91




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7012




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1846




RON


Romanian leu


4,4185




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3170




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2267




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3006




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,9403




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5229




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5847




KRW


South Korean won


1 436,24




ZAR


South African rand


11,8186




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9379




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,6063




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 505,14




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9519




PHP


Philippine peso


52,479




RUB


Russian rouble


40,0061




THB


Thai baht


37,621




BRL


Brazilian real


2,5913




MXN


Mexican peso


15,8285




INR


Indian rupee


69,5630






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Second call for proposals under Commission Decision C(2010) 7499 laying down criteria and measures for the financing of commercial demonstration projects that aim at the environmentally safe capture and geological storage of CO 2 as well as demonstration projects of innovative renewable energy technologies under the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowances trading within the Community established by Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU Emissions Trading Scheme, carbon capture and storage, clean technology, environmental protection, financing, invitation to tender, renewable energy








C_2013094EN.01000801.xml










3.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/8





Second call for proposals under Commission Decision C(2010) 7499 laying down criteria and measures for the financing of commercial demonstration projects that aim at the environmentally safe capture and geological storage of CO2 as well as demonstration projects of innovative renewable energy technologies under the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowances trading within the Community established by Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
2013/C 94/07
Notice is hereby given of the launch of the second call for proposals under the above Decision of 3 November 2010.
Proposals are invited for the call. The call deadlines, information on the modalities of the call and the guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals are available through the following European Commission website:
http://ec.europa.eu/clima/funding/ner300/index_en.htm
Corrigendum to Notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/248/13 — Administrators (AD 6), buildings sector ( OJ C 29 A, 31.1.2013 )
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, competition (EU), construction policy








CA2013094EN.01000101.xml










3.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 94/1





Corrigendum to Notice of open competition — EPSO/AD/248/13 — Administrators (AD 6), buildings sector

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 29 A of 31 January 2013
)

(2013/C 94 A/01)
On page 3, Section IV ADMISSION TESTS:
for:

‘The admission tests are organised by EPSO and you will take them on a computer. The selection board decides on the difficulty of the tests and approves their subject matter on the basis of proposals made by EPSO.

Admission tests will be organised if the number of candidates applying exceeds 1 000 per field. In this case you will be informed via your EPSO account.’,


read:

‘The computer-based admission tests will be organised only if the number of candidates exceeds a certain threshold. The threshold will be determined by the Director of EPSO, as the appointing authority, after the deadline for applications. The threshold may not be the same for each field and you will be informed of the precise details via your EPSO account.
The selection board decides on the difficulty of the tests and approves their subject matter on the basis of proposals made by EPSO.’;

on page 4, Section V, point 1(a), second paragraph:
for:


‘If prior admission tests are organised, candidates' compliance with the general and specific conditions will be checked in descending order of their marks in those tests until a list has been compiled of 1000 candidates per field who:’,


read:


‘If prior admission tests are organised, compliance with the general and specific conditions will be checked for each field in descending order of the marks obtained until the number of candidates defined by the appointing authority is reached who:’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6701 — Ferrovial/Enterprise)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: United Kingdom, economic concentration, merger control, transport infrastructure








C_2013094EN.01000101.xml










3.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6701 — Ferrovial/Enterprise)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 94/01
On 25 March 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6701. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
The European Council in 2012.
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: General Secretariat of the Council
Subjects: EU action, EU employment policy, Economic and Monetary Union, European Council, dissemination of EU information, euro area, the EU's international role

Q
C
-
A
O
-
1
2
-
0
0
1
-
E
N
-
C

EN

Rue de la Loi/ Wetstraat 175
1048 Bruxelles/Brussel
BELGIQUE/BELGIË
Tel. +32 22816111

www.european-council.europa.eu

The European Council in 2012

doi:10.2860/58191

ISSN 1977-3110

JANUARY 2013

am302278Couv.indd   1
am302278Couv.indd   1

8/02/13   11:08
8/02/13   11:08
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013094EN.01000201.xml










