do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-15/11: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2012 — Sina Bank v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Actions for annulment — Duty to state reasons)
Date: 2012-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Iran, capital movement, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, international sanctions, nuclear non-proliferation








C_2013026EN.01004102.xml










26.1.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 26/41





Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2012 — Sina Bank v Council
(Case T-15/11) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Actions for annulment - Duty to state reasons)
2013/C 26/79
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sina Bank (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: B. Mettetal and C. Wucher-North, lawyers)

Defendant: Council (represented by: M. Bishop and G. Marhic, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of, first, Annex VIII to Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1), in so far as the latter concerns the applicant, and, second, the ‘decision’ in the Council’s letter of 28 October 2010 concerning the applicant; and a declaration of inapplicability, as regards the applicant, of, first, Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2007 L 195, p. 39), as resulting from Council Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 amending Decision 2010/413 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 81), in so far as the latter concerns the applicant, second, Article 16(2) of Regulation No 961/2010 and, third, Article 20(1)(b) of Decision 2010/413.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP, as resulting from Council Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 amending Decision 2010/413, and Annex VIII to Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007, in so far as the latter concern Sina Bank;










2.


Orders that the effects of Annex II to Decision 2010/413, as resulting from Decision 2010/644, be maintained in relation to Sina Bank until annulment of Annex VIII to Regulation No 961/2010 takes effect;










3.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










4.


Orders the Council to bear two thirds of the costs incurred by Sina Bank and two thirds of its own costs;










5.


Orders Sina Bank to bear one third of its own costs and one third of the Council’s costs;










6.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 72, 5.3.2011.
Case F-112/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 11 December 2012 — Trentea v FRA (Civil service — FRA staff — Members of the temporary staff — Recruitment — Vacancy notice — Rejection of an application)
Date: 2012-12-11
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: candidate, indemnification, job vacancy, recruitment, servant (EU)








C_2013038EN.01002903.xml










9.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/29





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 11 December 2012 — Trentea v FRA
(Case F-112/10) (1)

(Civil service - FRA staff - Members of the temporary staff - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Rejection of an application)
2013/C 38/55
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Cornelia Trentea (Vienna, Austria) (represented by L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (represented by M. Kjærum, acting as Agent, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Civil service — First, the claim for annulment of the defendant’s decisions rejecting the applicant’s application for the post of administrative assistant in the field of Finance and Procurement and appointing another candidate to that post. Secondly, the claim for compensation in respect of the material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Declares that Ms Trentea must bear her own costs and orders her to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.






(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2011, p. 43.
Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran apply
Date: 2012-12-11
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, trade restriction








C_2012380EN.01000701.xml










11.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 380/7





Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran apply
2012/C 380/04
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (1) and in Annex IX to Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures against Iran.
The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, by 31 January 2013, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 46 of Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 and Article 26(3) of Decision 2010/413/CFSP, of the list of designated persons and entities in Annex IX and Annex II respectively.


(1)  OJ L 195, 27.7.2010, p. 39.

(2)  OJ L 88, 24.3.2012, p. 1.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 December 2012 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency (10090/2/2012 — C7-0329/2012 — 2010/0303(COD))
Date: 2012-12-11
Institutions: Committee on Budgets, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, Committee on Transport and Tourism, Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety, European Parliament
Subjects: European Maritime Safety Agency, maritime safety, operation of the Institutions, pollution control measures, pollution from ships








C_2015434EN.01017101.xml










23.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 434/171





P7_TA(2012)0473
European Maritime Safety Agency ***II
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 December 2012 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency (10090/2/2012 — C7-0329/2012 — 2010/0303(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: second reading)
(2015/C 434/25)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Council position at first reading (10090/2/2012 — C7-0329/2012),










—


having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 16 February 2011 (1),










—


after consulting the Committee of the Regions,










—


having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2010)0611),










—


having regard to Article 294(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to Rule 72 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A7-0387/2012),












1.


Approves the Council position at first reading;












2.


Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the Council position;












3.


Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council, in accordance with Article 297(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;












4.


Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;












5.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.






