do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-486/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te ’s Hertogenbosch (Netherlands) lodged on 31 October 2012 — X, other party: Heffingsambtenaar van de gemeente Z
Date: 2012-10-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: disclosure of information, interpretation of the law, personal data, tax








C_2013026EN.01002401.xml










26.1.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 26/24





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te ’s Hertogenbosch (Netherlands) lodged on 31 October 2012 — X, other party: Heffingsambtenaar van de gemeente Z
(Case C-486/12)
2013/C 26/45
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Gerechtshof te ’s Hertogenbosch

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: X

Respondent: Heffingsambtenaar van de gemeente Z

Questions referred







1.


Does the provision of access (pursuant to Article 79(2) of the Wet GBA [Law on personal data held by local authorities]) constitute compliance with the obligation of communication of the data undergoing processing as referred to in the second indent of Article 12(a) of … Directive [95/46/EC (1)]?










2.


Does Article 12(a) of the Directive preclude the levying of fees in respect of the communication, by means of a transcript from the municipal database, of the personal data undergoing processing?










3.


If Question 2 is to be answered in the negative: is the levying of the present fees excessive within the meaning of Article 12(a) of the Directive?






(1)  Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ 1995 L 281, p. 31).
Summary information communicated by Member States on State aid granted in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products
Date: 2012-10-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Abruzzi, Italy, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, fishing industry, small and medium-sized enterprises








C_2012334EN.01000701.xml










31.10.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 334/7





Summary information communicated by Member States on State aid granted in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products
2012/C 334/05
Aid No: SA.35086 (12/XF)
Member State: Italy
Region/Authority granting the aid: Regione Abruzzo
Title of aid scheme/name of company receiving an ad hoc aid: cessazione temporanea delle attività di navi di pesca di stanza nel porto di Pescara abilitate al sistema a strascico.
Legal basis: Delibera della Giunta Regionale della Regione Abruzzo n. 404 del 25 giugno 2012 in materia di concessione di aiuti in regime di esenzione per la cessazione temporanea delle attività di prelievo ittico alle imprese armatrici di navi da pesca di stanza nel porto di Pescara abilitate al sistema a strascico.
Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or amount of ad hoc aid granted: EUR 780 000
Maximum aid intensity: 100 %
Date of entry into force: 
Duration of aid scheme: Until the end of 2012
Objective of aid: Subsidy to cover the additional reduction of fishing effort during two additional periods of temporary cessation of activity: from 9 July 2012 to 5 August 2012 and from 18 September 2012 to 5 October 2012
Indicate which of Articles 8 to 24 is used: Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 736/2008
Activity concerned: Trawling by vessels based at the port of Pescara
Name and address of the granting authority: 





Direzione Politiche Agricole e di Sviluppo Rurale, Forestale, Caccia e Pesca




Servizio Adeguamento alla normativa comunitaria ed economia ittica




Via Catullo 17




65127 Pescara PE




ITALIA




Web address where the full text of the scheme or the criteria and conditions under which ad hoc aid is granted outside of an aid scheme can be found: http://www.regione.abruzzo.it/pesca
Motivation: Indicate why a State aid scheme has been established instead of assistance under the European Fisheries Fund:
A longer cessation of fishing activity subsidised by EFF resources is made impractical by the low level of remaining resources under Measure 1.20.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6720 — OAO VTB Bank/Corporate Commercial Bank/Bulgarian Telecommunications Company)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2012-10-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Bulgaria, economic concentration, financial institution, high-definition television, merger control, telecommunications industry








C_2012334EN.01000101.xml










31.10.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 334/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6720 — OAO VTB Bank/Corporate Commercial Bank/Bulgarian Telecommunications Company)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2012/C 334/01
On 22 October 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6720. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case C-488/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 October 2012 — Sándor Nagy v Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal
Date: 2012-10-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Hungary, interpretation of the law, right to justice, unfair dismissal, worker information








C_2013079EN.01000301.xml










16.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 79/3





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 October 2012 — Sándor Nagy v Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal
(Case C-488/12)
2013/C 79/04
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Sándor Nagy

Defendant: Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal

Questions referred







1.


Can Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that that provision is intended to guarantee the possibility of a legal remedy only for unlawful and unjustified dismissal?










2.


Does that provision mean that an employer is bound to provide the employee with reasons in writing on dismissal and the dismissal will then not be unjustified?










3.


