do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1204/2012 of 14 December 2012 approving amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Castelmagno (PDO))
Date: 2012-12-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, cows’ milk cheese, designation of origin, product designation








L_2012347EN.01000801.xml










15.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 347/8








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1204/2012
of 14 December 2012
         
approving amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Castelmagno (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 9(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, and having regard to Article 17(2) thereof, Italy’s application for approval of amendments to the specification for the name ‘Castelmagno’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


A statement of objection substantiated under Article 7(3)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 was notified to the Commission by Luxembourg.












(3)


By letter of 23 September 2010, the Commission invited the interested parties to hold appropriate consultations. No agreement was reached between the parties within six months of that date. However, Luxembourg withdrew its objection by letter of 2 August 2012,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 24 December 2009 regarding the name contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 14 December 2012.


For the Commission


The President

José Manuel BARROSO
            





(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ C 320, 24.12.2009, p. 27.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

ITALY
Castelmagno (PDO)
Case T-544/12: Action brought on 14 December 2012 — Pensa Pharma v OHIM — Ferring and Farmaceutisk Lab Ferring (PENSA PHARMA)
Date: 2012-12-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pharmaceutical industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013055EN.01001802.xml










23.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/18





Action brought on 14 December 2012 — Pensa Pharma v OHIM — Ferring and Farmaceutisk Lab Ferring (PENSA PHARMA)
(Case T-544/12)
2013/C 55/32
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Pensa Pharma, SA (Valencia, Spain) (represented by: M. Esteve Sanz and M. González Gordon, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ferring BV (Hoofddorp, Netherlands) and Farmaceutisk Lab Ferring A/S (Vanlose, Denmark)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 October 2012 in case R 1883/2011-5; and










—


Order the defendant and if the case might be, the interveners, to pay the costs of the proceedings and the costs of the appeal incurred within the OHIM.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘PENSA PHARMA’, for goods and services in classes 3, 5 and 44 — Community trade mark registration No 4954831

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicants for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The requests for a declaration of invalidity were based on the grounds laid down in Article 53(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) and 8(5) and Article 53(2) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, and on the Benelux trade mark registration No 377513 of the word mark ‘PENTASA’, for goods in class 5

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Accepted the request for a declaration of invalidity against the CTM for all the contested goods and services

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law:






—


Infringement of Article 53(3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009; and










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009
Case T-463/11: Order of the General Court of 14 December 2012 — Dectane v OHIM — Hella (DAYLINE) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2012-12-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013038EN.01002302.xml










9.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/23





Order of the General Court of 14 December 2012 — Dectane v OHIM — Hella (DAYLINE)
(Case T-463/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 38/41
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Dectane GmbH (Leipzig, Germany) (represented by: P. Ehrlinger and T. Hagen, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by K. Klüpfel, then by K. Klüpfel and D. Botis, agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Hella KGaA Hueck & Co. (Lippstadt, Germany) (represented by: R. Schnekenbühl, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2011 (Case R 1231/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Hella KGaA Hueck & Co. and Dectane GmbH.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs of the defendant.






(1)  OJ C 298, 8.10.2011.
Case C-588/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 14 December 2012 — Lyreco Belgium NV v Sophie Rogiers
Date: 2012-12-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Belgium, framework agreement, interpretation of the law, parental allowance, work contract








C_2013079EN.01000602.xml










16.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 79/6





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 14 December 2012 — Lyreco Belgium NV v Sophie Rogiers
(Case C-588/12)
2013/C 79/11
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Arbeidshof te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Lyreco Belgium NV

Defendant: Sophie Rogiers

Question referred

Do the provisions of Clause 1 and Clause 2, paragraph 4, of the framework agreement concluded on 14 December 1995 by the general cross-industry organisations, UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC, on parental leave, contained in the Annex to Council Directive 96/34/EC (1) of 3 June 1996 on the framework agreement on parental leave concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC, preclude the protective award which is payable to the worker who was bound to his employer by a full-time employment contract of indefinite duration, and whose employment contract is terminated unilaterally by that employer without urgent cause or sufficient ground during a period of reduction of working hours, on the grounds of the taking of parental leave, by 20 % or 50 %, from being calculated with reference to the salary payable during that period of reduction, where the same worker would be entitled to a protective award calculated by reference to the full-time salary if he had reduced his working hours by 100 %[?]


(1)  OJ 1996 L 145, p. 4.
Case T-90/12: Order of the General Court of 14 December 2012 — Elegant Target Development and Others v Council
Date: 2012-12-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2013038EN.01002702.xml










9.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/27





Order of the General Court of 14 December 2012 — Elegant Target Development and Others v Council
(Case T-90/12) (1)

2013/C 38/50
Language of the case: English
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.
Case F-149/12: Action brought on 14 December 2012 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2012-12-14
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: deduction at source, disability insurance, indemnification








C_2013108EN.01003801.xml










13.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 108/38





Action brought on 14 December 2012 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-149/12)
2013/C 108/89
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision to recover the sum of EUR 500 per month by withholding that sum from the applicant’s invalidity allowance during the period April to June 2012.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision, contained in the applicant’s pension statement for the month of April 2012, to withhold EUR 500 from the invalidity allowance to which the applicant was entitled in respect of that month;










—


Annul the decision, contained in the applicant’s pension statement for the month of May 2012, to withhold EUR 500 from the invalidity allowance to which the applicant was entitled in respect of that month;










—


Annul the decision, contained in the applicant’s pension statement for the month of June 2012, to withhold EUR 500 from the invalidity allowance to which the applicant was entitled in respect of that month;










—


In so far as necessary, annul the decisions rejecting the complaints made against the decision referred to above;










—


Order the Commission to pay to the applicant the following sums: EUR 500, together with interest on that sum at the rate of 10 % per annum and annual capitalisation, with effect from 1 May 2012 until actual payment of that sum; EUR 500, together with interest on that sum at the rate of 10 % per annum and annual capitalisation, with effect from 1 June 2012 until actual payment of that sum; EUR 500, together with interest on that sum at the rate of 10 % per annum and annual capitalisation, with effect from 1 July 2012 until actual payment of that sum;










—


Order the Commission to pay the costs.
Case T-326/12: Order of the General Court of 14 December 2012 — Al Toun and Al Toun Group v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Removal from the list of persons concerned — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2012-12-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, common foreign and security policy, international sanctions, trade restriction








C_2013055EN.01001401.xml










23.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/14





Order of the General Court of 14 December 2012 — Al Toun and Al Toun Group v Council
(Case T-326/12) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Removal from the list of persons concerned - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 55/25
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties


Applicants: Salim Georges Al Toun (Al Ghassaneya-Lattakia, Syria) and Al Toun Group (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: S. Koev, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Kyriakopoulou and I. Gurov, Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Council Decision 2011/782/CFSP of 1 December 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Syria and repealing Decision 2011/273/CFSP (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 56), Council Implementing Decision 2012/256/CFSP of 14 May 2012 implementing Decision 2011/782 (OJ 2012 L 126, p. 9), Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and repealing Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 (OJ 2012 L 16, p. 1), and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 410/2012 of 14 May 2012 implementing Article 32(1) of Regulation No 36/2012 (OJ 2012 L 126, p. 3), in so far as those acts concern the applicants.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The Council of the European Union is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 311, 13.10.2012.