do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-552/12: Action brought on 21 December 2012 — North Drilling v Council
Date: 2012-12-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Iran, abuse of power, equal treatment, international sanctions, ownership, right to justice








C_2013046EN.01002201.xml










16.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/22





Action brought on 21 December 2012 — North Drilling v Council
(Case T-552/12)
2013/C 46/39
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: North Drilling Co. (Teheran, Iran) (represented by: J. Viñals Camallonga, L. Barriola Urruticoechea and J. Iriarte Ángel, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Article 2 of Council Decision 2012/635/CFSP of 15 October 2012, amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran, in so far as it concerns it and remove its name from the annex thereto;










—


annul Article 1 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 945/2012 of 15 October 2012, implementing Regulation (EU) 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran, in so far as it concerns it and remove its name from the annex thereto, and










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on six pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging manifest error






—


The first plea alleges a manifest error of assessment of the facts on which the contested provisions are based, as they lack any real factual and evidential basis.














2.


Second plea in law, alleging breach of the duty to state reasons






—


The second plea alleges a breach of the duty to state reasons, as the contested provisions are vitiated in relation to NDC by a statement of reasons which is inadequate, general and stereotypical.














3.


Third plea in law, alleging disregard for the right to judicial protection






—


The third plea alleges infringement of the right to effective judicial protection with regard to the statement of reasons for the measures, the lack of evidence in relation to the reasons stated and the rights of the defence and the right to property, given that the requirement to state reasons has not been fulfilled, which has an impact on the other rights.














4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to property






—


The fourth plea is based on infringement of the right to property, since that right was restricted without valid justification.














5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment






—


The fifth plea is based on infringement of the principle of equal treatment, since the relative position of the applicant has been prejudiced without reason.














6.


Sixth plea in law, alleging misuse of powers






—


The sixth plea in law is based on misuse of powers, since there is objective, precise and consistent evidence which supports the argument that the sanction was adopted for purposes other than those put forward by the Council.
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2012 — Amending Budget No 1
Date: 2012-12-21
Institutions: European Institute for Gender Equality
Subjects: EU expenditure, EU office or agency, amending budget, budgetary resources, financial year, gender equality, publication of accounts








C_2012397EN.01004901.xml










21.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 397/49





Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Institute for Gender Equality for the financial year 2012 — Amending Budget No 1
(2012/C 397/11)

REVENUE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2012


Amending budget No 1


New amount





2






COMMISSION SUBSIDY





2 0


COMMISSION SUBSIDY


7 741 800


 


7 741 800




 



Title 2 — Total




7 741 800



 



7 741 800





 



GRAND TOTAL




7 741 800



 



7 741 800






EXPENDITURE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2012


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






STAFF





1 1


SALARIES


2 725 000


–31 000


2 694 000




1 2


MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURE ON STAFF RECRUITMENT AND TRANSFER


20 000


23 000


43 000




1 3


MISSION EXPENSES


45 000


 


45 000




1 4


SOCIOMEDICAL INFRASTRUCTURE


30 000


8 000


38 000




1 5


TRAINING


55 000


 


55 000




1 6


EXTERNAL SERVICES


70 000


 


70 000




1 7


RECEPTIONS AND EVENTS


15 000


 


15 000




 



Title 1 — Total




2 960 000




0,—




2 960 000






2






BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING EXPENDITURE





2 0


OFFICES


492 800


49 500


542 300




2 1


PURCHASE OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT


130 000


70 000


200 000




2 2


MOVABLE PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED COSTS


110 000


 


110 000




2 3


CURRENT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE


40 000


 


40 000




2 4


TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND POSTAGE


60 000


–9 500


50 500




2 5


MEETINGS


250 000


–90 000


160 000




2 6


RUNNING COSTS


45 000


 


45 000




2 7


INFORMATION AND PUBLISHING


40 000


 


40 000




2 8


STUDIES


20 000


–20 000


—




 



Title 2 — Total




1 187 800




0,—




1 187 800






3






OPERATING EXPENDITURE





3 0


TRANSLATION


200 000


 


200 000




3 1


INSTITUTIONAL SETUP AND BODIES OF EIGE


—


 


—




3 2


COMPARABLE AND RELIABLE DATA AND GE INDICATORS ON GENDER EQUALITY


1 260 000


 


1 260 000




3 3


COLLECTING AND PROCESSING METHODS AND PRACICES FOR GENDER EQUALITY WORK


1 060 000


 


