do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6755 — Bain Capital Investors/Apex Tool Group)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2012-12-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, machine-tool industry, merger control








C_2012400EN.01000101.xml










28.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 400/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6755 — Bain Capital Investors/Apex Tool Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2012/C 400/01
On 17 December 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6755. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6782 — HIG Capital/Petrochem Carless Holdings)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2012-12-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: company with share capital, economic concentration, merger control, oil industry








C_2012400EN.01000202.xml










28.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 400/2





Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6782 — HIG Capital/Petrochem Carless Holdings)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2012/C 400/04
(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)
On 28 November 2012, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration between HIG Europe Capital Partners LP and Petrochem Carless Holdings Limited. On 19 December 2012, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2012-12-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2012400EN.01000501.xml










28.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 400/5





Euro exchange rates (1)

27 December 2012
2012/C 400/07

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3266




JPY


Japanese yen


113,87




DKK


Danish krone


7,4602




GBP


Pound sterling


0,81990




SEK


Swedish krona


8,6273




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2082




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,3760




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,115




HUF


Hungarian forint


291,43




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6971




PLN


Polish zloty


4,0688




RON


Romanian leu


4,4215




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3757




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2782




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3156




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,2834




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6183




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6212




KRW


South Korean won


1 422,42




ZAR


South African rand


11,2774




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2740




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5558




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 820,43




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,0598




PHP


Philippine peso


54,589




RUB


Russian rouble


40,3706




THB


Thai baht


40,660




BRL


Brazilian real


2,7186




MXN


Mexican peso


17,1939




INR


Indian rupee


72,9130






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case F-162/12: Action brought on 28 December 2012 — ZZ v EEA
Date: 2012-12-28
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, medical diagnosis, sick leave








C_2013086EN.01003002.xml










23.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 86/30





Action brought on 28 December 2012 — ZZ v EEA
(Case F-162/12)
2013/C 86/51
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Environment Agency

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to reinstate the applicant following sick leave after the date when, according to medical opinion, he was fit for work.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of 20 September 2012 by the authority empowered to conclude contracts, rejecting the complaint of 21 May 2012 seeking withdrawal of the decision of 21 February 2012 to reinstate the applicant on 24 January 2012 following sick leave.










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2012-12-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2012400EN.01000401.xml










28.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 400/4





Euro exchange rates (1)

24 December 2012
2012/C 400/06

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3218




JPY


Japanese yen


111,64




DKK


Danish krone


7,4616




GBP


Pound sterling


0,8175




SEK


Swedish krona


8,6323




CHF


Swiss franc


1,207




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,3695




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,127




HUF


Hungarian forint


290,19




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6965




PLN


Polish zloty


4,0816




RON


Romanian leu


4,4181




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3769




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2715




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3124




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,2447




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6071




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6129




KRW


South Korean won


1 419,69




ZAR


South African rand


11,342




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2394




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,544




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 762,86




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,0511




PHP


Philippine peso


54,362




RUB


Russian rouble


40,503




THB


Thai baht


40,46




BRL


Brazilian real


2,7487




MXN


Mexican peso


17,0977




INR


Indian rupee


72,64






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6642 — Eaton Corporation/Cooper Industries)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2012-12-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical equipment, energy industry, merger control








C_2012400EN.01000102.xml










28.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 400/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6642 — Eaton Corporation/Cooper Industries)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2012/C 400/02
On 23 November 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6642. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Initiation of proceedings (Case COMP/M.6690 — Syniverse/Mach)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2012-12-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, technology, telecommunications industry








C_2012400EN.01000201.xml










28.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 400/2





Initiation of proceedings
(Case COMP/M.6690 — Syniverse/Mach)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2012/C 400/03
On 20 December 2012, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.
In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301 / 2967244) or by post, under reference COMP/M.6690 — Syniverse/Mach, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË
Case F-161/12: Action brought on 28 December 2012 — ZZ v ECDC
Date: 2012-12-28
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, damages, dismissal, indemnification








C_2013055EN.01002701.xml










23.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/27





Action brought on 28 December 2012 — ZZ v ECDC
(Case F-161/12)
2013/C 55/47
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: V. Kolias, lawyer)

Defendant: European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

To seek compensation for the non-material damage that the applicant would have suffered due to his dismissal.

