do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-576/12: Action brought on 31 December 2012 — Łaszkiewicz v OHIM — Capital Safety Group EMEA (PROTEKT)
Date: 2012-12-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, protective equipment, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013108EN.01002703.xml










13.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 108/27





Action brought on 31 December 2012 — Łaszkiewicz v OHIM — Capital Safety Group EMEA (PROTEKT)
(Case T-576/12)
2013/C 108/71
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Grzegorz Łaszkiewicz (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: J. Gwiazdowska, legal adviser)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Capital Safety Group EMEA, SAS (Carros Cedex, France)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside in its entirety the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 October 2012 in Case R 700/2011-4;










—


deliver final judgment — if the state of the proceedings so allows — by allowing registration of the Community trade mark applied for (Registration No 8478331);










—


if necessary — should the state of the proceedings so allow — refer the case back for reconsideration by the Fourth Board of Appeal, in accordance with the binding criteria laid down by the Court of Justice;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant in his action before the Board of Appeal and before the Opposition Division of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market;










—


collect the evidence indicated in the content of the application;










—


conduct the written procedure, with Polish as the language of the case.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the word element ‘protekt’ for goods in Classes 6, 7, 9, 22 and 25 — Registration No 008478331

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Capital Safety Group EMEA, SAS

Mark or sign cited in opposition: The Community word mark Protecta, registered for goods in Classes 6, 7 and 9

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Pleas in law:







—


Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Breach of Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Rules 50 and 52 of Commission Regulation No 2868/95.
Information on the date of signature of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania
Date: 2012-12-31
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Mauritania, financial compensation of an agreement, fishery management, fishing agreement, fishing area, fishing permit, fishing rights, interim agreement (EU), protocol to an agreement, signature of an agreement








L_2012361EN.01001001.xml










31.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 361/10







Information on the date of signature of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania

The European Union and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Mauritania signed the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement, respectively in Brussels on 12 December 2012 and in Nouakchott on 16 December 2012.
The Protocol accordingly applies provisionally from 16 December 2012 pursuant to Article 9 thereof.
Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 234/2012 of 31 December 2012 amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement
Date: 2012-12-31
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: European Economic Area, access to information, administrative check, atmospheric pollutant, audit, disclosure of information, environmental monitoring, environmental statistics, reduction of gas emissions, revision of an agreement, technical standard




L_2013081EN.01003601.xml










21.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 81/36








            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE
         
No 234/2012
of 31 December 2012
         
amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement


THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 of 21 June 2012 on the verification of greenhouse gas emission reports and tonne-kilometre reports and the accreditation of verifiers pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.












(2)


Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following point is inserted after point 21ape (Commission Regulation (EU) No 606/2010) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:






‘21apf.



32012 R 0600: Commission Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 of 21 June 2012 on the verification of greenhouse gas emission reports and tonne-kilometre reports and the accreditation of verifiers pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 181, 12.7.2012, p. 1).’.






Article 2
The text of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on 1 January 2013, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).


Article 4
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 31 December 2012.


For the EEA Joint Committee


The President

Atle LEIKVOLL
            





(1)  
            OJ L 181, 12.7.2012, p. 1.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.
Case C-614/12: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 December 2012 — József Dutka v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal
Date: 2012-12-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Hungary, dismissal, interpretation of the law, labour relations








C_2013114EN.01002301.xml










20.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 114/23





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 December 2012 — József Dutka v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal
(Case C-614/12)
2013/C 114/34
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: József Dutka

Defendant: Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal

Questions referred







1.


Having regard to Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must it be considered that Union law is being implemented within the meaning of Article 51(1) of the Charter where domestic law provides for automatic termination of legal employment relationships or for their termination by decision?










2.


If the first question is answered in the affirmative, is it appropriate to interpret Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as laying down a prohibition of unjustified dismissal or as doing so to the extent to which it requires that the reasons for dismissal appear clearly from the document bringing the legal relationship to an end and that the worker should be able to verify their truthfulness and relevance?










3.


If that is the case, is national legislation which grants the Member State an opportunity to dismiss (lay off) the worker without giving reasons solely in legal relationships in which the State acts as employer through its State administrative organs contrary to the obligation to account for dismissals which results from Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?
Information on the date of signature of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Madagascar
Date: 2012-12-31
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Madagascar, agreement (EU), financial compensation of an agreement, fishing agreement, fishing permit, fishing rights, protocol to an agreement, signature of an agreement








L_2012361EN.01000901.xml










31.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 361/9







Information on the date of signature of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Madagascar

The European Union and the Government of the Republic of Madagascar signed the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement in Brussels on 6 December 2012.
The Protocol accordingly applies provisionally from 1 January 2013 pursuant to Article 15 thereof.