do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-112/12: Order of the President of the Court of 5 December 2012 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hongrie) — Franklin Templeton Investment Funds Société d’Investissement à Capital Variable v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Kiemelt Ügyek és Adózók Adó Főigazgatósága
Date: 2012-12-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Hungary, equal treatment, free movement of capital, interpretation of the law, legal domicile, right of establishment, shareholder, tax exemption








C_2013063EN.01001504.xml










2.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/15





Order of the President of the Court of 5 December 2012 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hongrie) — Franklin Templeton Investment Funds Société d’Investissement à Capital Variable v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Kiemelt Ügyek és Adózók Adó Főigazgatósága
(Case C-112/12) (1)

2013/C 63/28
Language of the case: Hungarian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 157, 2.6.2012.
Case F-88/09 and F-48/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — Z v Court of Justice (Civil service — Officials — Reassignment — Interests of the service — General rule of correspondence between the grade and the post — Rights of the defence — Psychological harassment — Article 12 of the Staff Regulations — Duty of care — Principle of sound administration — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary measure — Written warning — Rights of the defence and principle of the right to be heard)
Date: 2012-12-05
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, indemnification, psychological harassment, reassignment, rights of the defence, sanction (EU), services of general interest








C_2013038EN.01002901.xml










9.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/29





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — Z v Court of Justice
(Case F-88/09 and F-48/10) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Reassignment - Interests of the service - General rule of correspondence between the grade and the post - Rights of the defence - Psychological harassment - Article 12 of the Staff Regulations - Duty of care - Principle of sound administration - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary measure - Written warning - Rights of the defence and principle of the right to be heard)
2013/C 38/53
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Z (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented: initially by L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers, subsequently by F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: A. V. Placco, Agent)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to transfer the applicant in the interest of the service to another directorate and an order that the defendant pay compensation for non-material loss.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the actions in Joined Cases F-88/09 and F-48/10;










2.


Orders Z to bear three-quarters of his own costs in Case F-88/09 and to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case F-48/10;










3.


Orders the Court of Justice of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay a quarter of those incurred by Z in Case F-88/09.






(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010, p. 80.
Case F-76/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — Grazyte v Commission (Civil Service — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Condition laid down in Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Ten-year reference period — Starting point — Expiry point — Periods of service for an international organisation disregarded — Application by analogy with the provisions of Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII of the Staff Regulation)
Date: 2012-12-05
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, indemnification, international organisation, remuneration of work, return migration








C_2013038EN.01003101.xml










9.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/31





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — Grazyte v Commission
(Case F-76/11) (1)

(Civil Service - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - Condition laid down in Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Ten-year reference period - Starting point - Expiry point - Periods of service for an international organisation disregarded - Application by analogy with the provisions of Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII of the Staff Regulation)
2013/C 38/58
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Diana Grazyte (Utena, Lithuania) (represented by: R. Guarino, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin, Agent and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer, then V. Joris, Agent and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application for the annulment of the decision of the Appointing Authority refusing the applicant’s claims for expatriation allowance.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ms. Grazyte to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 319, 29.10.2011, p. 29.
Case T-143/11: Judgment of the General Court of 5 December 2012 — Consorzio vino Chianti Classico v OHIM — FFR (F.F.R.) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a Community figurative mark ‘F.F.R.’ — Earlier national figurative marks CHIANTI CLASSICO — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2012-12-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wine








C_2013026EN.01004201.xml










26.1.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 26/42





Judgment of the General Court of 5 December 2012 — Consorzio vino Chianti Classico v OHIM — FFR (F.F.R.)
(Case T-143/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a Community figurative mark ‘F.F.R.’ - Earlier national figurative marks CHIANTI CLASSICO - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2013/C 26/80
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Consorzio vino Chianti Classico (Radda in Chianti, Italy) (represented by: S. Corona, G. Ciccone and A. Loffredo, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by V. Melgar and G. Mannucci and subsequently by V. Melgar and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Fédération française de rugby (FFR) (Marcoussis, France)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 January 2011 (Case R 43/2010-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Consorzio vino Chianti Classico and Fédération française de rugby (FFR).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 10 January 2011 (Case R 43/2010-4) in so far as the Board of Appeal rejected the opposition based on Article 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders Consorzio vino Chianti Classico and OHIM each to bear the costs which they have incurred in the course of the proceedings before the General Court.