Form of order sought







—


Order to pay the sum of at least 118 500 euros in compensation of non-material damage;










—


order ECDC to pay all costs.
Case T-573/12: Action brought on 28 December 2012 — Matrix Energetics International/OHIM (MATRIX ENERGETICS)
Date: 2012-12-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, health care, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013063EN.01002401.xml










2.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/24





Action brought on 28 December 2012 — Matrix Energetics International/OHIM (MATRIX ENERGETICS)
(Case T-573/12)
2013/C 63/49
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Matrix Energetics International, Inc. (Lynnwood, United States) (represented by: R. Böhm, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of appeal of the Office Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 October 2012 in Case R 56/2012-4;










—


Order the Office Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to bear the costs of the proceeding.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘MATRIX ENERGETICS’ for services in class 41 — International registration No W 995 247

Decision of the Examiner: Refused protection of the International Registration designating the European Union

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.
Corrigendum to the calls for proposals under the multi-annual work programme 2012 for grants in the field of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) for the period 2007-2013 ( OJ C 368, 28.11.2012 )
Date: 2012-12-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Community trunk route, EU programme, economic support, invitation to tender, transport network








C_2012400EN.01002501.xml










28.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 400/25





Corrigendum to the calls for proposals under the multi-annual work programme 2012 for grants in the field of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) for the period 2007-2013
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 368 of 28 November 2012
)
2012/C 400/15
On page 16, sixth indent:
The corrected text of the call for proposals for projects in the field of ‘Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) including the European Electronic Toll Service (EETS)’ is available at:
http://tentea.ec.europa.eu/en/apply_for_funding/follow_the_funding_process/2012_map_its_call.htm
Notice to operators — Explanatory note concerning the application of Commission Regulation (EC) No 616/2007 — Tariff quotas in the poultry meat sector
Date: 2012-12-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Brazil, Thailand, import (EU), import licence, poultry, poultrymeat, tariff quota








C_2012400EN.01000601.xml










28.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 400/6





NOTICE TO OPERATORS
Explanatory note concerning the application of Commission Regulation (EC) No 616/2007 — Tariff quotas in the poultry meat sector
2012/C 400/08
This communication concerns imports from Brazil, Thailand and other countries under quotas corresponding to order numbers 09.4253, 09.4255, 09.4257, 09.4258, 09.4259, 09.4263, 09.4264 and 09.4265 under Commission Regulation (EC) No 616/2007, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1246/2012 (1) for the quota period from 1 March to 30 June 2013. The purpose of this communication is to clarify the maximum amounts per application as determined in accordance with Article 4(5) of Regulation (EC) No 616/2007.
According to Regulation (EC) No 616/2007, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1246/2012, applications for import licences and import rights for the quota period from 1 March to 30 June 2013 shall be submitted in the first week of January 2013.
Operators are hereby informed of the maximum amounts to be applied for the quotas corresponding to order numbers 09.4253, 09.4255, 09.4257, 09.4258, 09.4259, 09.4263, 09.4264 and 09.4265, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 616/2007.









Country of origin


Group No


Order number


Quantity available 1.3.-30.6.2013
(tonnes)


Maximum amount per application as laid down by Article 4(5) of Regulation (EC) No 616/2007
(tonnes)




Brazil


4B


09.4253


97,35


9,735




Thailand


5A


09.4255


693,00


69,30




5B


09.4257


3,30


0,33




09.4258


198,00


19,80




09.4259


198,00


19,80




Other


6B


09.4263


72,60


7,26




09.4264


48,84


4,884




09.4265


41,25


4,125




All applications beyond the maximum amounts specified above will be rejected.
When an operator lodges an application for any order number stated above, the competent authority of the Member State shall inform the operator that the application will be accepted only when respecting the relevant maximum amount laid down in Article 4(5) of Regulation (EC) No 616/2007.


(1)  OJ L 352, 21.12.2012, p. 16.
Case T-575/12: Action brought on 28 December 2012 — Pyrox v OHIM — Köb Holzheizsysteme (PYROX)
Date: 2012-12-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, fuel, lubricants, machine-tool industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013055EN.01002301.xml










23.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/23





Action brought on 28 December 2012 — Pyrox v OHIM — Köb Holzheizsysteme (PYROX)
(Case T-575/12)
2013/C 55/41
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Pyrox GmbH (Oberhausen, Germany) (represented by: T. Eigen, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Köb Holzheizsysteme GmbH (Wolfurt/Vorarlberg, Austria)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 4 October 2012 in joined Cases R 2187/2011-1 and R 2507/2011-1;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs including those incurred in the proceedings before OHIM.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark which includes the word element ‘PYROX’, for goods in Classes 4, 7 and 11 — Community trade mark application No 8 612 781

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Köb Holzheizsysteme GmbH

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the national word mark ‘PYROT’ for goods in Class 11

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the contested decision was annulled in part and the application was rejected in its entirety

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009