do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-161/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Puglia (Italy) lodged on 29 March 2013 — Idrodinamica Spurgo Velox and Others v Acquedotto Pugliese SpA
Date: 2013-03-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: appeal, award of contract, limitation of legal proceedings








C_2013189EN.01000301.xml










29.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/3





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Puglia (Italy) lodged on 29 March 2013 — Idrodinamica Spurgo Velox and Others v Acquedotto Pugliese SpA
(Case C-161/13)
2013/C 189/04
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Puglia

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Idrodinamica Spurgo Velox and Others

Defendants: Acquedotto Pugliese SpA

Questions referred







1.


Must Articles 1, 2a, 2c and 2f of Directive 1992/13/EEC (1) be interpreted as meaning that time for the purposes of bringing proceedings for a declaration that there has been an infringement of the rules governing the award of public procurements contracts runs from the date on which the applicant became aware — or, through the exercise of ordinary diligence, ought to have become aware — of the existence of that infringement?










2.


Do Articles 1, 2a, 2c and 2f of Directive 1992/13/EEC preclude provisions of national procedural law, or interpretative practices, […] which allow the court to declare inadmissible an action for a declaration that there has been an infringement of the rules governing the award of public contracts, where, as a result of the conduct of the contracting authority, the applicant became aware of the infringement after the formal communication of the essential elements of the decision definitively awarding the contract?






(1)  Council Directive 92/13/EEC of 25 February 1992 coordinating the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of Community rules on the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors (OJ1992 L 76, p. 14).
Case C-162/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 29 March 2013 — Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav d. d.
Date: 2013-03-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: approximation of laws, commercial vehicle, interpretation of the law, motor vehicle insurance, road traffic, tractor








C_2013156EN.01002401.xml










1.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 156/24





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 29 March 2013 — Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav d. d.
(Case C-162/13)
2013/C 156/37
Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Damijan Vnuk

Defendant: Zavarovalnica Triglav d. d.

Question referred

Must the concept of ‘the use of vehicles’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Council Directive 72/166/EEC (1) of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability, be interpreted as not extending to the circumstances of the present case, in which the person insured by the defendant struck the applicant’s ladder with a tractor towing a trailer while hay was being stored in a hayloft, on the basis that the incident did not occur in the context of a road traffic accident?


(1)  OJ 1972 L 103, p. 1.