1 060 000




3 4


RESOURCE AND DOCUMENTATION CENTRE


534 000


 


534 000




3 5


AWARENESS-RAISING, NETWORKING AND COMMUNICATION


540 000


 


540 000




 



Title 3 — Total




3 594 000



 



3 594 000





 



GRAND TOTAL




7 741 800




0,—




7 741 800
Case C-603/12: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 21 December 2012 — Pia Braun v Region Hannover
Date: 2012-12-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, discrimination on the basis of nationality, education grant, free movement of persons, frontier worker, interpretation of the law, residence permit








C_2013101EN.01000701.xml










6.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 101/7





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 21 December 2012 — Pia Braun v Region Hannover
(Case C-603/12)
2013/C 101/13
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Pia Braun

Defendant: Region Hannover

Question referred

Does the right to freedom of movement and freedom of residence conferred on a Union citizen by Articles 20 and 21 TFEU preclude — in a case such as the present one, in which a student who still lives with her parents in a Member State neighbouring Germany and whose parents commute to Germany for work has applied for an education grant for studies in a third Member State — a regulatory system in national law under which German nationals with a permanent residence outside the Federal Republic of Germany may be awarded an education grant to attend an education establishment situated in a Member State of the European Union only if special circumstances of the individual case justify the grant and, pursuant to which, the approval of the grant is left, as to the remainder, to the discretion of the competent national authorities?
Case T-567/12: Action brought on 21 December 2012 — Kaatsu International/OHIM (KAATSU)
Date: 2012-12-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, audiovisual equipment, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013063EN.01002301.xml










2.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/23





Action brought on 21 December 2012 — Kaatsu International/OHIM (KAATSU)
(Case T-567/12)
2013/C 63/46
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Kaatsu International Co. Ltd (Morningside Drive, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the contested decision of the Board;










—


Order the defendant to pay to the Applicant the Applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this appeal.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘KAATSU’ for goods and services in classes 9, 10, 16, 28, 41 and 44 — Community trade mark application No 10 179 547

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the CTM application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-556/12: Action brought on 21 December 2012 — Royalton Overseas/OHIM — SC Romarose Invest (KAISERHOFF)
Date: 2012-12-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, household article, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013063EN.01002202.xml










2.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/22





Action brought on 21 December 2012 — Royalton Overseas/OHIM — SC Romarose Invest (KAISERHOFF)
(Case T-556/12)
2013/C 63/44
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Royalton Overseas Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: C. Năstase, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SC Romarose Invest Srl (Bucharest, Romania)

Form of order sought

The applicant claim that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trademarks and design) as of October 4, 2012 and Communicated on October 22, 2012 in the case file No R 2535/2011-1.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘KAISERHOFF’, for goods in classes 8 and 21 — Community trade mark registration No 9 242 066

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Romanian trade mark registration No 110 809 of the word mark ‘KAISERHOFF’ for goods in classes 11, 21 and 35

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Rule 50, corroborated with Rule 20(7) of Regulation No 2868/95 and Articles 76(1) and 42(5) of Council Regulation No 2007/2009.
Case T-572/12: Action brought on 21 December 2012 — Nissan Jidosha/OHIM (CVTC)
Date: 2012-12-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013079EN.01001901.xml










16.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 79/19





Action brought on 21 December 2012 — Nissan Jidosha/OHIM (CVTC)
(Case T-572/12)
2013/C 79/34
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Nissan Jidosha KK (Yokohama-shi, Japan) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister and D. Cañadas Arcas, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the First Board of appeal’s Decision of 6 September 2012, (Case R 2469/2011-1);










—


Order that the Respondent pays the Appellant its costs incurred before the Board of Appeal and the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘CVTC’ for goods in classes 7, 9 and 12

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected partially the CTM renewal

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Art 50 of Council Regulation No 207/2009.
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2012 — Amending Budget No 1
Date: 2012-12-21
Institutions: European Environment Agency
Subjects: EU expenditure, European Environment Agency, amending budget, budgetary resources, financial year, publication of accounts








C_2012397EN.01000101.xml










21.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 397/1





Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Environment Agency for the financial year 2012 — Amending Budget No 1
(2012/C 397/01)

REVENUE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2012


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY, EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION (EFTA) CONTRIBUTION AND NEW MEMBER COUNTRIES CONTRIBUTION





1 0


EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY AND EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION (EFTA) CONTRIBUTION


41 627 249


61 108


41 688 357




 



Title 1 — Total




41 627 249




61 108




41 688 357






2






MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE





2 0


PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF MOVABLE AND IMMOVABLE PROPERTY


p.m.