3.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

28 March 2013
2013/C 94/03

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2805




JPY


Japanese yen


120,87




DKK


Danish krone


7,4553




GBP


Pound sterling


0,8456




SEK


Swedish krona


8,3553




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2195




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,512




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,74




HUF


Hungarian forint


304,42




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7017




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1804




RON


Romanian leu


4,4193




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3212




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2308




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3021




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,942




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5308




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,59




KRW


South Korean won


1 425,03




ZAR


South African rand


11,82




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,96




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,594




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 447,96




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,965




PHP


Philippine peso


52,296




RUB


Russian rouble


39,7617




THB


Thai baht


37,423




BRL


Brazilian real


2,5703




MXN


Mexican peso


15,8146




INR


Indian rupee


69,566






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6503 — La Poste/Swiss Post/JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, postal service








C_2013094EN.01000102.xml










3.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6503 — La Poste/Swiss Post/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 94/02
On 4 July 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6503. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case C-166/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Melun (France) lodged on 3 April 2013 — Sophie Mukarubega v Préfet de police, Préfet de la Seine-Saint-Denis
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: France, illegal migration, residence permit, return migration, rights of the defence








C_2013164EN.01001103.xml










8.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/11





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Melun (France) lodged on 3 April 2013 — Sophie Mukarubega v Préfet de police, Préfet de la Seine-Saint-Denis
(Case C-166/13)
2013/C 164/20
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal administratif de Melun

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Sophie Mukarubega

Defendants: Préfet de police, Préfet de la Seine-Saint-Denis

Questions referred







1.


Is the right to be heard in all proceedings, which is an integral part of the fundamental principle of respect for the rights of the defence and is furthermore enshrined by Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, to be interpreted as requiring that, where the administration intends to issue a return decision in respect of an illegally staying alien, irrespective of whether or not that return decision is taken after a refusal of a residence permit, and in particular in a situation where there is a risk of absconding, the administration must enable the interested party to present observations?










2.


Does the suspensive effect of the misuse of powers proceedings before the administrative court mean that it is possible to dispense with the prior right of an illegally staying alien to make his observations known with regard to the proposed removal measure to be taken against him?
Case C-165/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 3 April 2013 — Stanislav Gross v Hauptzollamt Braunschweig
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: excise duty, interpretation of the law, trading operation








C_2013207EN.01000301.xml










20.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 207/3





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 3 April 2013 — Stanislav Gross v Hauptzollamt Braunschweig
(Case C-165/13)
2013/C 207/03
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Stanislav Gross

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Braunschweig

Question referred

Does the second subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Council Directive 92/12/EEC (1) on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products, notwithstanding its schematic connection with Article 7(3) of that directive, preclude legislation of a Member State under which a person who, for commercial purposes, holds products subject to excise duty which have been released for consumption in another Member State is not liable for duty in circumstances where he did not acquire those products from another person until after the entry process had been completed?


(1)  OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, citrus fruit, import (EU), originating product








C_2013094EN.01000901.xml










3.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/9





Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
2013/C 94/08
1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.
Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 8/20, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits
(namely mandarins, etc.)


People's Republic of China


Anti-dumping duty


Council Regulation (EC) No 1355/2008 (OJ L 350, 30.12.2008, p. 35) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 158/2013 (OJ L 49, 22.2.2013, p. 29)


31.12.2013






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6818 — Deutsche Bahn/Veolia Transport Central Europe)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Berlin, Germany, carriage of goods, carriage of passengers, economic concentration, merger control, transport company








C_2013094EN.01001001.xml










3.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/10





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6818 — Deutsche Bahn/Veolia Transport Central Europe)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 94/09






1.


