do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Call for proposals under the Implementation Plan of Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking
Date: 2013-01-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU programme, fuel cell, hydrogen, invitation to tender, joint venture








C_2013010EN.01000501.xml










15.1.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 10/5





Call for proposals under the Implementation Plan of Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking
2013/C 10/08
Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the Annual Implementation Plan 2013 of the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH JU).
Proposals are invited for the following call: FCH-JU-2013-1

Call documentation including deadline and budget is given in the call text, which is published on the following website:
http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/fp7_calls
Commission Regulation (EU) No 27/2013 of 15 January 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for forkbeards in EU and international waters of V, VI and VII by vessels flying the flag of Spain
Date: 2013-01-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU waters, Spain, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, ship's flag








L_2013014EN.01000101.xml










18.1.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 14/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 27/2013
of 15 January 2013
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for forkbeards in EU and international waters of V, VI and VII by vessels flying the flag of Spain


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 1225/2010 of 13 December 2010 fixing for 2011 and 2012 the fishing opportunities for EU vessels for fish stocks of certain deep-sea fish species (2), lays down quotas for 2012.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2012.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2012 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 15 January 2013.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 336, 21.12.2010, p. 1.




ANNEX






No


FS/83/DSS




Member State


Spain




Stock


GFB/567-




Species


Forkbeards (Phycis spp.)




Zone


EU and international waters of V, VI and VII




Date


12.12.2012
Case C-21/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 15 January 2013 — Simon, Evers & Co GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen
Date: 2013-01-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: China, Germany, Thailand, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), interpretation of the law, machine tool, originating product








C_2013114EN.01002401.xml










20.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 114/24





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 15 January 2013 — Simon, Evers & Co GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen
(Case C-21/13)
2013/C 114/37
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Simon, Evers & Co GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen

Question referred

Is Council Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 of 11 June 2009 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not, (1) invalid because the Commission, by misjudging the requirements arising from Article 13 of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community concerning the finding of a circumvention of anti-dumping duty measures, (2) presumed that there was a circumvention merely because the volume of exports in question from Thailand increased significantly after the imposition of the measures, although the Commission, with reference to the lack of cooperation from Thai exporters, made no further specific findings?


(1)  OJ 2009 L 151, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 1996 L 56, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6752 — CVC/Cunningham Lindsey Group)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-01-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance company, investment company, merger control








C_2013010EN.01000101.xml










15.1.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 10/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6752 — CVC/Cunningham Lindsey Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 10/01
On 3 December 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6752. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case T-21/12: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2013 — Alfacam and Others v Parliament (Action for annulment — Public service contracts — Procurement procedure — Supply of audiovisual services to the Parliament — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Articles 94 and 103 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) no 1605/2002 — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law)
Date: 2013-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Parliament, audiovisual industry, award of contract, invitation to tender, provision of services, services contract








C_2013071EN.01002201.xml










9.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/22





Order of the General Court of 15 January 2013 — Alfacam and Others v Parliament
(Case T-21/12) (1)

(Action for annulment - Public service contracts - Procurement procedure - Supply of audiovisual services to the Parliament - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Articles 94 and 103 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) no 1605/2002 - Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law)
2013/C 71/34
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Alfacam (Lint, Belgium); Via Storia (Schiltigheim, France); DB Video Productions (Aartselaar, Belgium); IEC (Rennes, France) and European Broadcast Partners (Eubropa) (Aartselaar) (represented by: B. Pierart, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by: P. López-Carceller and C. Braunstein, and subsequently by: P. López-Carceller and G. Hellinckx, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 18 November 2011 to award lot No 1 in the call for tenders EP/DGCOMM/AV/11/11 relating to the provision of audiovisual services within the Parliament in Brussels (Belgium) to watch tv and of the Parliament’s decision of 18 November 2011 rejecting Eubropa’s bid for that lot.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.






(1)  OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.
Case T-182/10: Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2013 — Aiscat v Commission (State aid — Direct concession for the construction and subsequent management of a section of motorway — Decision to take no further action on the complaint — Action for annulment — Actionable measure — Locus standi — Individual concern — Admissibility — Definition of aid — State resources)
Date: 2013-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, State aid, control of State aid, motorway, road building








C_2013055EN.01000902.xml










23.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/9





Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2013 — Aiscat v Commission
(Case T-182/10) (1)

(State aid - Direct concession for the construction and subsequent management of a section of motorway - Decision to take no further action on the complaint - Action for annulment - Actionable measure - Locus standi - Individual concern - Admissibility - Definition of aid - State resources)
2013/C 55/14
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Associazione italiana delle società concessionarie per la costruzione e l’esercizio di autostrade e trafori stradali (Aiscat) (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Maresca, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Concessioni Autostradali Venete — CAV SpA (represented by: C. Malinconico and P. Clarizia, lawyers)

Re:

Application for the annulment of the Commission’s decision of 10 February 2010 rejecting a complaint lodged by the applicant concerning the alleged unlawful State aid granted by the Italian Republic to CAV.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action.