 


p.m.




2 1


PROCEEDS FROM THE HIRING-OUT OF FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT


p.m.


 


p.m.




2 2


CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER SPECIFIC AGREEMENTS — ASSIGNED REVENUE


—


 


—




2 3


REIMBURSEMENT OF VARIOUS EXPENSES


p.m.


 


p.m.




2 4


GIFTS AND LEGACIES


p.m.


 


p.m.




2 5


MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES


—


7 347


7 347




 



Title 2 — Total




p.m.




7 347




7 347





 



GRAND TOTAL




41 627 249




68 455




41 695 704






EXPENDITURE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2012


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






STAFF





1 1


STAFF IN ACTIVE EMPLOYMENT


21 886 861


– 271 000


21 615 861




1 2


EXPENDITURE RELATED TO RECRUITMENT


120 000


305 350


425 350




1 3


MISSIONS AND DUTY TRAVEL


950 000


 


950 000




1 4


SOCIOMEDICAL INFRASTRUCTURE


800 000


 


800 000




1 6


SOCIAL SERVICES


5 000


 


5 000




 



Title 1 — Total




23 761 861




34 350




23 796 211






2






ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE





2 1


RENTAL OF BUILDINGS AND ASSOCIATED COSTS


3 235 170


– 141 000


3 094 170




2 2


MOVABLE PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED COSTS


150 000


36 000


186 000




2 3


CURRENT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE


500 000


 


500 000




2 4


ENTERTAINMENT AND REPRESENTATION EXPENSES


12 000


–5 000


7 000




2 5


EEA GOVERNANCE


205 000


–10 000


195 000




2 6


ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OF THE AGENCY


10 000


 


10 000




 



Title 2 — Total




4 112 170




– 120 000




3 992 170






3






OPERATING EXPENDITURE





3 3


RESOURCES


11 682 940


200 760


11 883 700




3 4


STRATEGIC ACTIONS


—


 


—




3 5


STRATEGIC ACTIONS


2 070 278


–46 655


2 023 623




3 6


STRATEGIC ACTIONS


—


 


—




 



Title 3 — Total




13 753 218




154 105




13 907 323





 



GRAND TOTAL




41 627 249




68 455




41 695 704
Case T-550/12: Action brought on 21 December 2012 — bachmeier v OHIM (oto-soft)
Date: 2012-12-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pastry-making, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013055EN.01001902.xml










23.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/19





Action brought on 21 December 2012 — bachmeier v OHIM (oto-soft)
(Case T-550/12)
2013/C 55/34
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: bachmeier GmbH & Co. KG (Ramsau b. Berchtesgaden, Germany) (represented by D. Donath, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 October 2012 in Case R 1784/2011-1;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: word mark ‘oto-soft’ for goods and services in Classes 1, 7, 8, 10, 41 and 44 — Community trade mark application No 9 836 081

Decision of the Examiner: rejection of the application for registration

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009
Commission Decision of 21 December 2012 on public holidays for 2014 for the institutions of the European Union
Date: 2012-12-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU institution, public holiday








C_2013039EN.01002601.xml










12.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/26






COMMISSION DECISION

of 21 December 2012
on public holidays for 2014 for the institutions of the European Union
2013/C 39/03

PUBLIC HOLIDAYS FOR 2014







1 January


Wednesday, New Year’s Day




2 January


Thursday, the day following New Year’s Day




17 April


Maundy Thursday/Holy Thursday




18 April


Good Friday




21 April


Easter Monday




1 May


Thursday, Labour Day




9 May


Friday, Anniversary of the Declaration made by President Robert Schuman in 1950




29 May


Thursday, Ascension Day




30 May


Friday, the day following Ascension Day




9 June


Whit Monday




21 July


Monday, Belgian National Holiday




15 August


Friday, Assumption Day




24 December to 31 December


Wednesday
6 end-of-year days
Wednesday




TOTAL


18 days




Luxembourg: same days apply as in Brussels.
Work will resume as normal on Monday 5 January 2015.
Without prejudice to the schedule of public holidays for 2015, Friday 2 January 2015 will be a holiday.
The Commission reserves the right to modify these provisions, should the needs of the service so require.