Does failure to communicate reasons in itself make the measure unlawful or may the employer state reasons subsequently in the course of any employment litigation?
Case F-129/12: Action brought on 31 October 2012 — ZZ v Parliament
Date: 2012-10-31
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, damages, dismissal, indemnification, psychological harassment








C_2013026EN.01007302.xml










26.1.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 26/73





Action brought on 31 October 2012 — ZZ v Parliament
(Case F-129/12)
2013/C 26/151
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi, C. Bernard-Glanz, A. Tymen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to dismiss the applicant and the decision rejecting his request for assistance seeking recognition of psychological harassment, and a claim for damages.

Form of order sought







—


Declare the present action admissible and well founded;










—


annul the decision to dismiss the applicant dated 19 January 2012;










—


annul the decision dated 20 March 2012, rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance of 22 December 2011;










—


if necessary, annul the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament, dated 20 July 2012, received on 24 July 2012, rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 30 March 2012 against the decision to dismiss him;










—


if necessary, annul the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament, dated 8 October 2012, received on 11 October 2012, rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 22 June 2012 brought against the decision rejecting his request for assistance;










—


order the Parliament to pay EUR 120 000 in damages;










—


order the Parliament to pay all the costs.
Case C-489/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 October 2012 — Lajos Tiborné Böszörményi (Debrecen, Hungary) v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal (Budapest, Hungary)
Date: 2012-10-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Hungary, interpretation of the law, right to justice, unfair dismissal, worker information








C_2013079EN.01000302.xml










16.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 79/3





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 October 2012 — Lajos Tiborné Böszörményi (Debrecen, Hungary) v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal (Budapest, Hungary)
(Case C-489/12)
2013/C 79/05
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Lajos Tiborné Böszörményi (Debrecen, Hungary)

Defendant: Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal (Budapest, Hungary)

Questions referred







1.


Can Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that that provision is intended to guarantee the possibility of a legal remedy only for unlawful and unjustified dismissal?










2.


Does that provision mean that an employer is bound to provide the employee with reasons in writing on dismissal and the dismissal will then not be unjustified?










3.


Does failure to communicate reasons in itself make the measure unlawful or may the employer state reasons subsequently in the course of any employment litigation?
Summary information communicated by Member States on State aid granted in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products
Date: 2012-10-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, State aid, aid to undertakings, aquaculture, control of State aid, fishery product, small and medium-sized enterprises, young farmer








C_2012334EN.01000801.xml










31.10.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 334/8





Summary information communicated by Member States on State aid granted in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products
2012/C 334/06
Aid No: SA.33634 (11/XF)
Member State: Italy
Region/Authority granting the aid: Ministero delle politiche agricole e forestali
Title of aid scheme/name of company receiving an ad hoc aid: ricambio generazionale e sviluppo delle imprese giovanili nel settore della pesca e dell'acquacoltura — Fondo dello sviluppo dell'imprenditoria giovanile in agricoltura l.n. 296 del 2006.
Legal basis: Decreto ministeriale n. 115 del 2011; decreti direttoriali attuativi n. 117, 118 e 119 del 2011.
Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or amount of individual aid granted: EUR 500 000
Maximum aid intensity: Up to 100 %
Date of entry into force: 
Duration of aid scheme: 
Objective of aid: To encourage the replacement of elderly fishermen by younger ones and the development of fisheries businesses started by young people
Indicate which of Articles 8 to 24 is used: Articles 11, 20 and 21 of Regulation (EC) No 736/2008
Activity concerned: Fisheries and aquaculture
Name and address of the granting authority: 





Ministero delle politiche agricole e forestali




Viale dell'Arte 16




00142 Roma RM




ITALIA




Web address where the full text of the scheme or the criteria and conditions under which ad hoc aid is granted outside of an aid scheme can be found: http://www.politicheagricole.gov.it
Justification: Indicate why a State aid scheme has been established instead of assistance under the European Fisheries Fund:
This aid scheme supports generational renewal and the development of businesses started by young people in the fisheries and aquaculture sector by means of technological innovation, training, the promotion of fisheries products and pilot projects.
Case C-491/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 October 2012 — Magdolna Margit Szabadosné Bay v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal
Date: 2012-10-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Hungary, interpretation of the law, right to justice, unfair dismissal, worker information








C_2013079EN.01000401.xml










16.3.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 79/4





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 October 2012 — Magdolna Margit Szabadosné Bay v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal
(Case C-491/12)
2013/C 79/07
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Magdolna Margit Szabadosné Bay

Defendant: Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal

Questions referred







1.


Can Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that that provision is intended to guarantee the possibility of a legal remedy only for unlawful and unjustified dismissal?










2.


Does that provision mean that an employer is bound to provide the employee with reasons in writing on dismissal and the dismissal will then not be unjustified?










3.


