do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-26/13: Action brought on 27 March 2013 — ZZ v OHIM
Date: 2013-03-27
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: damages, indemnification, report








C_2013207EN.01005602.xml










20.7.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 207/56





Action brought on 27 March 2013 — ZZ v OHIM
(Case F-26/13)
2013/C 207/92
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report for the period from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2011 and claim for damages.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the appraisal report issued to the applicant in respect of the period from 1 October 2010 to 30 September 2011;










—


order OHIM to pay an adequate compensation in the discretion of the Court — not below an amount 500 Euro — to the applicant for the moral and immaterial damages suffered by the applicant as a result of the contested appraisal report;










—


Order OHIM to pay the costs.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6643 — Uniqa/Dekra/Dekra-Expert)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-03-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance company, merger control








C_2013089EN.01000101.xml










27.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 89/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6643 — Uniqa/Dekra/Dekra-Expert)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 89/01
On 20 March 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6643. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case C-154/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 27 March 2013 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v X B.V.
Date: 2013-03-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, delivery, dental medicine, intra-EU trade, medical device, tax exemption








C_2013178EN.01000302.xml










22.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 178/3





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 27 March 2013 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v X B.V.
(Case C-154/13)
2013/C 178/05
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant: X B.V.

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 140(a) and (b) of the 2006 VAT Directive (1) be interpreted as meaning that the exemption from VAT for which that provision provides does not apply to the intra-Community acquisition of dental prostheses? If the answer is no, is the application of the exemption subject to the condition that the dental prostheses are supplied from abroad by a dentist and/or dental technician to a dentist or dental technician?










2.


If the exemption from VAT (whether or not under the conditions described in Question 1) for which Article 140(a) and (b) of the 2006 VAT Directive provides applies to the intra-Community acquisition of dental prostheses, does the exemption therefore apply in Member States, such as the Netherlands, which have complied with the exemption provided for in Article 132 of the 2006 VAT Directive, to the intra-Community acquisition of dental prostheses originating from a Member State which has taken advantage of the derogating and transitional arrangements for which Article 370 of the 2006 VAT Directive provides?






(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC from the Raad of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).
Case C-331/12: Order of the President of the Court of 27 March 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
Date: 2013-03-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Poland, consumer protection, data protection, national implementing measure, personal data, regulation of telecommunications








C_2013225EN.01005707.xml










3.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/57





Order of the President of the Court of 27 March 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
(Case C-331/12) (1)

2013/C 225/118
Language of the case: Polish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.