do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2013-03-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, chemical compound, import (EU), originating product








C_2013060EN.01001001.xml










1.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 60/10





Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
2013/C 60/05
1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.
Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 8/20, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Monosodium glutamate


The People's Republic of China


Anti-dumping duty


Council Regulation (EC) No 1187/2008 (OJ L 322, 2.12.2008, p. 1)


3.12.2013






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.
Case T-128/13: Action brought on 1 March 2013 — Vicente Gandia Pla/OHIM — Tesco Stores (MARQUES DE CHIVÉ)
Date: 2013-03-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wine








C_2013123EN.01002101.xml










27.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/21





Action brought on 1 March 2013 — Vicente Gandia Pla/OHIM — Tesco Stores (MARQUES DE CHIVÉ)
(Case T-128/13)
2013/C 123/35
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Vicente Gandia Pla, SA (Chiva, Spain) (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tesco Stores Ltd (Cheshunt, United Kingdom)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims/claim that the Court should:






—


Declare admissible the here concerned appeal and enclosures;










—


Annul the Boards of Appeal Decision;










—


Condemn the OHIM and the intervener to bear the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘MARQUES DE CHIVÉ’ for goods in classes 29, 32 and 33 — Community trade mark registration No 9 571 415

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark or sign cited in opposition: United Kingdom registration No 1 520 720 of the word mark ‘MARQUES DE CHIVE’ for goods in class 33

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition directed at the application for the goods in class 33 for lack of genuine use

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the application for the goods in class 33

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 42(2) and (3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-102/13 P: Appeal brought on 1 March 2013 by the Federal Republic of Germany against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2012 in Case T-205/11 Germany v Commission
Date: 2013-03-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, application of EU law, interpretation of the law, principle of legal certainty, tax exemption








C_2013164EN.01000801.xml










8.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/8





Appeal brought on 1 March 2013 by the Federal Republic of Germany against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2012 in Case T-205/11 Germany v Commission
(Case C-102/13 P)
2013/C 164/13
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and J. Möller, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


Set aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 18 December 2012 in Case T-205/11;










—


declare the action admissible and refer it back to the General Court for a decision on the merits; and










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and before the Court of Justice.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The appeal has been brought against the order of the General Court of the European Union of 18 December 2012 in Case T-205/11, by which the General Court dismissed the action brought by the Federal Republic of Gemany for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C-7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany (Sanierungsklausel).
The Federal Government’s appeal is based on two grounds of appeal, each of which concerns a complaint as to insufficient reasoning:






—


Breach of the principle of the efficient administration of justice, which is a special manifestation of the general legal principle of legal certainty, in that the General Court erred in its classification of the Commission’s chosen notification procedure in respect of the decision at issue, and did not establish any requirements as to the formalities to be observed in order for notification, with a form for acknowledgement of receipt, of a decision under Article 7 of Council Regulation No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (1) to be effective.










—


Breach of the principle of the efficient administration of justice, which is a special manifestation of the general legal principle of legal certainty, in that the General Court found that the Commission was not, in relation to the complaint of late submission of the application, required to adduce evidence of receipt of mail by an identifiable person or of the fact that the person concerned was authorised to accept notification.






(1)  OJ 1999 L 83, p. 1.
Case T-131/13: Action brought on 1 March 2013 — Lardini v OHIM (Representation of a flower)
Date: 2013-03-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, textile product, trade-mark law








C_2013141EN.01002301.xml










18.5.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 141/23





Action brought on 1 March 2013 — Lardini v OHIM (Representation of a flower)
(Case T-131/13)
2013/C 141/41
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Lardini Srl (Filottrano, Italy) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 December 2012 in Case R 2578/2011-1; and










—


order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings in their entirety, including the costs incurred during the appeal procedure in Case R 2578/2011-1





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: Position mark in the form of a flower for goods in Class 25

Decision of the Examiner: Application refused

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-03-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013060EN.01000701.xml










1.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 60/7





Euro exchange rates (1)

28 February 2013
2013/C 60/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3129




JPY


Japanese yen


121,07




DKK


Danish krone


7,4560




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86300




SEK


Swedish krona


8,4475




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2209




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,4870




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,637




HUF


Hungarian forint


295,80




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7007




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1515




RON


Romanian leu


4,3588




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3580




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2809




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3461




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,1830




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5810




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6237




KRW


South Korean won


1 423,71




ZAR


South African rand


11,7550




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1720




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5855




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 702,12




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,0617




PHP


Philippine peso


53,427




RUB


Russian rouble


40,0833




THB


Thai baht


39,085




BRL


Brazilian real


2,5871




MXN


Mexican peso


16,7554




INR


Indian rupee


71,3860






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-634/11: Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 1 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Ireland — Ireland) — Irish Bank Resolution Corp. Ltd, formerly Anglo Irish Bank Corp. Ltd v Sean Quinn and Others
Date: 2013-03-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: commercial court, court of civil jurisdiction, enforcement of ruling, interpretation of the law, jurisdiction








C_2013129EN.01001201.xml










4.5.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 129/12





Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 1 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Ireland — Ireland) — Irish Bank Resolution Corp. Ltd, formerly Anglo Irish Bank Corp. Ltd v Sean Quinn and Others
(Case C-634/11) (1)

2013/C 129/21
Language of the case: English
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 73, 10.3.2012.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2013-03-01
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), organic acid, originating product








C_2013060EN.01000901.xml










1.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 60/9





Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
2013/C 60/04
1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.
Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 8/20, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Citric acid


People's Republic of China


Anti-dumping duty


Council Regulation (EC) No 1193/2008 (OJ L 323, 3.12.2008, p. 1)


4.12.2013




Undertakings


Commission Decision 2008/899/EC (OJ L 323, 3.12.2008, p. 62) as amended by Commission Decision 2012/501/EU (OJ L 244, 8.9.2012, p. 27)






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.