do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6827 — Honeywell/Intermec)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-02-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: automation, computer equipment, data collection, economic concentration, merger control








C_2013051EN.01001701.xml










22.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 51/17





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6827 — Honeywell/Intermec)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 51/10






1.


On 15 February 2013, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Honeywell International Inc. (‘Honeywell’, United States of America), acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Intermec, Inc. (‘Intermec’, United States of America), by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


Honeywell: active in aerospace products and services, automotive products, electronic materials, specialty materials, performance polymers, transportation and power systems, home and building controls, and industrial controls. Through its Automation and Control Solutions division, Honeywell is active in the manufacturing and sale of automatic data identification and data capture (‘AIDC’) equipment, including ruggedised mobile computers, laser and imager scanning engines and barcode scanners, and related services and accessories,










—


Intermec: active in the manufacturing and supply of AIDC equipment, including ruggedised mobile computers, laser and imager scanning engines and barcode scanners, voice recognition systems, barcode printers and labels, radio-frequency identification systems, related services and accessories and life cycle services.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6827 — Honeywell/Intermec, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).
Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 October 2012 to 31 October 2012 (Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council )
Date: 2013-02-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: drug surveillance, market approval, marketing standard, medicinal product








C_2013053EN.01000101.xml










22.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 53/1





Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 October 2012 to 31 October 2012

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
 (1)
)

2013/C 53/01
—   Modification of a marketing authorization (Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council): Accepted










Date of the decision


Name of the medicinal product


Holder of the marketing authorization


Number of the entry in the Community Register


Date of notification




25.10.2012


Keppra







UCB Pharma S.A.




Allée de la Recherche 60, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgique/Researchdreef 60, 1070 Brussel, België






EU/1/00/146


29.10.2012




25.10.2012


Temozolomide Hospira







Hospira UK Limited




Queensway, Royal Leamington Spa, Warwickshire CV31 3RW, United Kingdom






EU/1/10/615


29.10.2012






(1)  OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency for the financial year 2012 — Amending Budget No 1
Date: 2013-02-22
Institutions: European Commission, Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency
Subjects: EU expenditure, amending budget, budgetary resources, executive agency, financial year, publication of accounts








C_2013052EN.01003301.xml










22.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 52/33





Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency for the financial year 2012 — Amending Budget No 1
(2013/C 52/08)

REVENUE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2012


Amending budget No 1


New amount





2






COMMISSION SUBSIDY





2 0


EU BUDGET CONTRIBUTION TO THE EXECUTIVE AGENCY


9 805 000


 


9 805 000




 



Title 2 — Total




9 805 000



 



9 805 000






9






MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE





9 0


MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE


p.m.


 


p.m.




 



Title 9 — Total




p.m.



 



p.m.





 



GRAND TOTAL




9 805 000



 



9 805 000






EXPENDITURE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2012


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






STAFF EXPENDITURES





1 1


SALARIES AND ALLOWANCES


6 937 000


– 391 000


6 546 000




1 2


SUNDRIES OF RECRUITMENT AND CHANGE OF PERSONNEL


26 000


–8 000


18 000




1 3


EXPENSES OF MISSIONS


150 000


 


150 000




1 4


SOCIO, INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRAINING


178 000


–15 000


163 000




1 7


REPRESENTATION EXPENSES AND EVENTS


5 000


 


5 000




 



Title 1 — Total




7 296 000




– 414 000




6 882 000






2






INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURES





2 0


OFFICES


1 300 000


4 000


1 304 000




2 1


COMPUTER EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND MAINTENANCE


530 000


242 000


772 000




2 2


GOODS, PIECES OF FURNITURE AND INCIDENTAL EXPENSES


26 000


48 000


74 000




2 3


ADMINISTRATIVE RUNNING EXPENDITURES


33 000


–3 000


30 000




2 4


TELECOMMUNICATION AND EXPENSES OF POSTING


7 000


–1 000


6 000




 



Title 2 — Total




1 896 000




290 000




2 186 000






3






TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT EXPENDITURES





3 1


MEETINGS OF EXPERTS, CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS


5 000


 


5 000




3 2


INFORMATION AND PUBLICATIONS


120 000


–15 000


105 000




3 3


OTHER TECHNICAL EXPENSES AND OF ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT


488 000


139 000


627 000




 



Title 3 — Total




613 000




124 000




737 000





 



GRAND TOTAL




9 805 000




0,—




9 805 000
Case C-90/13 P: Appeal brought on 22 February 2013 by 1. garantovaná a.s. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2012 in Case T-392/09: 1. garantovaná a.s. v European Commission
Date: 2013-02-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: competition, fine, infringement of EU law








C_2013114EN.01002801.xml










20.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 114/28





Appeal brought on 22 February 2013 by 1. garantovaná a.s. against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 12 December 2012 in Case T-392/09: 1. garantovaná a.s. v European Commission
(Case C-90/13 P)
2013/C 114/43
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: 1. garantovaná a.s. (represented by: B. Hartnett, Barrister, O. Geiss, Rechtsanwalt, P. Lasok QC, J. Holmes, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the General Court’s decision of 12 December 2012 in Case T-392/09 as it relates to the second pleas in the Appellant’s Application before the General Court;










—


uphold that plea as well-founded;










—


reduce the level of the fine to EUR 2.1 million, representing 10 % of the Appellant’s turnover in 2008 as recoded at paragraph 84 of the Contested Judgment; and










—


order the Commission to pay the Appellant’s costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant submits that the General Court erred in dismissing the appellant’s second plea in law.
Article 23(2) of regulation No. 1/2003 (1) provides: ‘…the fine shall not exceed 10 % of its [the undertaking in question] turnover in the preceding business year’. The ‘preceding business year’ is the last full business year immediately preceding the date of adoption of the Commission decision finding that there has been an infringement of the competition rules and imposing a fine.
In the present case the ‘turnover in the preceding business year’ was that for 2008, not the turnover taken into account by the Commission. The effect of using the turnover for 2007 was to inflate the fine imposed on Garantovaná to just under 100 % of its turnover in the business year preceding the date of adoption of the Commission decision (22 July 2009).
The appellant submits that the Commission’s use of the 2007 turnover was contrary to the clear wording and purpose of article 23(2) and unlawful. As claimed in Garantovaná’s second plea in law in the proceedings before the General Court, the fine should therefore be reduced either in compliance with Article 23(2) or in the exercise of the Court’s unlimited jurisdiction under article 261 TFUE and article 31 of regulation no 1/2003.


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty OJ L 1, p. 1