do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-85/13: Action brought on 14 February 2013 — K-Swiss/OHIM — Künzli SwissSchuh (Trainer with five stripes)
Date: 2013-02-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, footwear industry, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_2013123EN.01001701.xml










27.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/17





Action brought on 14 February 2013 — K-Swiss/OHIM — Künzli SwissSchuh (Trainer with five stripes)
(Case T-85/13)
2013/C 123/28
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: K-Swiss, Inc. (California, United States) (represented by: R. Niebel and K. Tasma, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Künzli SwissSchuh AG (Windisch, Switzerland)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), dated 30 October 2012 in Case R 174/2011-2; and










—


Order the defendant and, as appropriate, the intervener to bear the coasts of the action.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The figurative mark representing a trainer with five stripes — Community trade mark registration No 4 771 978

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The grounds of the request for a declaration of invalidity were those laid down in Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the contested Community trade mark invalid

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-349/12: Order of the President of the Court of 14 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék, (formerly Fővárosi Bíróság) — Hungary) — Peró Gáz Kft v János Balla
Date: 2013-02-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European patent, administrative procedure, interpretation of the law, patent law








C_2013129EN.01001203.xml










4.5.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 129/12





Order of the President of the Court of 14 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék, (formerly Fővárosi Bíróság) — Hungary) — Peró Gáz Kft v János Balla
(Case C-349/12) (1)

2013/C 129/23
Language of the case: Hungarian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 311, 13.10.2012.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 758/2011 of 1 August 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 1291/2009 concerning the selection of returning holdings for the purpose of determining incomes of agricultural holdings ( OJ L 199, 2.8.2011 )
Date: 2013-02-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, Guadeloupe, Hungary, Ireland, Martinique, Réunion, economic accounts for agriculture, farm accountancy data network, farm income








L_2013043EN.01005901.xml










14.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 43/59







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 758/2011 of 1 August 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 1291/2009 concerning the selection of returning holdings for the purpose of determining incomes of agricultural holdings
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 199 of 2 August 2011
)

On page 43, in point (3) of the Annex, concerning the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 1291/2009:
for:








 


‘HUNGARY


 




764


Alföld


1 016 




767


Dunántúl


675 




768


Észak-Magyarország


209 




Total Hungary


1 900 ’





read:








 


‘HUNGARY


 




767


Alföld


1 016 




768


Dunántúl


675 




764


Észak-Magyarország


209 




Total Hungary


1 900 ’
Corrigendum to Call for Proposals — EACEA/21/12 — MEDIA 2007 — Support for the Transnational Distribution of European Films — the ‘Selective’ Scheme 2013 ( OJ C 300, 5.10.2012 )
Date: 2013-02-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU aid, audiovisual industry, film industry, invitation to tender








C_2013042EN.01001101.xml










14.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 42/11





Corrigendum to Call for Proposals — EACEA/21/12 — MEDIA 2007 — Support for the Transnational Distribution of European Films — the ‘Selective’ Scheme 2013
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 300 of 5 October 2012
)
2013/C 42/07
On page 6, point 6:
for:

‘The deadlines for sending applications are 30 November 2012, 1 April 2013 and 1 July 2013.’,

read:

‘The deadlines for sending applications are 30 November 2012, 4 April 2013 and 1 July 2013.’.
Public holidays in 2013: EEA EFTA States and EEA institutions
Date: 2013-02-14
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: EEA joint institution, EFTA countries, public holiday








C_2013042EN.01000601.xml










14.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 42/6





Public holidays in 2013: EEA EFTA States and EEA institutions
2013/C 42/04










 


Iceland


Liechtenstein


Norway


EFTA Surveillance Authority


EFTA Court




1 January


X


X


X


 


X




2 January


 


X


 


X


X




6 January


 


X


 


 


 




2 February


 


X


 


 


 




11 February


 


 


 


 


X




12 February


 


X


 


 


 




19 March


 


X


 


 


 




28 March


X


 


X


 


X




29 March


X


X


X


X


X




31 March


X


X


X


X


X




1 April


X


X


X


X


X




25 April


X


 


 


 


 




1 May


X


X


X


X


X




9 May


X


X


X


X


X




10 May


 


 


 


X


X




17 May


 


 


X


 


 




20 May


X


X


X


X


X




30 May


 


X


 


 


 




17 June


X


 


 


 


 




24 June


 


 


 


 


X




5 August


X


 


 


 


 




15 August


 


X


 


 


X




2 September


 


 


 


 


X




8 September


 


X


 


 


 




1 November


 


X


 


X


X




8 December


 


X


 


 


 




24 December


 


 