2.


Orders Associazione italiana delle società concessionarie per la costruzione e l’esercizio di autostrade e trafori stradali (Aiscat) to bear half of its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by the European Commission and all of the costs incurred by Concessioni autostradali Venete — CAV SpA.










3.


Orders the Commission to bear half of its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Aiscat.






(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.
Case T-54/11: Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2013 — Spain v Commission (ERDF — Reduction of financial assistance — Aid for the operational programme falling within Objective 1 (2000-2006) concerning the region of Andalucía (Spain) — Article 39(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 — Three-month period — Directive 93/36/EEC — Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a tender notice)
Date: 2013-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Andalusia, European Regional Development Fund, Spain, financial aid, invitation to tender, operational programme








C_2013055EN.01001001.xml










23.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/10





Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2013 — Spain v Commission
(Case T-54/11) (1)

(ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - Aid for the operational programme falling within Objective 1 (2000-2006) concerning the region of Andalucía (Spain) - Article 39(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 - Three-month period - Directive 93/36/EEC - Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a tender notice)
2013/C 55/15
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by: M. Muñoz Pérez, subsequently by S. Martínez-Lage Sobredo, and finally by A. Rubio González and N. Díaz Abad, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 7700 final of 16 November 2010 reducing the assistance from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to the Objective 1 integrated operational programme for Andalucía (2000-2006), in so far as it imposes a financial correction of 100 % on the ERDF-financed expenditure for contracts no 2075/2003 and no 2120/2005.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6758 — Bunge Group/MBF/Novaol Austria)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2013-01-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-foodstuffs, biofuel, economic concentration, merger control, oil industry, plant health product








C_2013010EN.01000202.xml










15.1.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 10/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6758 — Bunge Group/MBF/Novaol Austria)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2013/C 10/04
On 8 January 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6758. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case T-174/13 P: Appeal brought on 25 March 2013 by the European Commission against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 January 2013 in Case F-27/11, BO v Commission
Date: 2013-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, allowances and expenses, health insurance, infringement of EU law








C_2013164EN.01001901.xml










8.6.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/19





Appeal brought on 25 March 2013 by the European Commission against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 January 2013 in Case F-27/11, BO v Commission
(Case T-174/13 P)
2013/C 164/34
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: BO (Amman, Jordan)

Form of order sought by the appellant

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 January 2013 in Case F-27/11 BO v Commission;










—


dismiss the action brought by BO in Case F-27/11, ordering him to pay the costs of those proceedings;










—


decide that each of the parties are to bear their own costs relating to the present proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the Commission relies on a single plea in law alleging infringement of Article 19 of the Common rules on the insurance of officials of the European Communities against the risk of disease and of point 2.5 of Chapter 12, entitled ‘Transport costs’, of Title II of the Commission Decision of 2 July 2007 laying down general implementing provisions for the reimbursement of medical expenses, in so far as the CST failed to have regard to the strict nature of the exclusion of reimbursement of transport costs laid down by that latter provision.
Case F-5/13: Action brought on 15 January 2013 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2013-01-15
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, competition (EU), customs








C_2013123EN.01002901.xml










27.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/29





Action brought on 15 January 2013 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-5/13)
2013/C 123/51
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J. Grayston, G. Pandey, M. Gambardella, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list of the EPSO/AD/205/10 competition.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of 09.03.2012 of the Selection Board and of the European Personnel Selection Office (hereinafter ‘EPSO’), notified in the EPSO’s account in which it was confirmed not to include the applicant's name in the reserve list of the competition (EPSO competition EPSO/AD/205/10 (customs field), which was the reply to the ‘Request for review of reasoning tests’ presented by the applicant;










—


annul the decision of 23.12.2011 of the Selection Board and of EPSO, notified in the EPSO’s account in which the applicant was notified that his name was not placed on the ‘reserve list’ (the database of successful candidates) as he did not obtain the necessary pass marks in the verbal reasoning tests;










—


annul EPSO and the Selection Board implied decision, never served upon the applicant, not to grant him disclosure the documents he requested with letter of 31.12.2011 (Request for review);










—


annul EPSO’s implied rejection of the Applicant’s Complaint under Article 90 (2) of the Staff Regulation of Officials of the European Union;










—


annul EPSO Notice of competition EPSO/AD/205/10 (customs field), published in OJ C 292 A/1 of 28.10.2010;










—


annul in its entirety the ‘reserve list of the competition EPSO/AD/205/10 (customs field)’ published in the OJ C 22 A/1 of 27.01.2012;










—


order that the Commission to bear the Applicant’s costs.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2013-01-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU waters, Netherlands, North Sea, Norwegian Sea, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, ship's flag








C_2013010EN.01000401.xml










15.1.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 10/4





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
2013/C 10/06
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


7.12.2012




Duration


7.12.2012-31.12.2012




Member State


The Netherlands




Stock or group of stocks


HAD/2AC4.




Species


Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)




Zone


IV; EU waters of IIa




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


FS81TQ44






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.