do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2013-01-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2013004EN.01000101.xml










9.1.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 4/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

8 January 2013
2013/C 4/01

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3086




JPY


Japanese yen


114,56




DKK


Danish krone


7,4603




GBP


Pound sterling


0,81450




SEK


Swedish krona


8,5766




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2092




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,3255




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,587




HUF


Hungarian forint


292,70




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6969




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1245




RON


Romanian leu


4,4110




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3281




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2466




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,2899




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,1435




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5660




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6080




KRW


South Korean won


1 390,63




ZAR


South African rand


11,2239




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1462




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5725




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 655,08




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9817




PHP


Philippine peso


53,401




RUB


Russian rouble


39,6090




THB


Thai baht


39,834




BRL


Brazilian real


2,6483




MXN


Mexican peso


16,6881




INR


Indian rupee


72,0580






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-10/13: Action brought on 9 January 2013 — Bank of Industry and Mine v Council
Date: 2013-01-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Iran, access to EU information, capital movement, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, fundamental rights, international sanctions, legal basis, nuclear policy, ownership, powers of the institutions (EU), principle of proportionality








C_2013079EN.01002401.xml










16.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 79/24





Action brought on 9 January 2013 — Bank of Industry and Mine v Council
(Case T-10/13)
2013/C 79/42
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Bank of Industry and Mine (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: E. Glaser and S. Perrotet, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought







—


Annul Article 1(8) of Council Decision 2012/635/CFSP of 15 October 2012 in so far as it has amended Article 20(c) of Decision 2010/413/CFSP;










—


Annul Council Decision 2012/635/CFSP of 15 October 2012 in so far as it includes BIM in the list of entities to which the measures freezing funds referred to in Annex II to Decision 2010/413/CFSP are to apply;










—


Annul also Council Implementing Regulation No 945/2012 of 15 October 2012 in so far as it includes BIM in the list of entities to which the measures freezing funds in Annex IX to Regulation No 267/2012 are to apply;










—


Declare that Regulation No 267/2012, Decision 2010/413/CFSP, as amended by Decisions 2012/35/CFSP and 2012/635/CFSP in their provisions inserting then amending Article 20(c) of Decision 2010/413/CFSP and adding the applicant to the list in Annex II, does not apply to BIM;










—


And, in the alternative, should Article 1(8) of Council Decision 2012/635/CFSP of 15 October 2012, in so far as it has amended Article 20(c) of Decision 2010/413/CFSP, not be annulled, declare that it does not apply to BIM;










—


Order the Council to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on ten pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in Case T-9/13 National Iranian Gas Company v Council.
Case T-11/13: Action brought on 9 January 2013 — Tegometall International v OHIM — Irega (MEGO)
Date: 2013-01-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, metalwork, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013055EN.01002402.xml










23.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/24





Action brought on 9 January 2013 — Tegometall International v OHIM — Irega (MEGO)
(Case T-11/13)
2013/C 55/43
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Tegometall International AG (Lengwil, Switzerland) (represented by: H. Timmann and E. Schaper, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Irega AG (Zuchwil, Switzerland)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


alter the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 October 2012 in Case R 1522/2011-1 and declare Community trade mark No 3 786 134‘MEGO’ invalid; in the alternative, annul that decision and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal for reassessment;










—


order the intervener and OHIM to pay the costs of the invalidity proceedings, the appeal proceedings and the present action.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: the word mark ‘MEGO’ for goods in Classes 6 and 20 — Community trade mark No 3 786 134

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Irega AG

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: the applicant

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: the national, Community and international registrations of the word mark ‘TEGO’, the national and Community trade marks ‘TEGOMETALL’ and the national, Community and international registrations of the figurative mark, which includes the word element ‘Tegometall’, for goods in Classes 6, 20 and 21

Decision of the Cancellation Division: the application was rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Pleas in law:







—


Incorrect application of the principle of res judicata











—


Infringement of Article 34(2) and Article 8(2) of Regulation No 207/2009










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009