Does failure to communicate reasons in itself make the measure unlawful or may the employer state reasons subsequently in the course of any employment litigation?
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2012-10-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2012334EN.01000301.xml










31.10.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 334/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

30 October 2012
2012/C 334/03

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2962




JPY


Japanese yen


103,00




DKK


Danish krone


7,4597




GBP


Pound sterling


0,80620




SEK


Swedish krona


8,6155




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2085




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,4380




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,022




HUF


Hungarian forint


284,58




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6961




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1305




RON


Romanian leu


4,5403




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3307




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2489




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,2961




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,0457




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5765




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5808




KRW


South Korean won


1 414,71




ZAR


South African rand


11,1852




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0884




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5295




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 463,11




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9560




PHP


Philippine peso


53,384




RUB


Russian rouble


40,6450




THB


Thai baht


39,780




BRL


Brazilian real


2,6334




MXN


Mexican peso


16,9152




INR


Indian rupee


69,9510






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-474/12: Action brought on 31 October 2012 — Giorgis v OHIM — Comigel (Shape of goblets)
Date: 2012-10-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, food industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2013009EN.01004001.xml










12.1.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 9/40





Action brought on 31 October 2012 — Giorgis v OHIM — Comigel (Shape of goblets)
(Case T-474/12)
2013/C 9/72
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Giorgio Giorgis (Milan, Italy) (represented by: I. Prado and A. Tornato, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Comigel SAS (Saint- Julien-lès-Metz, France)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 July 2012 in case R 1301/2011-1; and










—


Order OHIM to pay the costs





Pleas in law and main arguments


Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The three-dimensional mark representing a shape of goblets, for goods in class 30 — Community trade mark registration No 8132681

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The request for a declaration of invalidity was based on grounds for refusal pursuant to Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Articles 7(1)(b) and (d) of Council Regulation No 207/2009

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the contested CTM invalid

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.
Summary information communicated by Member States on State aid granted in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products
Date: 2012-10-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, fishery product, industrial infrastructure, occupational safety, small and medium-sized enterprises








C_2012334EN.01000901.xml










31.10.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 334/9





Summary information communicated by Member States on State aid granted in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products
2012/C 334/07
Aid No: SA.35136 (12/XF)
Member State: Italy
Region/Authority granting the aid: Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia Giulia
Name of the company receiving ad hoc aid: Cooperativa pescatori San Vito S.c.r.l.
Legal basis: Decreto n. 789 del 10 aprile 2012 del direttore del servizio caccia, risorse ittiche e biodiversità: «Legge regionale n. 18 del 29 dicembre 2011, articolo 2, commi 38-45. Concessione di aiuti alla Cooperativa pescatori San Vito di Marano Lagunare per l'acquisto attrezzature nell'ambito di un'azione collettiva ai sensi dell'articolo 37 del regolamento (CE) n. 1197/2006, Decreto di impegno».
Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or amount of individual aid granted: EUR 200 000
Maximum aid intensity: Up to 60 % of eligible expenses
Date of entry into force: 
Duration of aid scheme: 
Objective of aid: Investments, in the common interest, in equipment and infrastructure for production, processing or marketing and aimed at improving working conditions and safety
Indicate which of Articles 8 to 24 is used: Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 736/2008
Activity concerned: Collective actions
Name and address of the granting authority: 





Direzione centrale risorse rurali, agroalimentari e forestali




Servizio caccia, risorse ittiche e biodiversità




Via Sabbadini 31




33100 Udine UD




ITALIA




Web address where the full text of the scheme or the criteria and conditions under which ad hoc aid is granted outside of an aid scheme can be found: http://www.regione.fvg.it
Justification: Indicate why a State aid scheme has been established instead of assistance under the European Fisheries Fund
EFF resources are insufficient to support all common/collective regional fisheries projects; therefore, in view of the relevance of the project in question, the regional government has decided to increase the funding available.
Furthermore, the measure taken by the regional government includes ad hoc aid for the San Vito Fisheries Cooperative, an association comprising most of the fishermen in the municipality of Marano Lagunare, with over 150 members.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1069/2012 of 31 October 2012 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Newmarket Sausage (PGI))
Date: 2012-10-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: United Kingdom, designation of origin, meat product, pigmeat, product designation








L_2012318EN.01000501.xml










15.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 318/5








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1069/2012
of 31 October 2012
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Newmarket Sausage (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Newmarket Sausage’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 31 October 2012.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Dacian CIOLOȘ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ C 69, 7.3.2012, p. 15.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat-based products

UNITED KINGDOM
Newmarket Sausage (PGI)