do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-148/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 25 March 2013 — A v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
Date: 2013-03-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, foreign national, refugee, stateless person








C_2013171EN.01001602.xml










15.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/16





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 25 March 2013 — A v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
(Case C-148/13)
2013/C 171/32
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: A

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

Question referred

What limits do Article 4 of Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Articles 3 and 7 thereof, impose on the method of assessing the credibility of a declared sexual orientation, and are those limits different from the limits which apply to assessment of the credibility of the other grounds of persecution and, if so, in what respect?


(1)  OJ 2004 L 304, p. 12.
Case T-175/13: Action brought on 25 March 2013 — Omega v OHIM — Omega Engineering (Ω OMEGA)
Date: 2013-03-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, technology, trade-mark law








C_2013147EN.01002802.xml










25.5.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 147/28





Action brought on 25 March 2013 — Omega v OHIM — Omega Engineering (Ω OMEGA)
(Case T-175/13)
2013/C 147/51
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Omega SA (Biel/Bienne, Switzerland) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Omega Engineering, Inc. (Stamford, United States)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 January 2013 in Joined Cases R 2055/2011-1 and R 2186/2011-1 and grant protection for the trade mark concerned in respect of all of the goods requested;










—


order OHIM and Omega Engineering, Inc. to pay the costs of the present proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Omega SA

Community trade mark concerned: International registration, designating the European Union, of the figurative mark with word element ‘Ω OMEGA’ for goods in Class 9 — international registration No 997 036 designating the European Union

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Omega Engineering, Inc.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National and Community word marks ‘OMEGA’ for goods and services in Classes 7, 9, 11, 16, 35, 38, 41 and 42

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part and protection applied for refused in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the applicant’s appeal and more extensive partial refusal of the protection applied for

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009
Case C-618/12: Order of the President of the Court of 25 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Paris — France) — Société Reggiani SpA Illuminazione v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances
Date: 2013-03-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: France, personal property, right of establishment, tax rebate








C_2013225EN.01005904.xml










3.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/59





Order of the President of the Court of 25 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Paris — France) — Société Reggiani SpA Illuminazione v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances
(Case C-618/12) (1)

2013/C 225/130
Language of the case: French
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 101, 6.4.2013.
Case C-150/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 25 March 2013 — C v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
Date: 2013-03-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, foreign national, refugee, stateless person








C_2013171EN.01001702.xml










15.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/17





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 25 March 2013 — C v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
(Case C-150/13)
2013/C 171/34
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: C


Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

Question referred

What limits do Article 4 of Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Articles 3 and 7 thereof, impose on the method of assessing the credibility of a declared sexual orientation, and are those limits different from the limits which apply to assessment of the credibility of the other grounds of persecution and, if so, in what respect?


(1)  OJ 2004 L 304, p. 12.
Case C-513/12: Order of the President of the Court of 25 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Aslihan Nazli Ayalti v Federal Republic of Germany
Date: 2013-03-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, Germany, Türkiye, family migration, language teaching








C_2013225EN.01005807.xml










3.8.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 225/58





Order of the President of the Court of 25 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Aslihan Nazli Ayalti v Federal Republic of Germany
(Case C-513/12) (1)

2013/C 225/125
Language of the case: German
The President of the Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.
Case C-151/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Versailles (France) lodged on 25 March 2013 — Le Rayon d’Or SARL v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances
Date: 2013-03-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, elderly person, health care, health insurance, tax exemption








C_2013171EN.01001703.xml










15.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/17





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Versailles (France) lodged on 25 March 2013 — Le Rayon d’Or SARL v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances
(Case C-151/13)
2013/C 171/35
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour administrative d’appel de Versailles

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Le Rayon d’Or SARL

Defendant: Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

Question referred

Must Article 11A(1)(a) of the Sixth Directive, (1) incorporated in Article 73 of Directive 2006/112/EC, (2) be interpreted as meaning that the ‘healthcare lump sum’ disbursed by sickness insurance funds to residential care homes for the elderly pursuant to Article L. 174-7 of the Code de la sécurité sociale and exempted from value added tax under Article 261(4)(1b) of the Code général des impôts represents a subsidy which is directly linked to the price of the healthcare services provided to residents and which thus falls within the scope of value added tax?


(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

(2)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).
Judgment of the Court of 25 March 2013 in Case E-10/12 — Yngvi Harðarson v Askar Capital hf. (Directive 91/533/EEC — Obligation to inform employees — Amendments to a written contract of employment — Effect of non-notification of amendments)
Date: 2013-03-25
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: bankruptcy, indemnification, private limited company, work contract, worker information








C_2013270EN.01000701.xml










19.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 270/7





JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 25 March 2013
in Case E-10/12
Yngvi Harðarson v Askar Capital hf.
(Directive 91/533/EEC — Obligation to inform employees — Amendments to a written contract of employment — Effect of non-notification of amendments)
2013/C 270/05
In Case E-10/12 Yngvi Harðarson v Askar Capital hf. — REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur (Reykjavík District Court), on the interpretation of Council Directive 91/533/EEC of 14 October 1991 on an employer’s obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen (Judge-Rapporteur) and Páll Hreinsson, Judges, gave judgment on 25 March 2013, the operative part of which is as follows:
Council Directive 91/533/EEC of 14 October 1991 on an employer’s obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship must be interpreted as not requiring that compensation to an employee is to be assessed on the basis of a written contract of employment if no written document has been handed over to the employee concerning amendments, temporary or permanent, that may have been made to the essential aspects of the contract of employment or employment relationship between the parties within the time limits laid down in Article 5 of the Directive. This applies also in the context of bankruptcy proceedings or a comparable division of a limited liability company.
Case C-149/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 25 March 2013 — B v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
Date: 2013-03-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, foreign national, refugee, stateless person








C_2013171EN.01001701.xml










15.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 171/17





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 25 March 2013 — B v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
(Case C-149/13)
2013/C 171/33
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: B

Defendant:
Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie


Question referred

What limits do Article 4 of Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1) of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Articles 3 and 7 thereof, impose on the method of assessing the credibility of a declared sexual orientation, and are those limits different from the limits which apply to the assessment of the credibility of the other grounds of persecution and, if so, in what respect?


(1)  OJ 2004 L 304, p. 12.