On 21 March 2013, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Deutsche Bahn AG (‘DB’, Germany), via its subsidiary DB Mobility Logistics AG, acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation the sole control of the undertaking Veolia Transport Central Europe (‘Veolia’, Germany) through purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for DB: DB, headquartered in Berlin, Germany, is a multinational mobility and logistics group. DB is engaged in passenger transport by rail and bus, freight forwarding and logistics (including freight transport) and ancillary services,










—


for Veolia: Veolia, located in Berlin, Germany, is part of the Veolia Transport Transdev Group (‘VTD’). VTD holds a 65 % share in Veolia with the remaining 35 % share being held by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (‘EBRD’). Veolia operates bus passenger transport networks and roads in six Central Eastern European countries: the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia within the EEA and in Croatia and Serbia outside of the EEA. In addition, Veolia operates a very limited regional rail service in the Czech Republic.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6818 — Deutsche Bahn/Veolia Transport Central Europe, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).
Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2013/10/EU of 19 March 2013 amending Council Directive 75/324/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to aerosol dispensers in order to adapt its labelling provisions to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures ( OJ L 77, 20.3.2013 )
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: aerosol, chemical product, consumer information, inflammable product, labelling








L_2013091EN.01001601.xml










3.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 91/16







Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2013/10/EU of 19 March 2013 amending Council Directive 75/324/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to aerosol dispensers in order to adapt its labelling provisions to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 77 of 20 March 2013
)

On page 21, Article 3(1), the second subparagraph is replaced as follows:

‘They shall apply those provisions from 19 June 2014 as regards aerosol dispensers containing a substance.’
Corrigendum to Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of solar glass originating in the People’s Republic of China ( OJ C 58, 28.2.2013 )
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, complaint to the Commission, glass, import (EU), originating product








C_2013094EN.01001101.xml










3.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/11





Corrigendum to Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of solar glass originating in the People’s Republic of China
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 58 of 28 February 2013
)
2013/C 94/10
On page 6, in point 2. Product under investigation:
for:

‘The product subject to this investigation is solar glass consisting of tempered soda-lime-flat-glass, with an iron content of less than 300 ppm, a solar transmittance of more than 88 % (measured according to AM1,5 300-2 500 nm), a resistance to heat up to 250 °C (measured according to EN 15150), a resistance to thermal shocks of Δ 150 K (measured according to EN 15150) and having a mechanical strength of 90 N/mm2 or more (measured according to EN 1288-3) (“the product under investigation”).’,

read:

‘The product subject to this investigation is solar glass consisting of tempered soda-lime-flat-glass, with an iron content of less than 300 ppm, a solar transmittance of more than 88 % (measured according to AM1,5 300-2 500 nm), a resistance to heat up to 250 °C (measured according to EN 12150), a resistance to thermal shocks of Δ 150 K (measured according to EN 12150) and having a mechanical strength of 90 N/mm2 or more (measured according to EN 1288-3) (“the product under investigation”).’.
Case T-195/13: Action brought on 3 April 2013 — dm-drogerie markt/OHIM — V-Contact (CAMEA)
Date: 2013-04-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pharmaceutical industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013171EN.01003101.xml










15.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/31





Action brought on 3 April 2013 — dm-drogerie markt/ OHIM — V-Contact (CAMEA)
(Case T-195/13)
2013/C 171/58
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: B. Beinert and O. Bludovsky, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: V-Contact Kft (Szada, Hungary)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 January 2013 (Appeal relating to Opposition Proceedings No R 452/2012-1) and, by way of correction, delete the applicant’s trademark;










—


Alternatively annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 January 2013 (Appeal relating to Opposition Proceedings No R 452/2012-1) and, remit the case to the Office for Harmonisation;










—


Alternatively annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 January 2013 (Appeal relating to Opposition Proceedings No R 452/2012-1).





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘CAMEA’ for, inter alia, goods in classes 3, 5 and 16 — Community trade mark application No 9 279 928

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: International registration designating, inter alia, the European Union and covering goods in classes 3, 5 and 8

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.