(1)  OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.
Reserve list — Open competition — COM/AD/17/10 — Administrators (AD 11) — Senior Economist
Date: 2012-12-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, competition (EU), economy








CA2012375EN.01000101.xml










5.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 375/1





RESERVE LIST (1)

OPEN COMPETITION
COM/AD/17/10
ADMINISTRATORS (AD 11)
SENIOR ECONOMIST
(2012/C 375 A/01)
Merit Group 1






DUPRIEZ


Quentin




DURAN LAGUNA


Jorge




FABBRIS


Tiziana Laura




KANCS


D'Artis




KUHNERT


Stefan




RICHTER


Kaspar




SCHULTE


Markus




Merit Group 2






BETHUYNE


Gerrit




HESPEL


Evelyne




PINELLI


Dino




VINHAS DE SOUZA


Lucio




VIVIANI


Carlo




The reserve list will be valid until 31 December 2015.


(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.
Case T-333/12: Order of the General Court of 5 December 2012 — Soltau v Commission
Date: 2012-12-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: cartel, competition law, fine, legal adviser








C_2013032EN.01002704.xml










2.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 32/27





Order of the General Court of 5 December 2012 — Soltau v Commission
(Case T-333/12) (1)

2013/C 32/50
Language of the case: German
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 303, 6.10.2012.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2012-12-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2012375EN.01000101.xml










5.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 375/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

4 December 2012
2012/C 375/01

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3092




JPY


Japanese yen


107,28




DKK


Danish krone


7,4604




GBP


Pound sterling


0,81230




SEK


Swedish krona


8,6265




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2136




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,3465




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,243




HUF


Hungarian forint


282,39




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6964




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1291




RON


Romanian leu


4,5343




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3367




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2497




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3013




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,1463




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5866




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5941




KRW


South Korean won


1 419,25




ZAR


South African rand


11,5504




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,1506




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5265




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 580,93




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9830




PHP


Philippine peso


53,449




RUB


Russian rouble


40,3515




THB


Thai baht


40,179




BRL


Brazilian real


2,7575




MXN


Mexican peso


16,9802




INR


Indian rupee


71,5710






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case F-6/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — Bourtembourg v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Expatriation allowance — Concept of habitual residence — Permanent or habitual centre of interests — Temporary residence for the purpose of study — Place where professional activity is pursued — Fixed term employment relationship)
Date: 2012-12-05
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, indemnification, labour relations, residence, return migration








C_2013038EN.01003201.xml










9.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/32





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — Bourtembourg v Commission
(Case F-6/12) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Expatriation allowance - Concept of habitual residence - Permanent or habitual centre of interests - Temporary residence for the purpose of study - Place where professional activity is pursued - Fixed term employment relationship)
2013/C 38/61
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Julien Bourtembourg (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Dony, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and V. Joris, Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the Commission’s decision refusing to grant the applicant the expatriation allowance.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 24 May 2011 refusing to grant Mr Bourtembourg the expatriation allowance;










2.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Bourtembourg.






(1)  OJ C 184, 23.6.2012, p. 22.
New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
Date: 2012-12-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Malta, commemoration, euro, issuing of currency








C_2012375EN.01001201.xml










5.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 375/12





New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
2012/C 375/06




National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Malta

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.
Issuing country: Malta
Subject of commemoration: Majority Representation 1887
Description of the design: The design was created by the Maltese artist Gianni Bonnici and it shows a jubilant crowd with the Governor’s Palace, in Valletta, depicted in the background. At the top of the inner ring, in a semicircle, the inscription ‘MALTA — Majority representation 1887’. At the bottom the year ‘2012’.
The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.
Number of coins to be issued: 
Date of issue: September 2012


(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).
Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2012-12-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: China, Kazakhstan, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), mineral compound, originating product








C_2012375EN.01001701.xml










5.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 375/17





Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
2012/C 375/08
Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no duly substantiated request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will shortly expire.
This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (2).









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Silico-manganese
(including ferro-silico-manganese)


People's Republic of China and Kazakhstan


Anti-dumping duty


Council Regulation (EC) No 1420/2007 (OJ L 317, 5.12.2007, p. 5)


6.12.2012






(1)  OJ C 119, 24.4.2012, p. 8.