(1)  OJ C 107, 6.4.2011, p. 68.

(2)  Texts adopted of 15.12.2011, P7_TA(2011)0581.
Case F-65/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2012 — Mata Blanco v Commission (Civil service — Internal competition COM/INT/OLAF/09/AD10 — Combating fraud — Respective competences of EPSO and the selection board — Admission tests supervised by the selection board — Oral test — Infringement of the notice of competition — Difference between marks — Evaluation criteria — Equal treatment of candidates — Manifest error of assessment — Principles of transparency and of sound administration — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2012-12-11
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, administrative competition, administrative transparency, division of powers, equal treatment, fraud








C_2013046EN.01002602.xml










16.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/26





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2012 — Mata Blanco v Commission
(Case F-65/10) (1)

(Civil service - Internal competition COM/INT/OLAF/09/AD10 - Combating fraud - Respective competences of EPSO and the selection board - Admission tests supervised by the selection board - Oral test - Infringement of the notice of competition - Difference between marks - Evaluation criteria - Equal treatment of candidates - Manifest error of assessment - Principles of transparency and of sound administration - Obligation to state reasons)
2013/C 46/47
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Mata Blanco (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially B. Eggers and P. Pecho, acting as Agents, then B. Eggers, acting as Agent)

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the EPSO decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list for internal competition ‘COM/INT/OLAF.09/AD10 — Administrators specialised in anti-fraud’ and the reserve list and all the decisions taken on the basis of that list

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Mata Blanco to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010, p. 73.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 December 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America, on the other (16395/1/2011 — C7-0182/2012 — 2011/0303(NLE))
Date: 2012-12-11
Institutions: Committee on Development, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: Central America, association agreement (EU), political cooperation, trade relations








C_2015434EN.01018701.xml










23.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 434/187





P7_TA(2012)0479
EU-Central America association agreement ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 December 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America, on the other (16395/1/2011 — C7-0182/2012 — 2011/0303(NLE))
(Consent)
(2015/C 434/30)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (16395/1/2011),










—


having regard to the draft Association Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America, on the other (16396/2011),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 217 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0182/2012),










—


having regard to its resolution of 11 December 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and Central America, on the other (1),










—


having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Development (A7-0362/2012),












1.


Consents to conclusion of the agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the countries of Central America.






(1)  Texts adopted, P7_TA(2012)0478.
Case C-579/12 RX: Decision of the Court (Reviewing Chamber) of 11 December 2012 to review the judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) delivered on 8 November 2012 in Case T-268/11 P Commission v Strack
Date: 2012-12-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: case-law (EU), paid leave, sick leave








C_2013071EN.01000601.xml










9.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/6





Decision of the Court (Reviewing Chamber) of 11 December 2012 to review the judgment of the General Court (Appeal Chamber) delivered on 8 November 2012 in Case T-268/11 P Commission v Strack
(Case C-579/12 RX)
(2013/C 71/10)
Language of the case: German

Parties to the proceedings before the General Court


Appellant: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings: Guido Strack

Questions to be reviewed

The review shall concern the questions whether – having regard to the case-law of the Court of Justice relating to the entitlement to paid annual leave as a principle of European Union social law, which is also expressly affirmed in Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and is covered in particular by Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9) – the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 8 November 2012 in Case T 268/11 P Commission v Strack affects the unity or consistency of European Union law inasmuch as the General Court, as an appeal court:






—


interpreted Article 1e(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union to the effect that it does not include the requirements relating to the organisation of working time contained in Directive 2003/88, in particular, paid annual leave, and










—


consequently, interpreted Article 4 of Annex V to those Regulations as implying that the right to carry over annual leave exceeding the limit laid down in that provision may be granted only where the official has been unable to take leave for reasons connected with his activity as an official and the duties he has thus been required to perform.




The persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the parties to the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union are invited to lodge their written observations on those questions at the Court of Justice of the European Union within one month of the service of the present decision.
Judgment of the Court of 11 December 2012 in Case E-1/12 — Den norske Forleggerforening v EFTA Surveillance Authority (Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority — State aid — Alleged aid granted to Nasjonal digital læringsarena (NDLA) — Decision not to open the formal investigation procedure — Notion of economic activity — Notion of doubts — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2012-12-11
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: State aid, control of State aid, judicial inquiry, publisher








C_2013270EN.01001001.xml










19.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 270/10





JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
of 11 December 2012
in Case E-1/12
Den norske Forleggerforening v EFTA Surveillance Authority
(Action for annulment of a decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority — State aid — Alleged aid granted to Nasjonal digital læringsarena (NDLA) — Decision not to open the formal investigation procedure — Notion of economic activity — Notion of doubts — Obligation to state reasons)
2013/C 270/08
In Case E-1/12, Den norske Forleggerforening v EFTA Surveillance Authority — APPLICATION for the annulment of Decision No 311/11/COL of 12 October 2011 on alleged aid granted to Nasjonal digital læringsarena, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President, Per Christiansen and Páll Hreinsson (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges, gave judgment on 11 December 2012, the operative part of which is as follows:
The Court hereby:






1.


Annuls ESA’s Decision No 311/11/COL of 12 October 2011 on alleged aid granted to Nasjonal digital læringsarena.










2.


Orders ESA to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Case T-584/11: Order of the General Court of 11 December 2012 — Atlas Transport v OHIM — Hartmann (ATLAS TRANSPORT) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2012-12-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, transport company








C_2013038EN.01002401.xml










9.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/24





Order of the General Court of 11 December 2012 — Atlas Transport v OHIM — Hartmann (ATLAS TRANSPORT)
(Case T-584/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 38/42
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Atlas Transport GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: U. Hildebrandt, K. Schmidt-Hern and B. Weichhaus, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Alfred Hartmann (Leer, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 September 2011 (Case R 2262/2010-1), relating to revocation proceedings between Mr Alfred Hartmann and Atlas Transport GmbH.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The parties are to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.
Case F-107/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2012 — Ntouvas v ECDC (Civil service — Contract staff — 2010 appraisal procedure — Application for annulment of the appraisal report)
Date: 2012-12-11
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: disease prevention, health care, servant (EU)








C_2013046EN.01003101.xml










16.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/31





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2012 — Ntouvas v ECDC
(Case F-107/11) (1)

(Civil service - Contract staff - 2010 appraisal procedure - Application for annulment of the appraisal report)
2013/C 46/60
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ioannis Ntouvas (Sundbyberg, Sweden) (represented by: E. Mylonas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (represented by: R. Trott, Agent, and D. Waelbroeck, lawyer)

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report for the period of 1 January to 31 December 2010

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;;










2.


Orders Mr Ntouvas to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control.






(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 69.
European Parliament decision of 11 December 2012 concerning voting in the event that the seat of a full member of a committee falls vacant (interpretation of Rule 187(1)) (2012/2254(REG))
Date: 2012-12-11
Institutions: Committee on Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: EP Committee, appointment of members, composition of a parliamentary committee, interpretation of the law, parliamentary rules of procedure, parliamentary vote








C_2015434EN.01015501.xml










23.12.2015   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 434/155





P7_TA(2012)0484
Voting in the event that the seat of a full member of a committee falls vacant (interpretation of Rule 187(1))
European Parliament decision of 11 December 2012 concerning voting in the event that the seat of a full member of a committee falls vacant (interpretation of Rule 187(1)) (2012/2254(REG))
(2015/C 434/19)

The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the letter of 27 November 2012 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs,










—


having regard to Rule 211 of its Rules of Procedure,












1.


Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 187(1):
‘In the event that the seat of a full member of a committee falls vacant, a permanent substitute from the same political group shall be entitled to vote in place of the full member, on a temporary basis pending the provisional replacement of the full member in accordance with Rule 186(5), or, in the absence of such provisional replacement, pending the appointment of a new full member. Such entitlement is based on Parliament's decision concerning the numerical composition of the committee, and aims at ensuring that the number of members of the political group concerned who can take part in the vote is equal to the number entitled to do so before the seat fell vacant.’












2.


Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.