 


 


X




25 December


X


X


X


X


X




26 December


X


X


X


X


X




27 December


 


 


 


 


X




30 December


 


 


 


 


X




31 December


 


X


 


 


X
Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))
Date: 2013-02-14
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Norway, State aid, aid for restructuring, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, industrial restructuring, innovation, research and development








C_2013042EN.01000501.xml










14.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 42/5





Information communicated by the EFTA States regarding State aid granted under the Act referred to in point 1j of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement (Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation))
2013/C 42/03
PART I







Aid No


GBER 14/12 R&D




EFTA State


Norway




Granting authority


Name


The Research Council of Norway




Address







PO Box 2700 St. Hanshaugen




0131 Oslo




NORWAY








Webpage


http://www.forskningsradet.no




Title of the aid measure


The FORNY2020 programme




National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication)


Government white paper on research: ‘Commitment to research’. Budget documents from Ministry of Trade and Industry. Guidelines from The Research Council of Norway.




Web link to the full text of the aid measure


http://www.forskningsradet.no/en/Funding/FORNY2020/1253977989673/p1184150364108?progId=1253968959600&visAktive=false




Type of measure


Scheme


X




Duration


Scheme


1.1.2012 to 31.12.2020




Economic sector(s) concerned


All economic sectors eligible to receive aid


X




Budget


Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme


NOK 20 million




Aid instrument (Article 5)


Grant


X




PART II








General Objectives (list)


Objectives (list)


Maximum aid intensity in % or maximum aid amount in NOK


SME — bonuses in %




Aid for research, development and innovation
(Articles 30-37)


Aid to young innovative enterprises
(Article 35)


NOK 7,5 million
(EUR 1 million)
Case C-77/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’instance de Quimper (France) lodged on 14 February 2013 — CA Consumer Finance v Francine Crouan, née Weber, Tual Crouan
Date: 2013-02-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: France, consumer protection, credit, interest, interpretation of the law, national law, unfair terms of contract








C_2013123EN.01001201.xml










27.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/12





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’instance de Quimper (France) lodged on 14 February 2013 — CA Consumer Finance v Francine Crouan, née Weber, Tual Crouan
(Case C-77/13)
2013/C 123/18
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal d’instance de Quimper

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: CA Consumer Finance

Defendants: Francine Crouan, née Weber, Tual Crouan

Question referred

Does Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (1) preclude an interpretation of the national law which validates terms that unilaterally vary the rate of interest in credit agreements, leaving the reasons for the variation in the rate and the methods for calculating that rate to the discretion of the lender, where there are no valid reasons specified in the agreement, if those terms are consistent with wording established by legislation and the lender has, in implementing the agreement, satisfied the statutory requirements relating to the information which must be provided to the borrower?


(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-02-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013042EN.01000101.xml










14.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 42/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

13 February 2013
2013/C 42/01

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3480




JPY


Japanese yen


125,95




DKK


Danish krone


7,4616




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86600




SEK


Swedish krona


8,4768




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2365




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,3710




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,423




HUF


Hungarian forint


289,10




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6997




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1718




RON


Romanian leu


4,3868




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3788




AUD


Australian dollar


1,3036




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3518




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,4550




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6022




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6696




KRW


South Korean won


1 464,91




ZAR


South African rand


11,9221




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,4014




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5840




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


13 001,89




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1659




PHP


Philippine peso


54,820




RUB


Russian rouble


40,4920




THB


Thai baht


40,197




BRL


Brazilian real


2,6569




MXN


Mexican peso


17,0794




INR


Indian rupee


72,5480






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-75/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 14 February 2013 — SEK Zollagentur GmbH v Hauptzollamt Gießen
Date: 2013-02-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: customs debt, customs inspection, customs transit, customs warehouse








C_2013147EN.01000801.xml










25.5.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 147/8





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 14 February 2013 — SEK Zollagentur GmbH v Hauptzollamt Gießen
(Case C-75/13)
2013/C 147/13
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: SEK Zollagentur GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Gießen

Questions referred







1.


Are the relevant provisions of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, (1) in particular Article 50 thereof, to be interpreted as meaning that an article left with a person by the customs authority for temporary storage in an approved place is deemed to have been removed from customs supervision if it is declared for an external transit procedure, but it does not in fact accompany the prepared transit papers on the transport planned and is not presented to the customs office at the place of destination?










2.


If the answer to the first question is affirmative: In such circumstances is the person who, as the approved consignor, placed the goods in the transit procedure a customs debtor under the first indent of Article 203(3) of the Customs Code or under the fourth indent of Article 203(3) of the Customs Code?






(1)  OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1.