(2)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.
Case F-110/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — Lebedef and Others v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Article 64 of the Staff Regulations — First subparagraph of Article 3(5) of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations — Corrective coefficient — Act adversely affecting an official — Equal treatment)
Date: 2012-12-05
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, equal treatment, regulations for civil servants, remuneration of work








C_2013038EN.01003103.xml










9.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/31





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — Lebedef and Others v Commission
(Case F-110/11) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Article 64 of the Staff Regulations - First subparagraph of Article 3(5) of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations - Corrective coefficient - Act adversely affecting an official - Equal treatment)
2013/C 38/60
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Lebedef and Others (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the pay slips of the applicants for December 2010 and their pay slips of the following months to the extent that they contain no correction of the adjustment of remunerations taking account of the corrective coefficient for their place of employment.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Messrs Lebedef, Jones and Gonzales Gonzales and Mrs Lebedef-Caponi to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 6, 7.1.2012, p. 26.
Case F-29/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — BA v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Competition notice EPSO/AD/147/09 — Creation of a reserve list for the recruitment of administrators having Romanian citizenship — In-depth knowledge of the official language of Romania — Hungarian language minority in Romania — Not admitted to the oral test — Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination — Scope)
Date: 2012-12-05
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, Romania, administrator, admission to examinations, competition (EU), equal treatment, linguistic discrimination, national minority








C_2013046EN.01002802.xml










16.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/28





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 December 2012 — BA v Commission
(Case F-29/11) (1)

(Civil service - Open competition - Competition notice EPSO/AD/147/09 - Creation of a reserve list for the recruitment of administrators having Romanian citizenship - In-depth knowledge of the official language of Romania - Hungarian language minority in Romania - Not admitted to the oral test - Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination - Scope)
2013/C 46/53
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: BA (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) (represented: initially by S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers and subsequently by S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by B. Eggers and P. Pecho, acting as Agents, and subsequently by B. Eggers, acting as Agent)

Re:

Civil service — Action for annulment of the selection board’s decision in competition EPSO/AD/147/09-RO not to admit the applicant to the oral test in that competition.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders BA to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 173, 11.6.2011, p. 16.
Case C-562/12: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tartu Ringkonnakohus (Estonia) lodged on 5 December 2012 — MTÜ Liivimaa Lihaveis v Eesti-Läti programmi 2007–2013 Seirekomitee
Date: 2012-12-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU programme, Estonia, Latvia, interpretation of the law, powers of the institutions (EU), right of action








C_2013038EN.01001401.xml










9.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/14





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tartu Ringkonnakohus (Estonia) lodged on 5 December 2012 — MTÜ Liivimaa Lihaveis v Eesti-Läti programmi 2007–2013 Seirekomitee
(Case C-562/12)
2013/C 38/18
Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Tartu Ringkonnakohus

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: MTÜ Liivimaa Lihaveis

Defendant: Eesti-Läti programmi 2007–2013 Seirekomitee

Third party: Eesti Vabariigi Siseministeerium

Questions referred







(a)


Are the rules of procedure of a monitoring committee jointly set up by two Member States, such as the Programme Manual adopted by the Monitoring Committee for the Estonia-Latvia Programme 2007–2013, which provide that ‘The decisions of the Monitoring Committee are not appealable at any place of jurisdiction’ (Chapter 6.6.4 of the Programme Manual) compatible with Article 63(2) of Council Regulation No 1083/2006 (1) in conjunction with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?










(b)


If Question (a) is to be answered in the negative, must point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that Chapter 6.6.4 of the Programme Manual adopted by the Monitoring Committee for the Estonia-Latvia Programme 2007-2013 is an act of an institution, body, office or agency of the Union which must be declared invalid?










(c)


If Question (a) is to be answered in the negative, must the second sentence of the first paragraph of Article 263 in conjunction with Article 256(1) and Article 274 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that the General Court of the European Union or the competent court under national law has jurisdiction to hear and determine actions against decisions of the Monitoring Committee for the Estonia-Latvia Programme 2007-2013?






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (OJ 2006 L 210, p. 25).